On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I received the following inquiry from Thomas Hallauer of TheWhereBusiness:
- Is Egnos being used by the community? it's live, it's free but I am trying
to find out how available it is (and if it helps)?
yes and yes and yes
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
http://opengeodata.org/new-design-concept-for-openstreetmaporg
Whatever merits the (external, commercial) uservoice.com service might have,
I am extremely sceptical about using it for openstreetmap.org. Join
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
Wrong. Map bugs. Did you read my post Fred ? :-)
So you meant to integrate uservoice.com instead of integrating
openstreetbugs? But can their system tie notes to map locations?
Well I'll go further.
openstreetbugs
Guys all the SOTM votes are run by independent parties with additional
independent verification, you doing any of that here? It's a bias for one of
the people on the ballot sheet to be emailing asking for the your 5 votes.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:45 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:27 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
keep in mind that this is for a 6 month term
Good point - I should have caught this in the '[Talk-us] Feburary 4th Minutes
and Election Update' email. Too many fricking emails.
I'm cool that kate is also overseeing
Good luck all!
On Feb 15, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the interest in the US Local
Anyone in or near Budapest please give Gabor a shout to speak at a conf about
OSM...
Yours c.
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi
Want to help promote OSM and happen to live in or be in LA?
We have a booth at SCALE
http://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale8x/
Weekend 20/21 Feb.
For helping, you get a warm fizzy feeling and entry to the conference and
tshirts and stuff.
Ping me if you can help out.
Yours c.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
It appears that there is a systematic error in the summit elevations
in OSM, at least in Colorado.
Well I was given a map, a guide book and a diary for xmas all for climbing
every 14er, so... I can go fix those :-)
Talking about CO it's this
any way the importer can
a) go back and fix all the millions of duplicated nodes
b) not do it in future?
:-)
Yours c.
Steve
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Mike N. wrote:
any way the importer can
a) go back and fix all the millions of duplicated nodes
b) not do it in future?
I'm working on both points -
a) Happens in several cases:
1. At the joining of streams to waterbodies. The duplicate happens
How accurate is NHD data?
I have a lot of streams going approximately down ski runs in CO here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.8671lon=-105.7518zoom=14
(yes the ski runs need mapping too)
There's no streams for many of those there in winter. I'm pretty sure summer is
the same
Hi
Thought I'd try to put this together:
--
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Project_of_the_week
Every week, OSMers everywhere are invited to help in this weeks project. This
is inspired by the huge amount of effort that went in to mapping Haiti by
people all over the world.
--
So please
-
Van: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] Namens SteveC
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 februari 2010 19:42
Aan: Talk Openstreetmap
Onderwerp: [OSM-talk] Project of the week
Hi
Thought I'd try to put this together:
--
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
On Feb 9, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Dave F. wrote:
SteveC wrote:
Hi
Thought I'd try to put this together:
--
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Project_of_the_week
Every week, OSMers everywhere are invited to help in this weeks project.
This is inspired by the huge amount of effort
6:30pm or so, you can listen over the interwebs:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/lincolnshire/programmes/schedules
Anything local I should try and mention?
Yours c.
Steve
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Dave F. wrote:
I realize most people have fallen asleep on this thread, but did anyone
get a detailed report on why OSM was rejected?
It's like Encyclopedia Britannica looking to move to Wikipedia in 2004 or
something, printing out a lot of books and getting
On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Dave F. wrote:
This won't happen if none of the map creators are taking the data
because they think it's crap.
Saying 'none' is exceptional hyperbole.
Yours c.
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi
I own openstreetmap.us
There are other community sites like openstreetmap.nl and openstreetmap.de
If anyone wants to set up something similar, just tell me the IP address of
your box and I will point the domain at it.
Yours c.
Steve
___
nice, can anyone do it?
On Jan 23, 2010, at 2:29 AM, Nick Austin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:43 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Robert Scott wrote:
Perhaps it would be good to downplay Haiti, as it could give her a handle
to say 'Of course projects
I think we should organise an OSM crowd to go. Who's up for it?
