Hi cleary,
OpenStreetMap carto would be the best place for checking whether this is a
known issue and loving it if it isn't.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, 5:15 PM cleary wrote:
>
> I have noticed errors in rendering names of
Was at ceBIT this week and Helen Owens, the head of the Public Data Branch
within the PM portfolio presented on the planned, more "open", release
of the remaining 9 themes within the Foundation Spatial Data Framework
(FSDF).
Earlier this year the National Addresses and Administrative boundaries
Hi guys,
We have permission. If there are able resources with the know-how then a
page for a State-wide import already exists. Its current status is that it
hasn't been presented to the @imports list yet but it is quite close (If
you're importing en-masse then it needs to go through this
bus stops? Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:03 PM Jason Ward <jasonjwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We have permission. If there are able resources with the know-how then a
>> page for a State-wide import already exists. Its current
Hi Simon,
Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be 3a4 of [1]
as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to the downstream osm
licence. I've read the links below and on a first pass it appears to be
quite a broad licence to use (Specifically 2a 1B & 2a 1B) of [1]
as the restriction applies to Licenced Data only. Probably a question for
the Commonwealth solicitors that wrote the EULA.
[1] - http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 21:39 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote:
> 2a2
>
>
> Am 30.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb
Hi Kristy,
Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this
list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful
(Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a
closer measure of 'active' contributors)
I've always used addr:suburb=coorparoo and in my early work (that I am
still to correct/remove) addr:city=Brisbane. Something about nominatum
having the geo context to know which city said suburb exists within. The
city node over City Hall being that get context.
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014,
Thanks for the link Richard (I should become a member and jump on over
there!),
Very casual mapper here though so my membership will have to wait. I spent
about an hour following a couple of those threads though.
For a start, and because I don't see threads like this unless I'm linked to
them,
Hi Chris,
Any thoughts on shifting the source references to data.qld.gov.au? At some
point in the future a whole of government permission (like the TMR one)
would negate the need to update attribution statements.
Hi Tim,
Agree with a zoned verification approach. To your point about accuracy
would the OpenCycleMap countours be a valid positional accuracy check? If
I read this link [1] correctly they are =/- 16m in vegetated areas and
+/-5m.
I note that this maps tiles have implemented at 10m intervals as
I have intentions of following the British structure for QLD boundaries (no
permission to use this dataset yet). Boundary is the chosen type there:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1464290
multipolygon, though, is winning that race it seems:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/type
Has the mapper been contacted?
On Saturday, 5 April 2014, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','daniel.ocon...@gmail.com');
wrote:
I'm wondering where the source data came from?
--
Cheers,
Jason
M: 0438740049
___
Hi Team,
I've been doing some SuperUser edits in 4sq recently and poked my head into
the OSM page they hold on their site (https://foursquare.com/about/osm) and
its slightly at odds with the messaging I have been using when resolving
notes I have deemed as irrelevant to use and I thought I'd
Hi Alex,
Good question and I have since figured out how to access notes I have
touched/resolved to demonstrate my point. My treatment of notes is
probably the problem. :)
I see this note [1] as being a legitimate use case for them in that there
used to be a roundabout there and not the
Sounds fine. A quick google indicates the approach has historical
endorsement [1] but could you define the geographical scope of these
changes and the logic/software you'd be using to do these changes?
Note [2] is a worthwhile read if you haven't spotted it already.
[1]
/morb_au/diary/5421
[4] : http://www.svgopen.org/2003/papers/PublicTransportMappingExample/
[5] : http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=qroti#keys
[6] : http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/368 (5kx5k Mapcraft Pie)
Cheers,
Jason
On 26 December 2013 16:03, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for that. I have read that several times and in fact link to it in
the Wiki page for this import (my prior email contains that link). That is
the clearest indication yet that I might need to rethink the existing
dataset.
I would advise against removal of anything unless verified by
If this [1] doesn't yield a response he is definitely over OSM.
[1] : https://twitter.com/jward101/status/437826150052552704
Cheers,
Jason
On 24 February 2014 15:37, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 24/02/14 12:01, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer that you can't get in contact
Sorry for the double post / email,
This [1] looks like the reversion has been done for AU. If a mrpulley is
on the talk-au list could you update Serge and talk-au?
[1]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20634749
Cheers,
Jason
On 19 February 2014 11:12, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com
like to know how we can afford these tunnels as long
as the East-West link! :-p
One positive in this, it's got me to start using JOSM a little. I might
just change over from Potlatch 2 yet..
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi DWG (CC talk-au list
Hi DWG (CC talk-au list),
Below is a segment of a discussion on talk-au regarding edits made by
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/robbief14.
