We as a UK community, certainly from the countryside mapping point of
view tend to be walkers and cyclists. We see a track, we know its a
track because the tagging language of OSM is after all our native
language.
Take for example
http://trigpoint.myzen.co.uk/photodump/20201212_150029.jpg
This
Firstly, before worrying about mapping is to report the illegal obsruction,
i.e. the locked gate to the highway authority so that action can be taken to
get the problem resolved.
In my experience they like a photo of the problem.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Tuesday, 8 December 2020, Mark Lee via
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 08:36 +, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
> I am pretty sure that I remember checking bridges in my area some
> time ago, using a tool that someone kindly provided, which flagged up
> all bridges, where the clearance height was not specified in OSM.
>
> I regret that I
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 23:54 +, Neil Matthews wrote:
> https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/network-rail-reveals-most-bashed-bridge-in-britain-09-11-2020/
>
> Saw this and thought it might suit a small virtual project - to
> check/add bridge heights from mapillary images or similar might
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 08:32 +, Edward Bainton wrote:
> Hi all
> I've been reading the wiki here on conditional restrictions.
>
> Should these be along the whole length of the relevant road, or can
> they be on a fragment of way near the restriction sign?
>
> Eg, the whole of Stanwick,
On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 11:31 +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 10/11/2020 10:55, Jon Pennycook wrote:
> > Returning to this subject, but not necessarily at roundabouts -
> > turn
> > restrictions are still being added even where they don't exist
> > (apparently) - e.g.
> >
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 12:10 +0100, Ben Proctor wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has chipped in on this thread so far.
>
> I'd like to draw out what I see as the key threads of the discussion
> so far:
> The use of :cy and :en name tags should be encouraged. It allows more
> flexibility in
On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 14:28 +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> On 16/10/2020 14:08, Gruff Owen wrote:
> > With that in mind, and admittedly polemicising the debate a little.
> > If
> > we accept the premise that the native language of Wales is Welsh
> > and
> > that OSM is a community mapping project
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 18:36 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 2020-10-03 18:16, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
> > On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
> >
> >
> > > They are intended to stop this type of routing
> > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/direct
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 16:50 +0100, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
> On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:
>
> > There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions ,
> > either
> > no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to
> > prevent turning back into the
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 14:05 +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi
>
> There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions ,
> either no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts
> to prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no
> explicit signed
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 10:10 +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> On 28/09/2020 10:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> > Remember: OSM is not an IT project.
>
> Indeed not. But this is also a good example of the truism that OSM
> is
> not a map, it's a database. Having the right data in the database
>
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 16:28 +0100, Rodrigo Díez Villamuera wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, I would like to introduce myself on this email list and
> to thank you all for your contributions to OSM. Great work!
>
> After some time using OSM as a user, I decided to make my first step
> as a
On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 10:15 +0100, Corentin Furet wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> I am new in London (and in the UK in general) and I started mapping
> around me. I have some questions about local habit of mapping.
>
Welcome to the UK.
This list is very quiet, your messgaes will be seen by far
On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 22:02 +0100, Inan Hira via Talk-gb-london wrote:
>
> Along with an in person survey, borough websites/maps could be a good
> reference. Also check Royal Mail's postcode finder [3] to see if
> you're
> missing any building numbers or names.
>
> [3]:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.62023=-3.07049#map=18/52.62023/-3.07049
Phil
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 22:51 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> I've identified the postcode, SY21 8JY, and found a list of
> properties
> which share it:
>
>http://www.mycounciltax.org.uk/results?postcode=sy218jy
Possible at some point, a bridleway passes it.
Phil
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 22:51 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> I've identified the postcode, SY21 8JY, and found a list of
> properties
> which share it:
>
>http://www.mycounciltax.org.uk/results?postcode=sy218jy
>
> It's very close to
I must admit that I have never thought of mapping one, we tend to just
use them to confirm the legal status of a right of way in much the same
as we map speedlimits, not the signs.
