Re: [OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

Alex S. schrieb: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> place_of_warship, ... >> > Shouldn't that be naval_yard? ;) > Hmm, full tagging should be: amenity=place_of_warship religion=military denomination=U.S.Navy ;-))) Regards, ULFL ___

Re: [OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

Hi! Please don't count me on the "Perl regulars" ;-) As I've already said, these automated fixes have to be done very "sensible". However, last time I looked at tagwatch, there were already a lot more than 100 different typo fixes necessary - only in the german tagwatch list - without any "ac

Re: [OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

Colin Marquardt schrieb: > "Rahkonen Jukka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> When I am looking at the Scandinavian data loaded into PostGIS >> database with the fine osm2pgsql utility (thanks, Artem) I can >> simply find hundreds or thousands of logical errors in data. For >> example this is an

Re: [OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

Rahkonen Jukka schrieb: > Hi, > > When I am looking at the Scandinavian data loaded into PostGIS database with > the fine osm2pgsql utility (thanks, Artem) I can simply find hundreds or > thousands of logical errors in data. For example this is an excerpt from the > list of highway tags used in

Re: [OSM-talk] Neuer OSM T-Shirt Vorschlag

Ulf Lamping schrieb: > Hi! > Sh.., wrong list! Should have gone to the german one. Anyway, I've added a new OSM T-Shirt design, you may just follow the links ;-) Regards, ULFL > Ich hab mich auch mal in der hohen Kunst des T-Shirt Designs versucht ;-) > > Bei meinen

[OSM-talk] Neuer OSM T-Shirt Vorschlag

Hi! Ich hab mich auch mal in der hohen Kunst des T-Shirt Designs versucht ;-) Bei meinen Experimenten hab ich einiges ausprobiert, z.B. auch eine "bildliche Kausalkette" versucht - also Bilder von Satellit, GPS Receiver, Computer, Karte - das sieht aber dann irgendwie wegen der vielen Details

Re: [OSM-talk] Lighthouses? Should they be rendering?

Mike Collinson schrieb: > At 04:25 PM 9/02/2008, Lauri Hahne wrote: > >> On 09/02/2008, Dermot McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> PS: I'd still love to see those lighthouses we do map appearing on the >>> rendered output. >>> >>> >> Usually that requires pressuring the right g

Re: [OSM-talk] Garmin icon for a bicycle

Karl Newman schrieb: > Appallingly, that icon seems to be omitted from the Garmin POI types. > You'll have to substitute a different type, or maybe create your own icon. > Or maybe one of the bicycle icons from: http://www.gpsdrive.de/development/map-icons/overview_lic.en.shtml, especially http

[OSM-talk] [tagging] confusion: tourism=zoo vs. leisure=zoo?!? Proposal differs from map features page!

Hi! As someone pointed out on the german list. The zoo tag in map features is under tourism: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features#Tourism But the corresponding proposal is clearly using leisure: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Zoo or see:

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals

Robert Vollmert schrieb: > Hello, > > On Feb 3, 2008, at 20:20, Robin Paulson wrote: > >> taking on board one of Frederic's comments from last week: there are a >> lot of proposed 'shop' tags on the proposals page, something which is >> overwhelming and time-consuming to solve using our current

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] request for more votes - power_plant

Robin Paulson schrieb: > this has been open for two weeks, and currently has 10 yes votes and 1 no > votes. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Power_plants > > could i request some more votes please, to push it one way or the other. > > unless ulf wants to re-consider hi

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM icons

Igor Brejc schrieb: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Would be nice if Kosmos would use the > same icons for the same things as JOSM does. > > P.S: I still consider Ko

[OSM-talk] OSM icons (was: "Crudely-drawn pint glasses")

Igor Brejc schrieb: > Is there somewhere a repository of totally free general-purpose icons > such as this? I'm asking because I would like to extend Kosmos rendering > rules with some nice icons. > The collection of OSM icons in SVN [0] is quite usable and should contain most of what you nee

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagwatch

Etric Celine schrieb: > Hi everyone, > > as you may or may not have noticed i have recently worked a bit on the > existing Tagwatch script and changed a few things. > > My changes includes > * the use of a template parsing engine and thus a better looking website > * use of the Osmarender 6 rules

Re: [OSM-talk] "Crudely-drawn pint glasses"

Alex S. schrieb: > Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > >> Try openclipart.org. [..] it's all public domain. >> > No, most icons there are not. Most do, however, have compatible > licensing. (There may be some "no commercial" stuff in there, so check) > I've checked various icons from the zip co

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] filtering of tagging e-mails (was Re: Move tagging RfCs/voting to extra list?)

Robin Paulson schrieb: > from now on, until someone creates an extra tagging list, i'll include > [tagging] in every tag proposals e-mail, to let those of you who > aren't interested, filter out this stuff easily. every e-mail client > has filter capabilities, so this shouldn't be a problem. > > i'

Re: [OSM-talk] Move tagging RfCs/voting to extra list?

Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > >> Well, if nobody wants to write digests, then IMHO it's just not a good >> idea to move to a seperate mailing list. >> > Well in that case I'd say let's just bin the whole voting process and > live happily ever after ;-) > Hopefully I'm too well behaved

Re: [OSM-talk] Move tagging RfCs/voting to extra list?

Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi >> Simply move the proposal stuff into a different list without this >> posting is probably a very bad move, since this tends to become the >> "elitist circle" that most people want to avoid (including myself). >> > I don't consider the whole voting business "el

Re: [OSM-talk] Move tagging RfCs/voting to extra list?

Frederik Ramm schrieb: > At the time, I thought we had somewhat of a consensus that we should > either create an extra list or have one condensed "voting issues" > posting per week (or so). > I don't think that 'or' is the right word here. If we want to split these topics into a seperate list,

Re: [OSM-talk] I've removed historic=icon from map features

Marc Schütz schrieb: > I have now created two proposals: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/wayside_shrine > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/wayside_cross > Hi Marc! First of all, I'm not against putting these things into OSM as they often c

Re: [OSM-talk] Kosmos v1.9 - poster printing OSM maps

Igor Brejc schrieb: > Hello Ulf, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi Igor! > > I just wanted to have a short look at the Kosmos source code, just out > of interest. But

Re: [OSM-talk] Kosmos v1.9 - poster printing OSM maps

Igor Brejc schrieb: > Hello everyone, > > As I promised a while back, Kosmos can now print OSM maps on multiple > pages. For those interested more info is here: > http://igorbrejc.net/openstreetmap/kosmos/kosmos-v19-printing-maps-inspecting-elements-and-more > > Hi Igor! I just wanted to have

Re: [OSM-talk] Nokia N810

David Earl schrieb: > Has anyone got a Nokia N810? (This is a Linux internet tablet with a > built in GPS - http://europe.nokia.com/A4568578 - that someone mentioned > on this list a while back, and is now available). > > If so, how easy is it to get at the raw data and/or a GPX file for the > G

[OSM-talk] highway=bus_guideway approved - after a "run-off ballot" :-)

Hi! The second voting round of the bus guideway tag has ended at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Bus_guideway. As adding the feature itself wasn't really questioned after the first voting, this second round was about finding the best tag for it. The following was vote

[OSM-talk] OSM in the press: Article about the finished TIGER import on linux.com

Hi! Read for yourself here: http://www.linux.com/feature/125344 Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Pillbox proposal approved

Geoff Richards schrieb: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> Please don't simply remove the discussion / voting from a proposal if it >> get's aproved! >> > Sorry, I was just copying what others had done on previous pr

Re: [OSM-talk] Pillbox proposal approved

Geoff Richards schrieb: > The voting period on my Pillbox proposal is finished (it's had two weeks > now), with 8 votes for and none against. I'll now do the necessary > editing and add it to the Map_Features page. > Hi! Please don't simply remove the discussion / voting from a proposal if it

[OSM-talk] [RFC] shop = beverages

Hi! There's an RFC about shop=beverages, please have a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Beverages Unless there are substantial problems with this RFC, I'll start voting in about two weeks ... Regards, ULFL ___ tal

Re: [OSM-talk] tag proposal categories

Robin Paulson schrieb: > in an effort to make it easier for people to comment and vote on > current tag proposals, i've created a couple of new categories for the > wiki: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Category:Tag_Vote_Open > and > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Category:RFC_

[OSM-talk] [voting] shop=laundry

Hi! The corresponding RFC is now more than two weeks ago, with no substantial problems shown up (since it was updated 2007-12-31). Voting is opened for the next two weeks at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Laundry Regards, ULFL __

Re: [OSM-talk] election 1 Voting system prototype

Sebastian Spaeth schrieb: > OK, I just coded up a little prototype. Consider this a small test of > the system. I propose to set up an osmvoting mailing list to which vote > proposals are sent. Subscribers will have to just insert one of the > following: > +1 > -1 > 0 > Hi! Unfortunately, th

Re: [OSM-talk] proposal guidelines

Robin Paulson schrieb: > further to my e-mails last week concerning badly-documented proposals, > i've put together a proposals guideline page: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Creating_a_proposal > > could i get some impressions on it please? i would like it to be > fairly comprehensive

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging hierarchies

Andy Robinson (blackadder) schrieb: > While we are talking about tags I want to thank all those who take the time > and effort to put up proposals and make comments on them. The process is > very useful in seeing what users need and wish to tag. Personally though I > feel the process is more compli

[OSM-talk] [voting] man_made=wastewater_plant - approved

Hi List! The voting about man_made=wastewater_plant ended with 14 approvals and no disapprovals. I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it to the map features page. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetma

Re: [OSM-talk] voting closed, proposal approved - dam

Robin Paulson schrieb: > voting has now closed on waterway=dam, with 14 approve votes, and no > object votes > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Dam > > it has been moved to the approved features page > > Is there a reason that you've not added it to the map features pa

