On 09/19/2012 10:55 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
[1] Of course, I don't mean you personally, Jean-Marc. I have no idea
of your OSM screen name, if you are a Cadastre importer or if you use
an import account. I mean those who have been knowingly ignoring the
import guidelines.
I was not
2012/9/19 Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de
On 19.09.2012 11:22, Christian Quest wrote:
We're voting proposed tag scheme.
... or not. Frequently nowadays a new value or scheme is invented w/o
voting. No statement by myself whether I think this is good process or
not...
So these
Hi,
On 09/19/2012 04:24 PM, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
I've read the rather long thread Import guidelines OSMF/DWG governance and
I'd like to propose a change on the wiki page :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
I think that imports, or all automated edits, have multiple
Hendrik Oesterlin wrote on 18/06/2011 at 16:27:27 +1100
subject [OSM-talk] Bing aerial imagery priorities :
Steve Coast wrote on 17/06/2011 at 08:09:37 +1100
subject [OSM-talk] Bing aerial imagery priorities :
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like to
get input
Pieren wrote:
There definitely is not general agreement at this time that this passage
should be changed.
Could you please point out in archives (wiki or mailing list) where
the separate account became generaly agreed ? Or you can simply tell
me the communication channel and an approximate
Frederik Ramm wrote:
But besides the content aspect, there's also the technical or procedural
aspect - things like where and how to document your import, or whether or not
you need a separate import account, or whether it is acceptable to do
large-scale imports with an account the name of which
The import guideline thread spam got me thinking about how such an issue
could be solved cleanly. I have forever had a problem with the OSM data
being one big blob instead of using all that semantic information to group
and organize the objects.
There are a host of issues like importing datasets
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I've combined their responses and made them generic.
I take my turn to combine your arguments:
- Too hard to register with another email. I say use
username+osmimp...@yourisp.com if they support it. Alternatively,
Hi,
De : Michael Kugelmann
On 19.09.2012 23:45, Vincent de Chateau-Thierry wrote:
The only criteria for removing French Cadastre data will be the value
of the source tag.
That's a bad idea: if someone for what ever reason just decides to
remove (or change) the source=cadastre tag of a
On jeudi 20 septembre 2012, Marc SIBERT wrote:
The complete
ignorance of any contact (threre have been two or three tries) was the
reason for the (short term) block, not the disregard of the guidelines.
In fact I *did* answer twice, in March September. I explain my point of
view and the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Check the list of arguments presented here for the mandatory separate account:
1. it's easier to separate from normal contributions
2. it's more effecient for sourcing
3. it's easier to identify the source if we change the
I'd like to propose a change on the wiki page :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
I think that imports, or all automated edits, have multiple aspects.
Up to that point, we fully agree.
there's also the technical or procedural aspect (...)
I don't think these should
Pieren wrote:
Check the list of arguments presented here for the mandatory separate account:
Pieren - please stop banging on about this - we know that the current process is
flawed but it WAS put in place when problems arose in the Canadian imports, and
it IS current practice. If one 'local
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
there's also the technical or procedural aspect (...)
I don't think these should be decided locally.
And that's where we disagree. Your are not accepting any distinction about all
different cases in your statement, and it seams you are implicitly denying
the ability
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
We can get back to the topic of governance and discussion about those laws and
who decide them, and how.
Or just get back to fixing the process in the first place?
SO we have less chance of misinterpreting the 'guidelines'?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
The 'mechanisms' that we use MUST be managed centrally,
What are you talking about ? What mechanisms are you refering to ?
and it is this mechanism that is currently BROKEN when handling
imported data?
Are you talking about the mechanism that the dwg is blocking users not using
a
Hi,
Following the discussion on the infamous french Cadastre 'imports',
I've tried to find the country of living of the DWG members (according
to http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group):
Matt Amos (OSMF Board) ; Matt ; UK
Tom Hughes ; TomH ; UK
Paul Norman ; pnorman ; near
On 20 September 2012 12:46, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Grant Slater ; ? ; UK
I am South African, but currently living in the UK. I speak English
and Afrikaans.
http://osm.org/user/Firefishy
/ Grant
___
talk mailing list
According to the Plan 2012 PDF they intend to look for new members...
