Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

And the disease is spreading: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Jnd I'm scared. This needs to be mitigated, but indeed, how? Jo On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 1:03 PM Jo wrote: > I went to check a platform tagged as > > highway=platform > > which is perfectly alright. > > iD tells me that's deprecated

Re: [Talk-at] Allgemeine Hilfestellung

Herbert Allmeier schrieb: > Ich muss schon sagen, dass die Mailinglisten von der Übersicht her nicht > wirklich leicht verdaulich sind Zum einen hängt das natürlich daran, dass man sein E-Mail-Programm selbst so konfiguriert wie man es möchte. Dann ist es auch möglich, die Mails der Mailingliste

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

For a very long time I have been trying to adopt the public_transport scheme. After several years of asking it would be rendered on its own without the need for highway=bus_stop tags, I'm giving up on it and came to the conclusion that highway=bus_stop on nodes next to the highway and

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Per tornare all'oggetto del thread io metto "permissive" alle strade che hanno un cartello di "Strada privata" ma senza nessun segnale di divieto o barriere di accesso, tipo questa: https://www.rivalta-trebbia.it/sentiero-nel-bosco-di-croara/. Lo interpreto come proprietà privata, per cui il

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Am Mo., 27. Mai 2019 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Andy Townsend : > Occasionally there are examples of people > accepting suggestions like this without thinking, and what I'd normally > do in such cases is to comment on the changeset concerned and politely > explain why in this particular case the

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 27/05/2019 12:08, Jo wrote: And the disease is spreading: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Jnd I'm scared. This needs to be mitigated, but indeed, how? Suggestions about tag improvements by an editor are not a new thing - JOSM has had them for ages.  Occasionally there are examples of people

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Andrew Hain wrote: > Have a new team of developers code from the codebase of iD. > Write a new online editor from scratch. > Abandon online editing and tell everyone to use an offline editor. Please stop trolling. Richard -- Sent from:

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

I went to check a platform tagged as highway=platform which is perfectly alright. iD tells me that's deprecated and suggests to change it to: public_transport=platform bus=yes Then upon uploading it tells me another "improvement" can be made: highway=footway So they are transposing

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

In case that this is an undesirable wrong tagging one may request JOSM dev to add validator rule fixing this. You may also propose worldwide bot edit reverting such changes. (note, I am not sure whatever either is a good idea, it is one of reasons why I did neither) 27 May 2019, 13:08 by

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 27/05/2019 12:23, Phil Wyatt wrote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dplatform This suggests replacing highway=platform with public_transport=platform Most of the public_transport=* tags are pure duplicates of existing, more popular tags. They add nothing to the OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Hi, On 5/27/19 12:58, Christoph Hormann wrote: >> * Automated Edits code of conduct >> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) >> : You take advantage of mappers unconsciously adding highway=footway >> to platforms. This is an automated edit. > it seems clear to me

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On Monday 27 May 2019, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > > it seems clear to me that any tool that leads mappers to > > unconsciously perform automated edits could and should be blocked > > from write access to the API and accordingly should not be > > available on osm.org. > > I guess that in cases

Re: [OSM-talk-be] join us at State of the Map

Ben and I will be joining too. Met vriendelijke groeten, Pieter Vander Vennet Op vr 24 mei 2019 om 17:39 schreef joost schouppe : > Talking about money: now is the time to buy your tickets: > https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/05/24/sotm-2019-ticket-sales-opened/ > Early bird community

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

I cant see how a new team of developers would help - they would be operating under the same rules (which I suspect are pretty vague) as all the current developers. Who at the moment dictates which editors can be used at osm.org? If they don't like ID, they can get it turned off. If the ID

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On Monday 27 May 2019, Simon Poole wrote: > The problem with this (and the longer thread on tagging), that it has > had exactly 0 effect. > > As I see it we can choose between > > [...] I think this is a too limited view of the options the OSM community has. I in particular see: * a wide range

