Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] area=yes on object without kind + using PICC & JOSM

On 2018-01-12 14:52, Jo wrote: > You are right in that we shouldn't base any of our mapping on what is > visible on Google Streetview. Which is why I was suggesting that > somebody go check it out locally. I've been looking at Belgian aerial > imagery we are allowed to use, taken over several

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Interesting use case of combining OSM with proprietary data

> > My argument is about the geometry information. The friction map > combines road geometries from OSM and Google road geometry information. > I see no way it can be argued that this combination of road geometry > data which is rendered into the friction map is a collective database. > None of

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Interesting use case of combining OSM with proprietary data

On Friday 12 January 2018, Kathleen Lu wrote: > Your analysis does not follow. > > The researcher's description says: "These datasets were each > allocated a speed or speeds of travel in terms of time to cross each > pixel of that type. The datasets were then combined to produce a > 'friction

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

Je pense qu'Osmose ne cherche pas que des "routes" et que les chemins piétons sont appropriés aussi (highway=path), le but étant que les bâtiments en question puissent être atteint et savoir quel est la plus proche voirie utilisable ou localiser un parking même si on termine à pied. C'est le

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Interesting use case of combining OSM with proprietary data

They are using OSM road data and Google road data to generate what they > call a "friction surface" which is essentially a raster map indicating > how fast you can move at every point of the map - faster on roads, > slower elsewhere depending on relief and landcover. This friction map > you can

Re: [Talk-it] Imagery_used = Custom

Ha, okay. Grazie mille! Andreas Lattmann -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de Catastro

Recomiendo usar la página de discusión de la propuesta para que creemos entre todos una serie de preguntas y respuestas frecuentes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios Javier El 12 de enero de 2018, 20:24, Javier Sánchez Portero

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Stefan Keller wrote: > I would even go further by refering to policies about automated reply > mails and/or chat bots. I can't find an authoritative source but I > think there's at least a netiquette saying that communications to > humans

Re: [OSM-talk] Tool for tag tracking

Thanks mmd and Roland, I was able to test it. Since these new queries extend the type of actions to report, Should there be a an action subtype that reports either tag or geometry only actions ? det_action = [tag_create, tag_modify, tag_delete, geometry_create, geometry_modify,

Re: [Talk-it] Imagery_used = Custom

Il changeset è relativo ad un evento Osm segnalato in lista un paio di giorni fa da Alessandro Palmas. Hanno usato questo task http://osmit-tm.wmflabs.org/project/29 Ciao ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de Catastro

Todo lo contrario Mateu, el programa coge de OSM los nombres de calles más aproximados al que viene en Catastro, luego se revisan a mano dando prioridad a lo que está en OSM. Respecto a los números de portal lo mismo. El trabajo que está hecho se respetará. Mira la propuesta en particular la guía

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] réflexion sur l'ia appliqué aux cartes

Un exemple pratique pour osm https://github.com/geometalab/OSMDeepOD résultat repris par un maproulette qui signale les passages piéton manquant http://maproulette.org/map/1416/1233235 Le taux de réussite est très variable. il aurait peut-être fallu entraîner la reconnaissance plus localement

[Talk-it] Imagery_used = Custom

Buongiorno, Ne sapete qualche cosa di queste mappe citate in questo changeset [1]? Grazie. [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55354965 Andreas Lattmann -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Tool for tag tracking

Wow, that's nice, thanks! Il 12/01/2018 06:31, Roland Olbricht ha scritto: Hi, for the sake of completeness, I would like to give a preview what is in the development for Overpass API: Similar to this one

[Talk-cz] Starva iD editor - chyba

Ahoj, přestalo fungovat ukládání v Strava iD editoru. Dnes už jsem zmařil dva hodinové changesety. Ach jo... Normálním iD funguje jak má, Strava běží normálně ale při uložení hlásí chybu "není internetové připojení" Neměl by někdo typ jak lokálně uložit neuložená data z iD editoru? Případně

Re: [Talk-GB] AGM planning task force

Manchester certainly sounds a good choice. As for venues I would suggest The Manchester Escalator (open working space) on Deansgate, walkable from the stations. I attended a Manchester Open Data Group meeting there, on behalf of OSM, a couple of years ago and think it is a suitable venue with

Re: [Talk-GB] Heads up: Please check recent edits by this user...

Hi, On 01/12/2018 05:08 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > I haven't yet heard what the intention of these edits is. It seems to be > to split waterways at all junctions with other waterways, This is something that any routing engine for a road network must do - and thankfully it is usually done in the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

Bonsoir à tous, Je confirme que l'analyse est vraiment pertinente mais cela va être long d'en voir le bout ! Encore plus de 41 000 points à dégommer et cela prend du temps pour chacun d'eux. Je suis tombé dans ce quartier sur des squares indiqués sur le cadastre :

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

2018-01-12 17:01 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr : > I agree. Right now, messages and comments sent via OSM channels tend to > be written by humans for a specific individual recipient, which gives > them a very good signal-to-noise ratio. Interesting discussion to me because I'm

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

Hi, Am 2018-01-12 um 17:01 schrieb Tobias Knerr: > On 12.01.2018 15:39, Andy Townsend wrote: >> More seriously, any automatic use of OSM messages is problematical >> because it devalues the messages that we want people to actually read - >> the ones that are composed by and sent be a human, and

Re: [Talk-at] Wiener Kurzparkzonen

Diese Fehlermeldung wurde durch die App "Free Parking" ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fr.lcdm.freeparking ) kreiert, bevor man nun einen tag "erfindet" könnte man evt nachfragen wie die das "free parking" auswerten, die App gibt es ja für mehr Städte wie haben andere es gelöst?

