I have updated the Foundation wiki page on the OSM site.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation
The list of directors should now be accurate.
I have updated the income and outgoings from the treasurer's report.
I have added basic details of the current activities; including the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:04:00PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Does
anybody here really think that the foundation's chairman would snatch
the trademark away from his own organization? [...]
Unlikely. Maybe Steve or somebody else from the foundation can shed some
light on how this happened
,
Peter Miller
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
The minutes referred to in the post below don't appear to mention the
trademark application. I can't find a reference to it in other minutes
either. Am I missing something?
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
relations in the future.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
Chris
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
Closing the poll.
The results look like this:
Place no restrictions whatsoever on the use of the map data (Use a
Public Domain license)
41.1% 76
Ensure that users of the data contribute back any improvements they
make (Use a
I have done some edits to the Open Data Licence Page. I have
1) Created a 'See Also' section with links to other related pages (some
of which were listed previously in the intro paragraph)
2) Edited the criticism section to make it clearer, to remove detail
and link to other places
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course at this point your eye is mysteriously drawn to the elephant
in the room, which is what deserves copyright protection?.
Adding a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp Klaus Krause
Sent: 03 November 2008 09:55
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gentle
Sent: 03 November 2008 10:10
To: Iván Sánchez Ortega
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A super quick poll
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have given the 'brief and use cases' page a bit of a tidy up over the past
day and moved a lot of the content around.
I have:
1) Put the Use Cases ahead of the brief, because the Use Cases seem to
be getting most of the attention
2) Re-ordered the Use Cases to put the most common
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Collinson
Sent: 31 October 2008 16:47
To: OSM; legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Spam] [OSM-legal-talk] [Announcement] new mailing list: legal-
general
After some requests
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have added an extra use case on the click-through topic, basically
saying that we'd
like to avoid having to set up a tightly controlled environment where
everyone has to make sure to only pass the data on to people who have
agreed to some legal document beforehand.
that available to the community through the
wiki.
Does that make sense?
Peter
Peter Miller
CEO, Ito World Ltd
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
picture on our Flickr site:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/itomedia/pool/
Happy mapping !
Peter Miller, Ito World Ltd
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Take grade for instance, all occurances of which have now been
changed to tracktype. Which is a hell of an assumption about the
use of the grade tag, and what people potentially might want to
mark with that in the future. This isn't just typo fixing, this is
going way beyond that.
Peter Miller schrieb:
The only link from this page is one back to the xybot user page and
there is
no link to the bot's page itself (is there one?) to provide information
about what the bot is doing and why and what one should do if one
disagrees
with the edits.
thanks for your hint
-Original Message-
From: Peter Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2008 22:38
To: 'Frank Sautter'; 'talk@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Xybot
Peter Miller schrieb:
The only link from this page is one back to the xybot user page
I have just noticed that SteveC created a wiki page outlining his proposed
process for implementing the ODBL Licence about a month ago. Here it is:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Open_Data_License/Timeline
Does this make sense to people? This is good but it does raise various
Don't set up too much of your own structure just yet, because it is very
well possible that it makes sense to fly under the flag
OpenStreetMap/PD once things are a bit clearer, but you cannot
possibly expect many from OSM to endorse the thing when so little is
clear about it... personally, I
What does OSM Foundation think about the PD repository? Would it make sense
to host both licences under the name OpenStreetMap or would it be
confusing? How much OSMF wants to be part of the PD version? After all
I think most of the decisions will be the same for both (e.g.
deciding about tags,
to know a great deal
about the subject. One of the outputs from this process will be a set of
informed recommendations and observations which ITO will make available to
the OSM community and to the foundation to help in the licence drafting
process.
Regards,
Peter Miller
CEO, Ito World Ltd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MJ Ray
Sent: 16 October 2008 09:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call
forcomments
Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
:36:39PM +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
I was really signalling that I had got the Brief and Use Cases into a
form
where I was happy with them and where I thought they covered the issues
raised but needed confirmation re that from others.
The way you phrased it made it sound final even
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 15 October 2008 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call
forcomments
Peter Miller wrote:
Tim
/08, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a final call for comments by readers of legal-talk for feedback
on
the brief and the use cases.
I think we should make it clear in each use case the full
requirements, the whole picture, including whether they would also be
required
I feel that the above question should never appear in a call for
comments: no one person can speak for everyone else. It's very much
an anyone feel like being shouted at? question.
I hope we can avoid shouting:) I do think it is important that we discuss
issues now rather than at the end
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 October 2008 20:46
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call
forcomments
The key
harder the longer we
fiddle because the community is growing and more and more contributors will
be drifting out of contact.
Regards,
Peter Miller
http://www.itoworld.com www.itoworld.com
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
forcomments
Peter Miller wrote:
Sent: 14 October 2008 10:28 AM
To: 'Licensing and other legal discussions.'
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call for
comments
This is a final call for comments by readers of legal-talk for feedback
on
the brief and the use cases.