Personally I think they're doing a great job and I would not want to take
their place.
Greets,
Floris
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.netwrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion on the
On 20/09/2012 12:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It would certainly be helpful if more local communities would have one
of their members amongst the DWG members.
It certainly would -- those local communities who feel they need better
representation should decide amongst themselves who they want to
Would be nice if they would fix the aereal images in the capital area in
Iceland on the border of Reykjavík and Kópavogur. There are some major
residential areas which can't be adjusted according to imagery due to
that. I'm sure they actually have the images but haven't chosen which
ones to apply
...you might like to retweet this:
http://twitter.com/openstreetmap/status/248759285801185281
:)
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 20/09/2012 13:18, Lester Caine wrote:
Go on wiping and reloading every time the source data is updated and
manually merging everything.
Sounds ugly doesn't it ? Because it is. Wouldn't it be much better if
each building from the cadastre had a UUID that could be traced so that
differential
On 20/09/12 12:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Following the discussion on the infamous french Cadastre 'imports',
I've tried to find the country of living of the DWG members (according
to http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group):
Matt Amos (OSMF Board) ; Matt ; UK
Tom Hughes ;
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:32 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
Hi there,
I have a question about imports and the
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 20/09/2012 13:18, Lester Caine wrote:
Go on wiping and reloading every time the source data is updated and manually
merging everything.
Sounds ugly doesn't it ? Because it is. Wouldn't it be much better if each
building from the cadastre had a UUID that could be
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
The 'mechanisms' that we use MUST be managed centrally,
What are you talking about ? What mechanisms are you refering to ?
Simply the methods by which data is added to the database.
And all I am trying to understand now is why if we HAVE digital data to work
with
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Should the licence change to something other than CC-BY-SA 2.0 or ODbL 1.0,
OSMF have guaranteed that they will identify and remove any data
incompatible with that licence.
Incidentally, I believe that the burden OSMF
De : Lester Caine
So would it not be better to provide it as an raster overlay instead? And
trace
from that.
But I was assuming that this was vector data?
French cadastre is vector data in about 70-80% of the 36.000 municipalities.
The rest is
made of old paper maps turned into
Which one has both public transport routing and a Streetview alternative?
This might just confuse your 'typical' iPhone user.
Greets,
Floris
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
...you might like to retweet this:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Check the list of arguments presented here for the mandatory separate account:
1. it's easier to separate from normal contributions
2. it's more effecient for sourcing
3. it's easier to identify the source if we change the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion on the infamous french Cadastre 'imports',
I've tried to find the country of living of the DWG members
You might also have a look at other working groups and opportunities
to volunteer
De : 2012-09-20 Lester Caine lester at lsces.co.uk
Pieren - please stop banging on about this - we know that the current process
is flawed but it WAS
put in place when problems arose in the Canadian
imports, and it IS current practice. If one 'local group'
is treated as a 'special case' then
Hello everyone -
I'm excited to announce that the Knight Foundation has awarded a grant of
$575,000 to Development Seed and MapBox to improve OpenStreetMap infrastructure.
Myself and my colleages from the Development Seed and MapBox team are looking
forward to closely work with other
Vincent de Chateau-Thierry wrote:
For the vector data, it is also available as raw .osm files, split into
thematic layers :
mainly administrative boundaries and buildings.
Sure it can be processed. Change detection for buildings is a topic discussed
on talk-fr
but there is no real tool
Le 20 sept. 2012 à 13:22, Lester Caine a écrit :
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
We can get back to the topic of governance and discussion about those laws
and
who decide them, and how.
Or just get back to fixing the process in the first place?
