On 2/26/2015 10:49 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
If the problem is in an area where there's no-one to survey, then so
what? Fixmes don't show up on any end-user (as opposed to mapping QA)
rendering, they don't mess up routing, they don't affect geocoding or
have any other negative consequences
Hey Marc,
2015-02-26 15:02 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
het is me niet helemaal duidelijk wat er hier zal moeten gebeuren. willen
ze bv. tellen hoeveel kilometer snelweg er is en zien dat dat aantal niet
dramatisch zakt ?
het lukt me momenteel niet om bv. alle changesets tussen
'k ben er niet zo zeker van dat de medewerkers van Westtoer zelf de mapping
gaan doen.
De mapping party zal bestaande en nieuwe mappers aantrekken, waarbij er
mogelijk medewerkers aanwezig zullen zijn.
Taggen zal natuurlijk volgens de OSM regels gebeuren.
Een deel van de gegevens die jij aangeeft
On Thursday 26 of February 2015 17:31:18 Fabri wrote:
ps: un altro si lamenta dei nomi errati
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Francesco%20Maria%20Volpe%20Montesani/diar
y/34474
Un po' opinabile (e che c'entra con l'altro messaggio?).
Si lamenta della A3 Salerno-Reggio Calabria che sarebbe
Un utente italiano chiede consiglio tramite diario
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alberto1989/diary/34388
chi può aiutare lo contatti
ps: un altro si lamenta dei nomi errati
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Francesco%20Maria%20Volpe%20Montesani/diary/34474
Ben Abelshausen schreef op 26/02/2015 om 15:29:
Hey Marc,
2015-02-26 15:02 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis
marc.ge...@gmail.com
mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com:
het is me niet helemaal duidelijk wat er hier zal moeten gebeuren.
willen ze bv. tellen hoeveel kilometer snelweg er is en zien dat dat
In questo caso si parla di alberi importati da dati regionali che
probabilmente non riflettono un vero albero presente nella realtà. Alberi
esistenti inseriti dagli utenti dopo controllo in loco non fanno parte
della possibile pulizia dei dati.
Il 26/feb/2015 15:43 Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com ha
Thanks for the link to the good github repo.
I did not expect to be the first one to point this out. Same issues and
suggestions have been made at least on June 10, 2014:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/622
Do the people in charge of the rendering plan to solve this? The
On 26/02/2015, Severin Menard severin.men...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know where is the good door to knock on to report an issue
with the OSM standard rendering. For a few months, it became totally fuzzy
regarding the countries boundaries, almost preventing to distinguish the
het is me niet helemaal duidelijk wat er hier zal moeten gebeuren. willen
ze bv. tellen hoeveel kilometer snelweg er is en zien dat dat aantal niet
dramatisch zakt ?
het lukt me momenteel niet om bv. alle changesets tussen Antwerpen en
Mechelen deftig te bekijken om problemen te detecteren. Hoe
On 26 February 2015 at 12:39, Severin Menard severin.men...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know where is the good door to knock on to report an issue
with the OSM standard rendering. For a few months, it became totally fuzzy
regarding the countries boundaries, almost preventing to distinguish
Hallo,
2015-02-21 10:35 GMT+01:00 Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com:
Laat zeker weten als je dit ziet zitten. Laat je niet afschrikken voor de
workload want dat zal nogal meevallen denk ik.
= écht niemand die dit ziet zitten?
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,
Ben Abelshausen
Il 20 gennaio 2015 18:58, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com ha scritto:
... ma prima di importare veri alberi monumentali, eliminiamo gli alberi
importati en masse! E' un problema massiccio nel Veneto, ma anche altrove.
non vedo cosa ci sia di male ad avere una mappa dettagliata con alberi
che
Hi,
I would like to know where is the good door to knock on to report an issue
with the OSM standard rendering. For a few months, it became totally fuzzy
regarding the countries boundaries, almost preventing to distinguish the
countries from each other. Eg in Westerm Africa from zoom 4, then zoom
On 26 February 2015 at 13:56, Severin Menard severin.men...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the people in charge of the rendering plan to solve this? The UI is
improving more and more, would be great if the standard map becomes fully
understandable.
