On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
Are there any tools that can tip users to what they could do in a particular
map area?
In my experience, when mappers go out and start to map, they discover
things that interest them straight away.
I used to bring the OSM Cheat
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
Are there any tools that can tip users to what they could do in a
particular
map area?
In my experience, when mappers go out and start to map, they
Russ -
I agree that rules can be tricky. Would it be possible, to play around with
the code you've written, to see what results it generates?
The issue I'm trying to address is this: people who sign up for OSM then
make 0 edits. Why? Is it because they cannot find the editor? Is it because
they
In page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page, Image of the week points
to Template:Iotw image/2013-2.
The first week image do not appear today. Is this the zero day bug? Somebody
nows how to correct?
Pierre
___
talk mailing list
There was an edit [1] to get the correct year belonging to this week,
since week number 1 of 2013 started before year 2012 ended. There is a
syntax for this in MediaWiki, see [2]. However, the trouble seems to be
that using that syntax, the week number is only available zero-padded,
while the
Another way to get the week number that's not zero-padded is to bring
back the {{CURRENTWEEK}}, but then different syntaxes are mixed, which
is a bit ugly. I did this as a workaround just to get it working, but
we'll have to figure out the best long term solution.
Regards,
Erik
2013-01-01
After trying to contaminate a couple of friends with the OSM virus,
the biggest problem I think we have comes from the complexity of the
editors (even P2) multiplied by the growing data density.
The growing amount of data makes editing looking more difficult and
newcomers are afraid of breaking
Thanks Erik, the image is back.
Pierre
De : Erik Lundin e...@lists.lun.nu
À : talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 1 janvier 2013 14h11
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Image of the week points to wrong week
Another way to get the week number that's not
Christian Quest writes:
newcomers are afraid of breaking existing stuff.
I was totally afraid of breaking existing stuff. How embarrassing!
Maybe if it was easier to revert a changeset, like from the person's
changeset listing?
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports
What I've found easiest is to encourage people to check on areas they
know well, like where they currently live. Armed with that and maybe
some imagery, they might have some basis to make edits. They will be
fairly careful since it's an area they care about.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 01/01/13 18:26,
On 2013-01-02 07:26, Jeff Meyer wrote:
I agree that rules can be tricky. Would it be possible, to play
around with the code youve written, to see what results it generates?
The issue Im trying to address is this: people who sign up for OSM
then make 0 edits. Why? Is it because they cannot
What do you mean, The wrong route? Is there a wrong route for recruiting
and engaging new mappers?
As for interacting, why are you presuming I have not done so?
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Robin Paulson ro...@bumblepuppy.org wrote:
On 2013-01-02 07:26, Jeff Meyer wrote:
I agree that
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Gert-Jan van der Weijden wrote:
Voor dat geld mag je 4x per jaar een update aanleveren, en wordt de boel als
WMS en WFS ontsloten (dus niet tiled!)
Voor welk bedrag zouden ze dan een WMS-T aanbieden zoals BRT nu wordt
aangeboden?
Stefan
Heren Floris en Hugo,
Is mijn indruk correct dat er steeds meer data wel beschikbaar is en geschikt
voor verwerking in OSM, maar dat geautomatiseerd robotisch toevoegen van deze
gegevens of niet mogelijk of onwenselijk is?
mvrgr
Robert Elsenaar
From: St Niklaas
Sent: Friday, December 28,
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
Is mijn indruk correct dat er steeds meer data wel beschikbaar is en
geschikt voor verwerking in OSM, maar dat geautomatiseerd robotisch
toevoegen van deze gegevens of niet mogelijk of onwenselijk is?
Nouja ik ben wel eens bij een bespreking van IM
Olá
Eu saber como mexer com relaçoes mas infelizmente não tem accesso ao
ferramentos necesarios ate dia 20
Aun Johnsen
On 1. jan. 2013, at 17:35, Eduardo Nunes e...@ymail.com wrote:
Olá pessoal,
A relação que delimita o município de Formosa está errada, pois está
englobando todo o
Isto é o Distrito Federal e não Formosa. Veja:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=97945019
Em 1 de janeiro de 2013 17:35, Eduardo Nunes e...@ymail.com escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
A relação que delimita o município de Formosa está errada, pois está
englobando todo o Distrito
Aun,
Obrigado
Em 1 de janeiro de 2013 17:55, Eduardo Nunes e...@ymail.com escreveu:
Isto é o Distrito Federal e não Formosa. Veja:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=97945019
Em 1 de janeiro de 2013 17:35, Eduardo Nunes e...@ymail.com escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
A
Fala Eduardo,
O problema parece ser que segmentos do polígono da fronteira do DF foram
unidos em um só, e isso confundiu as relações que tratam dos limites
do DFe de Formosa.
