Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

This will give you an idea http://www.kslublris.com/LRIS/Kerala/district.php Just select Trissur or Ernakulum -- naveenpf On 23 March 2016 at 09:20, Jaisen Nedumpala wrote: > > > 2016-03-23 9:05 GMT+05:30 Jaisen Nedumpala : > >> >> >> 2016-03-22 22:46

Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

2016-03-22 22:46 GMT+05:30 Arun Ganesh : > My feedback on the current state of the proposal: > > # Admin Boundaries > > This looks good overall. The important aspect about admin boundaries is > that they are fairly static and do not change unless through legislation. > Is

[OSM-talk] DB Performance (was: JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?_

This from the ogr2ogr documentation[1] may be relevant: "When writing into transactional DBMS (SQLite/PostgreSQL,MySQL, etc...), it might be beneficial to increase the number of INSERT statements executed between BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT TRANSACTION statements. This number is specified with

Re: [OSRM-talk] hsgr error after many requests

Hi Daniel, I was using the development branch of osrm-backend and the standard (eg npm install osrm) version of node-osrm. Since I couldn't figure out how to get the correct version of node-osrm installed on the remote machine I redid the entire process with the master branch. It works now,

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Questa di dare i soldi alla fondazione mi sembra una buona idea. Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSMAnd-Live-tp5870406p5870460.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

Hi Frederik and Jukka Before I try give answers to performance let's be aware that we're (at least I am) speaking about a "desktop exchange format", not a storage fomat for GIS processing. But Frederik's comment piqued my curiosity and I did some quick comparison. I generated 1 mio. records in

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 23/03/2016 2:47 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: ># First goal: >First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations >which have a natural=water . Then, it will: >* Delete natural=water from all the ways if they are NOT closed or >

Re: [Talk-GB] [UK Chapter] Definition of OSM.

Echoing Jerry's previous plea - please comment on the Google docs AoA- there has been a fresh definition of OpenStreetMap there for several days Regards Brian On 22 March 2016 at 21:32, Tim Waters wrote: > Frederik is correct in saying that OpenStreetMap Project does not

Re: [Talk-cz] Galerie predevsim ceskych prikladu vyuziti OSM a vyzva k zaslani/oznameni dalsich prikladu vyuziti OSM

...že mě to nenapadlo, já marně hledal v DB OSM vč. historie editací, kde to ten rendeRRRer vzal... :o) Kakrrraholte! vop -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Jan Dudík Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 22. 3. 2016 23:07:44

Re: [Talk-cz] Galerie predevsim ceskych prikladu vyuziti OSM a vyzva k zaslani/oznameni dalsich prikladu vyuziti OSM

Ad pirrráti: je tam i Karrrlštejn, Starrrá Huť, Parrrdubice, Starrré Purrrkartice, Jarrrošov nad Nežárkou, Pernarrrec. --- Ing. Jan Dudík projekce dopravních staveb tel. 777082195 Dne 22. března 2016 21:37 Pavel Bokr napsal(a): > Ahoj, > > diky za tipy, doplnil jsem do

Re: [Talk-it] OSMIT 2016 + inaugurazione sede

Ho cambiato i miei programmi e conto di esserci a Milano. Volker 2016-02-26 18:11 GMT+01:00 Simone Cortesi : > Ciao a tutti, > il 21 maggio OpenStreetMap Italia inaugura la sua sede. > > Ci sembrava carino organizzare non solo una festicciola per tale > occasione, ma anche

Re: [Talk-GB] [UK Chapter] Definition of OSM.

