On 20/09/2016 10:38, Derick Rethans wrote:
If the items no longer function as how they are described, and not will
come back, I would delete them right away.
I disagree. Any feature in the landscape should remain mapped until it
has actually disappeared. In the mean time, the 'disused:'
OK, thanks for your help on this. I’ve ended up with a combination that seemed
most sensible:
- the two car parks I have tagged with removed:amenity and removed:parking,
because they are gone.
- Norman Street (and the gyratory roads around the car parks) I have tagged
with access=no, but not
On 20/09/16 at 11:28am, Donald wrote:
>If a building or road is removed, and nothing has replaced it, then i
>think it is good to have some sort of lifestyle prefix like
>demolished:building or removed:road, especially as they are usually still
>visible from aerial images.
>
>
2016-09-20 10:38 GMT+01:00 Derick Rethans :
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
>
>> There are some major redevelopment works just starting in central
>> Lincoln. The old bus station has closed, and a number of streets and
>> car parks between it and the rail
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
> There are some major redevelopment works just starting in central
> Lincoln. The old bus station has closed, and a number of streets and
> car parks between it and the rail station are now shut for the
> construction of the new transport hub. In
5 matches
Mail list logo