Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

Salut, Le projet a été abandonné faute de suffisamment de personnes intéressées. En revanche, je continue à travailler sur ces sujets de mon côté. J'ai un logger qui fonctionne avec un arduino-like, mais il mérite des améliorations, pour le moment tout est encore sur une plaque de

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

Tak zatahni :-) On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, 12:09 Petr Vozdecký, wrote: > me by se moc libilo vice do veci zatahnout lidi z SK :) > > vop > > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Tom Ka > Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 12. 6. 2020 9:16:44 > Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt

Re: [Talk-us] Rail tagging in US (and North America): operator=* and reporting_marks=*

Sorry I saw your email in the ORM list and responded directly. I find line segment numbers on track charts and timetables. I mostly work with lines that have left BNSF or its predecessors so I have line segments that were assigned by those railroads. Here is a great list of line segments of the

Re: [Talk-us] Rail tagging in US (and North America): operator=* and reporting_marks=*

It is absolutely fascinating (to me, anyway) to watch this conversation! I thanked Russ Nelson on wiki for his comments at New York/Railroads. (And we still have a ways to go there). SteveA ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Rail tagging in US (and North America): operator=* and reporting_marks=*

I'd love any information you can send regarding any sort of route number in use here like you're discussing. I've worked around the US rail industry for several decades (federal bridge engineer), and have never heard of such a thing, so I'm very curious. You're not talking about the FRAARCID in

Re: [Talk-us] Rail tagging in US (and North America): operator=* and reporting_marks=*

Chuck, Thank You for your time fixing the reporting marks section. Railroad Line numbers do exist for railroads in the United States and Canada. Ref= is for the use of line numbers. I can send you links to line numbers. Line numbers were given to a line by the railroad when it was laid and

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

>I understand fred, how do you know the date of the satelite view, in pre-fab a >building can go up >  >in a day. >>Friday, June 12, 2020 7:24 PM -05:00 from Dave F via talk < >>talk@openstreetmap.org >: >> >>On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: >>> I am confused, >>> are you

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: I am confused, are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am editing, not relying on satellite view which is behind by at least 7 month or more here, i should be messing around in London. If you have information

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 23:00, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: Friday, June 12, 2020 10:20 AM -05:00 from James : No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can become quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is quick and easy, but span over

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Numéro sans nom de rue : faux positifs dans la validation de JOSM

Enfin j'ai déjà vu parfois des tags utilisant des lettres cyrilliques ou grecques à la place des lettres latines dans les tags (sur les tags typologiques, c'est détecté, mais dans les valeurs libres comme dans "name=*" ce n'est pas exceptionnel car ce n'est pas validé, et pas facile à voir sur les

Re: [OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:32 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/6/20 1:37 am, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by

Re: [OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

On 13/6/20 1:37 am, Paul Johnson wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff > wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de : > > >

Re: [Talk-us] Rail tagging in US (and North America): operator=* and reporting_marks=*

In the interim this week, I got the wiki page up for tag:reporting_marks, and started using the tag in my area as a bit of a test - we had the thought that if there proved to be a better tag to hold this info, since this is a "novel" tag, it'd be easy to query out places we'd used it and just

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Numéro sans nom de rue : faux positifs dans la validation de JOSM

Valide aussi la relation si tu crois qu'elle est chargée: il peut y avoir une erreur dans l'attribut utilisé ("associatedStreet" bien écrit ? il y a peut être un blanc ou un caractère de contrôle en trop...) Si tu as un doute, retape le nom du tag entièrement mais le validateur devrait te dire

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/6/20 9:19 pm, Colin Smale wrote: On 2020-06-12 13:00, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Numéro sans nom de rue : faux positifs dans la validation de JOSM

Sans doute parce que la relation associatedStreet n'est pas chargée dans JOSM ! JOSM ne télécharge rien pendant sa validation, ses tests sont uniquement sur ce qui est présent en mémoire. Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 19:09, Yves P. a écrit : > Bonsoir, > > JOSM râle pour *addr:housenumber=** sans

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

>Friday, June 12, 2020 10:20 AM -05:00 from James : >  >No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can become >quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is quick and easy, but >span over multiple kms If the satellite view ( imagery)  in my local area is 7

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

Le 12/06/2020 à 20:06, ades a écrit : C’était ça merci L’idée est d’envisager de fabriquer un gnss à partir d’arduino ou de raspberry. Je ne suis qu’au début du projet ;-) Mais ce n'est pas un projet de récepteur GNSS open source, il était question d'utiliser un module du commerce.

