Hi Simon, Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be 3a4 of [1] as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to the downstream osm licence. I've read the links below and on a first pass it appears to be quite a broad licence to use (Specifically 2a 1B & 2a 1B) of [1] so am curious to know where the barrier lies.
[1] - https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/EULA_open_G-NAF_administrative_boundaries.pdf [2] - https://www.dpmc.gov.au/pmc/about-pmc/core-priorities/public-data-branch-within-dpmc/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available Thanks! On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 20:53 Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just had a quick look at the licence terms. While the license is based > on CC by 4.0 (which is own can of worms) it unluckily contains a provision > prohibiting specific use that makes the data clearly (as in we will never, > in no circumstances be able to adhere to the terms) unusable for OSM and > further means it does not meet the definition here > http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/. > > Sorry > > > Simon > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