Re: [OSM-talk] I've removed historic=icon from map features

Tony Bowden schrieb: > Robin Paulson wrote: > After - I think - three questions over the last months about historic=icon on this list - with no real response - I just removed it from the map features page. If some one comes up with a good explanation what this is we might put

Re: [OSM-talk] [RFC] shop = chemist

David James schrieb: > On Wed, January 9, 2008 7:30 am, Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> There's an RFC about shop=chemist, please have a look at: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Chemist >> >> On the wikipedia page about superdrug, I'

[OSM-talk] I've removed historic=icon from map features

Hi! After - I think - three questions over the last months about historic=icon on this list - with no real response - I just removed it from the map features page. If some one comes up with a good explanation what this is we might put it back later, but in the meantime this was only confusing

[OSM-talk] [voting] waterway=weir (as a way) - approved

Hi List! The voting about waterway=weir (being used also for ways - instead of only nodes as before) ended with 11 approvals and no disapprovals. I've accidentially approved it two days too early (scheduled for 2008-01-11), but I hesitate to revert the wiki changes, as there seems to be no dis

[OSM-talk] [RFC] shop = chemist

Hi! There's an RFC about shop=chemist, please have a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Chemist On the wikipedia page about superdrug, I've found the term "health and beauty retailer" which might be a better term than chemist. I'm still pretty unclear about the

[OSM-talk] highway=busway (or alike) - second try - please vote

Hi! When I read the voting result of highway=busway correct (voting was open for quite a while), the general idea of tagging this feature in a special way is undisputed. However, there is a dispute about the actual tag to be used. There are three alternatives: highway=busway highway=bus_guide

[OSM-talk] [voting] landuse=railway - approved

Hi List! The voting about landuse=railway ended with 16 approvals and no disapprovals. I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it to the map features page. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [OSM-talk] voting closed - kiosk

Robin Paulson schrieb: > this proposal has been open for voting for 8 weeks now > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Kiosk > > it has been approved with 14 yes votes > > it has been moved to the map features and approved features page > > Hi! There's a very similar prop

[OSM-talk] [voting] mountain_pass=yes - approved

Hi List! The voting about mountain_pass=yes ended with 18 approvals and 2 disapprovals. I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it to the map features page. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org htt

Re: [OSM-talk] new proposal - paintball

Robin Paulson schrieb: > a new tag for proposal > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/paintball > > please could i get some opinions > > thanks > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/c

[OSM-talk] [voting] mountain_pass=yes - some more votes please

Hi List! The voting about moutain_pass=yes is still a bit undecided - we need some more votes. Please go and vote at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Pass Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://l

Re: [OSM-talk] "Approved" and "Rejected" proposals in the Wiki

Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > >> What about moving proposals not actively worked upon to a new >> inactive_proposals page (or simply to the rejected features page)? >> > By the way, who has come up with these rejected/approved features > pages? Don't know. > I don't like that too much -

[OSM-talk] [voting] highway=living_street - approved (in the end)

Hi List! The voting about highway=living_street ended with 24 approvals and 15 disapprovals. After a lot of discussion about this tag, I've approved it now - in the end the proposal has a majority in it's current form. Reading most of the comments and votes (again), I think that starting anoth

[OSM-talk] [voting] amenity=fountain - approved

Hi List! The voting about amenity=fountain ended with 13 approvals and no disapprovals. I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it to the map features page. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org htt

Re: [OSM-talk] more information needed - tourism=rest_camp

Robin Paulson schrieb: > could the person who proposed: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Rest_Camp > > please provide some more information on the proposal? > > it is unclear what it is actually for, beyond duplicating a range of other > tags > > failing that, could it

Re: [OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds

Robin Paulson schrieb: > On 04/01/2008, Michael Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through >>> the whole comments/opinions/voting process? >>> >> Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up >> up

Re: [OSM-talk] more votes requested - man_made=sub_station

Robin Paulson schrieb: > On 04/01/2008, Brent Easton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You don't need any more votes. If there are no negative votes, then 6 Yes's >> is enough to approve it. >> > it is? oh, i thought it was 10. 6 seems awfully low > > thanks though, wil move it across to app

Re: [OSM-talk] [RFC] shop = laundromat -> shop=laundry

Ulf Lamping schrieb: > There's an RFC about shop=laundromat, please have a look at: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Laundromat > There were some comments and talk on the list about Laundromat vs. Launderette vs. Laundry. I've changed th

[OSM-talk] [voting] shop=dry_cleaning - approved

Hi List! The voting about shop=dry_cleaning ended with 7 approvals and no disapprovals. I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it to the map features page. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org htt

[OSM-talk] After approval of a map feature, please also add the feature to the "Appoved Features" page

Hi! There were some approvals in recent days. Please don't forget to add them to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Approved_features (simply moving the according line from the proposed to approved page will do the trick). I've added place=locality, but there might be others ... Regards,

[OSM-talk] [voting] amenity=fountain

Hi! The corresponding RFC was updated two times - now it seems to make sense to most people. Voting is opened for the next two weeks at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Fountain Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@open

<    1   2   3