Frederik is correct in saying that OpenStreetMap Project does not appear in the OSMF Articles of Association. However, on the OSMF website, the following words are used: "The Foundation supports the OpenStreetMap Project." So the wider OSM "thing" is the OpenStreetMap Project rather than the

Re: [Talk-cz] Galerie predevsim ceskych prikladu vyuziti OSM a vyzva k zaslani/oznameni dalsich prikladu vyuziti OSM

Ahoj, diky za tipy, doplnil jsem do galerie: - seznam.cz (zaklad, turistickou, zimni a zemepisnou) - odkaz na tripomatic (zatim pracovne tam kde je) az tam toho bude vic tak bych tyhle on-line sluzby oddelil asi od dalsich vyuziti - originalni PFko (zatim jako obrazek, “zivy” link bych uvital

Re: [Talk-it] Coordinatori regionali

Il 22/03/2016 20:48, Francesco Placco ha scritto: Salve a tutti, l'idea dei coordinatori regionali mi piace molto. Ma ho un dubbio. Io sono Calabrese, e non c'è molta collaborazione in zona. Mantengo personalmente i contatti con i vari utenti e gruppi che mappano, ma si tratta per lo più di

Re: [Talk-cz] Data IPR Praha

Uvažují buď o výjimce pro OSM nebo o změně licence. Stávající licence se jim už osvědčila, hledají něco podobného (ústní sdělení na GIS Ostrava). Ale bohužel, nevisí to jenom na nich (jak píše Martin), je to spíš magistrátní rozhodnutí (ale nenechávají to spát, jdou po tom) J út 22. 3. 2016 v

Re: [Talk-in] parliamentry, assembly seat boundaries

I added some comments to urban area in the talk page. On 22 March 2016 at 15:34, Jaisen Nedumpala wrote: > Hi, > > I have made a few additions and corrections to to this page: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries > > Please have a look at

Re: [Talk-it] Coordinatori regionali

Salve a tutti, l'idea dei coordinatori regionali mi piace molto. Ma ho un dubbio. Io sono Calabrese, e non c'è molta collaborazione in zona. Mantengo personalmente i contatti con i vari utenti e gruppi che mappano, ma si tratta per lo più di gruppetti autonomi, che spesso, una volta finita

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

Ahoj, nedal by se používat pro stezky, které směřují z bodu A do bodu B, ale nejsou fyzicky značeny, tag "ktc_none=*"? Michal Dne 22.03.2016 v 16:42 Karel Volný napsal(a): zdar, ... Presto ale ani jedna z nich nema v realu zadne znaceni. ok, vymažeme z mapy hranice krajů, protože nejsou

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Peccato che non accettino i nuovi indirizzi bitcoin (iniziano per 3 invece che 1)... A quest'ora sarei ricco sfondato :D -- cascafico.altervista.org twitter.com/cascafico Il 22/mar/2016 13:49 "Francesco Pelullo" ha scritto: > > Il 22 mar 2016 13:33, "Luca Delucchi"

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Il 22/03/2016 14:58, Andrea Albani ha scritto: > Ciao, > > premetto che per me l'idea di dare soldi ai contributor ha come effetto > collaterale quello di incentivare (potenzialmente) un editing che poco > avrebbe a che fare con la qualità, ma più con la quantità. > > Non trovate ? > > Detto

Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

My feedback on the current state of the proposal: # Admin Boundaries This looks good overall. The important aspect about admin boundaries is that they are fairly static and do not change unless through legislation. Is this understanding correct? I would correct the admin_level values to closely

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

I think that this would be a great Maproulette subject! > On Mar 22, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Maarten Deen wrote: > >> On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: >> >> # First goal: >> First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations >> which have a

[Talk-GB] UK chapter

Hi everyone Anyone wishing to be listed as a founder member on the incorporation documents to be registered at Companies House please send your full name and address to "osmuk at nomoregrapes.com" . In case anyone wonders whose address this is: it's Gregory Marler's I guess legally that entitles

[Talk-GB] Nottingham Pub Meetup tonight 19:30

At the Lincolnshire Poacher as usual. Jerry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:12:42 +0100, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: > >Mappers frequently map things in ambiguous ways or change existing > >mapping in ways that make it ambiguous and it is hard to decide from > >the data alone how to interpret such mapping. A bot will not be any > >better in doing