On Jan 20, 2010, at 2:53 AM, Steve Chilton wrote:
UK GEOforum is pleased to announce its forthcoming UKGEOforum 2010
Lecture
featuring guest speaker Vanessa Lawrence, Director General and Chief
Executive, Ordnance Survey
Richard your views on the rasters seem a little bizarre, harking back to a
golden era where cartography was respected by the good folk of the land and had
pride of place... etc.
Basically you're shamelessly protecting your own pretty small industry from
competition with a lot of waffle about
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Though custom cartography is the right answer for many applications, it
will find it difficult to compete with the free, universally-recognised
cartography of the OS.
Are
On Jan 14, 2010, at 11:40 AM, David Earl wrote:
On 14/01/2010 18:27, Dave F. wrote:
Andy, The taxpayers have already paid for it, many times over. I resent
having to pay £7.50 for a map I've already financed to construct.
As I've paid for it, I think it should be given to me free of charge.
On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
SteveC wrote:
Basically you're shamelessly protecting your own pretty small industry
What, magazine publishing? :p
No, carto
Looking forward to your, and others', response to DCLG.
Yeah, it's very cool you've put it together and I
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think you have the wrong vision that you'll be competing with free maps,
just the same as the big guys are terrified of competing with a free OSM.
The value just moves
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:33 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Richard's a socialist so I can see him arguing for weird government
monopolies on making pinball machines for one-legged immigrants living in
wales or whatever, but what
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
This isn't me saying that I disapprove of a commercial company giving
away a whole load of raster maps for free, I'm saying I don't think
the government should be funding it.
Okay so you feel rasters are a special case, different to vectors.
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Tom Chance wrote:
Wading in (though for the purposes of a putative OSMF response, we can just
leave this whole argument to one side and focus on the data)...
2010/1/18 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
I didn't say I wanted a monopoly. I'd rather either
a)
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:20 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
This isn't me saying that I disapprove of a commercial company giving
away a whole load of raster maps for free, I'm saying I
Rufus
Awesome this is happening, but the name is wrong. We don't need a OKFNODCAL,
and even the ODbL can be shortened, we need something that they all share and
then we also need a NC version. I suggest it's just something like OD for
OpenDatabase in place of CC, so that you get OD-BY-SA as
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
then we also need a NC version.
NC licenses are not compatible with OKFN's own definition of Open
Knowledge, Paragraph 8:
(quote)
8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict
You're right we should just give up.
Yours c.
Steve
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:53 AM, jonathon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 13:35, SteveC wrote:
we also need a NC version.
Need?
Problem # 1: Define Non-Commercial Usage.
Problem # 2: Define Commercial Usage.
Problem # 3: What
One of the things we did in the beginning of OSMF is say, roughly, what the
budget would be spent on. Therefore, if you prioritized the list of goals and
assigned rough budget %'s to them you avoid a lot of problems over what to
focus time, money and effort on 1, 2 or 5 years down the line.
are employed by
CloudeMade. Furthermore, the [OSMF] chairman is the boss of that
commercial enterprise. Personally, i find that the worst possible
combination.
bye
André
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2009-December/059909.html
I simply have a problem with SteveC being on the board
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
I don't know about that legal stuff in detail, but I agree that CC0
would probably be the best licence. If OSM won't go and really try to
sue people, why protect the data? And why protect the data at all?
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
I don't know about that legal stuff in detail, but I agree that CC0
would probably be the best licence. If OSM won't go
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
doesn't apply to Geodata.
Because...?
Factual data. What you are attempting to enforce is the viral effect,
which directly is what you also try to overcome...
So I
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:43 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
I don't know
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:54 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
doesn't apply to Geodata.
Because...?
Factual
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
So I can't license data because it's factual?
You cannot /copyright/ the data because it is factual. A license for
what you couldn't /copyright/ in the first place
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Anthony wrote:
There's no reason to license data if it's factual.
You're jumping from your pseudo-legal argument to your moral argument. It
would
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
SteveC schreef:
So I can't license data because it's factual?
You cannot /copyright/ the data because it is factual. A license
for what you couldn't /copyright
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The point is that *morally* you want the data to be PD and *morally* I want
it to be SA.
Morally, I want my data to be SA. CC-BY-SA, to be specific.
Well that doesn't work
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
The point is that *morally* you want the data to be PD and *morally*
I want it to be SA. The legal points you make are just supporting
cases that you're cherry picking to help you.