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dplatform This suggests replacing highway=platform with public_transport=platform Cheers - Phil From: Jo [mailto:winfi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 27 May 2019 9:04 PM To: Richard Fairhurst Cc: OpenStreetMap Subject: Re: [OSM-talk]

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Am Mo., 27. Mai 2019 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Marcello : > Per tornare all'oggetto del thread io metto "permissive" alle strade che > hanno un cartello di "Strada privata" ma senza nessun segnale di divieto o > barriere di accesso, tipo questa: >

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 27/05/2019 16:26, Frederik Ramm wrote: AFAIK many editors for example silently drop "created-by" and didn't hear anyone complain about that. That's a bit different. "created-by" was, err,,, created by the developers of the API/editors. Contributors never added it themselves. It hasn't

[OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

Hi, 1. This is a bridge: no doubt.https://www.google.be/maps/@50.9628551,5.0810297,3a,75y,328.21h,89.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXz43z9vWyUiOpCVTschIUQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=nl 2. This is a tunnel: sure

Re: [Talk-it] Source sentiero

Behsembra un'esempio da manuale che rispecchia tutto cio' che non andrebbe fatto e cioe': 1) mappare da una sorgente cartacea che al di la della precisione potrebbe anche avere dei diritti d'autore che in questo modo non vengono rispettati 2) mappare senza esserci stati 3) usare tag sbagliati

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On Monday 27 May 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > By default iD actively suggests to > - change objects modified by user (like JOSM) > - objects selected by user during editing Wouldn't it be relatively simple to change the default to only touch features modified by the user in the version

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

Cool collection of bridges (except #2). I too think that if its not dug, it's not a tunnel. I have another cool example, not from belgium though: https://www.google.be/maps/@45.5067122,6.6792676,3a,75y,267.08h,77.06t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stJwtCeCLHlLxMPnVB_ZYdw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=nl This view

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

27 May 2019, 17:51 by o...@imagico.de: > actively modifying features the mapper has not touched in > their fundamental semantics. As already hinted i know too little about > how iD works to specifically say something about how it fits in here. > By default iD actively suggests to - change

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On Monday 27 May 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I admit I am not convinced that it addresses the problem. > > I think that problem in in specific validator rule that is clearly > unwanted by general community* and it does not matter when and how it > appears. Yes, i agree for this particular

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

Hoi Stijn, Het kan zijn dat ik iets mis - het is een zware dag geweest op het werk :( - maar volstaat het niet om ter plekke eens te gaan kijken? Let wel, in het kader van mijn eigen specialisme (vliegvelden in de ruime zin van het woord) ben ik zelf vaak genoeg aan het mappen op plaatsen

[Talk-it] Source sentiero

Buongiorno, Il source del seguente sentiero [1] è riferito a: Esino Lario Carta escursionistica sentieri e toponimi - CAI, ANA, Associazione Amici del Museo delle Grigne Onlus E su note: Va controllato il tracciato del sentiero con un gps È lecito il source utilizzato? Un escursionista

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

Hello, I would consider each situation from #3 to #9 here as a bridge. Here’s why. If there had never been a railway, the road would be where it is now, and it is perfectly flat and aligned with the houses nearby (implicitely level=0 and layer=0 in OSM). On the contrary, the embankment is an

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

27 May 2019, 19:38 by o...@imagico.de: > On Monday 27 May 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> >> By default iD actively suggests to >> - change objects modified by user (like JOSM) >> - objects selected by user during editing >> > > Wouldn't it be relatively simple to change the default to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

I think some passages are called a mole pipe, but that makes it not a tunnel. Don't have tunnel vision: All your examples are railroad bridges. A tunnel has mosttimes also a depth: it lies not under, but beneath something and/or crosses several things. Also, sometimes a traffic sign F8 can

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bridge or tunnel?