Re: [Talk-cz] Data IPR Praha

Ahoj, Dne 22. března 2016 15:13 Jethro napsal(a): > je zde nějaký pokrok? Rád bych podle ortofoto domapoval tramvajové trati. > MSF zmena licence na strane IPR bude nejakou dobu trvat (musi to projit magistratem). Pracuje se na tom. Martin -- Martin Landa

[Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

Merging recent discussions from district[1] and constituency [2] boundaries. The current tagging scheme for boundaries in India[3] has limitations since it was not effectively researched to properly separate revenue and local body boundaries. This is the reason to draw up a more well researched

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: ># First goal: >First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations >which have a natural=water .  Then, it will: >    * Delete natural=water from all the ways if they are NOT closed or >    ring 0. > This is a good proposition to

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

zdar, ... > Presto ale ani jedna z nich nema v realu zadne znaceni. ok, vymažeme z mapy hranice krajů, protože nejsou v terénu značeny, jen sem tam se najde nějaká cedule u silnice, například? :-) ... nebo asi jsem nepochopil, proč bylo třeba o tom takto mluvit? > a) tolik zelenych cest, ze

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On Tuesday 22 March 2016, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: > > Can you give me an example ? I probably could (after all i am on record for saying waterbody mapping in OSM is a practical case of the infinite monkey theorem) but right now i don't have the time to look for a good real world example. In

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Chapter: Who will be the "we"?

Dave At its narrowest - the members who pay the subscription At its widest - anyone who produces or uses OSM data in the UK Regards Brian On 21 March 2016 at 00:40, Dave F wrote: > Hi all > > OK, this a genuine, non rhetorical, non cynical question. > > I've

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 22/03/2016 13:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: Hi everybody, So, what do you think ? I think it's a silly idea. Identifying complex potentially problem areas is one thing - as you've found, attempting to fix them automatically is quite another. In among the "obvious" fixes will be many

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 16-03-22 15:23:44, Maarten Deen, wrote 1.7K characters saying: On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: # First goal: First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations which have a natural=water . Then, it will: * Delete natural=water from all the ways if they are

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: # First goal: First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations which have a natural=water . Then, it will: * Delete natural=water from all the ways if they are NOT closed or ring 0. I have been fixing waterways and water

Re: [Talk-cz] Data IPR Praha

Ahoj, je zde nějaký pokrok? Rád bych podle ortofoto domapoval tramvajové trati. MSF Jethro 2016-03-05 11:27 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa : > Dne 5. března 2016 0:05 Petr Vejsada napsal(a): >> ty záchody jsou i na Geoportálu Praha jako otevřená data. > >

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 16-03-22 14:53:42, Christoph Hormann, wrote 1.9K characters saying: On Tuesday 22 March 2016, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: # Why ? Well, OSM has a quite exhaustive lakes/water surfaces database, but it's a complete pain to work on because: * Some non closed ways have a natural=water

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On 16-03-22 10:23:51, Nicolás Alvarez, wrote 1.2K characters saying: El 22 mar 2016, a las 10:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon escribió: # First goal: First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations which have a natural=water . Then, it will: * Delete

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Ciao, premetto che per me l'idea di dare soldi ai contributor ha come effetto collaterale quello di incentivare (potenzialmente) un editing che poco avrebbe a che fare con la qualità, ma più con la quantità. Non trovate ? Detto questo... hai un'idea di come funziona il ranking ? Guardando le

[Talk-it] Assemblea Wikimedia Italia, 9 aprile, Firenze

Poiché qualcuno ha espresso interesse a essere notificato in lista: la prossima assemblea di Wikimedia Italia aka OpenStreetMap Italia sarà il 9 aprile a Firenze. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Raduni/Firenze_2016_-_Assemblea_Wikimedia_Italia L'odg comprende l'approvazione del

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

On Tuesday 22 March 2016, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote: > > # Why ? > Well, OSM has a quite exhaustive lakes/water surfaces database, but > it's a complete pain to work on because: > * Some non closed ways have a natural=water or a water=* tag, > which makes no sense and is forbidden. >

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Chapter: Who will be the "we"?