Probably map them as man_made:signpost or something similar.
They are a very common everyday object so would not
On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 11:51 +0100, Nick wrote:
> That would be great, bearing in mind access rights differ (e.g.
> Scotland
> and England).
Not just England, Wales too.
Phil (trigpoint)
>
> A really interesting point regarding temporary land-use (forestry,
> farming etc.) restrictions -
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 11:54 +, Andrew Hain wrote:
> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning
> for highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset
> in Potlatch 1.
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
>
>
>
>
> I
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 18:25 +0100, Tony OSM wrote:
> Reported in Local Newspapers
> https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/long-awaited-20m-road-linking-18495724
>
> the road has opened.
>
> Can anyone point me to a definitive line to allow me to map it, or
> does
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>
> Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net:
> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> > > You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the
> > > work I’m doing to look at getting
Hi MateuszYou would need to venture deep into the rural UK to start
finding these signs, they are quite common around here.An example here
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Hys6QlJfrRC9fNHsPzeTTQ
This one is just narrow, with few ad-hoc passing places, places to
squeeze to allow another car to pass
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:35 +0100, SK53 wrote:
> Its quite possible that this just cannot be done. I believe
> Leicestershire, and consequently Rutland as well, does not use any
> reference to tehe parish in the identifiers used in official
> documents. Instead all paths consist if a letter
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 20:50 +0200, BD wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I was looking at the discussion about PRoW and how to request the
> information from local council. I wonder if there is a comprehensive
> list/central location where we have stored information regarding
> which council has been
On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 12:44 +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How is it suggested to tag "there are commonwealth war graves here"?
>
> At least near me, there's usually a fairly large white on green sign
> near the entrance, so even if it's not something you'd explicitly go
> out
> to
On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 18:11 +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
> If there is anyone who keeps a weather eye on South-West London, in
> particular the Twickenham area, would they like to cast their eye
> over the changesets of a brand-new user "tommyf5"? He has been busy
> today making many changes that I
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 19:09 +, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> People are beginning to get more used to doing that, though. A lot
> of
> coffee shop chains offer a discount for people bringing a re-usable
> cup.
> Waitrose gives customers free coffee if they have a re-usable cup.
> So
> the
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 18:59 +0100, European Water Project wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I respect your opinion about the fit for the Quarterly Project. I
> don't know enough about the project criteria to have an opinion -
> even if I am passionate on the subject.
I do understand you passion on the subject,
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 12:17 +0100, European Water Project wrote:
> Dear Jez,
> Gus Hoyt who was responsible at Refill UK (before being made
> redundant), for all partnerships was a vocal proponent of
> collaboration and open data.
>
> Unfortunately, the Refill board has consistently voted to
The West Midlands showgroung is tagged as amenity=showground.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Monday, 24 February 2020, SK53 wrote:
> I asked similar questions about 6 months ago:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-September/023452.html
> ,
> and there are other discussions going back
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:47 +, SK53 wrote:
> There's one fairly close to me (or at least their sign is still
> there, I've not recently verified that they still exist). We used
> shop=coal (but see below), which is not far off the more generic
> shop=fuel.
>
> It's over 20 years ago since I
On Sunday, 2 February 2020, Andy Robinson wrote:
> Solid fuel; as in a coal merchants. Yes, still a few of those around,
> probably many of them in some countries.
>
> amenity=fuel / fuel=solid perhaps but that will receive a petrol pump on the
> map for your efforts.
>
>
In GB halt has been used to indicate request stops.
That is the how they are described by train staff, as opposed to Principal
Stations where the train always stops.
You will find lots of halts on the Cambrian, Heart of Wales and three on the
Shrewsbury Crew Railway.
Typical announcement
On Wednesday, 29 January 2020, Neil Matthews wrote:
> See edits by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jackgeo123
>
Hi Neil
It certainly looks like vandalism and needs to be reverted.