Yes, we're planning to solve this (it is bothering me
I agree. In most cases, a FIXME should be left until someone on-site can
verify what is correct.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
On February
I'm having the same problem now. Matthieu already experienced this before
and for him it was resolved by clearing the cache, then accepting a
certificate again.
I'm going to try doing that.
Oei, in 't Engels vertrokken... Matthieu heeft dat probleem dus ook al
gehad. Bij hem was het opgelost
Now that we have an anointed notes system, how about an automated move to
notes, with the owner of the note being the person who originated the FIXME?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
wrote:
I agree. In most cases, a FIXME should be left until someone
Here's an example semi-bulk FIXME cleanup just done. This was manual, not
script based:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29107328
Clearly this was a simple mistake (a JOSM user doing select all and
getting nodes in addition to the ways they wanted to target). The original
changeset was:
Somewhere last weekend a new certificate was installed on osm.org. It's
some kind of weird certificate (don't know the details, but it was
discussed on the josm-dev mailing list), since it is signed by startssl.
I had a problem on a machine running Java 6, it was no longer possible to
submit
http://www.citylab.com/design/2015/02/watch-a-decade-of-data-come-to-life-on-openstreetmap/386183/
https://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/enf.0576ad9c/6/32/22.png?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoidHJpc3RlbiIsImEiOiJiUzBYOEJzIn0.VyXs9qNWgTfABLzSI3YcrQ
___
Talk-be mailing
I created a ticket. Will see what happens...
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11170#ticket
Gilbert
On 26 February 2015 at 20:52, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Somewhere last weekend a new certificate was installed on osm.org. It's
some kind of weird certificate (don't know the
Issue is already going on for 10 months. Doesn't look like it will be fixed
anytime soon.
Since the intro of support for https JOSM team has been struggling with
certificates.
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10033
Gilbert
On 26 February 2015 at 22:05, Gilbert Hersschens
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I think part of the objection to mechanical removal is that just because
there are a lot of particular values doesn't mean they are all junk, and
some could well have been added by hand.
Perhaps a more limited cleanup that
On 25.02.15 08:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think in many cases the proper action to perform on an object with
a FIXME tag that has a low chance of ever getting addressed is deletion.
-1
You can't really tell if the problem wasn't fixed of if it was fixed and the
user fixing it forgot to
Stamattina ho notato queste violazioni del copyright nel parcheggio gestito
da Saba (http://www.sabait.it/) all'ospedale di Borgo Trento, Verona.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5835036/2015-02-26_09.jpg
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5835036/2015-02-26_09.jpg
Le mappe sono situate
On 26/02/2015, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
*One)* We have a fixme system where human mappers are encouraged to pay
extra attention to particular areas or objects.
*Two) *There is an issue of mapper fatigue: each mapper will look at only
so many such tags in a lifetime of
On 26/02/2015, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
On 25.02.15 08:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think in many cases the proper action to perform on an object with
a FIXME tag that has a low chance of ever getting addressed is deletion.
highway=service
access=private
surface=asphalt
On 26/02/2015 08:43, Andreas Labres wrote:
This confirmation of course could be automated: show the user the
object with the tags on some areal imagery background and she/he can decide
(in
most cases, I'd say).
No -- the aerial imagery could be out of date, and it may not be
possible to tell
I think that it may be a good idea to considering deleting fixmes that:
- were added by mechanical mass edit
- were added to existing objects
- are completely useless
- are not indicating low quality of data/tags
For example set␣better␣denotation is not fitting - it seems that in this
case
also
On 25/02/2015, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
fixme=yes is an interesting one socially. It's a bit like
tiger:reviewed=no
Yes. I'm also willing to bet that in manny cases fixme=yes was added
by mistake, without the mapper understanding what it means.
If there's an obvious problem,
I think that it may be a good idea to considering automated deleting fixmes
that:
- were added by mechanical mass edit
- were added to existing objects
- are completely useless
- are not indicating low quality of data/tags
For example set␣better␣denotation is not fitting - it seems that in this
In light of the discussion the volume and quality of note and fixme items,
Pascal Neis
has whipped up some nice long term data for notes. Hopefully corresponding
data on fixme
will be possible in the future.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-overview
On 26/02/2015 18:25, Paul Johnson wrote:
Now that we have an anointed notes system, how about an automated
move to notes, with the owner of the note being the person who
originated the FIXME?