He is unresponsive to messages sent via OSM and continues to add and remove
content that has been established as incorrect. I am notifying you as
users
Its touched on in the Vandalism Wiki but not referred to the DWG page but
if there is not a suitable response then bringing it to the attention of
the Data Working Group for user blocking is the next step I guess.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group#User_Blocks
It suggest
...
Today's Topics:
1. Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
2. Re: Damage to Maps (Ben Kelley)
3. Re: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
4. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward)
5. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward)
6. Fwd: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson)
7. Fwd: Damage to Maps (Peter
This appears to be the changeset (done in the Web interface). I have
messages the person and let them know that a rollback of that will soon
occur.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19743866
Please go ahead and do that Peter.
Cheers,
Jason
Have you contacted the person?
Hi Peter,
If the changeset I have noted is the cause of the problem then if you could
revert that it should fix the problem. If you're not comfortable doing that
let the list know and someone will be able to do it.
Thankfully it's only 16hrs old but it does extend into Northern Sydney so
it is a
My understanding is that the whole changeset must be reverted.
No response from the user yet but if this is a clear mistake then the
changeset should be rolled back.
Cheers,
Jason
On 2 Jan 2014 16:02, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
Quoting Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com
The proposed observatory schema seems to have stalled but looking through
the discussion on it there was consensus from the group that is ready
enough to put to a vote (which is where it seems to have stopped progress).
Maybe take a look through there and pick up that proposal if you have the
fixme tags for
visually odd looking stop locations. Brisbane will be significantly more
difficult but I'm up for that challenge.
Cheers,
Jason
On 25 December 2013 08:54, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, Jason Ward wrote:
Hi again,
There has
Hi Daniel,
Wow that is a lot. I looked at
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=qroti#keys and was considering
these as candidates for removal and replacement with the new gtfs data /
positioning.
I presume nodes tagged without these key:value tags would come under the
standard duplication
Hi everyone,
I took the discussion offline momentarily and Daniel and I have had a few
email exchanges. The result is a Wiki page with information about the
process. Anyone interested in helping with the import and QA process (both
documenting and doing) is more than welcome to go right ahead.
The Wiki has been updated with the appropriate details. If anyone has any
questions or amendments please go right ahead and ask. I've redacted an
actual work address in the headers section of the attribution page as the
original response came from the CIO of the Dept. The second response, now
Hi Arthur,
Interesting. I have had higher zoom levels than Z19 for Brisbane locations
(see my earlier comment). The tiles are still not rendering past Z19 for
me today though.
I've dug a little deeper and in the folder of the screenshot I've just
attached you'll see that the
Hi again,
There has been a response from TMR and the necessary permission has been
obtained (for their datasets
accessiblehttps://data.qld.gov.au/organizationon the
data.qld.gov.au portal). I have an administrative query to be cleared by
TMR before I make any amendments to the Wiki.
Its a start
Hi folks,
I'm at a bit of a loss right now and wonder if any of you have experienced
the same issue.
For about a week on 2 different machines I have only had access to zoom
level 19.
I've pretty much run down every google result possible (remove tile cache,
remove attribution file et al) and
resolution layer only about twelve
months old. This may be related to what you are seeing.
On 6 Dec 2013, at 9:29 am, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
For about a week on 2 different machines I have only had access to zoom
level 19.
I've pretty much run down every google result possible
Ah. Okay. I'll jump on a few more IRC channels and keep an eye out then.
Thanks Andy.
Cheers,
Jason
On 6 December 2013 10:50, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Jason Ward wrote:
Extra / New Info. The OSM iD (in-browser) editor is also not showing the
Bing Hi res images
Its a bit of a stretch but they could be scaling back high load services
(ie. High Res map tiles) to non Bing products to ensure their 3D Maps
release runs buttering smooth.
http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2013/12/05/maps3d.aspx
but
in this day and age that'd be an
/addressed.
I'll keep you in the loop of course and update the Wiki with any outcomes.
On 1 December 2013 00:02, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nice work - any response?
Steve
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
My
Hi Steve,
A similar discussion occurred as recently as Sep 2012 but my review of that
suggests no absolute resolution occurred. I'd suggest having a read (you
might have already) as its an indicator of the due diligence applied to
externally sourced data(sets).
Hi everyone,
My apologies if this has already been posted but I've just sent off a
request to data.qld.gov.au for explicit permission to incorporate and
publish their applicable datasets. I've provided them a link to the SA
Government response to the same permission request so I hope it is just
41 matches
Mail list logo