Re: [Talk-at] Wiener Kurzparkzonen

-- E-Mails signieren & verschlüsseln · https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/de/ Am 12.01.2018 17:38 schrieb Andreas: Am 2018-01-12 um 16:19 schrieb Stefan Nagy: ... Hier geht es mir jetzt nicht um den konkreten Fehlerbericht, sondern um eine allgemeine Frage: Kann man als Ziel definieren, dass

Re: [OSM-talk] Tool for tag tracking

Am 12.01.2018 um 14:51 schrieb Pierre Béland: > Hi Roland. Great additions again. > > I cannot access https://dev.overpass-api.de/api_new_feat/ to test. > > Hi have the message Forbidden, You don't have permission to access > /api_new_feat/ on this server. > Please disregard any line starting

Re: [Talk-it] Bacheche pubbliche

Il 12/01/2018 13:56, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: Tempo fa si era parlato di quella per i necrologi e, durante la discussione, era uscita anche una possibile definizione generica con la coppia di tag: tourism=information information=board Credo che questo tipo di PDI non sia così marginale.,

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de Catastro

El tema de las denominaciones de las vías públicas me interesa especialmente y lo he trabajado bastante en campo, en gran parte de la isla de Mallorca y en algunas zonas de la península. ¿Supone la importación del catastro que las denominaciones ​tomadas sobre el terreno y contrastadas con el

[OSM-talk-be] upcoming events: Brussels, Hasselt, Louvain-la-Neuve, Arlon, ...

Hi, Of course we hope to see you at Open Belgium, but there's also: - FOSDEM, a huge open source event in Brussels (3/4 Februsary): https://fosdem.org/2018/ - a Road Completion mapping workshop, where we want to work on the thousands of missing roads we found with AIV data. It's

Re: [Talk-at] Wiener Kurzparkzonen

Am 2018-01-12 um 16:19 schrieb Stefan Nagy: > Hallo, > > ich habe gerade einen Fehlerbericht (note) gelesen, bei dem es um eine > Parkmöglichkeit in Wien geht (siehe > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1264962). Wenn ich das richtig > interpretiere, dann geht es hier um das Vorhandensein eines >

Re: [Talk-GB] Heads up: Please check recent edits by this user...

"Improve river network topology"... That would be for water flow modelling. On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:10 Colin Smale, wrote: > User hornbydd2 has been making large numbers of edits to waterways in the > UK which have created loads of problems in relations, including admin >

[Talk-GB] Heads up: Please check recent edits by this user...

User hornbydd2 has been making large numbers of edits to waterways in the UK which have created loads of problems in relations, including admin boundaries. I haven't yet heard what the intention of these edits is. It seems to be to split waterways at all junctions with other waterways, e.g.

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On 12.01.2018 15:39, Andy Townsend wrote: > More seriously, any automatic use of OSM messages is problematical > because it devalues the messages that we want people to actually read - > the ones that are composed by and sent be a human, and have actual > useful information in them I agree. Right

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

I echo Bryan - this is a much needed feature. I started incorporating OSMCha into my review of new users in my area. That I could easily capture "good and bad" edits and post a comment to the user at the same time is nice. When I do come across a bad edit, and it doesn't happen often, I post a

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On 12/01/2018 14:52, Bryan Housel wrote: - “To European eyes the comments look like they were written by a six-year-old” Be nice everyone! Bryan, this is "being nice" in English.  It's a reply that incorporates a certain amount of humour (quotes around sarcasm, link to not-entirely-serious

[Talk-at] Wiener Kurzparkzonen

Hallo, ich habe gerade einen Fehlerbericht (note) gelesen, bei dem es um eine Parkmöglichkeit in Wien geht (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1264962). Wenn ich das richtig interpretiere, dann geht es hier um das Vorhandensein eines Parkstreifens (also der Parkmöglichkeiten auf der

Re: [Talk-it] disused:

...ripresomi dal momentaneo "sconforto" per essere alla fine giunti esattamente al punto dal quale eravamo partiti, mi sono comunque fatto un po' quest'idea: Il mio concetto base è far "sparire" dal rendering soltanto le funzioni e non gli oggetti quindi mi ci ritrovo benissimo ad applicare il

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

Yes, I agree the feature could be improved. Helpful: - "I think it should be more clear that clicking the button will add a changeset comment” - “I think localization could be improved and I’d love to help with this” - “I would like the opportunity to customize the message or see it before it is

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On 12/01/2018 14:07, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi, OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a user marks a changeset as good or bad. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101 I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature. The example

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:07:11 +0100 Michael Reichert wrote: > If third-party tools start to post comments to lots > of changesets automatically In that case that would be clearly wrong. But if I understand > From now on, when we review a changeset in OSMCha, a comment

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On 2018-01-12 15:07, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi, OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a user marks a changeset as good or bad. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101 I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature. We expect to

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

On 1/12/2018 9:13 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in. The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for their changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it. I haven't used this yet because I wanted to add my own

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

Hi, Am 2018-01-12 um 15:13 schrieb Bryan Housel: > I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in. > The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for > their changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it. It should be optional to post a changeset

Re: [Talk-cz] Dlouhé zimní večery.