I'd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederik Ramm
Sent: 14 October 2008 12:55
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final
callfor comments
Andy,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 13 October 2008 07:54
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License License License
Joseph Gentle wrote:
The
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederik Ramm
Sent: 13 October 2008 00:14
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License License License
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
Mike
I have updated the wiki 'brief' to reflect a number of issues raised in the
past few days.
1) I have removed all references to 'public' in the brief and now ensure
that Derived Database are distributed at least as widely as the end-user
experience itself and that others are free to distribute it
I notice that the conversation has moved on from issues around Derivative
Databases to factual/copyright data. Can I confirm that we have agreement on
the previous point re Derivative DBs?
Can I suggest:
1) We clarify that a Derived Database is only deems to exist when the
martial changes have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iván Sánchez Ortega
Sent: 08 October 2008 21:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM
El Miércoles, 8 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iván Sánchez Ortega
Sent: 08 October 2008 23:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM
El Miércoles, 8 de Octubre de 2008, Frederik Ramm
sections (4.4,
4.4c..) - are those sections in the new license, and where can they been
seen?
BR,
Kari
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Ward
Sent: 07
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 06 October 2008 13:39
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license: What is
publication/distribution?
Frederik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 06 October 2008 16:08
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license: What is
publication/distribution?
Peter Miller
:54PM +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
I have added the brief to the wiki here. Notice that I have also created
a
'Use Cases' section heading where we can add key example uses of the
data
which we can use to validate the final licence.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Open_Data_License
PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October 2008 12:53
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Barnett, Phillip; Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] vandalism on OSM
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Using OSM Mapper it is already possible to identify who is changing data
within
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 03 October 2008 13:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Process for agreeing the new licence
Peter Miller wrote:
I do understand
occasionally spotted unintentional problems produced
by people who are trying to help, but have spotted no deliberated areas in
my area.
Regards,
Peter Miller
www.itoworld.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barnett, Phillip
Sent: 03
and the
reverse).
Regards,
Peter
_
From: Nic Roets [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2008 21:51
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes
-Update
AFAIK, ORS is not FOSS. Neither
Can I suggest that considerable help can be given to the people on the
ground with these mapping parties if some 'virtual mapping party' stuff is
done in advance. This advance work is mainly to get the TIGER road data
aligned with the yahoo photography, getting road classes right (or at least
not
See my post to legal-talk around the licence that I made 10 days ago which
was not been responded to by anyone from the OSMF. As others have already
said, it looks stalled to me.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2008-September/001162.ht
ml
Incidentally I responded in detail to
/QROTI
Another interesting read is the http://www.transxchange.org.uk/
protocol for exchanging bus route information.
Cheers
Patrick
Peter Miller wrote:
Traditionally the GIS part (Where are the Stops? / What is the route?)
is
managed separately from the schedules themselves. If we
Traditionally the GIS part (Where are the Stops? / What is the route?) is
managed separately from the schedules themselves. If we define the routes
and the stops in OSM then we should probably leave it to other systems to
handle the timetables (opentimetableservice?).
One handover bit that is
In the afternoon from November to May
Etc etc
Regards,
Peter(Ito)
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
63 Cowper Street
Ipswich IP45JA
(m) +44 (0)7774 667213
http://www.itoworld.com www.itoworld.com
___
talk mailing list
talk
please add them on the
OSM wiki here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Mapper
Regards,
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
www.itoworld.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Good point. I would suggest that the cars are carried on public transport
along a 'route' defined using the route relation of type=railway. I would
suggest that the road network is connected to the railway station at each
end and possibly also to one or more railway platforms (but that is not yet
I think it is really confusing for tags to appear on the main list of
features (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features) which then
don't get implemented by core applications and I fear that we could end up
with a maze of different tags used by different applications which would be
I have noticed for some time that my responses to threads of conversations
don't appear properly in the thread structure in the archive; mine always
seem to be treated as a new conversation.
This is what I do.
I receive the 'digests' of recent conversations.
I notice a post that I want
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:12 +0100
From: Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik handling of highways that are also
landuse...
To: Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: osm talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:41:03 +0100
From: Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Left and Right?
To: Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:59:37 +0100
From: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Potlatch duplicated node
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Whilst reviewing data
From: Shaun McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Administrative boundaries (UK)
To: Bob Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Bob,
Use the information on the ground. You will
available but
may not be telling the whole story.
Regards,
Peter
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
http://www.itoworld.com www.itoworld.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:11:34 +0100
From: Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM relations workshop: results
To: Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
://www.itoworld.com/static/osmmapper
Regards,
Peter
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:16:47 -0700
From: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?
To: Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, Aug
service will be available from tomorrow am.
Regards,
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I have given the Wikipedia article on OpenStreetMap a tidy up. Please feed
free to make further changes as there is more that could be done, including
added references. I hope that I have made is read better for someone who
comes across the project for the first time. I have demoted (but not
. Feel free to sign it
if you prefer.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tim Waters (chippy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2008 19:44
To: Peter Miller
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New: 'OSM Mapper' for OpenStreetMap Contributors,
by Ito World
-Original Message-
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2008 19:59
To: Tim Waters (chippy)
Cc: Peter Miller; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New: 'OSM Mapper' for OpenStreetMap Contributors,
by Ito World
On 19 Jul 2008, at 19:44, Tim
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:22:40 +0100
From: Shaun McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenPlantMap
To: elvin ibbotson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This data is a little
I have clearly not got the hang of rivers and coastlines yet...
