dare to write. It does not expect answers.
JB.
Le 02/08/2020 à 13:44, Mikel Maron a écrit :
Hello
The OSMF board is working to make OSM's core software and infrastructure more stable and
sustainable by supporting paid roles for priority needs, such as the Senior Site
Reliability role
(
st do nothing about it.
JB, a sometimes-reader, seldom-writer.
Le 29/05/2019 à 17:32, Heather Leson a écrit :
Dear Christine, Bryan and colleagues,
Thank you for this conversation. Christine, thanks for the
consideration. Many people use ID. It is part of OSM.
Bryan, i will reach out to separ
cause they have been using this
rendering for decades.
JB.
Le 24/02/2018 à 04:45, Fernando Trebien a écrit :
As an exercise (and I'm curious about your thoughts on this), I found
the main routes between place=city within Czechia (didn't have time to
include cities in adjacent countries, be
objection, even
sometimes with halt-truth, there will come a time when there is no more
to say.
JB.
Le 13/11/2017 à 11:27, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
JB, try to avoid swearword outburst, not helpful. Are you taking issue
with the word "deprecated"? The proper word should probably hav
Le 13/11/2017 à 01:16, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
You are right that =0 and =no seem like nobrainers, but if we have
listed them as deprecated, we should not use them.
Deprecated? Where did you find that?
(Swearwords somewhere here. Did someone already said that you mix issues?)
x27;s fault, not OSM's).
Deprecated tags, badly applied new tags is another problem, that should
be discussed with the community if a mecanical edit is done.
JB.
Le 10/11/2017 à 08:18, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com
<mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com&
Le 08/11/2017 à 19:43, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
removing layer=0
Please don't. Once again, mapping is done by humans, and layer=0 IS
sometimes useful to humans, even if computers don't need it.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://li
Hello,
Someone hinted it earlier, but may I repeat?
Is @tagging (list) not working correctly?
JB.
Le 02/11/2017 à 13:34, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
sent from a phone
On 2. Nov 2017, at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
With landuse=residential there are no sub tags to in
So many people seem to think one geodatabase can be created only through
bots, imports, etc… why not go create it?
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Le 20/09/2017 à 13:05, Oleksiy Muzalyev a écrit :
It would give a boost to the Wikidata project.
Am I really reading from an OSM mailing list here?
I can imagine the time when you will not be able to parse an osm extract
offline, without reading data from external databases.
JB
Le 09/10/2016 à 19:14, john whelan a écrit :
Some are simply area=yes
iD there?
JOSM is not happy with them and will tell you before you upload.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Just saying that I'm impressed how much people can write about that
specific private company. Are there some lobbyists hidden somewhere out
there? Will next month be the same with McDonald's or Burger King?
Le 21/01/2016 17:25, Andy Mabbett a écrit :
On 21 January 2016 at 07:14, Bryce Nesbitt
Perhaps he actually meant to create a new mailing list for discussing
the idea of creating a new mailing list for (un)mapping abandoned
railways… You can never be too sure…
These months, @talk-fr seems calms compared to @talk…
Le 09/09/2015 20:59, Michael Reichert a écrit :
Am 2015-09-09 um 09
armer lobby to insert cow=yes/no/permissive
tag in all editors, especially iD. And prohibit change uploading if
unanswered.
JB.
Le 09/04/2015 15:34, Maarten Deen a écrit :
On 2015-04-09 15:15, Volker Schmidt wrote:
1) For me there is no a-priori conflict: according to the tagging,
this is a pedes
Le 18/03/2015 11:31, Janko Mihelić a écrit :
I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas.
They do exist: http://moodwalkr.makina-corpus.net/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
prefer the
first graph, showing how the notes db is already getting clustered --
too many openers, not enough closers. It seems that the OpenStreetBug
experience is already getting reproduced (the negative part, not the
beginning of it).
JB.
Links:
--
[1] http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/os
, 19000 closed ? Are the statistics really worse
than that of vandalism ?
JB.
Le 12.02.2015 19:38, Pierre Béland a écrit :
> We have to think of OSM as a global community where not all countires are
> equal with access to internet and computers. Often, people have smartphones
>
+1.
Quite funny actually that the parallel discussion on « how we map »
clearly states :
In talking to other mappers, always ASSUME GOOD INTENTIONS.
and drew no bad attention, but does not seems to be accepted for the
notes mappers (meaning creators, as in « I don't know to map, adding a
n
osmose, the qa tool.
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/
JB.
Le 26/01/2015 19:14, Dave Corley a écrit :
To me the only logical choice is #2 when you data is not accurate
enough for an import but the data itself is useful and something which
is wanted
All that is needed is a disclaimer added to
Le 26/01/2015 17:59, Jo a écrit :
It would indeed be preferable to use OSM Notes for that purpose.
Ho crap. Instead of importing 500 low-quality POI, just import 500
low-quality notes…
So that only the notes DB is a dump, but not the main one.
Sorry for the bad energy, but please do not conside
Le 18/12/2014 00:02, Clifford Snow a écrit :
According to the wiki [1] they may be properly attributing OSM.
