Hi Neil,
Thanks, I didn't realise there was such a delay on areas.
Tom
web: http://tomchance.org
twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP
On 28 April 2016 at 08:33, Neil Pilgrim
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> My guess would be
Hi Tom,
My guess would be that since this wad was added very recently, then the
corresponding 'area', which is updated less frequently (only within
overpass) does not generate results for you. You can see this if you
comment out certain parts of your last query:
- the line showing the relation
Okay, another one with a problem.
Using the exact same query for this ward relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6173643
Returns an empty dataset:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWi
If I run the equivalent query suggesting by Neil, it downloads some of ways
that are near to the boundary,
Thanks Neil,
I think I'll just have to go with that solution and then delete the ways I
don't want.
Tom
web: http://tomchance.org
twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP
On 23 April 2016 at 16:42, Neil Pilgrim
wrote:
I've had a play with this since I've been working with overpass turbo a bit
recently; the best I've come up with so far is something like this:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPR (wy over-commented ;))
As you'll see, this does include these roads, but does also include roads
leaving the area.
If
Unsure if it's the reason but Church Road doesn't share all the nodes.
At the junction of Stoney Lane it's inside the boundary.
I wouldn't lay multiple ways on top of each other as in Landsdowne
Place. The main point of relations was to allow entities such as
boundaries to be tagged into ways
Hi all,
It has been a very long time since I last posted here!
I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the
bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone spot
the problem in the data?
Here's the example I'm working with:
7 matches
Mail list logo