Hi Stijn and all In my opinion, a tunnel is something that was dug, in a hill or in mountain, under a river, ... Otherwise I would think of a viaduct. In that regard only your case #2 is a tunnel. Just my 2 cents... Pierre Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy. Message

Re: [Talk-at] Allgemeine Hilfestellung

Servus, ja das hast du afaik schon richtig gemacht. Die hier bei solchen Diskussionen gern genannten Vorteile von Mailingliste sind: - Du bekommst jede Nachricht als E-Mail direkt zugestellt - Du kannst das E-Mail Programm deiner Wahl verwenden - Am Handy besser lesbar als das aktuelle Forum

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Am Mo., 27. Mai 2019 um 06:47 Uhr schrieb canfe : > Il segnale divieto di transito è per tutti i veicoli secondo il CdS, quindi > anche bici e carretti. > Volendo mappare 'realmente' come stanno le cose bisognerebbe far capire che > non possono passare i veicoli a combustione interna (nelle

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Am So., 26. Mai 2019 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > in realtà “destination” è più permissivo di residenti, consente l’accesso > a chiunque volesse andare a trovare i residenti e commercianti, include i > visitatori, clienti, fornitori, ecc. > In OSM il tag "access=residents" è poco

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

The problem with this (and the longer thread on tagging), that it has had exactly 0 effect. As I see it we can choose between - doing nothing (seems to be most popular currently) - wage an edit war by reverting any edits that clearly do not correspond to best practices (not good) - put in

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Wiklund Johan wrote: > Adding footway to the platform serves no purpose but to please poorly > built > routing engines. Are there actually any such engines, or is this a post-facto justification? OSRM has routed over platforms since 8 September 2013. Valhalla does - it's multimodal and you

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Also: Have a new team of developers code from the codebase of iD. Write a new online editor from scratch. Abandon online editing and tell everyone to use an offline editor. -- Andrew From: Simon Poole Sent: 27 May 2019 11:07 To: talk@openstreetmap.org;

[talk-cz] Kam hlásit chyby v mapě?

Zdravím, ve svém okolí občas narazím na nepřesnost nebo chybu v mapě, kam a jak nejlépe toto hlásit? Bohužel nemám kapacitu na to nastudovat jak správně editovat a provádět editace sám. Díky. Tonda ___ talk-cz mailing list

Re: [Talk-hr] kuće bez broja

On 27. 05. 2019. 13:02, Michal Fabík wrote: On 26/05/2019 20:16, hbogner wrote: Po zakonu RH kućni broj "BB" više ne postoji. Zakon o prebvalištu: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2012_12_144_3072.html "Adresa u smislu ovoga Zakona je ulica ili trg i kućni broj evidentiran u

Re: [Talk-hr] kuće bez broja

On 26/05/2019 20:16, hbogner wrote: Po zakonu RH kućni broj "BB" više ne postoji. Zakon o prebvalištu: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2012_12_144_3072.html "Adresa u smislu ovoga Zakona je ulica ili trg i kućni broj evidentiran u registru prostornih jedinica što ga vodi nadležno

Re: [Talk-de] Workshop mit gemeinsamem mappen

Hallo, > Das ist eine gute Größe, aber das dürfte für eine Person schwer zu > stemmen sein. Ich bin auch für jede Hilfe und jede helfende Person offen und dankbar :) > Wir haben in Bochum jetzt den 2. Workshop hinter uns und haben dabei > sehr positive Rückmeldungen bekommen. > >

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

po 27. 5. 2019 v 11:06 odesílatel majkaz napsal: > Když funguji už rybářova žena, tak tři přání: > > na mapě, rozdělit typ "chybného rozcestníku" stejně, jako je to u vyfocených, > jen je dát šedivě - třeba jen stejnou ikonu jako na vyfocený objekt, ale > ponechat jen obrysy objektu bez výplně.

