Why make automated edits?
Why not use your scripting ability to contact the users that added the
ele=0 tags, tell them you have noticed lots and ask if they are right or
wrong. Ask them how they made them, so that they are aware and don't add
more wrong ele=0 tags.
Then you can even offer to
Hello.
2012/5/20 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote:
If no good and valid responses come until 2012-05-22, I will upload this.
You will not upload anything until there is a consensus that what you're
planning to do is good, else your account
...
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Edit-review-ele-0-tp5709502p5709582.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 05/20/2012 11:53 AM, Worst Fixer wrote:
Check with SRTM. Add source:ele=SRTM tag if it matches with reasonable
deviation.
Don't add source:ele=SRTM. You don't know the original source. It's very
likely more accurate than the approximation provided by SRTM. But most
importantly, manually
2012/5/20 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
On 05/20/2012 11:53 AM, Worst Fixer wrote:
Check with SRTM. Add source:ele=SRTM tag if it matches with reasonable
deviation.
Don't add source:ele=SRTM. You don't know the original source.
+1
Never add source-tags to data you don't know who, how and
Worst Fixer [mailto:worstfi...@gmail.com] wrote at Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:54
PM:
Ø You dislike me personally. You tell me I will be banned. You will never
say there is consensus on this upload. You give yourself right to make
final decision what is good and what is right.
Ø I think I
Willi-2 wrote
You are mapper since May 9th and behave like a schoolmaster (Deutsch:
Oberlehrer)
+1
i don't think, that he is an osm-newbie. too much technical knowledge. that
must be an additional account just to hide his real nick.
Regards
walter
btw: his out.osm contains changes of 1.6
Hello, all.
I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit.
Main changed tag is ele=0.
While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was
parsed into a set of more detailed tags.
I also created overview.html that might help your review.
Can you explain in plain English what kind of problem you see with the
ele=0 tag?
On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello, all.
I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit.
Main changed tag is ele=0.
While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was
Hi,
can I ask why are you going to delete gfoss_id?
It's a key used to reference cities in Italy with the data of Gfoss
association.
Perhaps some of these kind of tags could be transformed instead of being
deleted..
In this case I could discuss in Italian ML about transforming that key in
+1, there's plenty of places with 0 elevation above sea level... what's the
issue with it?
Bob
On 19 May 2012, at 15:10, Cartinus wrote:
Can you explain in plain English what kind of problem you see with the
ele=0 tag?
On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello, all.
I ask you
Hello.
Most of ele=0.0|0|0.000 tags were produced by bad import scripts or
automatical GPS track conversion software.
I propose removal not all ele=0.0|0|0.000. All that had source:ele
tag were preserved.
2012/5/19 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
Can you explain in plain English
_Most_ isn't good enough.
If you do it this way, you have just decided that mappers are only
allowed to tag objects with ele=0 if they also tag it with source:ele tags.
AFAIK the mappers that use source:whatever are a minority.
On 05/19/2012 04:28 PM, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
Most of
19.05.2012 15:57, Worst Fixer:
While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was
parsed into a set of more detailed tags.
Which other tags does this affect besides ele and is_in?
This is basic information for a review that I do not want to
reverse-engineer from an .osm
So what you're saying is I know there's broken data there, I'll fix this by
deleting good data. That doesn't sound like a good plan to me in any way
shape or form.
Bob
On 19 May 2012, at 15:28, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
Most of ele=0.0|0|0.000 tags were produced by bad import
Possibly using some 3rd party source of elevation data by coordinate
(like the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data from
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/) and if the ele=0 tag is on a location
where the average terrain around the coordinate is substantially
different than zero would be a way to
Hello.
If you download archive (or at least read my mail one line further before
replying) you notice overview.html containing information you requested.
Here is it separated:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzI7ljRzQhp4dFFOTDI3dDcwMVk
Also there you can see that 93% of ele=0 tags clearly come
On 19 May 2012, at 18:24, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
If you download archive (or at least read my mail one line further before
replying) you notice overview.html containing information you requested.
Here is it separated:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzI7ljRzQhp4dFFOTDI3dDcwMVk
Worst Fixer wrote:
I also created overview.html that might help your review.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzI7ljRzQhp4VnFPVkhZa096LWM
I just get You need to upgrade your Adobe Flash Player to watch this
video. when I try to view that. If it's just an html file, can't you
post it
19.05.2012 19:24, Worst Fixer:
If you download archive (or at least read my mail one line further
before replying) you notice overview.html containing information you
requested.
I did download the archive and open the overview.html before replying.
But I didn't find anything except a long
Hi,
On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote:
If no good and valid responses come until 2012-05-22, I will upload this.
You will not upload anything until there is a consensus that what
you're planning to do is good, else your account will be banned and your
edits reverted.
It is good
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Worst Fixer worstfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Most of ele=0.0|0|0.000 tags were produced by bad import scripts or
automatical GPS track conversion software.
I downloaded all ele=0 elements. There are a couple hundred that are
obviously bad but a
Worst Fixer wrote:
While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was
parsed into a set of more detailed tags.
I also created overview.html that might help your review.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzI7ljRzQhp4VnFPVkhZa096LWM
What _exactly_ are you actually
23 matches
Mail list logo