SO we have less chance of misinterpreting the
Pierre Béland wrote:
Check the list of arguments presented here for the mandatory separate account:
1. it's easier to separate from normal contributions
2. it's more effecient for sourcing
3. it's easier to identify the source if we change the license. We
faced that issue in the past for ODbl
2012-09-20 Lester Caine lester at lsces.co.uk
Comment fields are not documented as well as they should be and the
'problem' that instigated this thread is to my view of what's
on line a
very good example of why there WAS a problem. Correctly flagging
information is essential and we do
Béland Pierre wrote:
2012-09-20 Lester Caine lester at lsces.co.uk
Comment fields are not documented as well as they should be and the 'problem'
that instigated this thread is to my view of what's
on line a very good example of why there WAS a problem. Correctly flagging
information is
I believe there is some misunderstanding of the relationship between OSM
and OSMF.
Am 20.09.2012 16:36, schrieb Christian Rogel:
Le 20 sept. 2012 à 13:22, Lester Caine a écrit :
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
We can get back to the topic of governance and discussion about those laws and
who
2012-09-20 Lester Caine wrote
Alright insisting on a 'new account' may be wrong, but identifying the
'import source' somewhere is not unreasonable?
We do have the problem of the 'language' used to inform other users and some
English translations on some of the
cadastre import stuff would
Simon Poole wrote:
Yes, the development in the area of Open Data poses a serious challenge to OSM.
I suspect that the attitude of large parts of the community is that OGD is a
good thing, however I'm also fairly sure that there is no community consensus
that OSM should aspire to import
The new map replacement from apple in its IOS has drawn a lot of criticism .
quote from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/sep/20/apple-maps-ios6-station-towe
Within minutes of the launch of the iOS6 operating system, which comes
preloaded with Apple Maps, users were reporting that
Le 20 sept. 2012 à 18:59, Simon Poole a écrit :
.
While a more top down organisation of OSM a la Wikipedia or other
organisations is imaginable, there has never been a community consensus that
such a step would be desirable (if anything it is exactly the opposite). So
while the OSMF
Hi,
On 20.09.2012 12:29, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
And that's where we disagree. Your are not accepting any distinction about all
different cases in your statement, and it seams you are implicitly denying
the ability of the local community to decide wisely.
What I wanted to say is:
If the
Hi,
On 20.09.2012 13:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Are there plans to increase diversity amongst members of the DWG?
We've long been looking for native speakers of a couple of Eastern
European languages (Russian, Ukrainian) because an above-average number
of disputes arise in that area and it
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM, pavithran pavithra...@gmail.com wrote:
The new map replacement from apple in its IOS has drawn a lot of criticism .
quote from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/sep/20/apple-maps-ios6-station-towe
Within minutes of the launch of the iOS6 operating
2012/9/20 Alberto albertoferra...@fastwebnet.it:
“animal_shelter:dog:adoption=yes” + “animal_shelter:dog:boarding=yes” +
“animal_shelter:cat:adoption=yes” + “animal_shelter:cat:boarding=yes +
“animal_shelter:rabbit:adoption=yes” + “animal_shelter:rabbit:boarding=yes
OPPURE
Marcello,
Grazie per avermi invitato al tuo hangout.
Sono favorevole alla tua proposta, lo ritengo uno strumento utilissimo (se
non indispensabile). Metto in cc la lista perchè immagino interesserà tutti.
Non escludo che, tra la miriade di servizi offerti agli osmers, ce ne sia
già qualcuno che
per esaminare quest'area...
http://www.mantellini.it/2012/09/20/mapperfavore/
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Cesena... :). ma sono a disposizione
Gianmario Mengozzi
sent by GNexus
Il giorno 20/set/2012 14:28, Davide Meloni emmed...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
per esaminare quest'area...
http://www.mantellini.it/2012/**09/20/mapperfavore/http://www.mantellini.it/2012/09/20/mapperfavore/
provando a creare delle mappe per osmand ho trovato i seguenti problemi
fino a 300mg tutto ok e relativamente un tempo decente di creazione
sopra i 500Mb di mappa rallentamenti, problemi di errori di memoria, log file
in estensione di 10 gb o più e dalle 25 alle 30 ora per una mappa e non
Ciao,
controllo il forum dai feed ed ho iniziato ad aiutare questa ragazza che
sta facendo una tesi e vorrebbe utilizzare OSM per sviluppare una app per
disabili.
