On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
I'm generally not that overly concerned with the rest of the world,
but will be really upset with how this will push Australia backwards,
the ABS data and other datasets recently
2009/12/6 Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com:
Why would we need a fork? No current Australian datasets are CC-BY-SA
(or NC or ND), only CC-BY. ABS data, QLD boundaries and ACT POIs are
Creative Commons - Attribution 2.5 Australia (CC-BY). You can
commercialise and not share the data if
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
There has been a great number of mails on osmf-talk about an upcoming vote on
the database licence.
But no notice on the site or wiki. I suppose it isn't official discussion.
Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
maxi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
There has been a great number of mails on osmf-talk about an upcoming
vote on
the database licence.
But no notice on the site or wiki. I suppose it
On 05/12/2009, at 10:29 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
Certainly we should make this case clear to the OSM community.
Database protection always seemed to be a euro-centric ideal and not
one that the new licence analysis seemed to respond to adequately.
However, I believe that the ODbL
2009/12/5 80n 80n...@gmail.com:
The OSM Foundation can't force anyone to relicense their existing data
For clarity... the OSM Foundation is not some evil group...
The OSMF is open, anyone from the community can join. The OSMF Board
is democratically elected from the OSMF membership.
OSMF Board:
2009/12/5 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the proposed new licence.
It is designed around European law, and gives database protection which is
not a legal concept which is likely to apply here, after the recent High Court
case Nine vs IceTv, when the
On 05/12/2009, at 11:30 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
For clarity... the OSM Foundation is not some evil group...
The OSMF is open, anyone from the community can join. The OSMF Board
is democratically elected from the OSMF membership.
If anyone who isn't a OSMF member wants to read the discussion,
2009/12/5 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Only those who belonged to OSMF in Oct 09 will get a vote. Those who are
'merely' contributors will only get to be asked if they will relicense their
data or not. Only data from people who agree to relicensing will go forward
into the new licence.
I wonder if
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/5 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Only those who belonged to OSMF in Oct 09 will get a vote. Those who are
'merely' contributors will only get to be asked if they will relicense
their data or not. Only data from people who agree to relicensing will go
10 matches
Mail list logo
