On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nicholas Barnesn...@thebarnesfamily.eu wrote:
Surely it's perfectly obvious that if a road goes underneath another
road, there must be a bridge involved.
Or a tunnel.
Nick.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Peter Reedpeter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote:
What do you think – should I be ignoring “motoway_link” in the totals,
counting it as something else (and if so what?), do we just put this down to
the way DfT count the numbers, or is it just coincidence that the
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:43 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Robert Scott wrote:
Perhaps it would be good to downplay Haiti, as it could give her a handle to
say 'Of course projects like that are great for situations like Haiti but
when it comes to real
Try searching for Blackbushe Airport
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, David Ellams
osmli...@dellams.fastmail.fm wrote:
Nevertheless, my favourite OS FAIL remains the PRoW through a vat of
sewage on the Landranger (courtesy of Bing):
http://bit.ly/bHhDwW
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Ainsworth wrote:
When I reported some errors recently I contacted
customerservi...@ordnancesurvey.co.uk
mailto:customerservi...@ordnancesurvey.co.uk. They passed it onto
someone and then I received a reply
This users entire contribution to OSM is just 6 changsets spread over
25 minutes:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mem0709/edits
It's most likely a beginner still learning how to edit. I'd not
hesitate to revert everything that is even remotely suspect.
Nick.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:57 AM,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
To take a different example, the Royal Mail (still) claims database
copyright over the PAF (postcode address file) database. Would crowd
sourcing the address vs postcode data by each individual putting in their
own
I've not seen this before on Bing Images but it was bound to happen
sooner or later:
http://binged.it/xjBXPn
Nick.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Norris .
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nick%20Austin/edits
I note the above user has been very busy with remapping efforts in Hampshire
(with a healthy dose of odbl=clean tags too).
*waves*
I'm mainly doing roads, currently in and around
I suppose it's too late to propose an odbl=extend tag, which would
indicate that the way is no longer allowed to be modified after 1st
April but that the way will remain on the slippy map for the next 6
months to allow re-mappers to replace the way?
Nick.
I reckon It's the inclusion of the A1(M) relation (103623)
I've remove it from one of the carriageways and it seems to render properly now.
You just need to identify what it is about that relation that is
overriding the tunnel tag..
Nick.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Oliver O'Brien
Ollie,
I've removed highway=motorway from inside relation 103623. This
appears to fix the problem but I've no idea why.
Nick.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Nick Austin nick.w.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
I reckon It's the inclusion of the A1(M) relation (103623)
I've remove it from one
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy
sources?
If the way was created by a declining contributor then
Does anyone know what happened to the Somerset Levels super-relation?
I don't know how to search for deleted stuff so I can't look up it's
history to see what happened.
TIA.
Nick.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