Le ho dato qualche link a wiki e ho proposto Osmand, ma le mie conoscenze
si fermano qui in questo ambito.. :-)
Le ho chiesto due righe
Suppongo che sia a conoscenza di wheelmap.org.
Volker
2012/9/20 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
Ciao,
controllo il forum dai feed ed ho iniziato ad aiutare questa ragazza che
sta facendo una tesi e vorrebbe utilizzare OSM per sviluppare una app per
disabili.
Le ho dato qualche link a wiki e ho
Il giorno 20 settembre 2012 16:34, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Suppongo che sia a conoscenza di wheelmap.org.
Si, le ho linkato wheelmap e la pagina sull'accessibilità e OSM for the
blind...
Volker
___
Talk-it mailing list
Si,sono a conoscenza di wheelmap.org ma lì c'è solo la segnalazione
della barriera
Il 20 settembre 2012 16:35, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il giorno 20 settembre 2012 16:34, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Suppongo che sia a conoscenza di wheelmap.org.
Si, le
Buon punto di partenza è http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accessibility
Poi consiglio di vedere http://blog.wheelmap.org/en/contact-details/ che
mi pare abbiano anche fatto anche un'app android specifica per caricare i
dati su OSM.
Gliele giro sul suo account.
Alessandro
Il giorno 20
2012/9/20 Davide Meloni emmed...@yahoo.it
per esaminare quest'area...
http://www.mantellini.it/2012/**09/20/mapperfavore/http://www.mantellini.it/2012/09/20/mapperfavore/
Ma comunque fa un confronto Gmaps/Applemaps, OSM non c'entra per fortuna :)
all'attenzione della OSMF.
Saluti
/niubii/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-
it/attachments/20120920/705fcf7f/attachment.html
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk
ACHTUNG
Aufgrund von Ausfall 2er Leute die heute kommen wollten, werden wir den
Stammtisch auf einen anderen Tag verschieben. Ein Doodle-Link wird folgen
um den nächsten besten Termin zu finden.
Sorry für die kurzfristige Absage!
LG Thomas
___
Talk-at
Hallo!
Die Macher von OSM2World rendern jetzt freundlicherweise Graz mit als 3D
Map aus den Daten von OSM!
Willkommen Österreich:
http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=13lat=47.02696lon=15.44598layers=B00TTFF
MfG,
Lars Schimmer
--
-
TU
Danke für die Antworten allerseits.
Ich find's generell interessant dass es zur Zeit so viel Duplikation zwischen
Geodaten-Management in Regierungen und in OSM gibt während auf Open Government
Partnership und Open Data Konferenzen andaurend händeringend von crowd sourcing
gesprochen wird :D.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/12 22:17, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 20.09.2012 10:37, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Allerdings glaub ich mich zu erinnern, dass hier in einer
anderen Diskussion mal jemand kritisiert hat, dass diejenigen,
die bei Kreisverkehren / Ortseinfahren
From: Pavel Pisa [mailto:ppisa4li...@pikron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:01 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
I (for myself strongly demand) that my former and future change sets can
be exported from OSM under CC-BY-SA but I
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by convince people to add the odbl
clause to people providing data.
I mean I asked people to give us the data under cc-by-sa, and now i
would have to go back and ask for the odbl
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
that is different than to ask for the CT which is my eyes basically a
copyright assignment to the osmf, I cannot understand that or explain
And to add in one more point, I dont want to have to go back again and
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
This is a good reason to have contributor terms.
the contributor terms introduce more problems, like the fact that it
prevents anyone from importing any derived works.
lets say i download the new cc-by-sa+odbl
On 20/09/2012 16:32, Pieren wrote:
Hi legal-list,
I would like to point out an error in your French translation of the CT:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms/FR
compared to its original
(http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms).
Section 3. says
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
None of us speak good French though, if anyone would
like to provide an accurate translation, I would be grateful.
I would suggest:
par une majorité de 2/3 des contributeurs actifs.
instead of the current:
par une
On 20/09/2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
Hi there,
I have a question about imports and the ODBl,
I see that some sources have decided to dual license the data
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
But how can some third parties data be compatible when the CT says it
can change
On 20/09/2012 09:13, Stephan Knauss wrote:
On 20.09.2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
How can a contributor import any data and keep the data open to
license change? How can you keep any imports at all from people who
have not agreed to the CT directly?