Paragraph 3. They provided a link and they are treating us with the
same prominence as other map suppliers.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ
So the fight began anyway.
visible? I don't see
anything close to that today, even with the big map they have on their site.
https://www.geocaching.com/map/default.aspx#?ll=46.31658,-1.18652&z=5
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
same level as all other
proposals. I would disaprove any shortcut, UN or not UN.
After the saga of the OSMF Board, I guess a second such epic situation
would do no good to the contributor community.
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
OSM only evolves where
money is involved.
Anyway, thanks for the explanation.
JB.
Le 23/08/2014 16:45, john whelan a écrit :
>"It is important that OpenStreetMap keep the use of maps non-commercial."
Either the survey doesn't understand about OSM or since it does have
good as I thought it was?
Sorry for the interruption,
JB.
Le 23/08/2014 15:48, moltonel 3x Combo a écrit :
On 23/08/2014, john whelan wrote:
In an ideal world the way to get a proper random sample would be to select
OSM mappers randomly then message them. Hopefully you'd get better th
Have a look there:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/486
If categories are create (and I think they should), I would still add
private notes/heavy duty work
JB.
Le 10/08/2014 14:10, Matthijs Melissen a écrit :
I see a lot of comments like this. The underlying
ghway) does not seem an improvement to the
notes DB to me.
JB.
Le 10/08/2014 09:42, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Il giorno 09/ago/2014, alle ore 13:56, Norbert Wenzel
ha scritto:
just seeing these notes along a
motorway every few kilometers. And since these messages don't tell wh
that looks too much as remote note opening, and adds no
information (IMO) to the contributor.
JB.
Le 30/07/2014 10:10, Andreas Goss a écrit :
create a note for missing addresses, shops, pharmacies, etc. Such
notes do not help contributors because it is so obvious and does not
bring any inform
ed for several times, or notes
classifications, but to me, it seems that notes have just been added to
the main page then forgotten, for example:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/486
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2014-February/027728.html
(though I&#
://www.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=2.35202&lat=48.82157&zoom=10
http://www.itoworld.com/map/125?lon=2.34994&lat=48.82676&zoom=10
and some (but only a few) analyses from osmose:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Osmose/erreurs
I do not expect an answer, let's cool down,
JB.
think they participate
to a high quality note db. There are quality assessments tools around
that allow contributors to detect where speed limits are missing.
JB, with perhaps some bad faith in there, but not that much.
Le 29/07/2014 10:19, Steve Doerr a écrit :
On 29/07/2014 08:32, JB wrote:
Anyway, a
, if you do no have the
beginning and the end of the limit, at least in France, the information
is quite useless.
JB.
Le 29/07/2014 08:29, Norbert Wenzel a écrit :
On 07/29/2014 01:43 AM, John Packer wrote:
I'm from Brazil, and recently the community started reporting similar
notes, t
After rerendering (/dirty), blue went away:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/51.9605/-0.7644
Le 18/06/2014 08:27, Colin Smale a écrit :
It only appears to be happening on areas with the "default" landuse -
residential, farms etc are rendered normally. That might be a clue. So
far it seems
(not sure this is really a good idea, leaving dev decide on their
side... This is how you sometimes end with something users won't want to
use...
JB.)
Le 13/06/2014 16:26, Yves a écrit :
Thing is, it may be easier to find a consensus in -dev than elsewhere.
So a fixing list would be a
This is not done, and I certainly hope that the « community » does not
take it for granted before a hypothetical future vote.
And that if an actual vote takes place, a real debate also takes place,
with real counter-arguments replied to the already heard arguments.
JB.
Le 15/05/2014 15:11
Still not convinced. If you start adding "right", the next guy will soon
add "left".
JB.
Le 09/04/2014 16:28, colliar a écrit :
Am 09.04.2014 16:18, schrieb JB:
Le 09/04/2014 16:01, colliar a écrit :
I did start to add lower_side=right to barrier=retaining_wall,
man
cases to take into account?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcliff
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Ok, as long as it can be understood by anybody. It is not always the case.
As for the page on your profile, have you ever tried to use it after
contributing to more than 20 notes? 50 notes? 1000 notes? Very rapidly
unusable.
JB.
Le 28/03/2014 12:59, Craig Wallace a écrit :
On 2014-03-28 08
Didn't know that. Is it documented somewhere? Not on the wiki about the
api (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Map_Notes_API).
Good to know, anyway, but still unusable for the basic contributor (even
I would not use it easily).
JB.
Le 28/03/2014 10:25, SomeoneElse a écrit
ting some work done on notes in
France at SotM-FR next week-end, but forecast some additional info on my
diary page afterwards.
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
contributor, disambiguating situations with multiple and complex crossings.
JB
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Remote towards JOSM doesn't work anymore in https? Have you checked this?
JB.
Le 11/02/2014 21:02, Richard Weait a écrit :
http://blog.openstreetmap.org/2014/02/11/osm-enhances-user-privacy/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
the map is simply unusable.Besides, now that I'm connected, but do not have a picture to illustrate myself in my profile, where/how do I click on « modify »?
JB.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
43 matches
Mail list logo
