Hello Robin,
I highly agree with you.
The main reason for PTv2 not having as widespread adoption as it could
have is that it is not rendered, that is to say, it is not rendered on
OSM_carto (Osmand's rendering of PTv2 is near-perfect).
However, we're stuck with a rendering "committee" that
I have long ago proposed an addition to the PTv2 "route" schedule, which
is the "formula" tag. Formula's would be defined within a network (or
within a nation). For example, in the Netherlands, almost every
transport network has so-called "buurtbus", litterally "neighbourhood
bus" although
On 19-11-19 12:25, Tony OSM wrote:
Hi Janko
In my experience all railway companies give a journey a reference
Headcode like that, though the format differs. In Great Britain the
format used is ncnn, so for example 2P44 is a train from Manchester
Victoria to Preston departing 10:05. the next
On 05-08-19 13:22, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
On 02/08/2019 14:35, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think they should be mapped as relations with only stations in the
relation.
How would you perform real-time tracking?
I think that is not something one does on OSM.
On 02-08-19 15:35, Janko Mihelić wrote:
A user in Europe started adding long bus lines some time ago. These
routes are crossing several countries and mostly drive along motorways.
Here is a piece of motorway between Berlin and Dresden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313980637
it has two
On 11-06-19 18:13, Alexey Zakharenkov via Talk-transit wrote:
Hi, Noémie, Mateusz and others!
I’ve extracted all the generated error messages from our subway validator
source and list them below with some comments. You’ll see that most of them
concern topology of a transport network which
On 11-06-19 18:13, Alexey Zakharenkov via Talk-transit wrote:
Hi, Noémie, Mateusz and others!
I’ve extracted all the generated error messages from our subway validator
source and list them below with some comments. You’ll see that most of them
concern topology of a transport network which
On 11-06-19 18:13, Alexey Zakharenkov via Talk-transit wrote:
Thank you for the list!
There are a few I have questions about, either about your validator or
about the general use of the transit tags.
*) "Missing station= on a feature".
Requires that railway=station/halt object be tagged
On 29-05-19 17:35, Alexey Zakharenkov via Talk-transit wrote:
Hello everybody!
I'm a part of team who worries about public transport status in OSM database,
especially rapid transit transport. I want to represent a public transport
validator+generator that somebody might find a useful
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 14:44, Dave F via Talk-transit
> mailto:talk-transit@openstreetmap.org>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On the railway=platform wiki page there's a comment:
>
> "If there are more then one platform in one location, a relation
> could be used to "bind" them together.
On 18-05-19 17:40, Tim Saunders wrote:
I suspect I am a lone voice but I don't agree. The thing that
differentiates railways from a lot of historical features is they form a
network, some if which is still an operating railway and a lot of which
is still visible in the ground. Having the
On 13-05-19 00:14, Jo wrote:
I like to keep things simple, the best way to accomplish that, is by
having a single object for each stop that holds all the details for its
"lifetime". That's why I don't like the idea of 'upgrading from a node
to a way/area or a relation.
I don't agree with you
On 13-05-19 01:33, Mike N wrote:
On 5/12/2019 1:45 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
Btw, do you know of a way to copy data from one layer in JOSM to
another, while keeping it at the exact same position?
Edit / Paste at Source Position (CTRL+ALT+V).
Thank you (and John Whelan)
I still wish
On 09-05-19 23:03, Markus wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:15, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
7c. From what I'm understand, this bus stop node does not have to be
connected to a pedestrian highway either, with routers presumably
jumping from the nearest highway?
Yes, this is what OsmAnd does.
8.
On 12-05-19 17:48, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 07:54, Tijmen Stam wrote:
In my environment, some people are adding old ("razed" railways to
openstreetmak, of which no trace is visible in the field.
It concerns both old railways which have been gone since 1933,
Hello,
In my environment, some people are adding old ("razed" railways to
openstreetmak, of which no trace is visible in the field.
It concerns both old railways which have been gone since 1933, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592259029 (Note that this piece still
is somewhat visible,
example of a deadlock.
IIVQ/Tijmen Stam
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
On 06-05-19 19:29, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 2019-04-30 06:06, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
On 29/04/2019 16:22, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Stop areas are supposed to link stop positions to platforms, so a
router knows which platform you need to take a route that only stops
on a particular
On 28-04-19 16:27, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 10:04, Markus wrote:
Tram stops often have platforms (and bus stops sometimes too). For
such stops, two PTv1 elements are necessary because railway=tram_stop
can't be used on the same area (or way) as railway=platform (they
On 28-04-19 16:02, Markus wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 14:30, Snusmumriken
wrote:
Somehow I think that it is too late to define one schema that would
rule the world. Too much has already been mapped for it to be redone.
But I might be wrong. I also share your observation that PTv2 is way
too
On 29-04-19 16:58, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
The route and route_master relations have a documented "colour" key that
can be used. However, that seems to be intended for the line itself,
and I'm not aware of any renderer that uses it. If they did, they'd
probably use it for the label background
On 25-07-16 16:58, Ante Wessels wrote:
Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
On 07/25/2016 01:32 PM, Ante Wessels wrote:
Ik reed laatst het dorpje binnen waar ik geboren ben, Uithoorn, en merkte dat
de rondweg waar tientallen jaren over gepraat is warempel aangelegd is (N201+).