Dividi novamente o polígono do DF e editei a relação de Formosa para que
tenha somente as partes que compõem as
On 12-08-28 6:23, Rainer Kluge wrote:
Es wäre aus meiner Sicht zielführender, Regeln für das Taggen der
Zugänglichkeit von Gebäuden und Gebäudeteilen festzulegen (wenn es die
nicht schon gibt?). Zum Beispiel: Gebäude mit foot=yes sind
grundsätzlich für Fußgänger zugänglich. Wenn dann ein
Am 31/dic/2012 um 12:14 schrieb sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Per far prima puoi usare DBpedia (la versione semantica).
http://it.dbpedia.org/sparql
Questa query tira fuori tutti i nomi e cognomi di Italiani presenti su
Wikipedia
SELECT ?name, ?surname WHERE {
?person a
Scusate, visto solo ora che se n'era già parlato...
Am 01/gen/2013 um 10:32 schrieb Martin Koppenhöfer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 31/dic/2012 um 12:14 schrieb sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Per far prima puoi usare DBpedia (la versione semantica).
http://it.dbpedia.org/sparql
Questa query
Il 25 dicembre 2012 21:49, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com ha scritto:
secondo me dovrebbe essere una traduzione della pagina inglese, quindi
se vogliamo togliere o modificare qualcosa lo dovremmo togliere o
modificare anche nella/dalla pagina inglese.
condivido, qualcuno che ha
Buona anno a tutti!
Scusate per l'oggetto un po' generico ma ci sono varie questioni legate
alla nuova apertura di parte della zona di Porta Nuova/Stazione Garibaldi.
Oggi sono stato in visita e confrontando cio' che ho visto con quel che
c'e' su OSM, ho parecchi dubbi.
Credo che alcune cose
Il giorno 01 gennaio 2013 23:27, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto:
Buona anno a tutti!
Ciao e buon anno!
Scusate per l'oggetto un po' generico ma ci sono varie questioni legate
alla nuova apertura di parte della zona di Porta Nuova/Stazione Garibaldi.
Oggi sono stato in visita e
Ciao a tutti.
Secondo questa pagina non ci dovrebbe essere differenza nell'usare
contact:website o website=
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
Come pure per fax e contact:fax ad esempio.
In quanto sono segnalati come tag alternativi.
Come vi regolate voi?
Io preferisco
Jeg har bemærket at findvej botten de sidste par dage har slettet, men ikke
erstattet/opdateret alle addresser på de veje den har arbejdet. Nu har jeg
ikke tidligere holdt øje med botten, så jeg ikke helt klar over processen, men
umiddelbart virker det for mig lidt mistænkeligt. Er det en fejl?
Hej,
Yep, Geoservicen er nede i øjeblikket - og mit script var ikke så
robust, som jeg havde regnet med :-(
Jeg har sørget for, at scriptet ikke længere vil opdatere, hvis den
ikke kan hente data (uanset om man manuelt eller automatisk vil rette
adresser). Og så har jeg lige sat den automatiske
Hola, también hay que tener en cuenta que Bing actualmente al menos en mi zona
está más actualizado que PNOA.
Feliz 2013 a todos!!!
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
Hola, desde hace aproximadamente un mes cuando le doy a la flechita de
editar ya no me sale la última opción para ver quién ha editado una
determinada zona. sabéis como puedo hacerlo?
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
Ajuda este link?
http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please excuse typos and brevity.