[OSM-talk-fr] AG OSM-Fr 2020 c'est demain !

Bonsoir à toutes et tous, L'AG 2020 de l'association OpenStreetMap France c'est demain ! Tout est indiqué ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/OSM-FR/AGO_2020-06-13 Elle se passera en visio, le lien d'accès est sur cette page. Le déroulé aussi. *On démarre à 15h !* Rendez-vous est

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:27, Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 18:26 by aamac...@gmail.com: > > There have been requests for iD to warn users if they have unsaved edits > far away before they start editing a new area, but so far these issues have >

Re: [OSM-talk] our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying

On 20/05/2020 22:43, Lester Caine wrote: On 20/05/2020 20:32, Frederik Ramm wrote: Not copying past answers, at least the last two years or so, would mean we'd have to write all these answers again because the questions will inevitably be asked. I'm with you on that ... I've seen far too much

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] et si c'était Nöel ? liste de souhait et d'intérêt des outils existant

Bonsoir petit OSM-fr de noël, j'utilise régulièrement : - CyclOSM (:p) - BD Ortho IGN - UMap Je souhaiterais : - un wizard/éditeur d'ajout de POI tout public, notamment pour les commerces. Aujourd'hui un commerçant qui veut se faire référencer sur osm.org a le choix entre un éditeur complet (ID)

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

C’était ça merci L’idée est d’envisager de fabriquer un gnss à partir d’arduino ou de raspberry. Je ne suis qu’au début du projet ;-) > Le 12 juin 2020 à 17:55, Marc M. a écrit : > > Le 12.06.20 à 14:42, Eric SIBERT a écrit : >> Le 2020-06-12 13:46, ades a écrit : >>> Bonjour >>> Est-ce

Re: [Talk-dk] Brud på copyright.

Tak for info, jeg har ganske godt set de plakater, da jeg administrere Aarup Forum på FB, og nu i siger dette, så vil jeg lige få de opslag fjernet. Ser ud til at vedkommende tjener en formue med de billeder. Se vedhæftet billede. /Lytter1 Fra: Anders Hedelund via Talk-dk Sendt:

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Jun 12, 2020, 18:26 by aamac...@gmail.com: > There have been requests for iD to warn users if they have unsaved edits far > away before they start editing a new area, but so far these issues have been > closed once it is mentioned that other software also does this on occasion. > See for

[OSM-talk-fr] Numéro sans nom de rue : faux positifs dans la validation de JOSM

Bonsoir, JOSM râle pour addr:housenumber=* sans addr:street=* alors que la rue est indiquée dans une relation de type associatedStreet. __ Yves ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 16:45, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > This isn't unique to JOSM, though. This is *easily* doable with iD as > well (as evidenced by watching OSMCha with a bbox edged on Oklahoma's > maximum extents, Amazon Logistics does this a good 3-4 times a day every > day with changesets

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

Le 12.06.20 à 14:42, Eric SIBERT a écrit : > Le 2020-06-12 13:46, ades a écrit : >> Bonjour >> Est-ce quelqu’un a des news sur l »’avancement de la réalisation >> d’un gps open source ? parles-tu du projet de Stéphane Péneau "Et si on fabriquait notre récepteur/logger GPS ?" en mars 2018 ?