Hi Dave, I think that the "we" would be the members of the organization. Tim On 21 March 2016 at 00:40, Dave F wrote: > Hi all > > OK, this a genuine, non rhetorical, non cynical question. > > I've loosely been following the discussions of setting up a UK:chapter

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

> El 22 mar 2016, a las 10:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon > escribió: > > Hi everybody, > > I launched a bot (FrankVD_bot) this week which didn't make everyone happy, as > it wasn't discussed with the community, which is quite normal. Here's then > the RFC for (let's call

[OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

Hi everybody, I launched a bot (FrankVD_bot) this week which didn't make everyone happy, as it wasn't discussed with the community, which is quite normal. Here's then the RFC for (let's call it) scorpion. # Targets The targeted zones are actually the multipolygons with natural=water on

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

Frederik Ramm remote.org> writes: > > Hi, > > On 03/20/2016 10:56 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > > But Shapefile remains an oldtimer with more drawbacks than limited > > field names; see [1]. > > GeoJSON (ascii) and GeoPackages (binary) are formats which are more > > suited for the job. > > I

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Il 22 mar 2016 13:33, "Luca Delucchi" ha scritto: > > > cosa vuol dire che il 70% va ai contributors di OSM registrati? > > Che se ti registri al loro servizio come contributor OSM e fornisci un indirizzo bitcoin, ti versano una quota dei profitti derivanti dal servizio a

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Il 22 mar 2016 1:25 PM, "Federico Cortese" ha scritto: > > mentre il restante 70% ai contributors di OSM registrati. > > "... according to their ranking..." Questo non l'ho capito. Ciao /niubii/ ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Ciao, 2016-03-22 13:24 GMT+01:00 Federico Cortese : > Segnalo che col nuovo update di OSMAnd è disponibile la OSM Live subscription. > > http://osmand.net/osm_live#information > > Riassumendo in poche parole chi vuole usufruire del servizio paga una > quota mensile di 1,22 €

[Talk-it] OSMAnd Live

Segnalo che col nuovo update di OSMAnd è disponibile la OSM Live subscription. http://osmand.net/osm_live#information Riassumendo in poche parole chi vuole usufruire del servizio paga una quota mensile di 1,22 € per avere le mappe aggiornate con cadenza oraria. Del pagamento eseguito il 30% va

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo metodo per processare i dati GPS

2016-03-22 12:42 GMT+01:00 Federico Cortese : > Grazie Martin, molto interessante anche se non è spiegato come ci > siano riusciti. > scusate, questo è il paper:

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo metodo per processare i dati GPS

Interessante, stiamo a vedere le ricadute sul mercato! -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Nuovo-metodo-per-processare-i-dati-GPS-tp5870402p5870404.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Talk-it] Nuovo metodo per processare i dati GPS

2016-03-22 12:24 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > Segnalo questo articolo (in inglese): > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/16021507.htm > > La University of California ha sviluppato un nuovo metodo per calcolare la > posizione da dati GPS, il quale

[Talk-it] Nuovo metodo per processare i dati GPS

Segnalo questo articolo (in inglese): https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/16021507.htm La University of California ha sviluppato un nuovo metodo per calcolare la posizione da dati GPS, il quale dovrebbe consentire di ottenere una precisione di pochi centimetri senza aumentare il

[OSRM-talk] Demo server switchover to OSRM 5.0 and new HTTP API

Hi All, some of you are using the demo server at https://router.project-osrm.org in your own projects. This message is to notify you of upcoming changes there. For a while we've been working on OSRM 5.0.0, which will bring big changes to the osrm-routed HTTP API. You can see the new HTTP API

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: Fwd: relations boundary admin_level=4 manquantes

