I've seen a lot of poor mapping get replicated in this way by newcomers
copying the tags.
Cheerio John
Mike Thompson wrote on 2020-06-22 8:25 PM:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny via talk
mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
Jun 23, 2020, 00:07 by
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Jun 23, 2020, 00:07 by miketh...@gmail.com:
>
> "except for the preceding, we follow OSM community norms."
>
> This should be enough to ban of all their mapping accounts until changing
> their plan
> (I
> In case of noticing low quality paid mapping - please, at least leave
a changeset comment.
I think this is a sensible approach that I'll use in future rather than
leave an email.
On the comments about the classification we are talking specifically
about Africa where it is much more
Jun 23, 2020, 00:07 by miketh...@gmail.com:
> "except for the preceding, we follow OSM community norms."
>
This should be enough to ban of all their mapping accounts until changing their
plan
(I assume that they either backtracked that or stopped editing)
I know we are talking about Apple mappers here, but I wanted to point out
the Amazon Logistics mappers have been very responsive to changeset
comments. However:
1) One of their leaders explained their criteria for a track. There were
about four, and that was followed with "except for the
Jun 22, 2020, 23:48 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 22. Jun 2020, at 23:18, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> These had been changed from highway unclassified surface unpaved to
>>> highway=track by a mapper with Apple connections.
>>>
>> Can you link
Maybe the mappers think unclassified equals what we call highway=road, as in no
classification yet determined?
It’s a fairly common misconception among new mappers.
/Andreas
Skickat från min iPhone
> 22 juni 2020 kl. 23:50 skrev Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
sent from a phone
> On 22. Jun 2020, at 23:18, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
> wrote:
>
> These had been changed from highway unclassified surface unpaved to
> highway=track by a mapper with Apple connections.
> Can you link them? I would revert them as tagging for renderer if original
>
Jun 22, 2020, 22:54 by jwhelan0...@gmail.com:
> The ones that stood out were highways that connected settlements to other
> settlements on the map. These had been changed from highway unclassified
> surface unpaved to highway=track by a mapper with Apple connections.
>
Can you link them? I
The ones that stood out were highways that connected settlements to other
settlements on the map. These had been changed from highway unclassified
surface unpaved to highway=track by a mapper with Apple connections.
They seemed to have retagged a fair number and I don't honestly recall
exactly
Please clarify: are the Apple mappers 1) changing the ways to
highway=track, or 2) changing ways that are currently highway=track to
something else?
I would support #2 in any case where the way connects settlements, since we
have always defined highway=track as a way that is used for agriculture,
I've noticed a number of highways being changed in Africa from
unclassified to track and from unclassified to tertiary. The ones
I've noticed are Apple mappers usually with the comment of from Bing and
often the highways connect settlements so should be a minimum of
unclassified or path but
12 matches
Mail list logo