[Talk-ko] 나무의 종을 추가하는 데 도움이 될 JOSM 프리셋

저번에 동아시아 나무 프리셋을 제작하고 있는 Goda Maripo님을 언급한 적이 있습니다. 이번에는 본인이 아예 MIT 라이선스로 리포지토리를 배포하기로 결정했더라고요. 그래서 저번에 한국어만 덧붙인 프리셋을 이 참에 공개하려 합니다. JOSM에서 "사전 집합" => "사전 집합 환경 설정" => + 클릭 => https://raw.githubusercontent.com/depth221/preset_generator_for_JOSM/master/presets/test.xml 입력 => 적용 Maripo님은 JOSM 프리셋

Re: [Talk-de] Workshop mit gemeinsamem mappen

Hallo, > Du brauchst pro 3 Teilnehmer einen erfahrenen OSMer, der als _Mentor_ > seinen Schützlingen sattelfest zeigen kann, wo sie im Wiki die Antwort > auf ihre Frage finden, und wie sie den Text zu verstehen und zu > interpretieren haben, und wie man das dann in schlüssige Attribute umsetzt.

[Talk-se] Upphovsrätt på data och polygoner

Hej, Jag uppdaterade gis-filerna på min ftp. Det finns i en mapp SÖVD (kustvattenförekomster för södra Östersjöns vattendistrikt), bara gränspolygoner utan öar. Befintliga öar i OSM och i SMHI:s data har olika noggrannhet och skapar ett problem . Det är tidsödande att editera samtliga objekt.

Re: [talk-cz] Kam hlásit chyby v mapě?

Ahoj Tondo, nejideálnějším způsobem je poskytnout co nejvíce informací skrz Notes - česky poznámky ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Pozn%C3%A1mky ). Pokud v poznámce bude i odkaz na fotku potvrzující skutečnost, bude to skvělé. po 27. 5. 2019 v 13:41 odesílatel Tonda napsal: > Zdravím,

Re: [OSM-ja] Feature Proposal - Voting - 投票-改定提案 Japan tagging/Road types Implies and Useful combination

hayashiです 投票中の[改定提案 Proposed_Japan_tagging/Road_types]ですが、延長２週間のところ反対意見がないようなので明日、提案の内容でJapannTaggingの更新を行う予定です。 Warin61 さんから下記のようなコメントを頂いています。 「I *have comments* but abstain from voting on this proposal. In the last table for the tag 'path'

[Talk-ko] 주간OSM #459 미번역에 대해

미숙한 번역에도 주간OSM을 항상 보아 주시는 분들께 감사드립니다. 현재 #459와 #461의 한국어판이 아직 없습니다. #461은 방금 번역을 끝냈으니까 내일쯤이면 사이트에 올라올 것 같습니다. 그러나 #459는 앞으로도 번역하기 힘들 것 같습니다. 고로 미번역본이지만 번역한 부분까지만 여기에 올려 둡니다. 올해 수능을 보다 보니까 주간OSM 번역할 시간만 겨우 남게 되었네요. 여러 번 지각한 것에 대해 다시 한번 사과드립니다. 지도 제작 - 처음에 n76이 camp_site=camp_pitch

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ID suite

Il a très bien compris, et ce n'est pas de l'humour. C'est une autocomplétion bête et méchante parce qu'en faire une intelligente ça doit être autrement plus compliqué. Il ne faut pas y voir du mal. Le lun. 27 mai 2019 à 11:34, a écrit : > Value autocomplete wrong behavior >

Re: [Talk-pe] Peru Earthquake

Perfecto! Gra ias Omar y gracias Theo! El 27 de mayo de 2019 10:57:30 a. m. PET, Omar Vega Ramos escribió: >El 2019-05-26 11:30, Theo A escribió: >> Hola >> ¿Nos preguntábamos cómo se está viendo la situación en el suelo de >Perú? >> ¿Sería de uso una activación HOT en cualquier ubicación

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ID suite

version courte : corrigeons les erreurs pour éviter que taginfo les poussent en avant :) espérons qu'un jour qlq fasse un fork/PR non problématique d'iD améliorons la qualité du wiki version longue : Je trouve que c'est important de comprendre les différents problèmes qui mènent au fiasco actuel