Hij staat als
morgenavond om 20u?
Jo
Op 8 juni 2016 22:24 schreef Tijmen Stam <mailingli...@iivq.net
<mailto:mailingli...@iivq.net>>:
Jo,
Jij hebt destijds een hangout gedaan om het een en ander uit te
leggen over OV-lijnen bewerken, waar ik bij was. Ik was toen heel
nieuw in het OSM
Jo,
Jij hebt destijds een hangout gedaan om het een en ander uit te leggen
over OV-lijnen bewerken, waar ik bij was. Ik was toen heel nieuw in het
OSM-OV-gebeuren.
Worden hangouts ook opgeslagen en kan je ze later nog terugzien?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tijmen
On 04-06-16 14:18, Jo wrote:
Ik heb net de URL binnengekregen.
Ik moet eerlijk gezegd ook zeggen dat de kwaliteit me wat tegenviel.
Vaak een stuk minder goed dan Google en, omdat Google net een update
heeft gedaan, minder actueel. De beeldkwaliteit is in delen van het land
zelfs minder dan de Bing-WMS die we mogen
.
Tijmen
On 01-06-15 21:23, Tijmen Stam wrote:
On 01-06-15 08:51, Christ van Willegen wrote:
2015-05-31 14:32 GMT+02:00 Gert-Jan van der Weijden gee...@dds.nl:
De theorie:
In de traditie van René Magritte (Ceci n'est pas une pipe) en
Alfred Korzybski
(The map is not the territory) kun je redeneren
On 01-06-15 08:51, Christ van Willegen wrote:
2015-05-31 14:32 GMT+02:00 Gert-Jan van der Weijden gee...@dds.nl:
De theorie:
In de traditie van René Magritte (Ceci n'est pas une pipe) en Alfred Korzybski
(The map is not the territory) kun je redeneren dat de tekst op een
straatnaambord niet de
Hallo,
2 vragen over de Groenlandse[ K|k]ade in Vinkeveen.
1. Ik heb vaak gelezen Map what's on the ground. Hoe ga je om met een
straat die 3 straatnaambordjes heeft, 2x Groenlandse Kade (beiden
redelijk nieuw), 1x Groenlandsekade (ouder), maar de BAG-viewer geeft
wel aan Groenlandsekade? De
On 20-05-15 22:24, Lennard voor den Dag wrote:
Op 20 mei 2015 21:13 schreef Tijmen Stam mailingli...@iivq.net:
De op- en afritten van de Sluiskiltunnel staan nog als under
construction, terwijl deze gisteren geopend is. Kan iemand met lokale
kennis eens kijken of deze ongeveer goed liggen en
De op- en afritten van de Sluiskiltunnel staan nog als under
construction, terwijl deze gisteren geopend is. Kan iemand met lokale
kennis eens kijken of deze ongeveer goed liggen en dan de
construction-tags verwijderen?
Zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/47806#map=16/51.2959/3.8121 en
On 02/27/2015 09:24 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
De Chipknip is sinds 1 januari niet meer operationeel. Ik denk dat de
oplaadpunten nu zo'n beetje overal ook wel weggehaald zijn, in ieder
geval zullen ze niet meer operationeel zijn.
Volgens Taginfo [1] zijn er nog 292 instances can chipknip in OSM.
On 01/08/2015 02:00 PM, St Niklaas wrote:
Ronald,
Om het moeilijker te maken https://www. komt ook voor. Mechanisch lijkt
mij dat dan aardig lastig, ik voer ze zelf al wel in na een blik op de
site geworpen te hebben.
Theoretisch zeker een punt, praktisch valt het wel mee.
Elke site voor
On 01/08/2015 02:18 PM, St Niklaas wrote:
Tijmen,
Wat is een site voor consumenten ? Gelieerd aan winkels of
handelsmaatschappijen, maar zelfs de overheid gebruikt al https !
Sommige wel andere niet, maar ook de doorschakeling http(s) werkt.
Maar het is theoretisch niet waterdicht. Bv
Hoi,
Hoe gaan we in Nederland om met snelwegen waar een variabele snelheid geldt?
Bijvoorbeeld op de A1 tussen Hoevelaken en de A30 richting Enschede, of
op de IJsselbrug. Hier is een spitsstrook, en staan snelheidsborden die
kunnen wijzigen (zichtbaar aan de vertikale streepjes), en de
On 11/30/2014 03:21 PM, Pander OpenTaal wrote:
On 11/13/2014 06:29 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-11-13 17:11, Pander OpenTaal wrote:
Over Nuenen gesproken, de weg van Venray naar Nuenen heeft afwijkende
maximale snelheid in werkelijkheid t.o.v. wat OsmAnd meldt. Mocht iemand
dat willen
35 matches
Mail list logo