Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

It's probably easier to use the mosaic at https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/763#issuecomment-575933772 On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 14:13, Andrew Harvey wrote: > That's right it only shows up where the imagery covers, it's not a mosaic. > See the index at >

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

That's right it only shows up where the imagery covers, it's not a mosaic. See the index at https://gist.github.com/andrewharvey/57da8ad7f9f425d4c811e6cd33b2fdcb#file-index-geojson click on the polygons and it shows the ID which you can use to find the right URL. I'm still working on making this

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 09:43, Andrew Harvey wrote: > You can take one of the URLs from above, but without the "tms:" at the > start eg. > > https://{switch:a,b,c,d}. >

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

You can take one of the URLs from above, but without the "tms:" at the start eg. https://{switch:a,b,c,d}. tiles.mapbox.com/v4/openstreetmapau.10300100921A2B00/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbnN0cmVldG1hcGF1IiwiYSI6ImNqbWl3bXZ6aDA0MTkzd21xdnV1d2k0azEifQ.HYkMOqH_E2fYd1b0oXRe6w

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

uot; Sent: Sunday, 19 January 2020 8:33 am To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Graeme Fitzpatrick; Andrew Harvey Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery Another good use case for an Australian or Oceania centric task server. Any takers? On 19 January 2020 8:36:03 am AE

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

Another good use case for an Australian or Oceania centric task server. Any takers? On 19 January 2020 8:36:03 am AEDT, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >Load into iD to start with! > >Thanks > >Graeme > > >On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 23:18, Andrew Harvey >wrote: > >> How to load into iD/JOSM or how to

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

Load into iD to start with! Thanks Graeme On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 23:18, Andrew Harvey wrote: > How to load into iD/JOSM or how to make use of it for mapping? > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 08:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > >> Thanks for putting these up Andrew. >> >> The silly question

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

How to load into iD/JOSM or how to make use of it for mapping? On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 08:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Thanks for putting these up Andrew. > > The silly question though is how do we use them? :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ Talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On 18/1/20 7:15 pm, Sebastian S. wrote: I think the discussion regarding damaged is good, however I feel that this is a too fine grained quality for mapping from satellite images. I would use ruined. Ruined can be fully destroyed or partially. Ruined to me would be beyond economic recovery.

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

I think the discussion regarding damaged is good, however I feel that this is a too fine grained quality for mapping from satellite images. I would use ruined. Ruined can be fully destroyed or partially. If damaged my next question would be how much? A little? Very subjective to quantify.

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On 17/1/20 10:08 pm, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 17 Jan 2020, 11:42 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: I'm all for using the lifecycle prefix, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. I agreed that if there's still remains there use ruined or destroyed, not sure what the

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On 17/1/20 9:42 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 19:53, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: I have tagged some buildings that have been fire damaged to a large degree. I have used building=razed however I think this is wrong. I

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

Thanks for putting these up Andrew. The silly question though is how do we use them? :-) Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

17 Jan 2020, 11:42 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: > I'm all for using the lifecycle prefix, > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix> . I agreed that if > there's still remains there use ruined or destroyed, not sure what the > difference is though. > ruined implies that ruins

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 19:53, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have tagged some buildings that have been fire damaged to a large degree. > I have used building=razed however I think this is wrong. > > I think the lifecycle prefix should be used. > > The choices are; > > ruins:* > > or > >

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 20:45, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 06:56, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > > > Maxar have generously donated some satellite imagery of bushfire affected > > areas and they explicitly allow tracing for OSM, > > > > >

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 06:56, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Maxar have generously donated some satellite imagery of bushfire affected > areas and they explicitly allow tracing for OSM, > > https://blog.maxar.com/open-data-program/2020/open-data-response-to-the-australian-wildfires. There's nothing

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

I have tagged some buildings that have been fire damaged to a large degree. I have used building=razed however I think this is wrong. I think the lifecycle prefix should be used. The choices are; ruins:* or destroyed:* Thoughts? I note there is the possibility of partial damage. A new tag

[talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

Maxar have generously donated some satellite imagery of bushfire affected areas and they explicitly allow tracing for OSM, https://blog.maxar.com/open-data-program/2020/open-data-response-to-the-australian-wildfires . So far they haven't released any post event imagery but I'll try to keep an eye