Guten Morgen
> Man sollte sie wahrscheinlich auf die internationale tagging Liste bringen.
> Es bringt nicht viel, sie nur in der deutschen Liste zu fuehren..
>
Ist sicher eine gute Idee.
Mein Englisch reicht für eine Konversation, aber nicht für "Wissenschaftliche
Texte" wie Wiki oder
I'm seeing OSM data used more and more for generating the basemap onto
which things like store location data is displayed on store websites.
However, it's not always easy to find links to OSM attribution on such maps.
Has anyone seen this?
http://locations.pieology.com/
There's a link to
El Domingo 24 me parece bien, yo también me apunto.Salu2.
El Martes, 12 de abril, 2016 19:51:09, Omar Vega Ramos
escribió:
Hola
A mi me parece bien, me apunto.
Saludos
--
Omar Vega Ramos
GPG ID: 9825028B
___
Talk-pe
Olá Rui,
Eu pessoalmente usaria highway=secondary para as estradas desclassificadas.
No dia 13 de abril de 2016 às 02:38, Rui Oliveira
escreveu:
> Ora viva.
>
> Estava a enviar esta mensagem, aproveitando que há pouco tempo se
> uniformizou a classificação entre Cidades,
Hola
A mi me parece bien, me apunto.
Saludos
--
Omar Vega Ramos
GPG ID: 9825028B
___
Talk-pe mailing list
Talk-pe@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
On 13/04/2016 8:35 AM, Alejandro S. wrote:
But the surface tag applies to runaways, not aerodromes, does it?
If the surface tag is on the runway .. then it applies to the runway,
similarly for taxiway etc.
Personally my experience is that it much easier to map the runway, as
that is fairly
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
But the surface tag applies to runaways, not aerodromes, does it?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, 23:25 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/04/2016 5:47 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
> > Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> >> This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles
* Andrew Wiseman [160412 23:27]:
> [..]
> Or maybe there should be some tag difference between a proper airport with
> scheduled flights, a civil aviation airport, and just a field where a
> farmer might land?
Actually there is a tag, or rather there are two: The wiki page
Pour les "plaques" (qui sont en fait plus des bornes d'information
touristique que simplement posées au sol), juste à côté du chemin et pas
directement dessus, ne devrait-ce pas être de vrais objets de type
"billboard" ? (visibles sur la carte avec l'icone [i] bleue des panneaux
d'informations)?
Bonsoir,
Pour ceux qui n'ont pas eu l'occasion de voir ces lignes rouges et leurs
plaques, voici à quoi elle ressemblent : http://imgur.com/a/NdjFz
J'ai pas touché à celles que j'ai croisées jusqu'à présent, mais telles
quelles, avec un way footway sans relation, c'est redondant effectivement
I'm also glad to see this, and wish I had thought to mention it when I
first saw it! I was mapping in Knoxville, TN and there were a dozen
airports that clearly didn't exist. Most had in the past but weren't now,
so I tagged them with the appropriate life cycle prefix. I also noticed a
ton in SW
On 13/04/2016 5:47 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles use these features
to place labels and icons but these features are generally too
ill-defined and undifferentiated to do this properly.
I agree
Folks,
Please see the responses below from the Dept of Public Expenditure and
Reform which run the open data portal for the Irish government at
data.gov.ie
Can you please confirm that the response below is enough to begin using the
datasets from that site for OSM.
I believe it covers all the
Joost,
Any indication where help would be needed mostly? I'm trying to find a
solution so I can join (not an expert mapper, but I can definitely
help coordinating/general pc/mapping support).
Kind Regards,
Johan
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:16 PM, joost schouppe
wrote:
Perso je les ai retirés sur les relations que j'ai créé. Mais il y a
effectivement une plaque au sol assez visible.
Le 12/04/2016 22:55, JB a écrit :
Mouaif, les nœuds de ce genre, je suis pas convaincu quand même :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071657397
Mouaif, les nœuds de ce genre, je suis pas convaincu quand même :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071657397
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071657288
Et la plupart des autres. S'il y a une plaque explicative, on taggue la
plaque. Si c'est autre chose, on trouve autre chose, mais le
Hello Tom.