[Talk-ca] Batiments - Fonctions orthogonales

J'ai progressé dans le développement des fonctions pour orthogonaliser les bâtiments.  Ce n'est qu'une version préliminaire, incomplète, mais pour ceux intéresés par ces développements, il y a déja sufffisamment de fonctions de disponibles pour voir la progression et les défis que cela

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 16:00, Tom Ka wrote: > ted jsou 3 typy ikon podle druhu problemu, ale tohle muze byt uchovano > v barve ikony, jestli to mas nejak vyzkousene, posles mi bud ukzkovy > GPX nebo staci ty casti: > > XXX > Tohle vyjelo exportem z Locusu: information : "informace" - u mě

[Talk-it-lazio] First You Make the Maps

un articolo sulla storia delle mappe di navigazione: https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/trade-maps/index.html sent from a phone ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-pe] Peru Earthquake

El 2019-05-27 11:39, theo.andra...@gmail.com escribió: > Sí, creamos esos. ¿Hay otras áreas que crees que serían buenas para mapear? > > Gracias! > Theo > Sent from my iPhone > > > Sent from my iPhone >> On 27 May 2019, at 17:16, Johnattan Rupire wrote: >> >> Perfecto! Gra ias Omar y gracias

Re: [talk-cz] Kam hlásit chyby v mapě?

On 27. 05. 19 13:40, Tonda wrote: > Zdravím, > > ve svém okolí občas narazím na nepřesnost nebo chybu v mapě, kam a jak > nejlépe toto hlásit? Bohužel nemám kapacitu na to nastudovat jak > správně editovat a provádět editace sám. > > Díky. > > Tonda Ahoj, hodně záleží na tom, jakého typu jsou ty

[Talk-cu] name=WIFI_ETECSA

Hola, Lo siento, pero voy a escribir en inglés. I see many object like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4975076826 internet_access = wlan name = WIFI_ETECSA name:es = wifi etecsa shop = mobile_phone I think many are miss tagged. Unless I'm wrong, there are not always shop but only

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ID suite

Le 27/05/2019 à 16:32, Florimond Berthoux - florimond.berth...@gmail.com a écrit : C'est une autocomplétion bête et méchante parce qu'en faire une intelligente ça doit être autrement plus compliqué. Pas si compliqué, comme je le proposais et comme le propose Marc il "suffit" de virer les

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2019-05-25

These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@

Re: [Talk-pe] Peru Earthquake

Sí, creamos esos. ¿Hay otras áreas que crees que serían buenas para mapear? Gracias! Theo Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone > On 27 May 2019, at 17:16, Johnattan Rupire wrote: > > Perfecto! Gra ias Omar y gracias Theo! > > El 27 de mayo de 2019 10:57:30 a. m. PET, Omar Vega Ramos >

[talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

Are "Caltex" and "Caltex Woolworths" identical in some parts of Australia? I'm asking because I'm matching a few brands of local chains on OSM, and notice that Caltex entries default to Woolworths Petrol. The NSI info seems to have both using "brand=Caltex" but the Woolworths ones take priority

Re: [talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

Strictly speaking, I don't think that's true. Some Caltex operated sites still branded as Woolworths Caltex, and offered the Woolworths facilities. You couldn't tell just by looking who owned what. Of course, now Woolworths has sold all its fuel outlets, and doesn't operate as a fuel retailer

Re: [Talk-ca] Batiments - Fonctions orthogonales

Voici des tests supplémentaires qui couvrent la zone proposée par Daniel source https://github.com/jfd553/OrthogonalizingBuildingFootprint Les fichiers geojson suivants sont disponibleshttps://github.com/pierzen/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/sql/test/geojson/oq_on_toronto_jarek_s2a_building.geojson