Personally I'd rather keep any FIXMEs on the objects that they relate to.
--
Steve
---
This email
To make this simpler, for now I propose to mechanically delete the tags:
fixme=stream␣attibutes␣missing
stream=fixme
From several stream imports in the USA. Does anyone have comment or
considerations for that proposal (beyond the usual mechanical edit policy)?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
I feel that asking note writers to do more, and to optionally leave
contact info,
will not significantly reduce note volume.
No one's holding you back from proposing (or making) code changes, are they?
2015-02-26 10:34 GMT+01:00 dvdzero dvdz...@gmail.com:
Stamattina ho notato queste violazioni del copyright nel parcheggio gestito
da Saba (http://www.sabait.it/) all'ospedale di Borgo Trento, Verona.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5835036/2015-02-26_09.jpg
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
No one's holding you back from proposing (or making) code changes, are
they?
That proposal is already on the table:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/776
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Blake Girardot bgirar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am strongly in this camp. I have not seen any actual harm or problem
presented for 1.3 million fixme tags yet. But there is the potential for
problems if removed.
Even fixme=yes tags convey information: Someone felt
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:44 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
I traversed province de Liège end to end and I found no need to make
screenshots.
In the list, I opened the small left icon below the cart and I get a JPEG
viewer or a Mets viewer.
When I right click the picture, I
Donc une couverture qui change tout les jours... ou presque
Le 26/02/2015 20:44, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
Ça couvre les communes du cadastre vectorisées.
Le 26/02/2015 19:53, Vincent Privat a écrit :
Si ça couvre la France entière - la France. On a déjà des emprises qui
couvrent un pays
Michael, Wo ins Wiki hast du es jetzt gesetzt?
Jo
2015-02-27 7:00 GMT+01:00 Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de:
Am 27.02.2015 um 00:11 schrieb Jo:
Für die Lizenz ist es in Ordnung. Michael kann dich der Mail besorgen der
sagt das wir das benutzen können.
So etwas gehört sauber
Bravo pour ce beau boulot. Il ne manque qu'une représentation géographique de
ces rapprochements, sur fond OSM bien sûr ;-)
Gaël
Le 25 févr. 2015 à 13:57, adrien carpentier ad.carpent...@gmail.com a écrit :
Salut à tous,
parce qu'il serait dommage de ne pas faire un peu de pub à ce bel outil,
Oui, mais toujours plus :)
Le 27 févr. 2015 08:22, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr a écrit
:
Donc une couverture qui change tout les jours... ou presque
Le 26/02/2015 20:44, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
Ça couvre les communes du cadastre vectorisées.
Le 26/02/2015 19:53, Vincent
On 2015-02-26 21:34, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:
Op het forum heb ik een discussie gestart hoe de NS-poortjes getagd
moeten worden.
Vooral van belang in situaties waarbij een (wandel) route door een
station voert (zoals bv.in Woerden). Wandelaars zonder OV-chipkaart
kunnen dan niet door het station.
Dne 26. února 2015 23:47 Michal Pustějovský
michal.pustejov...@seznam.cz napsal(a):
Uvažovalo se nad tím, že by se na závěr přidalo české okénko s informacemi
z české komunity? Například co se řeší na mailing listu, informace týkající
se mapování ČR apod.? Byla by to taková pěkná přidaná
Am 27.02.2015 um 00:11 schrieb Jo:
Für die Lizenz ist es in Ordnung. Michael kann dich der Mail besorgen der
sagt das wir das benutzen können.
So etwas gehört sauber dokumentiert = ab in's Wiki! Es reicht nicht
dass jemand sagt, jemand Anderes sagt, dass es OK sei...
Grüße,
Michael.
Hallo,
die Wochennotiz Nr. 240 mit allen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der
OpenStreetMap Welt ist da:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2015/02/wochennotiz-nr-240/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
I går var jag på SamGis skåne och pratade lite om öppen data. Och då fick
jag av Trafikverket veta att de planerar att släppa Nationella vägdatabasen
fri till 1 januari 2016! Vet inte om det är känt sen tidigare, men det var
nytt för mig. Och om de inte krånglar till det med licensen så är ju
Concordo com o Aun, tem bastante diferença entre os dois.