Am 01.01.2013 23:03 schrieb Ricardo Sanz ricardosanz1...@gmail.com:
Hola, desde hace aproximadamente un mes cuando le doy a la flechita de
editar ya no me sale la última
necesito saber el historial de un determinado elemento y con este
enlace solo puedo por nodos
pero muchas gracias :)
El día 2 de enero de 2013 05:00, Manfred A. Reiter
ma.rei...@gmail.com escribió:
Ajuda este link?
http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please
Small statistic from our Lithuanian friends :).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tomas Straupis tomasstrau...@gmail.com
Date: 2013/1/1
Subject: [Talk-lt] Statistika (lt+lv+ee)
To: OSM Talk LT talk...@openstreetmap.org
Sveiki
Kaip ir žadėjau, štai statistika su tendencijomis:
Ich wünsche Allen OSM Freunden ein Gutes Neues Jahr 2013
Viel Erfolg, viele schöne Momente beim Mappen im Gelände und vor dem PC
Spass, Erlebnisse und natürlich Gesundheit
Martin alias Gosausee
___
Talk-at
Lietuviešu kolēģis savācis nelielu statistiku :).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tomas Straupis tomasstrau...@gmail.com
Date: 2013/1/1
Subject: [Talk-lt] Statistika (lt+lv+ee)
To: OSM Talk LT talk...@openstreetmap.org
Sveiki
Kaip ir žadėjau, štai statistika su tendencijomis:
Mappy New Year, mappers.
I'd love to see more Canadian cities start to host monthly OpenStreetMap
events in 2013. They're a great way to meet other mappers, to learn and
share the experiences of other mappers, to learn about the other things
interesting people do besides mapping. And they're
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I'm going to be in Toronto in the new year and was wondering if any OSM or
GIS events, meetings or mappy hours would be taking place. I'll be arriving
on the 2nd and leaving on the 7th for Penetang but might be free after
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:30 AM, William Rieck bi...@thinkers.org wrote:
There is no gospel, although surveys and GPS traces may be close, but
certainly not Bing and CanVec imports.
The map should represent what you see on the ground, so make whatever
adjustments are needed, using deduction
Hello all,
I've been recently drawing all of the buildings in Fredericton in
preparation for going around and collecting the addresses. I'd noticed that
all the buildings in Fredericton were offset. Naturally I assumed that
the original mappers in Fredericton had done this offset on purpose. I
Ive been looking at a bot to fix the double-space issue with
CanVec/Geobase, but no idea when Ill have the time for it so dont let that
stop anyone else interested from developing one, consulting, etc. Serges
work in the US with TIGER name expansions might be helpful.
Also, just a
Dans le Delta intérieur du Niger au nord du Mali, de vastes zones
parfois sur plusieurs kilomètres sont inondées à chaque année,
incluant des terres agricoles. Les champs saturés d'eau sur
l'imagerie Bing HR permettent de repérer ces zones inondables.
Même genre de chose à Madagascar. On
Bonjour
soucis de débutant sans doute, je ne peux pas répondre aux messages ?
/*
de Jo. :
Je suis nouveau sur OSM et je serait curieux de voir à quoi ressemblerai
un PLU. Est ce que tu aurait un extrait à me partager afin que je me
fasse une idée sur la question ?
*/
Le PLU en question est
Bonjour, et meilleurs vœux à tous :-)
On vient de m'envoyer trois fichiers : un .mp, un .shp et un .img.
http://tuxdomain.dyndns.org/osm-garmin/index.php?dir=Guyane/Yiyi
Comment peut-on s'en servir pour importer des données dans OSM ou les
convertir pour ce faire ?
J'ai essayé sur le .shp
Avant d'envisager un import...
- quid de l'aspect licence de ces données ? d'où proviennent-elles ?
- quid de leur exactitude/précision/fraicheur/pertinence ? que sont-elles ?
Les questions techniques viennent après ;)
Un fichier .shp seul c'est étonnant, en général il sort accompagné
d'un
Le message suivant de :
##
Salut à tous
Ca fait un moment que je contribue à OSM mais rejoindre votre forum peut
peut-être répondre a certaine de mes questions.
Je suis pompier volontaire et je souhaiterais pouvoir sortir une série de carte
avec toutes les informations utile à
C'est la saison des voeux, des bonnes résolutions...
Que peut-on souhaiter à OSM et OSM-FR ?
Pour OSM, le million de comptes ouvert va être franchit dans quelques
heures, d'ici 24 à 48h car 2012 s'est achevée avec 997250 comptes. On
n'était pas loin de passer le million pendant que les feux
Bonsoir,
Je n'ai pas prévu de moyen de corriger les données présentées dans l'outil.
Néanmoins, tant que l'établissement a été marqué comme intégré, il n'y a pas
trop de raisons qu'une tierce personne veuille l'intégrer à nouveau.
--
View this message in context:
Et bonne année au final
On 1 Jan 2013 18:25, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr wrote:
C'est la saison des voeux, des bonnes résolutions...