I don't *morally* want PD, I *morally* want
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The point is that *morally* you want the data to be PD and *morally* I
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
You asked why it doesn't work, and there is a wealth of information on the
list and the wiki...
There are a lot of claims on the list and the wiki that CC-BY-SA doesn't
work
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Trevor, let me guess that you feel people with actual law degrees like the
two that helped the LWG are wrong and you are right based on your 6th sense?
Who's Trevor?
My pet troll
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Trevor, let me guess that you feel people with actual law degrees like the
two that helped the LWG are wrong and you
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, SteveC wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The point is that *morally* you want the data to be PD and *morally* I
want it to be SA.
Morally, I want
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Anthony wrote:
I never said someone with a law degree would never make such a statement. I
said they are no more qualified to make such a statement than anyone else.
So let me get this straight, lawyers are not more qualified to make legal
arguments than anyone
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, SteveC wrote:
Well that doesn't work,
Why doesn't it work?
See legal-talk ad nauseum.
I've read the whole lot, over an 18 month period of time, and there is no
proof that CC-by-SA doesn't work
I've not seen anything proving
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
It is however quite stupid to think that only 265 people care enough about
their data to be worth a vote
The vote isn't
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You're really advocating switching license without asking anyone?
Isn't he merely stating that if you truly believe CC-BY-SA doesn't
protect the data, you don't have
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You're really advocating switching license without
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You're really advocating switching license without asking anyone?
Isn't he merely stating that if you truly believe CC-BY-SA doesn't
protect the data, you don't have to ask
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
SteveC schreef:
You're really advocating switching license without asking anyone?
Isn't he merely stating that if you truly believe CC-BY-SA doesn't
protect the data, you don't have to ask anyone to do so?
to do what, relicense
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, you can call him a troll, but I agree I so far haven't heard
sound arguments why CC-BY-SA doesn't work and what work actually
means. Doesn't work for Cloudmade?
I
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
Why don't you do it then, try and fork to CC0 or PD with planet.osm ?
Because I'm not convinced that CC-BY-SA won't hold ;)
So if IP lawyers cannot convince you, who
On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:48 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Lambertus schreef:
I'm just curious... why?
You misunderstand: Google would get my data for free and keep it closed.
You'd only be able to use it the way Google intends it to be used:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Nick, Oleg,
thank you for answering.
I'm quite surprised that you are working directly from the API. Nick writes:
The server is actually quite responsive for POIs - maybe its because
node queries are faster than way queries and
On Dec 6, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Well, you may think Creative Commons is stupid, but I hope others will
give them a chance and listen to what they have to say. I think they will,
considering that Creative
On Dec 6, 2009, at 2:03 AM, 80n wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Matt Amos schreef:
we're talking about moving to another
license with very similar requirements, but a
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michael Barabanov wrote:
I wonder how easy it is in fact to usefully take the OSM data without giving
things back, even with the current license. Seems to me, not so easy. OSM
data is not perfect. To create a value-add, a commercial entity would have to
On Dec 5, 2009, at 8:25 PM, 80n wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Remember: Steve is the head of the OSMF, so this is the OSMF Chairman's
position about other peoples opinions when they don't share his
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You cannot see the process how Cloudmade, Geofabrik and others
process their data.
Well the huge difference is that OSM is under a reciprocal license,
What
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I have no idea what that means.
I had no idea about reciprocal license either.
Ask Google. It might have something to do with the fact that they
want to own all
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I think that developing their own tools, infrastructure, branding,
product management... for MapMaker might give away what they think
about that.
I think you
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently 26th
February 2010), your contributions will not be included in ODbL licensed
downloads and you will not be able to continue contributing
Will be of interest to those in the bay area...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Anselm Hook ans...@gmail.com
Date: December 3, 2009 4:38:12 PM MST
To: ardevc...@googlegroups.com, geowank...@geowanking.org
Subject: [Geowanking] RT @ardevcamp: #AR #Layar fans/enthusiasts join us
Friday 7pm
Yeah if you could that would be super level 5 awesome.
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:59 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Are the NHD import people on this list?
Yes. I am one of them, but it appears that we're distributing
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Are we talking about all of Colorado or just a certain high-priority section?