Shelter protege do vento e do extremo frio (já vi alguns até com
calefação).
Aqui no Brasil nunca vi, só pontos cobertos mesmo. Acho melhor usar
covered=yes.
Vitor
2015-02-24 23:37 GMT-03:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com:
Ahoj, je dostupne vydani 238 tydeniku weeklyOSM:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/2496
Pekne pocteni...
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Moin,
neugierig wie ich nun mal bin, hab ich mir die aktuelle Situation aus
der Ferne angeschaut:
Mit Datenstand heute 10:56 Uhr sind doch beide Informationen immer noch
da - die offizielle Adresse am Gebäude und die inoffizielle Adresse am
node auf der Grenze.
Diesen Stand halte ich auch
The next casual social pub meet-up will be on Tuesday 3rd March at The Lord
Moon of the Mall pub near Trafalgar Square. We'll be there from 7pm
Map: http://osm.org/go/euu4gPUIN-?way=140469340
Jim McAndrew AKA JimmyRocks is visiting London from the states, so the pub
meet-up is dedicated to
Este 20 de Junio se celebrará en Sevilla la tercera edición de la versión
española de la Geocamp.
Se trata de una geo-desconferencia, una conferencia sin programa previo
donde los propios asistentes definen el contenido del mismo, tomando un
papel más activo dentro de la creación del evento. Es
Hey all,
Thanks to many who have already filled out this 2 minute survey. I plan to
use the results to make the mappy hour more attractive to more of you. If
you haven't yet, your opinion is valuable to me. Please take 2 minutes to
fill it out: http://goo.gl/forms/6h432K2l3L
Thanks again!
Salut,
super initiativa, felicitari si bafta.
Nu am citit inca documentele de la tine, si nu am inteles daca primaria
vrea sa si returneze comunitatii toate datele ce le introduc. Daca vor,
atunci solutia cea mai simpla este sa editeze direct pe OSM, si local sa
tina o baza pre-procesata
Hi,
Please see related boundary edits by this user:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joyvious324/history#map=7/12.341/123.202
Specifically those with changeset comment: [Samar] Added more boundaries
For a brief background, community consensus was, GADM is not good for
import into OSM both from
2015-02-26 10:43 GMT-03:00 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Aqui no Brasil nunca vi, só pontos cobertos mesmo. Acho melhor usar
covered=yes.
Mas essas coberturas dos pontos é shelter.
Tanto é que existe diferenciação de shelter no OSM:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type
Salut,
Se poate rezolva mai simplu:
- instalezi Postgres/PostGIS si prima oara faci import la datele pe
Romania la fisierul OSM
- apoi cu un script simplu in fiecare noape faci update automat la
baza de date din PostGIS direct de la serverul OSM. Nu mai trebuie
copie locala la
Wow. Ráno jsem si to přečetl anglicky a už je česká verze :-D
Díky.
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: TK tomas.kaspa...@gmail.com
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 26. 2. 2015 15:33:11
Předmět: [Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM 238 CZ
Ahoj, je dostupne vydani
Jo aha. Ráno byla 239 a tohle je 238
Drobnost. :-D
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 26. 2. 2015 15:53:14
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM 238 CZ
Wow. Ráno jsem si to přečetl anglicky
PS: je blbý, že databáze je 2 roky stará, ale bylu doplněny
ref:ropik.net: id pro pozdější aktualizace, nejlepší by byla
databáze přímo z ropik.net
Ale toto JE DATABAZE z ropiky.net! Odtamtud jsem ji dostal. ;-)
A dva roky stare nevadi, nove ROPiky se nestavi, a ty stare v CR by
bely byt uz
Så bra. Kanske borde ligga på dem ang. licens bara så det inte blir en som
är inkompatibel med OSM? Det är ju rätt hårda krav för att få läggas in på
OSM numera. Som jag fattat det duger inte cc-licenser utöver cc-0 längre.
