Anyone going to Halesowen on Thursday evening?
Miked29
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
You mean Harborne I hope Mike ;-)
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Mike Duffy [mailto:mdbg02...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 05 July 2011 11:10 PM
To: talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Thursday meet
Anyone going to Halesowen on Thursday evening?
On 4 July 2011 14:05, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
On 04/07/2011 12:48, Donald Noble wrote:
Sorry if this has been covered before, but I was just wondering what
the copyright position is with checking details of, say a church or a
shop, on their website and then adding those
Tom Chance wrote:
So I suspect it's potentially breaching copyright, and a matter of
judgement as to whether it's worth the risk. For example, if you
were copying in data from a commercial web site whose business
model was based around that data (like a listing of pubs) you
might get
On 04/07/11 18:36, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
So presumably we also need
confirmation from Ordnance Survey that they're happy for their content
to be distributed under DbCL (or at least under the ODbL+DbCL
combination).
No, because they've agreed that licensing their data under ODbL is not
Fantastic news - thanks to the License Working Group for their efforts on
this.
I've added a new answer to the
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5792/can-i-accept-the-new-contributor-terms-if-ive-contributed-data-from-ordnance-survey-opendata
/Can I accept the new Contributor Terms if I've
Michael Collinson mike@... writes:
Ordnance Survey has explicitly considered any licensing conflict between
their license and ODbL and has no objections to geodata derived in part
from OS OpenData being released under the Open Database License 1.0.
As I understand it the objection was not so
My rule of thumb is that getting facts from an individual website for a cafe
or shop or church is fine, but do not copy from online directories or the
databases maintained by search engines. If adding details from a website I will
usually note it in the 'source' or 'uri' tags, or in the changeset
David Earl wrote:
Even then, to infringe database copyright under UK law you would have to
copy a substantial part of the database. Checking or obtaining a few
names against such a list isn't database copyright infringement
Oh, absolutely. The thing I've always been anxious about, though, is
On 05/07/2011 11:26, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Even then, to infringe database copyright under UK law you would have to
copy a substantial part of the database. Checking or obtaining a few
names against such a list isn't database copyright infringement
Oh, absolutely. The
- Original Message -
From: Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK
Michael Collinson mike@... writes:
Ordnance Survey has explicitly considered any licensing conflict between
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
To take a different example, the Royal Mail (still) claims database
copyright over the PAF (postcode address file) database. Would crowd
sourcing the address vs postcode data by each individual putting in their
own
On 05/07/2011 12:28, Nick Austin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
To take a different example, the Royal Mail (still) claims database
copyright over the PAF (postcode address file) database. Would crowd
sourcing the address vs postcode data
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
Following my correspondence and a follow-up informal meeting by Henk Hoff,
I am now pleased to announce that the licensing group of the Ordnance Survey
has explicitly considered any licensing conflict between their
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
So presumably we also need confirmation from Ordnance
Survey that they're happy for their content to be
distributed under DbCL (or at least under the ODbL+DbCL
combination).
I think that's a red herring, isn't it? ODbL imposes additional requirements
over and
On 5 July 2011 13:14, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I think that's a red herring, isn't it? ODbL imposes additional requirements
over and above DbCL. OSM is not distributing OS OpenData under DbCL alone,
nor does it permit anyone else to do so (subject to the usual 'Substantial'
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
In the context of OSM, the fact that the contents will be under
DbCL will enable users to make use insubstantial extracts
without having to provide any attribution or share-alike or anything
else.
Again, as I said, insubstantial is statute law - both the EU
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
So presumably we also need confirmation from Ordnance
Survey that they're happy for their content to be
distributed under DbCL (or at least under the ODbL+DbCL
combination).
I
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
So if I understand what you're saying correctly, because there
are already provisions in UK law (and possibly elsewhere) that
allow you to make use of insubstantial parts of a work in any
way you want without infringing any copyright or database rights,
we
Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net] wrote:
Sent: 04 July 2011 2:03 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK
Mike Collinson wrote:
I would like to thank the Ordnance Survey for their kind consideration
and the speed in which they were able to
20 matches
Mail list logo