Le 22 mars 2016 à 01:41, a écrit : > Philippe, tu te fasis des amis en Allemagne avec tes relations gigognes : > http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53173=7 > Je ne vois pas de quoi tu parles sur ce fil. En revanche le seul qui s'est "plaint" a dit

Re: [talk-au] Overgrown (and illegal) bike track

It was mapped in 2009 and there appears nothing discernible on the satellite imagery and only one lone Strava track and no gps tracks near it, so if reverted to bush, I agree it’s time to delete it. > On 22 Mar 2016, at 7:39 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Hi all > > Just advising my

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

Ahoj! > 1) v terénu se vyskytuje rada "stezek", které ne/mají ráz "naucných stezek", > nelze to od sebe rozlisit. Nektere zcela jiste naucne se tak nejmenuji > (nemaji v nazvu slovo "naucna" apod.) Vyrostlo jich jako houby po desti za > EU dotace, drtiva vetsina z nich NEMA ZNACENI a ma jen

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vozdecký Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 22. 3. 2016 7:40:39 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"? " Ahoj, diky za názory. K jednotlivým reakcím: 1) v

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] QGIS/ArcGIS dans Openstreetmap

On 2016-03-22 09:53, moindjie mdahoma wrote: > est il possible de superposer une couche deja numerisée dans qgis ou Arcgis > dans OSM? exemple j'ai deja numeriser les bati de mon village dans qgis et > arcgis et je vais l'importer dans openstreetmap, et je n'arrive pas, que dois > je faire

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] (sans objet)

Bienvenue!De plus, as-tu regardé si tu pouvais trouver des imageries plus précises via des fond à licence ouverte? Attention le fond doit autoriser l'utilisation commercial :) Le Mardi 22 mars 2016 8h58, Jean-Marc Liotier a écrit : On 03/22/2016 07:15 AM, moindjie

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

Dne 22.3.2016 v 07:38 Petr Vozdecký napsal(a): > , na ktere dokonce ani > neni trasovani na jedno zastaveni namalovane). V realu mapovana neni - > zadne znacky na stromech. Kdyz se ale podivame na nasi mapu, ve ktere je > zaznacena (odkaz vyse), pak

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Oops, duplicate logain:refs added!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Colmn, I don't use the location from logainm to match up to OSM objects. Instead I use the hierachy. So if civil parish X is in barony Y in OSM and logainm, and barony Y has a logainm:ref of 123, and logainm only has one CP in barony Y with the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: Fwd: relations boundary admin_level=4 manquantes

Je n'ai PAS fait grandir les communes, puisqu'elles n'étaient PAS là du tout à l'origine (il n'y avait strictement aucune des communes de Polynésie et d'ailleurs en dehors des Tuamotus les autres communes de Polynésie sont toujours absentes : pour les iles de la Société, dont Tahiti, je vous mets

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] (sans objet)

On 03/22/2016 07:15 AM, moindjie mdahoma wrote: bonjours, je suis content de participer dans la liste et je peux contribuer sur les îles Comores là où je me trouve et j’espère aussi avoir votre aide pour que je puisse manipuler bien cet outil qui est nouveau et intéressant pour moi.

Re: [Talk-cz] Ne/mapovat stezky, ktere jsou znaceny jen "na papire"?

Ahoj, diky za názory. K jednotlivým reakcím: 1) v terénu se vyskytuje rada "stezek", které ne/mají ráz "naucných stezek", nelze to od sebe rozlisit. Nektere zcela jiste naucne se tak nejmenuji (nemaji v nazvu slovo "naucna" apod.) Vyrostlo jich jako houby po desti za EU dotace, drtiva vetsina

[OSM-talk-fr] (sans objet)

bonjours, je suis content de participer dans la liste et je peux contribuer sur les îles Comores là où je me trouve et j’espère aussi avoir votre aide pour que je puisse manipuler bien cet outil qui est nouveau et intéressant pour moi. je constate que l'image aérienne qui se trouve sur