/Andreas
2015-02-26 14:14 GMT+01:00 Tomas Wennström
C'est du super taf. Merci
Le 26 février 2015 13:31, Nicolas Dumoulin
nicolas_openstreetmap@dumoulin63.net a écrit :
Le vendredi 20 février 2015 20:14:51 Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
Bonjour,
On a mis en place un petit serveur qui permet d'avoir le cadastre par
tuiles. Ça facilité
Le vendredi 20 février 2015 20:14:51 Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
Bonjour,
On a mis en place un petit serveur qui permet d'avoir le cadastre par
tuiles. Ça facilité l'utilisation (et la configuration dans Josm !) mais
ça permet aussi d'avoir un mode joker qui détecte automatiquement la
2015-02-26 14:17 GMT-03:00 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
highway=bus_stop
shelter=yes
Eu só usaria esse. É um ponto de ônibus que tem abrigo.
amenity=shelter
highway=bus_stop
shelter=public_transport
Aqui pra mim já vira um abrigo que é/possui um ponto de ônibus :-)
Foarte tare ideea, mi-ar plăcea să ajut la proiect. Din păcate pot să fac asta
doar online. Dacă organizezi o listă de discuții, sau grup de lucru, pune-mă și
pe mine :)
-- Alex
On 26 Feb 2015, at 19:09, ciprian niculescu cnicu...@gmail.com wrote:
Salut,
super initiativa, felicitari si
Nelson
De acordo com
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport#Platform_2
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport#Platform_2 tem os
duas formas, “covered=yes” e “shelter=yes”
Aun Johnsen
On Feb 26, 2015, at 13:06, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-26 13:24 GMT-03:00 Lists johnsen-offsh...@gimnechiske.org:
De acordo com
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport#Platform_2 tem os
duas formas, covered=yes e shelter=yes
Isso, tem os dois.
Mas covered seria http://goo.gl/maps/82t2A e shelter a cobertura comum
que a
Usando somente a página highway=bus_stop
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Bus_stop como
referência, um ponto de ônibus coberto deve ter as tags:
highway=bus_stop
shelter=yes
Consultando a página shelter=*
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type e considerando
Hallo,
am Sonntag den 29.03.2015 ab 14:00 Uhr findet in Dortmund ein Treffen
ÖPNV-affiner/-interessierter Mapper aus dem Bereich des Verkehrsverbund
Rhein-Ruhr (VRR) statt.
Eine Vertreterin des VRR und wahrscheinlich auch von MentzDV wird
zugegen sein.
Weitere Informationen, geplante Agenda
Bonjour,
pour les rendus avec mapserver il existe le projet basemaps :
https://github.com/mapserver/basemaps
pour la remontée des données dans une base postgis, il existe également
imposm : http://imposm.org/ dont la dernière version gère l'utilisation des
fichiers difs.
Cordialement
Lionel
Ça couvre les communes du cadastre vectorisées.
Le 26/02/2015 19:53, Vincent Privat a écrit :
Si ça couvre la France entière - la France. On a déjà des emprises qui
couvrent un pays entier, pas de souci.
Le 26 févr. 2015 13:33, Nicolas Dumoulin
nicolas_openstreetmap@dumoulin63.net
Si ça couvre la France entière - la France. On a déjà des emprises qui
couvrent un pays entier, pas de souci.
Le 26 févr. 2015 13:33, Nicolas Dumoulin
nicolas_openstreetmap@dumoulin63.net a écrit :
Le vendredi 20 février 2015 20:14:51 Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
Bonjour,
On a mis en
Ahoj,
Rad bych ve svem okoli odstranil duplicity mezi importem a puvodnimi
daty. Neresim situaci, kdy i puvodni objekt byl bod, ale kdy puvodni
objekt byla oblast (area). Predpokladam, ze v danem pripade je
optimalni prenest tagy z importovaneho bodu na puvodni oblast. Nebo je
postup jiny?
Ahoj, podívej se jak je řešena adresa budovy:
budova je area
adresa je samostatný node (pokud možno v budově)
Ty bunkry by buď všechny měly být area s vlastnostmi nebo nody, jinak v tom
bude pěkný bordýlek: blbý vyhledávání a zobrazování
Spíše jsem za odebrat atributy z area a umístit samostatný
Nicht spekulieren, ins Wiki schauen! :) Habe in den letzten Wochen da
kräftig dokumentiert und im Forum darüber diskutiert. Hat zwar keine
hübschen Bilder sollte aber relativ komplett sein.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Transportation
Importieren ist sicher keine gute Idee, aber
奈良のにしむらです。
OSM
wikiのインポートガイドラインのページについて、OSMが現在採用するOdbLライセンスなどを取り込んだ最新の内容への翻訳が行われていなかったので、本日翻訳を進め、アップロードしてみました（まだこなれていない箇所やリンクの調整など完璧でないところがあるかと思いますが）。
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Import/Guidelines
（翻訳の元ページ）
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Hi,
ich habe hier den Fall das es einige Adressen gibt die strittig sind.