Řekla bych, že spíš možná obecně návod, jak dostat do mapy body, pokud mám adresy. Z mého pohledu pro uživatele tedy jak jednorázově, avšak dávkově geokódovat, jak si připravit data, a jak to v JOSM projít jednotlivě a zkontrolovat. Pomíjím, že ne všechny zdroje je možné přebrat, ale část bodů

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

reposting an earlier reply, which i mistakenly sent directly just to Michael -- Forwarded message - From: Erwin Olario Date: Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha To: Michael Reichert

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in. The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for their changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it. Thanks Bryan > On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Michael Reichert wrote: > > Hi, >

[OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

Hi, OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a user marks a changeset as good or bad. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101 I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature. We expect to read all mappers incoming message (personal

Re: [OSM-talk] Advertising on OSM

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 06:55:56 +0400 (GMT+04:00) "Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com" wrote: > I can't seem to find anything on the OSM Wiki. Have you checked https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description ? It has "Never use description=* to add advertising

Re: [OSM-talk] Tool for tag tracking

Hi Roland. Great additions again. I cannot access https://dev.overpass-api.de/api_new_feat/ to test. Hi have the message Forbidden, You don't have permission to access /api_new_feat/on this server.   Pierre Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018 00:33:33 HNE, Roland Olbricht

Re: [Talk-cz] Dlouhé zimní večery.

Dne 11.1.2018 v 22:53 Jan Dudík napsal(a): > Určitě by stálo za to (Majka) popsat mapování poštovních schránek. Spise vice rozepsat: https://openstreetmap.cz/poi-importer Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Tool for tag tracking

Wow, Roland, this is awesome! So, this seems to make any deliberations of introducing a survey_date:something tag or similar obsolete, because in the future, one will be able to search with overpass through the history on a per-tag basis. This will make it possible for QA and hm...

[Talk-it] Bacheche pubbliche

Tempo fa si era parlato di quella per i necrologi e, durante la discussione, era uscita anche una possibile definizione generica con la coppia di tag: tourism=information information=board Credo che questo tipo di PDI non sia così marginale., per cui vi chiedo se c'è un'alternativa, visto che le

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] maxspeed:type vs source:maxspeed

On sait pas todo, faut attendre, mais presque sûr aprés décrét y aura dans osm : 1- des highway + maxspeed=90 datant d'avant décret + parfois  FR:rural 2- des highway + maxspeed=90 datant d'apres décret ?? 3- des highway + maxspeed=80 datant d'apres décret ??   pour distinguer 1 et 2 serait

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Interesting use case of combining OSM with proprietary data

On Friday 12 January 2018, Rory McCann wrote: > As near as I can see, the only data they are distributing (publicly) > is the 2 GeoTIFF files in the "map.ox.ac.uk" page. The question is: > Is a GeoTIFF file created like this from OSM data which has been > mixed with other data, a Produced Work, or

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Interesting use case of combining OSM with proprietary data

As near as I can see, the only data they are distributing (publicly) is the 2 GeoTIFF files in the "map.ox.ac.uk" page. The question is: Is a GeoTIFF file created like this from OSM data which has been mixed with other data, a Produced Work, or a Derived Database? In support of "Produced Work",

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Problème IPv6 chez Orange causant des erreurs avec JOSM

Hello, Vu d’ici, l’IPv6 de Londres a été réparé, d’après ma probe atlas depuis le 2018-01-11 05:51:36 UTC, et la panne a durée 6d 23h 6m. https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/11556/#!tab-network Voici des mtr dans les deux sens qui ne marchaient pas durant cette panne :

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] changement possible de maxspeed en france au 1er juillet

Il faudra voir le décret lorsqu'il sera publié... là on est encore au stade "annonce". Le 11 janvier 2018 à 23:38, marc marc a écrit : > Le 11. 01. 18 à 22:53, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > > Quel maxspeed:type pour le type 80 "campagne" et le 90 voies

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Open Belgium

As said, I'll be there. I have submitted a talk about openseamap : « mapping the depth of the Belgian seaside » For this project, I am writing a proposal to get some financial support, eg/ from the communes/gemeenten on the seaside and from the Flemish government. Some help will be welcome for

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Open Belgium

Hi Joost, Hi list, I'll be there! And I plan to submit something about land-use in OSM. It could be a workshop. If someone wants to join in the authors/speakers, let me know! It would be better to have different points of view. There is also the subject of the cooperation between Sentiers