On 03/09/2019 09:54, Colin Smale wrote:
For HGVs there is another issue in play. Specialised devices using
specialised maps are required, to give routing appropriate to the
vehicle, its mass, length, height, width etc. These devices can be a lot
more expensive, and harder to find, than consu
On 2019-09-02 16:40, Mark Goodge wrote:
> One of the issues with relying on sat-nav is that the device data often isn't
> updated very often. Unless the government can impose some kind of legally
> binding SLA on the device manufacturers to ensure that all data updates are
> performed within a
On 03/09/2019 07:01, Warin wrote:
None of these are for the total removal of signs .. but for the removal
of unnecessary signs.
I said a trend. Some signs are legally required, because they are
needed to implement traffic regulation orders, so it will take a long
time to remove them.
Ultim
Community input to the plan is important. Any points you would like to
discuss can be added to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 07:02 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:
> >
On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:
On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
dis
On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
distracts drivers, and relying on satellite n
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
distracts drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide the
informati
Hi
Bullet point replies:
* Under the PROW section why are the 'yes' values not 'designated'?
* byway_open_to_all_traffic - Why is motor vehicle 'private/no'?
* Clarify which tags are optional (ie horse for Footpaths)
* Designated ways aren't limited to
footway/bridleway/cycleway/track/pat
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it distracts
drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide the
information instead.
What evidence have you of this "t
On 02/09/2019 16:57, Mark Goodge wrote:
I'm a little puzzled by one of the lines on the permissions grid on
that page. There's a line for "Legal RoW but access discouraged", with
a suggested tagging of "discouraged/private" for pedestrians (and
similar tags for other users).
Quite apart from
On 02/09/2019 14:30, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have
now created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath project
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
I'm a little puzzled
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sometimes they want us to add a "vehicle=no" to a track that has
absolutely no signposts whatsoever locally, meaning that nobody can
verify that vehicles are forbidden and no local motorist would be turned
away
Indeed, Frederik speaks wise words.
The role of OSMUK has been to handhold, that is 'support or guide (someone)
during a learning process or a period of change'. We've been there to
encourage them to work with the community to identify how they might tag,
and for them to publish their plans.
On M
On 02/09/2019 14:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sometimes they want us to add a "vehicle=no" to a track that has
absolutely no signposts whatsoever locally, meaning that nobody can
verify that vehicles are forbidden and no local motorist would be turned
away
This could conflict with a trend that I be
Hi,
On 02.09.19 15:30, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have
> now created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath
> projectÂ
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
It sounds like
Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have now
created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath project
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
___
Talk-GB mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo