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:31 AM Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:45:17PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 12.06.20 15:22, Dave F via talk wrote: > > > There is a lot of negativity about large changsets, but assessment of > > > them should be based on quality, not

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

> merci, mais je me suis mal exprimé, j’avais cru comprendre qu’il y avait > aussi un pjt de receveiur gnss, c’est plutôt ça qui m’interesse pour > l’instant, je crois avoir lu des échanges à ce sujet sur la liste, il y a > quelques mois, mais n’ai rien conservé… https://gnss-sdr.org/ est un

[OSM-talk-fr] Chambre de commerce et d'industrie

Bonsoir, Je ne trouve rien dans le wiki et un peu de tout dans la base de données : (cf. 122 objets https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/V0O) amenity=public_building building=civic building=commercial building=house building=office building=public building=yes office=administration office=association

[OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de: > > > > > Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. > > > > > Except cases where you

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:45:17PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 12.06.20 15:22, Dave F via talk wrote: > > There is a lot of negativity about large changsets, but assessment of > > them should be based on quality, not quantity. > > Yes, we're not discussing a popup that says "You

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de: > > > Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. > > > Except cases where you edit/delete already created huge objects or you create > huge object that

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can become quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is quick and easy, but span over multiple kms On Fri., Jun. 12, 2020, 11:10 a.m. ndrw, wrote: > On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: > > I am

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 13:35, Tobias Knerr wrote: On 12.06.20 13:00, Frederik Ramm wrote: I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. It would certainly be a improvement for day-to-day work. The root of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: I am confused, are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am editing, not relying on satellite view which is behind by at least 7 month or more here, i should be messing around in London. Yes, you can map anywhere

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

merci, mais je me suis mal exprimé, j’avais cru comprendre qu’il y avait aussi un pjt de receveiur gnss, c’est plutôt ça qui m’interesse pour l’instant, je crois avoir lu des échanges à ce sujet sur la liste, il y a quelques mois, mais n’ai rien conservé… > Le 12 juin 2020 à 14:42, Eric

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

I am confused,   are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am editing, not relying on satellite view   which is behind by at least 7 month or more here, i should be messing around in London.   >Friday, June 12, 2020 9:26 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk >: >  >On

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 3:09 PM Petr Vozdecký wrote: > tak nějak jsem si pokládal otázku, jak docílit toho, aby se účastnilo víc > lidí z SK, ne jen ty, který to máš až z Košic nesmírně daleko... Udělat to > v Blavě? Nebo v Břeclavi (na hranicích, kam to je z Prahy přímým vlakem)? > Myslím, že

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 14:44, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 12.06.20 15:22, Dave F via talk wrote: There is a lot of negativity about large changsets, but assessment of them should be based on quality, not quantity. Yes, we're not discussing a popup that says "You dumbass, why did you create a

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:07 AM Frederik Ramm wrote: > I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users > if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. > Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from where > you are editing at the

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Yes please - I am using Osmcha to look at changesets around me and i have a high number of changesets which span half Europe and thus intersect with the area i am looking at. Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. In which case, isn't it really OSMCha which is

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Hi, On 12.06.20 15:22, Dave F via talk wrote: > There is a lot of negativity about large changsets, but assessment of > them should be based on quality, not quantity. Yes, we're not discussing a popup that says "You dumbass, why did you create a world-spanning changeset?" ;) The way in which

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

> Yes please - I am using Osmcha to look at changesets around me and i have a high number of changesets which span half Europe and thus intersect with the area i am looking at. Side note to this discussion — in OSMCha you can filter out these wide spanning changesets with “Bbox size bound”

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12/06/2020 12:00, Frederik Ramm wrote: and very rarely intentional. Point 1: This is what's always confused me. I occasionally look into world wide changeset & it's often one spurious object in another continent, which the contributor can't explain. I'm unsure if it's one specific

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Le 12 juin 2020 14:14:15 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit : > > > >Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de: > >> Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. >> >Except cases where you edit/delete already created huge objects or you >create >huge object that actually

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

ahoj, to tuším a jsem moc rád... :) tak nějak jsem si pokládal otázku, jak docílit toho, aby se účastnilo víc lidí z SK, ne jen ty, který to máš až z Košic nesmírně daleko... Udělat to v Blavě? Nebo v Břeclavi (na hranicích, kam to je z Prahy přímým vlakem)? ...a to víš, že vám děsně

