Understood. For clarity that restriction means the Rights granted in odbl Clause 3.1 [1] are not possible with this data.
I can understand the restriction so I wonder if there is any scope for this to be removed. I do wonder though, when does Licenced Data become Adapted Material? I ask as the restriction applies to Licenced Data only. Probably a question for the Commonwealth solicitors that wrote the EULA. [1] - http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/ On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 21:39 Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > 2a2 > > > Am 30.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Jason Ward: > > Hi Simon, > > Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be 3a4 of [1] > as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to the downstream osm > licence. I've read the links below and on a first pass it appears to be > quite a broad licence to use (Specifically 2a 1B & 2a 1B) of [1] so am > curious to know where the barrier lies. > > [1] - > https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/EULA_open_G-NAF_administrative_boundaries.pdf > > [2] - > https://www.dpmc.gov.au/pmc/about-pmc/core-priorities/public-data-branch-within-dpmc/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available > > > Thanks! > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 20:53 Simon Poole < <[email protected]>[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> I just had a quick look at the licence terms. While the license is based >> on CC by 4.0 (which is own can of worms) it unluckily contains a provision >> prohibiting specific use that makes the data clearly (as in we will never, >> in no circumstances be able to adhere to the terms) unusable for OSM and >> further means it does not meet the definition here >> http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/. >> >> Sorry >> >> >> Simon >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