I agree with you in this point.
If we
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
() The CTs where written carefully to say, If you contribute Contents, You
are indicating that, as far as You know, You have the right to authorize
OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under our current licence
Mike Dupont writes:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
This is a good reason to have contributor terms.
the contributor terms introduce more problems, like the fact that it
prevents anyone from importing any derived works.
lets say i download the
On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
On 20.09.2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
How can a contributor import any data and keep the data open to
license change? How can you keep any imports at all from people who
have not agreed to the CT directly?
I agree
Bekim,
I have been working on understanding the new license even today.
it is cc-by-sa + database rights (odbl) + the right for osm to change
the licence at will in the future.
basically you need to grant the osm the rights to use the data,
Michael can give you more info about this,
thanks,
I dont understand that myself, it seems a bit fuzzy to me but this is
the right mailing list and I hope you will get some feedback,
thanks
mike
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Bekim Kajtazi bekim.kajt...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok but I don't know how to go about and do that! That's my problem.
Where
that sounds more like my conclusion, it is the end of the road for
share alike and sharing for osm.
basically it is turning into a dead end road.
well guys please help bekim, i have sent him to you,
mike
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Mike, I think we should
On 09/20/2012 08:46 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
that sounds more like my conclusion, it is the end of the road for
share alike and sharing for osm.
basically it is turning into a dead end road.
What in the hoof are you talking about?
- Rob.
___
On 20 September 2012 09:41, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Yes it is a small roundabout as you can not legally drive over it unless
it is impractical to do so.
The vehicle in the street view is clearly about to drive around the center
island. Whereas if it was a truck/bus/caravan it
On 20/09/12 18:37, Stephen Hope wrote:
Mini-roundabout doesn't mean you can legally drive over it in any
vehicle, it means that you can physically drive over it if you need
to. The australian guidelines are wrong, in this case. And yes, I
know how they evolved to this state, I've kept up on
Stephen wrote
there is now a need for using mini-roundabout in Australia.
I always like to simplify things (maybe too much sometimes).
How about If the approaches to the intersection/junction have
roundabout signs then it is a roundabout, roundabout laws apply and we
should tag it
On 20/09/2012 3:49 PM, Brett Russell signalled:
Been reading up on GPS accuracy and playing with averaging waypoints on the Garmin 62S and have realised that WAAS does not work outside the USA and
for some units better to have it switched off. If I wrong in my understanding please let me know.
I'm not saying that a mini-roundabout isn't a roundabout, it is, and all
the normal signs and laws apply. What it also is, however, is traversable.
If you have a vehicle that cannot go around it, because it is too large,
then you're allowed to go over it.
I'd be just a happy to use a normal
Stephen wrote
I'd be just a happy to use a normal roundabout way, and mark it as
traversable with traversable=yes
Yes - an excellent suggestion.
Nick
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 20/09/12 22:27, Peter Hoban wrote:
Discovering the accuracy of a unit is easy. Find a convenient spot near
your house and with your GPS record its position. Come back next day
(or at least a few hours later) and do it again. Repeat daily until you
are sick of it and you will then have a
Hi all
Interesting discussion and thanks for confirming that WAAS is not an option in
Australia so I will switch it off. Subtle details like this get missed in
various reviews and also means that USA and now likely European reviews with
claims of accruacy need have factored in that WAAS
Hi all,
On this topic -- for what it's worth I have written a JOSM plugin to
help with GPS accuracy in the case of having multiple tracks covering
the same . You can highlight a set of GPX tracks along a straight path
(or taken from a fixed position) and it will a) average them all to find
Massa, Arlindo! Depois vou contribuir com alguns arquivos.
