c_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thomas Bertels <tbert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer
> and wine as well as simple food"
> So should it be tagged as
> - amenity=restaurant cuisine=brasserie (empha
Reposting my message from tagging:
Based on https://www.lemoniteur.be/documentation/horeca-135.html it
seems that a brasserie is a café that serves simple food, and hence
the manager doesn't need to be a professional cook:
_Café_
Vous ne devez pas avoir un accès à la profession Restaurateurs
Le 31/05/2017 à 00:39, André Pirard a écrit :
What is the need to contact all those people after a SPW lawyer made
the situation clear?
To get an explicit authorization, like I said.
Following that, I've been on the phone with him and he told me that,
like many already know, we can use the
Le 31/05/2017 à 08:04, joost schouppe a écrit :
HI Thomas,
Thank you for taking this effort. For some it is extremely clear that
we can use SPW datasets, for others it is extremely clear we can not.
If the SPW are willing to officialise this, than we can step beyond
the doubt and the
Le 1/06/2017 à 11:18, joost schouppe a écrit :
Yep, you can. Spacebar+mouseclick. But there is no Imagery Offset
Database [1] plugin for either iD or Potlatch, so in that way JOSM can
be superior in some situations.
Both iD and Potlatch are fed through the OSM Editor Imagery index [2];
JOSM
/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016> (in
Brussels) and FOSDEM. So the meeting(s) don't need to take place in Namur.
Is anyone interested to be that person?
Hopefully, those licensing issues should be soon a thing of the past.
Thomas Bertels
___
Le 30/05/2017 à 18:43, Thomas Bertels a écrit :
He would like to have someone to talk to on behalf of the Belgian (or
at least Walloon) OSM community, to discuss further about the terms
and potential future cooperation with OSM.
That person would be a link with the OSM community and would