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

Le 2020-06-12 13:46, ades a écrit : Bonjour Est-ce quelqu’un a des news sur l »’avancement de la réalisation d’un gps open source ? Celui-là? https://gnss-sdr.org/ Eric ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 12.06.20 13:00, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users > if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. It would certainly be a improvement for day-to-day work. The root of the issue, though, is that bounding boxes

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Le 12.06.20 à 13:00, Frederik Ramm a écrit : > desirable imho yes, including offline editor like maps.me, when a contributor edit one object at the airport of departure and another at the airport of arrival, both in the same changeset. ___ talk mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de: > Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. > Except cases where you edit/delete already created huge objects or you create huge object that actually should be created. ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Hi, showing a warning for huge bboxes is a great idea. I can also imagine to extends this idea to the number of changes. So also showing a warning when there are more than a specific amount of added/changed/deleted nodes or something. I had the situation that I accidentally uploaded a huge bunch

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 01:00:56PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users > if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. > Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from where > you are

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Jun 12, 2020, 13:00 by frede...@remote.org: > Hi, > > I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users > if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. > Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from where > you are editing at the

[OSM-talk-fr] GPS Opens source

Bonjour Est-ce quelqu’un a des news sur l »’avancement de la réalisation d’un gps open source ? J’ais lu des trucs la dessus ici, mais je n’ai pas sauvegardé… merci ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tickets Restaurants et StreetComplete

> je pense qu'il faut revenir aux fondamentaux : SC est fait pour des > quêtes simples dont les réponses ne sont pas rébarbatives. > avec une quête avec 50 choix Tu n'en rajoute pas un peu ? ;) Moins de 10 cartes bancaires utilisables en France, et moins de 5 pour les titres restaurant si j'ai

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs

Le 12/06/2020 à 12:53, Cyrille37 OSM a écrit : Le 12/06/2020 à 11:04, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit : Comment tagger un commerce qui vend/répare tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs (c'est de saison) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgroundskeeping J'aime bien groundskeeping

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lancer de hache

> Comment renseigner (k=v) un truc tel que : > > https://www.lancerdehachelyon.fr/ sport=axe_throwing __ Yves___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

On 2020-06-12 13:00, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users > if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. > Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from where > you are editing at the

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

:-D -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Martin Ždila Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 12. 6. 2020 12:21:11 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020? " On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:10 PM Petr Vozdecký mailto:v...@seznam.cz)> wrote: " me by se moc libilo vice do veci zatahnout

[OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

Hi, I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets. Something like "you have unsaved edits more than 500km away from where you are editing at the moment, please upload those before you continue" or so.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs

Le 12/06/2020 à 11:04, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit : Comment tagger un commerce qui vend/répare tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs (c'est de saison) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgroundskeeping Cyrille37 ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs

Comme un magasin d'outillage à mon avis, et à mon avis ils vendent tout ce qui va avec, comme les GammVert: pelouse, engrais, rateaux... Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 11:04, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Comment tagger un commerce qui vend/répare tondeuse à gazon et > micro-tracteurs

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-fr asso] [vélo-écoles FUB] REPLAY et documentation : Webinaire Saisir des aménagements cyclables (temporaires) dans OSM Mercredi 20 mai 12h30

Le 12/06/2020 à 09:46, Morgane Régnier DROMOLIB a écrit : > J'accompagne un collectif d'habitants sur le Royans Vercors dans la > réalisation d'une carte "des mobilités" sur uMap. Cette carte référence > aussi les points dangereux à vélo, les suggestions, les arrêts REZO > POUCE, covoit, les

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:10 PM Petr Vozdecký wrote: > me by se moc libilo vice do veci zatahnout lidi z SK :) > neboj, ja to tu sledujem ;-) -- Ing. Martin Ždila OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

me by se moc libilo vice do veci zatahnout lidi z SK :) vop -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Tom Ka Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 12. 6. 2020 9:16:44 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020? "Ahoj, pokud by se melo drzet toho, jak se to zatim delalo (tj. jednou

[OSM-talk] Deprecated feature template in the wiki

Hi Martin, The icon for "deprecated" template was discussed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template_talk:Deprecated#Image . Citing myself: "I would suggest to change the image to an icon that symbolizes the word 'deprecated' more. This would help those mappers who use data items

[OSM-talk-fr] Tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs

Bonjour, Comment tagger un commerce qui vend/répare tondeuse à gazon et micro-tracteurs (c'est de saison) Merci, Jacques -- GnuPg : 156520BBC8F5B1E3 Because privacy matters. « Quand est-ce qu'on mange ? » AD (c) (tm) ___ Talk-fr mailing list

[OSM-talk-fr] Lancer de hache

Bonjour, Comment renseigner (k=v) un truc tel que : https://www.lancerdehachelyon.fr/ Merci, J. -- GnuPg : 156520BBC8F5B1E3 Because privacy matters. « Quand est-ce qu'on mange ? » AD (c) (tm) ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tickets Restaurants et StreetComplete

Bonjour, je pense qu'il faut revenir aux fondamentaux : SC est fait pour des quêtes simples dont les réponses ne sont pas rébarbatives. avec une quête avec 50 choix et un schéma fr-fr, cela ne va pas. pourquoi pas revenir au début ? ce poi accepte-t-il les tickets resto papier ? oui/non/limité et

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] politique de la ville et umap

Le 12.06.20 à 10:05, Laurence P a écrit : > Par contre les iframe n'ont plus l'air de fonctionner et je ne sais pas > pourquoi :/ > le contenu de l'iframe est en erreur https://storify.com/Cyrille37/cartopartie-lariche-ouest/embed?template=slideshow https://storify.com dit qu'ils ont fermé en

[talk-cz] Série Znalostní grafy: Díl 1: Úvod - Portál otevřených dat České republiky

Zajímavý text s drobnou zmínkou o OSM https://data.gov.cz/%C4%8Dl%C3%A1nky/znalostn%C3%AD-grafy-01-%C3%BAvod ;? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] COVID road changes

Temporary and experimental traffic orders may include a date on which the expire or have to be reviewed, so that could perhaps be tagged? None of the orders which I have seen have explicitly mentioned Covid-19, but any suggestions about how to tag these would be useful. On 12/06/2020 08:07,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: politique de la ville et umap

Bonjour, Romain m'a fait passer aussi ces liens. Là c'était dans le cadre d'ateliers sur la modification du PLU : https://artefacts.coop/2015/11/11/retourlarichecartopartie/ Et le lien vers la carte interactive des points relevés y est bien actif :

Re: [Talk-GB] COVID road changes

There will also likely be a spate of permanent renames of roads associated with beneficiaries of the slave trade. It's all go! --- https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, at 11:35 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Hi, > It seems that COVID is

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] et si c'était Nöel ? liste de souhait et d'intérêt des outils existant

Bonjour, Ce n’est pas possible en l’état, le tag osm_id n’est pas requêtable sur lebontag. Ca peut faire une amélioration, par contre. [http://montpellier3m.fr/signatures/signatureMontpellier3M.png] Bruno Béguin Responsable SIG espace public Coordination des politiques d’exploitation et de

Re: [Talk-GB] COVID road changes

Has anyone been adding any tagging to designate these as Covid-19 temporary blocks? It would make it interesting to see the amount of change, but also allow us to check which ones haven't been reverted when able. Gregory. On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, 01:23 Robert Skedgell, wrote: > On 11/06/2020

Re: [talk-cz] SotM a OpenAlt 2020?

Ahoj, pokud by se melo drzet toho, jak se to zatim delalo (tj. jednou solo, jednou s altem), tak letos solo. Jak s COVIDem na podzim ted tezko predvidat. Za mne bych zatim pocital s fyzickou akci zvlast. Predpokladam, ze to zase spadne na Brno, ale kdyby se v Praze (nebo jinde) chteli hecnout,