I think around the populous would be good, that basically comes down to
Boulder/Denver/Colo. Springs. AFAIK. But the whole state also awesome.
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Remember: Steve is the head of the OSMF, so this is the OSMF Chairman's
position about other peoples opinions when they don't share his own opinion.
I'm not allowed to have opinions?
Is this the organization you want to hand over the license of
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Liz wrote:
SteveC marked the NO page as in dispute. No, he didn't mark the YES page as
in
dispute.
If there was no dispute there would be no need for a vote.
I answered this on osmf-talk, why're you bringing it up over here?
There was a dispute, I marked
On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, SteveC wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Liz wrote:
SteveC marked the NO page as in dispute. No, he didn't mark the YES page
as in dispute.
If there was no dispute there would be no need for a vote.
I answered
On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:17, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
SteveC schrieb:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently
26th February 2010), your contributions will not be included in
ODbL licensed
On Dec 5, 2009, at 17:17, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, you wrote:
Don't you mean rather than admit I was wrong or talk about it
where I
brought it up, much better to try and stir the pot on another list?
i have not made personal comments about any one
i
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:43, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/6 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
Are you also living on planet Frederik? Out of all the crazy claims
this has to be the most crazy. Where have you been the past year of
consultations?
How
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:55, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
SteveC schrieb:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:17, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
SteveC schrieb:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After
On Dec 5, 2009, at 19:40, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/6 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
By letting them know FUD and BS will be shot down.
And you are coming off just as unrational as you are claiming they are
being and not helping fence sitters one bit.
Read
wrongly is better
than not to think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria
-Original Message-
From: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:35:13
To: Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.orgtalk@openstreetmap.org; Tom
Hughest...@compton.nu
Subject: Re
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 5, 2009, at 20:25, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Remember: Steve is the head of the OSMF, so this is the OSMF
Chairman's
position about other peoples
On Dec 5, 2009, at 20:51, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Steve,
SteveC wrote:
How is insulting people going to help things?
By letting them know FUD and BS will be shot down.
I understand that most statements you are responding to seem stupid,
unnecessary or inappropriate
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:03, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:15, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
SteveC schrieb:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 19:40, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/6 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
By letting them know FUD and BS will be shot down.
And you are coming off just
Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a
policy*.
It's pretty stupid but that's their policy. It's like the RIAA have a
closed policy and the consensus is viral in OSM.
Yours c.
Steve
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:36, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:52, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a
policy*.
What a non-sense, every academic works with attribution of past work.
Including
On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:53, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:42 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a
policy*.
PD-like licenses? You mean for databases of facts? Or am I
misinterpreting PD-like
Shaun it's simply not that clear cut, there are plenty of people in the US who
would never have gotten involved without TIGER. I met one yesterday and it was
the first thing he said.
On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Why oh why oh why do some people insist on wasting time
I was asked yesterday if/when the NHD would be imported around CO. Anyone know?
Yours c.
Steve
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
my mistake
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Sarah Manley wrote:
No just talk-us, not the actually lists were contacted.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I thought I mailed all the talk-us-* lists when I asked for input?
On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Sarah Manley
--
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:18:57 -0800
From: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] San Francisco / Bay area projects
To: Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net
Cc: Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com, talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: eb9f7ae1-b080-4092-86aa-a65229fdd
Resuming the weekly call, tomorrow after the US Chapter call:
Monday Nov 30th
5:30PM PST/8:30PM EST (immediately after the US chapter call)
+1 218-486-3891 x 224699644
Main topic is finalizing location and date.
Yours c.
Steve
___
Talk-us
I'm unfortunately on a plane for the scheduled time. Will reschedule shortly.
Yours c.
Steve
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Thinking about this 'numbers on nodes' schema... let's say it's perfect and we
all agree, then who's going to do the import work for it?
It requires matching up past and present geometries to find the correct nodes
to update, and, er, that's the hard bit of coding with the Karlsruhe schema
any idea where...? maybe we could get some locals to investigate what they are?
On Nov 15, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
So, it seems that the TIGER data have some interesting addresses like:
Non integer address: 9-35
Non integer address: 9-01
Non integer address: K200
Non integer
On Nov 14, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will
On Nov 14, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will
On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:49 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
2009/11/14 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just
search for all the ways that make up
301 - 400 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
