Hello all!
I would like to forward an invitation to all Brisbane OpenStreetMappers!
A Missing Maps mapathon is being held on 28th Feb (6pm) by Engineers
Without Boarders and the Australian Red Cross Youth.
And on the 12th Apr a larger event will be held.
Both events take place at WSP 900
Are you using Map Paint styles in JOSM? These help you visually see what
your road tags are doing.
"Enhanced Lane and road attributes" is the one you want, It's under View
> Map Paint Style > Preferences
I don't know if it would be helpful in this situation, or if you already
use it. But it has
If all is well with the data, Do we upload?
P.S. I'm still in the middle of Brisbane City's import, so I can't help
right now, But I'll jump in later in the month.
On 11/2/19 7:28 am, Dion Moult wrote:
> Hey talk-au,
>
> This is just a reminder that the NSW LPI address import project is
> still
Linking roads should (generally speaking) never have names, an update to
the ID editor now displays Destination instead of name for input. My
suggestion would be to change the Offramp prefixes to:
destination= The places mentioned on the exit sign
destination:street= The road name that is at the
have had a quick look at the address data file in JOSM, and it looks
> pretty good. When you split it by suburb / region, will you share the
> smaller region files so other mappers can help with the review /
> conflation / upload process?
>
> Regards,
> David Wales
>
> O
importing and the procedure you're planning on using.
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 15:46, Joel H. wrote:
>> Hi no need. I figured out all I needed with a simple python script I found
>> online and LibreOffice Calc.
>>
>> On 13/1/19 12:59 pm, David Wales wrote:
>>
&g
Is this information worth preserving in the upload?
On 13/1/19 12:52 pm, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
>> - What does the "ADDRESS USE TYPE" field mean? And should it be
>> preserved?
>
> Hi, just guessing, when a property fronts onto two roads, 'Uprn
> (official location)' is where their mail
Hi no need. I figured out all I needed with a simple python script I
found online and LibreOffice Calc.
On 13/1/19 12:59 pm, David Wales wrote:
> If you create a repository for your import scripts, and create some
> issues, I'm happy to help out.
>
> Have a look at Dion Moult's import repository
Hello everyone, I think that we should do selective imports of Brisbane
City address data, seeing as we have a waiver and obtaining address data
manually is labor intensive.
Since I live here I can handle imports.
However I would like help preparing the csv file, anyone who can lend
some python
). Other than that, I think
>> we're all good to go.
>>
>> Not wanting to hijack the project I've been a bit unsure on how to push
>> this import over the last hump. I could write up a list of questions for
>> the mail list or I could try to finish the wiki page and have the
>> di
Hmm, It's been almost a month since the last message in this
import-related thread. I hope for a date planned so we can follow
through with the plan, since it seems pretty complete.
If Andrew Davidson is still interested, his script could help match and
add the nodes into the relationships and
Hey I'm not familiar with MapRoulette.
Where can I view the source code? I (or maybe you could) would like to
perhaps make one for QLD.
If you are interested, I would choose Bing by default, but really none
are perfect.
On 12/12/18 3:54 am, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Thanks. Because you cannot
This was something I also found confusing, I have updated the wiki page
with an image that shows how it works.
On 15/12/18 2:09 am, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
> Thanks, Bryan :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Housel
> Sent: Dec 14, 2018 10:06 AM
> To:
few
>> mapping competitions in the near future for a few cities in
>> Australia, I’ll make an announcement separately when we’re ready to
>> do that. (Early next year I think)
>>
>> Another tool I’ve found really useful for checking complete / correct
>> tagging of motorways is
>
Thats pretty cool, I might compare a few of these roads.
On 15/11/18 9:25 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I did some brief comparison it and there was at
> least one place where it was better than what's in OSM currently
> (geometry).
I find the a geometry of the government data to be less straight
v1.0, I was planning to see if I could flag if the selected
> node is inside/outside the boundaries (eg: Mount Isa) and also look
> for duplicate place nodes (ie: same name appearing on different values
> of place).
>
>
> On 7/11/18 2:57 pm, Joel H. wrote:
>> How are we w
Thanks for introducing yourself.
A little while ago I fixed up the whole M5 motorway (and I believe some
of the M3 as well) in Brisbane and wrote a diary post about it. Mostly
with what I did.
I was wondering whether what I did was correct, or if my method has
given you any ideas?