Re: [talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:55 PM Charles Gregory wrote: > Are "Caltex" and "Caltex Woolworths" identical in some parts of Australia? > > "What is the difference between [the 535] Woolworths Caltex and [the 680] Caltex locations? Woolworths Caltex is a Woolworths owned fuel location, that sells

Re: [Talk-de] Workshop mit gemeinsamem mappen

Am 27.05.19 um 03:17 schrieb Hauke Stieler: Moin Jörn, danke für deine Ausführungen, so wie ich das sehe trifft der Link zum "Organized Editing" eher für größere Veranstaltungen zu? Ich erwarte fünf, maximal zehn Personen von denen eventuell nicht alle großartig mit machen. Das ist eine gute

Re: [talk-cz] ropiky - odkazy

Dneska to udělám hromadným editem přes ten svůj importní účet. Pro toho, kdo si hlídá sady změn v okolí, vyskočí mu to ve společném changesetu přes celou ČR, nebudu to dělit... Nazvu to "Změna URL řopíky", případně s poř. číslem...   Majka

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro del 27/05/2019.

Io proverò ad esserci Il 24 Maggio 2019 10:05:48 CEST, Mario Santanche ha scritto: >Io mi scuso se sono sparito dall'ultimo incontro. >Purtroppo, come vi dicevo, siamo in pieno piano di riorganizzazione >delle >biblioteche e ci saranno a breve parecchi accorpamenti amministrativi, >per >questo

Re: [talk-cz] ropiky - odkazy

Hotovo, ve dvou sadách změn - jedno pro body, druhé pro cesty.   Jen tak mimo - když jsem hledala, jak je to zmapované, vyskočilo na mě v Hlučíně (Darkovičkách) tohle . Nemůže na to někdo kouknout, a zmapovat to

[talk-cz] Is name=Automat na jizdenky MHD a good tagging?

There is group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV ) tagged * amenity=vending_machine * name=Automat na jizdenky MHD * operator=DPMB * payment:coins=yes * vending=public_transport_tickets Is it a good idea to use name tag in this way? It

Re: [talk-cz] proč se zobrazuje ikona chybějícího rozcetníku

Byl jsi moc rychly, prepocitavani se deje kazdou hodinu cca v case XX:10-XX:20. Bye ne 26. 5. 2019 v 18:59 odesílatel Zdeněk Pražák napsal: > > Nahrál jsem několik fotek rozcestníků a všiml jsem si, že se na > openstretmap.cz zobrazuje ikona chybějícího rozcestníku i v případech, kdy > fotka

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

Když funguji už rybářova žena, tak tři přání:   na mapě, rozdělit typ "chybného rozcestníku" stejně, jako je to u vyfocených, jen je dát šedivě - třeba jen stejnou ikonu jako na vyfocený objekt, ale ponechat jen obrysy objektu bez výplně. Tj. na information:board, information:map nedávat ikonou

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

ne 26. 5. 2019 v 11:06 odesílatel majka napsal: > Co používáš za program v mobilu? > Taky jsem s tím teď bojovala, a taky to považuji za nešikovné, už jen tím, že > narostla velikost souboru víc jak na dvojnásobek. > > Osobně bych to rozdělila podle druhu: > - rozcestník > - mapa > - ostatní

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] éditeur ID

Value autocomplete wrong behavior Tag autocomplete wrong behavior Encore deux exemples ci-dessus : je signale que l'autocomplétion tant des clés que des valeurs fait un peu n'importe quoi,

[OSM-talk-fr] ID suite

Value autocomplete wrong behavior Tag autocomplete wrong behavior Je ne trouve plus le fil de discussion où je parlais des problèmes d'ID. Deux exemples ci-dessus : je signale que

Re: [Talk-hr] OSM meetup 2019-05-21

Nastavak ## hbogner - za TMS čekam da prođe sljedeći pull request: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/663 - dodajem jedan po jedan sloj na tu listu, za sad sve što je objavljeno na tms serveru - objaviti na osm-hr.org ostale novosti ## task manager - ima interesa za taskove -