However one issue I did spot was there previously,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1783525689 is unlikely to
On Friday, 17 January 2020, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Just FYI, I've started off 2020 with a bang by doing 2 OSMUK presentations
> in the first 2 weeks. Firstly to #geomob in London about the FHRS Project +
> OSMUK progress. Secondly to the Shrewsbury Geospatial Forum as an intro to
> OSM and its
This does remind me of seeing a similar map at SOTM Scotland a few years ago
showing roads named street which should show mostly urban areas.
Unfortunately there was, and still is an issue with Watling Street, a very
prolific armchair mapper has added the name to any part of the A5/Watling
Thank you Andy, have commented, waiting to see if they respond.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Sunday, 5 January 2020, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 05/01/2020 21:33, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > I have just come across an armchair edit using Facebook AI data.
> >
> > They do seem to
I have just come across an armchair edit using Facebook AI data.
They do seem to have failed to check that detections are accurate, or
lack experience to identify common Midlands farmland features. They
have mapped several hedges as tracks.
Something I think we need to watch out for, this tech is
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 15:02 +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Thanks Jerry.
>
> I'd also subsequently discovered the data dump but had not yet got
> around to looking at it. What are you using here to view and work
> with the data? Is QGIS and 6GB RAM sufficient?
>
> I would be interested in
I had mapped, but forgotten to add the operator to the Inpost locker at
Morrisions. The only thing I have ever collected from Inpost are my two
interrail passes for SOTM Milan and SOTM Heidelberg.
Maybe a Morrions without such lockers mapped is a survey opportunity?
Phil (trigpoint)
On Wed,
They are certainly not post boxes, I have used amenity=vending_machine,
vending=parcel_pickup which is a combination that probably came from
asking on #osm.
For example my local one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5978482863
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Pna indicates the taging has a fair
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 12:50 +, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:44, Andy Mabbett > wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 11:59, Philip Barnes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am hoping to add Tapi Carpets to the name suggestion index,
> > > howeve
I am hoping to add Tapi Carpets to the name suggestion index, however it
doesn't have a wikidata tag. Searches lead to Allied Carpets.
Is anyone able to create a wikidata tag, or fix the issue?
Thanks
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Sailfish device
Thank you guys.
Thinking about it, at that time when all that was entered into the till
was the price separate tills would have made accounting for each
department easier.
Now with barcodes it is a simple piece of software.
Phil (trigpoint)
___
As Stuart said, last time I went in one it was interior decoration and didn't
sell clothes so probably one which needs a survey for each individual shop.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Friday, 20 December 2019, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> You could generalise if the majority of stores fit the standard
A simple question, but probably a complex answer.
Growing up a department store was divided up into a series of
departments, each operated almost as separate shops with their own
staff, own till and you paid for what you bought before you moved on to
the next department.
The obvious example is
t;
> > I think barrier=kerb + highway=crossing should be regarded as a mistake.
> > Taginfo shows ~ 1000 of them (0.47 of barrier=kerb nodes; 0.03% of
> > highway=crossing nodes) which should fixable.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Philip Barnes
> > wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019, David Woolley wrote:
> On 18/12/2019 13:31, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote:
> > That said, the same goes for cars - other than the lowest bodied sports
> > cars, pretty much all motor vehicles are capable of taking a kerb at low
> > speed.
>
> Although raised
On Monday, 16 December 2019, Gareth L wrote:
> I’m all for using a polygon per field, but am unsure what to do at the
> boundaries. Do I make 2 field polygons meet? Or leave a gap as there’s a
> track/hedge/fence/small coppice/ ditch/drain ? I’m probably not going to be
> able to map the
On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 19:51 +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> If struggling with setting up the Stava layer, or annoyed with
> cookies, then may I suggest the following page:
>
>
nnn-
nn_fbp_ga_gid_strava4_sessionajs_anonymous_idajs_group_idajs_user_idsp
Phil (trigpoint)
> On 19/11/2019 19:55, Philip Barnes
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 17:28 +, Michael Booth wrote:
> >
&
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 17:28 +, Michael Booth wrote:
> Only problem is that Strava's iD fork
> includes the low-res heatmap tiles, plus I don't think the
> Slide
> tool works anymore and it's a really old version of iD.