abraços,
On 19-09-2012 17:43, Arlindo Pereira wrote:
Criei o repositório no GitHub:
https://github.com/nighto/calibracao-mapas-ibge
Gerald (e demais), você pode colocar lá (ou me passar) os arquivos
.cal referente aos arquivos que
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] 3D-Mapping Doppelhaushälfte
Datum: Wed Sep 19 2012 22:19:10 GMT+0200
Von: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am 19. September 2012 18:01 schrieb Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-09-20 08:45, tumsi wrote:
Wenn ich das richtig mitbekommen habe, dann geht es hier doch um
_ein_ Gebäude mit Walmdach, aufgeteilt in 2 Einheiten. Wenn man
nun jeder Hälfte ein Walmdach verpasst, wie weiss der Renderer
dann, dass das nur
Hallo,
letzten Freitag hat die Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung das neue
Internetportal BayernAtlas freigeschaltet. Als Referenz an unser Projekt
gibt es zwei OSM-Layer mit Biergärten bzw. Picknickplätzen.
http://www.bayernatlas.de/
http://vermessung.bayern.de/aktuell/archiv/723.html
Getreu dem
Joachim Kast osm-ml at dd1gj.de writes:
letzten Freitag hat die Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung das neue
Internetportal BayernAtlas freigeschaltet. Als Referenz an unser Projekt
gibt es zwei OSM-Layer mit Biergärten bzw. Picknickplätzen.
Wow. Nicht schlecht. Ist zwar nur eine vergleichsweise
Am 20.09.2012 09:30, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Getreu dem Motto Etwas geht immer schief wurden unsere Daten vom
13.07.2012 unter ODbL attributiert, obwohl zu diesem Zeitpunkt unsere
Lizenzumstellung noch nicht abgeschlossen war. Dieses kleine
Missgeschick wird in Kürze behoben.
Es handelt sich um
Am 20.09.2012 09:02, schrieb Joachim Kast:
letzten Freitag hat die Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung das neue
Internetportal BayernAtlas freigeschaltet. Als Referenz an unser Projekt
gibt es zwei OSM-Layer mit Biergärten bzw. Picknickplätzen.
Schönes Beispiel, ich habe das mal verlinkt auf
Hallo,
das wäre doch mal ein Anfang, um den öffentlichen Nahverkehr wirklich
öffentlich zu machen.
http://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/bahn-fahrplan-als-opendata-veroeffentlichen
Gruß
Burkhard
___
Talk-de mailing list
schrieb Joachim Kast:
http://www.bayernatlas.de/
http://vermessung.bayern.de/aktuell/archiv/723.html
Hallo, was mir dabei so nebenbei auffällt ist das das
Satellitenbildmaterial sehr aktuell und sehr detailiert ist.
Kann man das als Hintergrund für JOSM einbinden?
Zur Zeit benutze ich
wwl usenet at schani.com writes:
Hallo, was mir dabei so nebenbei auffällt ist das das
Satellitenbildmaterial sehr aktuell und sehr detailiert ist.
Kann man das als Hintergrund für JOSM einbinden?
Ob man das kann, ist kaum relevant, weil du dann nicht davon abzeichnen
dürftest.
Zur Zeit
Kann man das als Hintergrund für JOSM einbinden?
Leider nicht. Aus den Nutzungsbedingungen:
Nicht erlaubt sind die Extraktion von Daten aus dem BayernAtlas und
deren weitere Nutzung (z.B. Vervielfältigung, Speicherung, Veränderung
oder die Integration in die Arbeitsumgebung des Nutzers sowie der
Hallo Lars,
Lars Schimmer schrieb:
Wir nehmen Wünsche für kleine Gebiete außerhalb von DE entgegen und
rendern auch schon einige Fleckchen z.B. in den USA und Japan. Schreib
dafür einfach Peda oder mir eine Mail! Am einfachsten ist es für uns,
wenn gleich einige Zoom-13-Kachenummern dabei
schrieb Manuel Reimer:
wwl usenet at schani.com writes:
Hallo, was mir dabei so nebenbei auffällt ist das das
Satellitenbildmaterial sehr aktuell und sehr detailiert ist.
Kann man das als Hintergrund für JOSM einbinden?
Ob man das kann, ist kaum relevant, weil du dann nicht davon abzeichnen
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
