On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote:
So my understanding is that OSM normally only maps what’s actually on
the ground rather than what might be shown on a map (and there was
some discussion recently about this -
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/msg19303.html)
This
On 8/13/2020 3:41 PM, Simon Still wrote:
Width of cycleyway is definitely useful if separated from traffic but
some way of reflecting the comfort of the riding experience on marked
routes would be a big step forward. Traffic Volumes,. Lane widths,
traffic speed all contribute (as does
I am using the UPRN data in QGIS and checking each manually on
https://osg.scot/portal/ (e.g. UPRN: 137090388). That of course does not
identify if it is historic and what it is assigned to (the UPRN open
data is a point not polygon)
On 13/08/2020 15:52, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 13/08/2020
On 13/08/2020 15:30, Nick wrote:
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish. UPRNs
that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so if we
could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs, it would
help users identify relevant ones
How are you
> On 13 Aug 2020, at 11:41, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 14:49, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> ... However, note that the "removed"
> sections mostly won't be reflected on the ground yet. Also, the
> dataset isn't perfect, as there's at least one bit near me
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish. UPRNs
that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so if we
could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs, it would
help users identify relevant ones
On 13/08/2020 14:08, Nick wrote:
Lester makes a
On 13/08/2020 13:34, I wrote:
The TOIDs in those datasets can then be cross-referenced against OS
OpenNames to give the OS name for the linked USRNs. Although this isn't,
always, the same as the official USRN name of the street, which can be
confusing. But that's because OS (like OSM) maps
Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is
not adopted)
On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it
On 13/08/2020 11:25, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 16:56, SK53 wrote:
OpenRoads from the Ordnance Survey contains a field containing the toid for the
street name. I wonder if we should include these alongside usrn & uprn. They
may be more useful than either for
These toids are for the name rather than the physical street - I'm not
interested in toids in general. It is their potential utility in
disambiguating streets which I'm interested in (although as the Derby Road
case I cited is one I'm particularly interested in - it splits multiple
times, has dual
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 14:49, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Sustrans' own website mapping has just been updated to take account of this,
> which you can see at https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ncn . The dashed
> lines are reclassified, while some sections have been removed entirely.
>
> It's
On 2020-08-13 12:25, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 16:56, SK53 wrote:
>
>> OpenRoads from the Ordnance Survey contains a field containing the toid for
>> the street name. I wonder if we should include these alongside usrn & uprn.
>> They may be more useful than
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 16:56, SK53 wrote:
> OpenRoads from the Ordnance Survey contains a field containing the toid for
> the street name. I wonder if we should include these alongside usrn & uprn.
> They may be more useful than either for gathering complex roads which share a
> name.
I'd
On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it immediately
accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to roads, but have
much to learn about them. I've added them to a couple of others at
Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields so
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it immediately
accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to roads, but have much
to learn about them. I've added them to a couple of others at Cinderhill
which is housing built on open fields so no historical properties there.
15 matches
Mail list logo