Que peut-on souhaiter à OSM et OSM-FR ?
Pour OSM, le million de comptes ouvert va être franchit dans quelques
heures, d'ici 24 à 48h car 2012
Et pour ceux qui veulent voir 2012 en vidéo avec le fameux changement de
licence :
http://derickrethans.nl/year-of-edits-2012.html
Le 1 janvier 2013 22:12, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com a écrit :
Et bonne année au final
On 1 Jan 2013 18:25, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr
Bonsoir,
Je comprend mais dans mon cas je pense avoir faire une erreur de saisi.
L'intégration de l'école est indiqué à plus de 300 mètre de son emplacement
exact. En fait j'ai validé au lieu de modifier l'emplacement et j'ai donc
confirmé le point temporaire.
Est ce que tu pourrait faire la
la facilité est de souhaiter de bon nodes, joyeux ways et de bonnes
relations, d'assumer ses toc et d'eviter les tms (s pour souris)
didier
Le mardi 01 janvier 2013 à 19:24 +0100, Christian Quest a écrit :
C'est la saison des voeux, des bonnes résolutions...
Que peut-on souhaiter à OSM et
はやしです。
伊豆大島分だけ国土数値情報からインポートしておいて頂けると嬉しいです。
大島旅客自動車の６路線分のバス停をインポートしました。
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
はやしさん、ありがとうございます。
複数のノードが重なっている箇所がありますが
路線が違う場合は別物としてインポートされているのでしょうか。
その場合ひとつで良いように思いますがどうなんでしょう。
＜例＞
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2090855814
→ノードが５つあります。
2013/01/01 yuu hayashi hayashi@gmail.com:
はやしです。
伊豆大島分だけ国土数値情報からインポートしておいて頂けると嬉しいです。
大島旅客自動車の６路線分のバス停をインポートしました。
On 31/12/2012 21:59, Graham Jones wrote:
I would like to see field boundaries and land uses in OSM, for the same
reason as you. I think the main reason that there are not many in
there, is that they are very difficult to survey.
I second that! See my diary entry
My main motivation for getting involved with OSM was to get a better walking
map on my garmin. To this extent I have been adding lots of barriers in the
southern part of the Peak District. So it is being done. Whilst it is time
consuming I wouldn't say it is difficult. I do survey with a
I guess it depends on what you think is 'difficult' - to actually survey
them means a lot of walking, so I tend to only add the ones that I can
remember when I get home, and get the routes from Bing.
I have just had another look and for dry stone walls, it is quite easy to
distinguish some in
Good job there Graham. I know most of the area around there quite well. The
Bing imagery is old, it still shows the cement works which was demolished
in 2005 I think. Compare it to Google and you can see it is there no more.
Although you can't use Google Satellite view to trace there is surely no
Thanks Steven,
I am pretty sure that any reference to Google maps/imagery is not allowed
(it would be worth searching through the mail archives for last time it was
discussed).
You are right though about the age of the Bing imagery - I noticed that the
cement works is still there in the photos. I
I have been adding lots of landuse data in south east London as part of a
few projects (see recent posts tagged
http://tom.acrewoods.net/tag/openstreetmap/).
Adding farmland fields, hedges, fences and footpaths is really valuable.
The same goes for accurate landuse mapping in cities. I would
On 01/01/13 11:15, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it
isn't mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default.
+1
Smothering the countryside with landuse when it's farmland seems well
over the top to me. Marking a single field
I have been using prow:ref, just because I came across it in the mailing
lists. I have not added many (~60 prows) and I don't mind converting those
over to prow_ref if that is the consensus.
My preference would be for prow:ref, as the colon is the 'standard' way to
define namespaces, and I am not
On 1 January 2013 16:10, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 01/01/13 11:15, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it isn't
mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default.
