On 11/02/17 12:21, Warin wrote:
On 11-Feb-17 11:28 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On 11/02/17 07:00, Warin wrote:
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road
classifications .. tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take into
On 11-Feb-17 11:28 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On 11/02/17 07:00, Warin wrote:
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road classifications
.. tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take into
account the importance to the
On 11/02/17 07:00, Warin wrote:
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road classifications
.. tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take into
account the importance to the community and that is very hard to
determine by
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road classifications ..
tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take into account
the importance to the community and that is very hard to determine by
simply travelling the road.
Where a
Do you mean without seeing them yourself Warren ? I personally think
that you should only correct another mapper's work if you have
personally seen something that needs correction. I am sure there are
some exceptions. But here, in particular, you seem to have "negative"
information.
Its
On 10 February 2017 at 16:33, Warren wrote:
> Do we accept the Main Roads Western Australia data as a list of officially
> recognised Roads ( highway = primary, residential, etc not = track or =
> path)?
>
> I accept the point that highway = unclassified could be
I agree Eon4wd, my interest in OSM originated from my interest in
bushwalking. Often we can make an educated guess of tracktype from an
aerial image and knowledge of the general area. I suggest that if it is
not clear you leave out the tracktype field, this implies unknown.
My point was
Hi Warren,
Tracks are of particular interest to me.
As a 4wder, I plan my travels according to the tracks and the 'grade' of the
track in an area, thus getting them right is important to me.
If highway = Track is used it really needs the additional 'grade' tags
The Aust tagging guidelines is a
Does the Main roads Department show residential roads?
If not then I would also assume that the unclassified roads would not
necessarily be displayed either.
On their website ..
https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/OurRoads/Facts/Pages/StateRoadNetworkMaps.aspx
they say
"In the future, this may
Generally if it's graded I would put highway=unclassified.
- Ben.
On 10 February 2017 at 10:51, Warren wrote:
> I have asked this question before but did not really get a clear answer.
>
> I am working off the Western Australian Main Roads data checking against
>
10 matches
Mail list logo