>
>
>
>
>
> The high-res heatmap tiles
On Tuesday, 19 November 2019, Silent Spike wrote:
> So I think what I'll do for now is go ahead and add this under
> `shop=houseware` since both replies here are in favour of that. If in
> future consensus changes (and adding this into the index is likely to bring
> any disagreement that hasn't
4425154bfda349ccf493487a80_0/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The data is freely usable, so there shouldn't be any
> > > licensing issues.
> > >
> > >
What is the source of the data you are planning to import?
Remember wikipedia is not a useable source under OSM licensing terms.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 15:12 +, Henry Bush wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> (I've sent this to both the talk-gb and imports mailing lists)
>
> This is
No problem with boats and greenhouses that don't move.
But these are probably seasonal and certainly shouldn't be mapped from aerial
imagery alone as they may have long gone. They certainly need a recent survey.
It reminds me of the time an armchair mapper carefully traced a Maize Maze that
My local Hotel Chocolate is also a cafe.
Phil (trigpoint)
> On Wednesday, 6 November 2019, Paul Berry wrote:
> > Continuing with the Hotel Chocolat example, it could well be the case that
> > most are tagged with shop=confectionery because that was the nearest-fit
> > tag that was suggested
See
https://www.ramblers.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-us/dont-lose-your-way-2026.aspx
https://www.oss.org.uk/what-do-we-fight-for/footpaths-rights-of-way/the-deregulation-act/
Historically we have been able to claim lost rights of way by providing user
evidence and have them added to the
On Monday, 30 September 2019, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Some people seem quite animated about non-squared buildings in OSMcan
> anyone tell me why it matters so much? because 'accuracy'?
Was thinking about squared buildings whilst in my local high street a while
back.
There wasn't one in
OSMand also shows them.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Tuesday, 24 September 2019, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 24/09/2019 13:24, Michael Booth wrote:
> > Fixmes can only be viewed in iD or with a QA tool, while notes can be
> > viewed on osm.org and StreetComplete which is useful for actually
> > going
I am inclined to go with disused:shop to indicate it is no longer a travel
agent, but leave the name as it is likely to remain a landmark for sometime.
Our local Toys'R'Us has only recently lost its branding.
Also being careful not to remove his statue from outside Leicester railway
station,
Not displaying a house number is particularly prevalent with 'end of
cul-de-sac' man where this makes working out where odd and even meet.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Tuesday, 30 July 2019, David Woolley wrote:
> On 30/07/2019 14:19, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > Is it typical for post codes to be
We can use fhrs to obtain postcodes for businesses which sell food and drink,
and these can be extended to other premises.
Residential areas are rather more difficult.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Tuesday, 30 July 2019, Andrzej wrote:
> Only postbox reference numbers, which are somewhat related to
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 07:06 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
> > That doesn't follow - in the UK we have always (with very rare
> > exceptions like Oxford High Street) mapped secondary, primary
> > and trunk to the official status of the road.
>
> It's slightly more nuanced
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 16:43 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 19/07/2019 16:04, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > As the sabristi have already discovered this one, and the OSM edits
> > appear linked to Sabre Wiki edits, I will identify it.
> >
> > In this case I am concentra
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 15:06 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 19/07/2019 14:17, David Woolley wrote:
> > On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > > I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no
> > > > road
> > > > should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is
>
I have always held the view that the great strength of OSM is boots on
the ground and mapping what we see is always better than other sources.
I currently have a dispute with a remote mapper who is upgrading
tertiary roads to primary.