+1
Smothering the countryside with landuse when it's
Find myself more or less agreeing with the points Chris and Dudley made. I
see see farmland as a default, and haven't put any effort into mapping
farmland or fields. But I also agree with Tom's point, it is information
that has a place in the database, and you dont need to render it if you
dont
Tom Chance wrote:
Mapping it as farmland needn't distract anybody
apart from the poor sod editing the data, that is.
yours from the sticks
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Marking-landuse-and-field-boundaries-tp5742119p5742180.html
Sent from the
On 1 January 2013 18:39, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
As I said above (you must have missed it) marking fields within urban
areas is a good idea as you been doing. The contrast with the surroundings
is valuable and is not smothering thousands of square kilometres with
pointless
Tom Chance wrote:
I also cannot understand comments such as Richard's, which arise
every time somebody wants to add additional data that they consider
valuable. Compared to the days of just mapping roads, many cities
today are a dense mass of addressed buildings, metadata-to-the-
eyeballs
While I agree that high data density is an issue, I can't see why this is a
strong argument for not tagging land use in rural areas, as even if we do
draw big polygons to distinguish farmed land from woodland from moors from
scree slopes etc, these areas are so big that it doesn't make rural data
On 1 Jan 2013 20:34, Richard Fairhurst richard@systeme...
Until then, the advanced mappers must share in OSM's collective
responsibility to keep the project editable by newbies. That's why I
believe
widespread farm landuse mapping in the countryside is an actively harmful
indulgence.
On 1 January 2013 16:30, Craig Loftus craiglof...@gmail.com wrote:
1/ prow:ref suggests some sort of name-spacing, but we haven't
actually developed any tagging scheme that makes use of a prow:*
name-space. So currently prow:ref would be the only tag used.
Is it wise to preclude adding more
One OSM commenter suggested that the best thing for the map was an import,
Import some German mappers they suggested. That isn't wrong, but in some
places it might be historically provocative. :-)
About 18 months ago I posted this Mappy Hour HOWTO.
I am generally opposed to importation of parcel data at the individual parcel level. This goes _directly_ to the design of OSM with a non-layered data model and the resultant massive increase in rendered data density.However, there is much information in local GIS datastores about subdivision and
On 12/31/12 5:12 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I'd argue that not all governmental boundaries need to be tagged as
boundary=administrative. In Ohio, we've started to retag CDP
boundaries with boundary=census and place=locality but without
admin_level. [1][2] They still show up in Nominatim as
i have observed some things along I 85 north of Charlotte that could use
some attention from a local
mapper. please contact me off list if you are in a position to go look
at some stuff and i'll give you
all the details.
thanks,
richard
___
Zip code areas and voting districts seem to me to be be functionally
equivalent to CPDs in that they are arbitrary geographic distinctions
determined by agencies outside of local governments or administrations. Are
they given a boundary=administrative?
For most administrative boundaries, one side
On 1/1/13 6:52 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Zip code areas and voting districts seem to me to be be functionally
equivalent to CPDs in that they are arbitrary geographic distinctions
determined by agencies outside of local governments or administrations. Are
they given a boundary=administrative?
zip
From: stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 12:31 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] An admin_level for CDPs?
I have been pondering the use of the admin_level key in the USA, and
have come to the realization that while values 2, 4, 6
{{key|border_type}} is described as an alternative and sometimes complement to
{{key|admin_level}} . I have recently been drawing subdivision boundaries
based on County GIS data and including {{tag|border_type|subdivision}} as part
of a relation of type border; see for instance
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch of
road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
Quoting from the Wikipedia article: The Adopt-a-Highway program, also known as
Sponsor-a-Highway (but see distinction below), is a promotional campaign
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch
of road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
My thinking right now would be to include at the way level these additional
tags:
On 2013-01-01 2:18 PM, stevea wrote:
On 12/31/12 5:12 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I'd argue that not all governmental boundaries need to be tagged as
boundary=administrative. In Ohio, we've started to retag CDP
boundaries with boundary=census and place=locality but without
admin_level. [1][2] They
On 2013-01-01 4:29 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net
wrote:
{{key|border_type}} is described as an alternative and sometimes complement to
{{key|admin_level}} . I have recently been drawing subdivision boundaries
based on County GIS data and including {{tag|border_type|subdivision}} as part
of a
Thanks for your comments, Serge. I'm confused by your reference to changeset
metadata as that is not easily accessible to future editors of the same ways.
It would put informative content remove from the editing process.
I've made reply comments in-line below.
--ceyockey
-Original
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:33 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Serge. I'm confused by your reference to changeset
metadata as that is not easily accessible to future editors of the same ways.
Changeset tags are accessible to editors just as easily accessible as
The amenity tag is way too overloaded to the point where it is pretty
useless. It might as well be thing instead of amenity. Do not use it
for new things. Why not just make a new tag like
adopt_a_highway=name of organization - it only requires one tag to
encode to encode the information and is
84 matches
Mail list logo