There is a missing island just north of the I66 on this view and also the
river bank is wrong further north by Canal Rd NW
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.8995
The UK is also setting out on creating data for a cycle journey planner
using a mixture of professionally and community collected data.
A number of people with OSM experience were involved in setting the data
standard and some good ideas from OSM have got into it and it will be
reasonably
until an authority launches
an official cycle journey planner based on OSM data.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2008 13:15
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: Peter Miller; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:00:22 +0200
From: Sebastian Spaeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Please enable commercial use
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Comments in line
-Original Message-
From: Ben Laenen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2008 12:30
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder); 'Jeffrey Martin'; 'Peter Miller'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-talk] Bus Stops
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Andy Robinson
are expecting Newbies in an area to immediately start retagging what is
there which might be seen as a bit alarming.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson (blackadder) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 April 2008 09:23
To: 'David Earl'; 'Peter Miller'
Cc: 'Talk
and concrete bus shelters.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:07 AM, Mike Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent background information for basing our models. Thank you
Peter.
Mike
At 07:21 AM 11/08/2007, Peter Miller wrote:
The conventional way of handling Bus Stops in the public
Comments in line
-Original Message-
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2008 00:22
To: Peter Miller
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bus Stops
On 23 Apr 2008, at 17:45, Peter Miller wrote:
The EU standard Transmodel defines a Stop
I thought it might be useful to have a concrete (literally) example of USA
tagging to talk about. So.. think I have tagged the highways from San
Francisco down to San Jose as described on the highway tagging page, with a
few exceptions. My reference was the international section of the highway
tag
consensus but might save a lot of work, but I think the only
roads that fit this condition are really motorways.
Thanks,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: David Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2008 20:21
To: Peter Miller
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Talk Openstreetmap
Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2008 15:42
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] tagging and rendering highways in the USA and
elsewhere
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Major non-interstate
the issue also applies to
other countries around the world.
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2008 17:38
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] tagging and rendering highways in the USA and
elsewhere
If we can agree on the rendering rules and get both Mapnik and
osmarender
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:44:49 -0400
From: Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] tagging and rendering highways in the USA and
elsewhere
To: Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:13:12 +0100
From: Matt Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OSM-talk] BBC: Villages 'discovered' in DR Congo
To: talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It seems the DR Congo has been
.
See you Saturday :)
Peter
-Original Message-
From: SteveC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 April 2008 20:34
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] virtual san francisco mapping party?
On 12 Apr 2008, at 02:00, Peter Miller
the right
visual appearance, rather than the rather classification.
Regards,
Peter
_
From: Karl Newman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2008 16:09
To: Peter Miller
Cc: SteveC; Talk Openstreetmap; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] virtual san
and leave it to others to finesse the tagging later.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 April 2008 11:28
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] virtual san francisco mapping party?
On Sat, Apr 12
At this moment we have just welcomed out 30,001st registered OSM user.
The user base has doubled in the past 150 days and gone up by four in the
past 300 days or thereabouts.
Not a bad growth rate really.
Regards,
Peter
Message-
From: Jon Burgess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2008 23:31
To: Peter Miller
Cc: 'Steve Chilton'; 'Dave Stubbs'; 'Talk Openstreetmap'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed
bypass
I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which has
colour'
style maps to be created. I am requesting that they publish the standard so
we can compare and contrast and will let you know when it becomes available.
Regards,
Peter Miller
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:41:26 + (UTC)
From: David Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
of it on Thursday (assuming it renders properly on
mapnik) and put it into the wikipedia article for the road.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Stubbs
Sent: 31 March 2008 18:04
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Robert (Jamie
Excellent. Thanks Steve.
So how should a proposed road be tagged? Should it be highway=proposed
Proposed=trunk Name=foo bypass?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steve Chilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2008 20:53
To: Dave Stubbs; Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Burgess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2008 23:31
To: Peter Miller
Cc: 'Steve Chilton'; 'Dave Stubbs'; 'Talk Openstreetmap'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed
bypass
I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which has rendered
already
Spur
so that they are now identical to that for the main bypass and should render
properly next week.
Regards,
Peter Miller
Ito World Ltd
image001.gif___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
-
From: Robert (Jamie) Munro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2008 12:29
To: Peter Miller; Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Miller wrote:
|
| This job does raise
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:54:59 +
From: Alilo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Teleatlas file format
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
Does any one know what file format or
) Test the licence via the use cases using the agreed mechanisms.
5) Recommend the licence for adoption by the community.
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
that, since it is only for 'internal' use, they therefore don't have
to offer any content back to OSM.
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes;
format=flowed
(follow-ups to legal-talk, please)
Peter Miller wrote:
There are clearly uncertainties and complications with the current
licence,
however it does allow for the license to be upgraded without going back
to
original
601 - 697 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