In the case of one I see a quiet tertiary road, with no
--- Original message ---
> On Friday, 12 July 2019, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> > On 12/07/2019 21:19, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > > Hi Brian
> > > Each pillar has a plate with an OS reassigned reference, which is easily
> > > on the ground verifiabl
On Friday, 12 July 2019, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Friday, 12 July 2019, Brian Prangle wrote:
> > I've noticed that some trigpoints are tagged with a reference prefixed
> > TPUK. This is a reference to the numbers assigned by the website
> > http://trigpointing.uk/ which h
On Friday, 12 July 2019, Brian Prangle wrote:
> I've noticed that some trigpoints are tagged with a reference prefixed
> TPUK. This is a reference to the numbers assigned by the website
> http://trigpointing.uk/ which has the following text as a footer: "The
> TrigpointingUK database is owned and
On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 17:29 +0100, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69064630#map=16/51.3132/-0.3029
>
> A user has removed what looks like valid data including shops &
> replaced
> with those listed in Google Maps
>
>
On Sun, 2019-06-23 at 16:50 +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2922
>
> (apologies for terseness - sending from pub beer garden)
Thank you Andy.
I have reverted this, I had already reverted their previous changes.
Must admit I thought they had given up.
There was a discussion on this subject a while back on the tagging list.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Thursday, 20 June 2019, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi Andy
>
> All the original swift collectors were mapped in collaboration with TfWM.
> They're tagged as per this example
>
> amenity=vending_machine
>
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:49 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > What about `max_age=toddler`? (i.e. the oldest you can be is "a
> > toddler"), likewise `min_age=young_child` for the "older" one? (Is
> > that
> > the best term?) Yes it's not a numeric age, but it's better than
> > nothing?
>
> Thanks
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019, Tony Shield wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.83309/-0.14321
>
> shows New England Road and Old Shoreham Road Brighton.
>
> The standard OSM render shows 12 rail lines bridged over the roads,
> could be read as there being 12 bridges.
>
>
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 04/06/2019 15:31, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > I would map them as separate playgrounds, map the fence and gate then add
> > age tags as appropriate to that area.
> >
> > My towns main rec has such a distinction, ou
I would map them as separate playgrounds, map the fence and gate then add age
tags as appropriate to that area.
My towns main rec has such a distinction, outside the fenced children's area
anyone can use the equipment.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019, Martin Wynne wrote:
> In
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019, Tony Shield wrote:
>
> Parkrun as a relation - why not, its similar to a country walk and we
> notate those. Would want to add parkrun description to UK wiki as to the
> meanings in the relationship.
>
We only map walking, or cycling, routes which are verifiable on the
On Friday, 24 May 2019, SK53 wrote:
> As a walker I appreciate walking through a real hay meadow full of
> attractive flowers rather than a sterile green desert of rye grass.
And as a walker a real meadow is a very nice place to sit down and enjoy a
relaxing lunch or coffee break.
Phil
I have used farmland=pasture and farmland=arable to cover these cases.
Other cases could be farmland=vineyard.
Sadly too many mappers use meadow to describe pasture which is a shame as it
would be good to be able to find real meadows. Obviously these cannot easily be
armchaired.
I don't
Also building=phonebox which I use.
The most common usage is defibrillators and bookshares.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 08/05/2019 12:46, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> > It's a bit of a stretch, but perhaps some kind of tourist information
> > feature?
>
>
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 23:14 +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the next OSM UK annual general meeting we thought we would try
> London as a possible location. Does anyone know of good (and cheap)
> venues that we can use? We have 100 members but would expect the
> number to actually
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 18:10 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> barrier=stile seems unhelpful to me if rendered as a normal stile
> symbol, for walkers needing to know if they will have to climb any.
>
> barrier=chicane would perhaps be more descriptive?
barrier=chicane will already be in use,
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 17:18 +0100, Michael Collinson wrote:
> ced close to each other (usually in a drystone wall) to
> leave a gap wide enough for humans and sheep dogs to squeeze through
That is a squeeze stile, stile=squeezer.