How are we with our import plan on the wiki, Do we have any blockers
stopping the PSMA import?
I think we should start setting dates state-by-state for import.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
I noticed this dataset too, but could never figure out how to open it
with JOSM.
Andrew Harvey, have you checked out these files? And do you have any
plans to convert them?
If we plan on doing a wider scale import I would suggest separating each
stream into its own .osm file so we could check
18 6:37 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
> Happy to help with Gold Coast area if there's anything I can do.
>
> I only use iD though, not JOSM, so don't know if that's a problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 21:13, Joel H. <mailto:jo
right fix,
> we need to snap the nodes and then removed the shared ways.
>
> We should be able to fix this in the processing scripts by increasing
> the tolerance that things get snapped together. In this case here, the
> two ways/nodes are 0.1m apart.
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018
e
> two ways/nodes are 0.1m apart.
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:33, Joel H. wrote:
>> On 19/10/18 5:01 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a problem with crossing ways? Why do they need a shared node
>>> when they are different admin levels?
&g
s there's a better/automated way, let's
> just address this manually either during the import or immediately
> after.
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:33, Joel H. wrote:
>> On 19/10/18 5:01 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a problem with crossing ways? Why do they need
Just took a look at the crossing boarders without ways error, and it
seems some level 10 boundaries are indeed overlaping. Check out
-22.5639465 147.0726169 in Queensland.
As for way too long, I also don't think that needs fixing, just some
automated JOSM warning not taking context into
OK, just tell me when you are ready, and I'll clean up QLD ready for
import.
On 14/10/18 10:46 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 21:15, Joel H. wrote:
>> Hey Andrew,
>>
>> Today on the QLD slack, I had a local mapper ask me about suburb areas.
>>
Hey Andrew,
Today on the QLD slack, I had a local mapper ask me about suburb areas.
I personally think it would be an opportune time to start on the QLD
import at least.
What is the status on the PSMA data? Is it ready to import, and is
anything holding us back?
In the meantime, I have run
Good, doing country wide I think would have been a pain. I just tried
QLD and all is looking good except the boundaries which extend into the
ocean.
Are you going to do the upload? And when should we do it?
On 9/10/18 6:19 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 13:10, Andrew Harvey
>discuss if this is the right format for upload or not
I found that GeoJSON file you sent worked best for me. Otherwise we
stick with .osm for OSM. I'm having trouble with that PBF file you sent
(or I don't have enough memory (I have 8GB))
>how we'll manage that upload in terms of breaking it
>Do you have examples of the overlapping ways? It looks pretty okay
around Brisbane to me. Here's an a mesh of the LGA's in GeoJSON which
you can import into JOSM with enough memory.
https://tianjara.net/data/LGA_mesh.geojson.xz
Just import the shapefile into JOSM and use the validation. The
.
But the biggest problem is that the names are all caps! Does anyone know
a way to automatically convert all of these properly so that "BRISBANE"
is "Brisbane"?
On 6/10/18 12:07 pm, Joel H. wrote:
>
> Hi cleary (and everyone),
>
> This is excellent news, I wasn't awar
Hi cleary (and everyone),
This is excellent news, I wasn't aware of this. I think this is great
and would be interested in importing Queensland's
My first though is to add a fixme notice (in similar fashion to the NSW
import), that tells us to reconsider the place label node already in
OSM, and
I have been using the barrier=toll_booth to mark automatic toll systems
on Brisbane highways. However this may introduce time penalties for the
routing systems.
A proposal is in for highway=toll_gantry
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Toll_Gantry)
It attempts to map the
In iD for me at least, paths next to roads are called "Pavement". I
agree with this terminology the most and think it was a mistake for OSM
to adapt the footway=sidewalk tag.
On 20/9/18 8:57 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Personally I refer to the path next to the road designed for
> pedestrians as
For everyone in Brisbane,
On the 30th of September we will be holding a mapping party event in
Kangaroo Point starting at 14:00 and finishing at 17:00.
You can read more at the wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brisbane/Events/2018-09-30_Kangaroo_Point_Mapping_Party
If you are
Awesome, I have been using the data to help with parks!
I don't think an import would be too good, just an update to existing
data. I might look into an updating of public transport and park
information later.
On 10/09/18 22:00, talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Send Talk-au mailing
Just letting everyone know that I did a slight revamp to the Guidelines
for Urban Footpaths over on our Tagging Guidelines page
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban_Footpaths_and_Cycleways).