Das Gebäude (Hambrinker Heide 54, 33649 Bielefeld ) steht unstrittig
in Bielefeld die Adresse findet man in unterschiedlichen Adressbeständen
aber auch in Gütersloh.
D.h. es gibt beide Adressen (Siehe Webatlas z.b.):
Am 26. Februar 2015 um 07:00 schrieb Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
Ich habe es etwas geändert:
R-Bahn/S-Bahn - railway=station, train=yes
R-Bahn ist railway=rail
S-Bahn ist afaik light_rail
bin nicht sicher ob ich auf dem Laufenden bin bei ÖPNV (und dann noch,
welches Schema), aber es gibt da
Ahoj, včera NAIMPORTOVÁNO.
Malá statistika:
Zdroj databáze: rop-1.0.0.gip ze dne 2013/12/05 19:52
Stavy:
nepostaven 37
neznamo 2
postaven, dochovan 4986
postaven, neznamo 1
postaven, poskozen 126
postaven, rozvalen 614
postaven, zahlazen 2358
postaven, znicen 1408
I actually reached out to ChrisEspectato (via an OSM account message) on 21
February to ask about the purpose of the notes. If I haven't heard back
after some time I was planning on going through and closing the notes. With
the anonymous notes, reaching out isn't possible. I think it's good to
Dne Čt 26. února 2015 22:28:44, Petr Slavíček, Bc. napsal(a):
adresa je samostatný node (pokud možno v budově)
ne nutně samostatný, ten bod může být klidně součástí budovy, např. když
označuje v obvodu budovy místo, kde je vchod s příslušnou adresou
Ty bunkry by buď všechny měly být area s
To make this simpler, for now I propose to mechanically delete the tags:
fixme=stream␣attibutes␣missing
stream=fixme
From several stream imports in the USA. Does anyone have comment or
considerations for that proposal (beyond the usual mechanical edit policy)?
Pěkná práce, díky :-)
Uvažovalo se nad tím, že by se na závěr přidalo české okénko s informacemi
z české komunity? Například co se řeší na mailing listu, informace týkající
se mapování ČR apod.? Byla by to taková pěkná přidaná hodnota. :-)
Michal
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: TK
Hi everyone,
I wanted to draw your attention to a release from the Dept. of Public
Enterprise Reform [1] on Feb 12th in which the Minister, Brendan
Howlin, launched a policy paper looking for feedback regarding the
type of licence to be applied in the future to data released by the
Irish Govt.
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Karel Volný ka...@seznam.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 26. 2. 2015 23:19:30
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] ŘOPíky
Dne Čt 26. února 2015 22:28:44, Petr Slavíček, Bc. napsal(a):
adresa je samostatný node (pokud možno v
Hallo Joachim,
Für die Lizenz ist es in Ordnung. Michael kann dich der Mail besorgen der
sagt das wir das benutzen können. Die HS sind natürlich nur die Hälfte der
Geschichte. Mir wäre es noch lieber wenn wir etwas wie GTFS oder
Datenbankdump haben könnten um so alle Linienvariante extrahieren zu
There is a discussion today on the general talk list about anonymous OSM notes.
The Yolanda / Haiyan Activation is an example where such info could have helped
if more infos provided and the possibility to interact with the person adding
such note. To revise the OSM Notes and enhance the map, we
Talking of archiving the Yolanda info, while working for the Hagupit typhoon,
I made propositions on the HOT Discussion list but only few comments.See
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Damage-evaluation-tagging-schema-td5831094.html
Plus still working on the Ebola activation and missed time
I'd like the damage tagging scheme to be a topic of discussion at the HOT
summit. @pierre do you think you could lead/propose a session.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:14 PM Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Talking of archiving the Yolanda info, while working for the Hagupit
typhoon,
I made
91 matches
Mail list logo