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 11:45 +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone
> Mainly for west mids mappers but cross-posted to talkgb for a wider
> audience.
> For some time I've collaborated with TfWM who make extensive
> use of OpenStreetMap. Together
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 15:34 +0100, Roger Calvert wrote:
> The Lake District National Park instructions to footpath
> surveyors
> recommends:
>
>
>
> "Where there are two items of furniture for the same crossing
> (for
> example, a gate and a stile alongside each other), then
I believe they were the zones covered by plusbus tickets.
Although the Telford one is certainly unlikely as it has not been maintained
since the import and Telford has expanded beyond it.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Thursday, 4 April 2019, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
> What do you mean by “pay scale”? Are
The Telford one certainly looks highly dubious cutting residential areas and
bus routes.
I agree these and public transport routes are best left to organisations such
as traveline. After all a bus route without timetable information is pretty
useless.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Thursday, 4 April
On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 14:13 +, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> That's interestingI'd wanted to go by train before as its more
> eco-friendly and more interesting, but struggled with the cost
> compared to flights. Do you use Loco2.com to plan?
I have used loco2, but since they have stopped selling
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 17:03 +, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Have you considered going to State of the Map 2019 in Heidelberg?
> https://2019.stateofthemap.org/
> Assuming that we are still allowed to travel to Europe, you could
> currently get a return flight from Gatwick to Stuttgart for £75 and a
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 15:15 +, David Woolley wrote:
> On 10/03/2019 14:58, Donald Noble wrote:
>
> > I suspect shop=catalogue is probably the best option for a normal
> > Argos
> > store, but just wondering:
> > a) if anything special is needed when it is just a counter in
> > another
> >
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 14:58 +, Donald Noble wrote:
> I noticed recently that an Argos[1] counter has opened inside the
> large Sainsbury's supermarket at Murrayfield, but I am not sure how
> best to tag this.
> I had a quick look, and Argos stores in the UK seem to be tagged in
> multiple
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 19:37 +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> > but it's a rare bridleway that is only wide enough for a horse,
>
> As DaveF has already suggested, I suspect that's hugely
> geographically variable - I can think of a few examples in
> Derbyshire, Notts and Yorkshire where "public
Field boundaries are often retained (development usually takes a field
at a time), look out for these. They are a useful guide to aligning
stuff with old aerial imagery.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 14:38 +, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> Hi
>
> Welcome to OSM.
>
>
>
>
Just wondering why the UK retail chains link has been removed?
Phil (trigpoint)
On 7 February 2019 16:18:35 GMT, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>I think it must be you. I just edited the 'See Also..'. Perhaps it
>secretly
>wants you to create a "Driving Centres in the United Kingdom" page
>instead
>;)
>
Sorry that should be way 645960418, I typed the changeset number in error.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 6 December 2018 13:12:23 GMT, Philip Barnes wrote:
>Not in a position to fix it now, but look at way 64621112.
>
>Phil (trigpoint)
>
>On 6 December 2018 12:57:47 GMT, Brian Prangle
Not in a position to fix it now, but look at way 64621112.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 6 December 2018 12:57:47 GMT, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi All
>
>I think this relation must be broken -it's disappeared from the main
>rendered map.There's over a 1000 members - anyone like to have a go at
>repairing
On 30 November 2018 11:49:08 GMT, Dave F wrote:
>
>
>On 30/11/2018 11:09, Philip Barnes wrote:
>> It is worth remembering that the PROWs shown on OS maps is an overlay
>provided by the highway authority.
>
>They're surveyed by local authorities (paid for by us),
Hi
The changeset comment is absolutely correct, we must not copy from OS maps, any
such changes should be reverted.
It is worth remembering that the PROWs shown on OS maps is an overlay provided
by the highway authority. These lines often differ from the on the ground
reality which is what
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