It was mostly formatting, but I also added some clarity. Mostly to the
A few days ago Bob from the Royal Geographical Society of QLD sent me an
email about mapping historical Pastoral Districts.
Anyone around Brisbane should have a little read (particularly the
question to OSM).
I made the suggestion that Open Historical Map should be used instead. I
was also
I would add the tag source= ... say something like 'personal knowledge, better
local knowledge appreciated'.
I will do this.
By the way .. it is better to alter something to what you want rather than
deleting the old and making a new,
that way people can track the history of the object
Just letting the mailing list know that I decided to make my own
administrative boarder for the City of Ipswich.
You can see it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8348274
Sadly towards the south and west of Ipswich it was hard to work out
where the boarder truly is. If anyone has
OSM is permitted to use the LPI Base Map, This contains street number
where they are.
However I am not from NSW so I can't say how accurate LPI is. You are
best to do a ground survey, the Android app StreetComplete is good for
this as long as the houses have been mapped already.
If you wish to
Hello, I'm just noticing around Moreton Bay Marine Park. Many
nature_reserves are currently formatted as follows:
name= Honeymoon Bay (MNP05)
Shouldn't this be:
name= Honeymoon Bay
ref= MNP05
?
-Joel
___
Talk-au mailing list
I guess now my question is, do we need better definitions of the usage
of the destination tag?
I saw back on that North Lakes intersection linked before
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-27.24180/153.02459). That we had
the destination= tag filled with the Suburb. Shouldn't this be the road
I wouldn't call myself new exactly, but since most roads were down since
the time I joined somethings are hazy.
I have recently added and changed some details related to intersections
(mostly adding slip roads and traffic lights).
What I'm mostly interested about are slip (turn left anytime with
our next event is.
I will colour-code loose zones for people to map in (similar rules to
HOTOSM, try to stay in your zone).
So please, if you are interested please respond ASAP!
-- Joel H.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https
Have we necessarily exhausted all our options? I only ever asked DNRM, I
know of other dataset from different agencies which is also CC-BY 4.0.
Also is it really needed to redact all that DCDB stuff? That was
imported back when we had permission right?
On 12/03/18 17:07, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
>
rry about not replying all with my last email.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Joel H. <95.5.ra...@gmail.com
> <mailto:95.5.ra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> OK everyone, Here is the feedback I got after asking for
> permission to use CC-BY 4.0 datasets:
According to Wikipedia
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Bank,_Queensland)
South Bank is a cultural, social, educational and recreational precinct
in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. The precinct is located in the
suburb of South Brisbane, on the southern bank of the Brisbane River.
This
Hello all.
You may have heard that I will be taking over OpenStreetMap Brisbane
events along with Stéphane. This year we are aiming for one event per
month, so try and come along to as many as you can!
This March we will be doing a Missing Maps party, This is a volunteer
event that will
I just downloaded an export of NSW boundary data from OSM. Now in this
dataset a locality called "Tweed Heads" has been included, The problem
is that is area only covers the CBD and not the city (including all
suburbs) as a whole.
How should I go about mapping this CBD boundary?
Also if
Hi All! I have made a response to DNRM, regarding the licensing for
locality boarders. Please give a critique before I send!
/Hello [NAME],//
//
//Thank you for your time and consideration regarding the approval for
OpenStreetMap.//
//
//As a response to your concern over the licence change,
Someone has imported all the boundaries for localities into OSM, However
most of these have fixme's. (example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6070204)
These ask for a center point/node, and to reconsider the place= tag.
Would it be a good idea for me to first, make a relation with the
are
overly complicated because an early (no longer active) mapper really
liked mapping turning lanes as separate ways, and not all have been fixed.
- David
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 16:59 Joel H. <95.5.ra...@gmail.com
<mailto:95.5.ra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello, I'm adding lane data
because an early (no longer active) mapper really
liked mapping turning lanes as separate ways, and not all have been fixed.
- David
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 16:59 Joel H. <95.5.ra...@gmail.com
<mailto:95.5.ra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello, I'm adding lane data to the Inner
Hello, I'm adding lane data to the Inner City Bypass in Brisbane.
In this spot here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23615424 there is 3
lanes, however the left turn only lane is already mapped as a separate
motorway link. My intention is to add turning lane data to this part of
the ICB.
54 matches
Mail list logo