I was the first person to notice yesterday your students doing the changesets.
I'm always happy to see new users adding stuff in the general Western PA area
(as long as it isn't fictional items of course), and I'm glad you're doing this.
However, there was one common problem with
Pour le suivi :
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fCk
Il y en a 3 de transformées et une incomplète. Par ailleurs, la ligne 7
qui est disponible en tant que relation a été recréée sous forme de
chemin en doublon par l'utilisateur Philippe21. Quelqu'un s'était chargé
de le contacter pour signaler le
Kontaktoval nekdy nekdo tyto provozovatele o moznosti poskytovat
otevrena data?
http://www.stromypodkontrolou.cz
Pokud ne, tak bych je zkusil kontaktovat.
Mirek
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
This weekend, at least 160 people will take their first OSM mapping steps
at the seven mapathons organized by univerisities all across the country.
This is a great opportunity to get new mappers, and even to try and start
building more OSM communities. Luckily, we found a dedicated OSM
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Elliott Plack
wrote:
> I am glad this conversation has restarted. A few of you, (Me, Paul,
> others..) will recall a similar conversation on the openstreetmap-carto
> repo a few years ago where I noted that there are simply too many of
Jeg kunne her til aften konstatere at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TrafikAlarm har været aktiv igen i dag og
fortsat arbejder på samme måde. Derfor har jeg bedt DWG blokere den:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/924. Eller rettere, give en slags
advarsel. Der kan ikke redigeres på
Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles use these features
to place labels and icons but these features are generally too
ill-defined and undifferentiated to do this properly.
I agree completely. This is something that should be
I am glad this conversation has restarted. A few of you, (Me, Paul,
others..) will recall a similar conversation on the openstreetmap-carto
repo a few years ago where I noted that there are simply too many of these
micro airports shown on the map. We discussed at great length how the
relative
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Martijn van Exel [160412 16:29]:
> > Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small
> airfield can be hard to verify from imagery - [..]
>
> one more thing to
Hi Brian,
If no one's emailed you off list, I'd be happy to do that transformation
for you later today.
Eric
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Brian Hollinshead
wrote:
> I have received from the Library Development Section of the LMGA the ITM
> co-ordinates of about 350
Hola!
¿qué les parece si lanzamos una asamblea de la comunidad para este mes?
si les parece bien nos autoconvocamos a reunirnos el día domingo 24 de
este mes, así tendremos tiempo de, primero confirmar la fecha, y
segundo, proponer una agenda.
Saludos!
--
Johnattan Rupire
@johnarupire
Ho chiesto e la situazione si può riassumere in:
Civico 6 wheelchair=no e si può entrare ed uscire nelle opening_hours della
biblioteca
Civico 5 wheelchair=yes, si esce sempre ma si accede solo negli orari di
altri uffici del level=0; in ogni caso per l'accesso alla biblioteca con
l'ascensore é
Das Problem ist, dass die Bedeutung der Worte nicht einheitlich ist und oft
nicht eindeutig. Wenn du die frueher zitierten Wikipedia-Artikel liest,
wird das klar.
Sicherlich gibt es in diesem Bereich ziemliche Konfusion in OSM. Ich bin
kein Spezialist, habe diese Diskussion eigentlich mehr
Wenn ich dich richtig verstehe sind Motorhomes also keine Wohnmobile,
sondern Kleine Häuser, die mit einem Motorfahrzeug zum nächsten Standort
gebracgt werden und dort dann auf Zeit wieder fest installiert zu weden.
Am 12.04.2016 um 19:26 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Achtung:
motorhome=no ist
* Paul Norman [160412 17:27]:
> On 4/12/2016 2:40 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
Díky, napíšu soukromý e-mail, ať to neřešíme tady.
<0174
Dne 12. 4. 2016 v 13:04 Michal Grézl napsal(a):
potrebuju poslat tu fotku, ve jmene sice < byt nesmi, ale to se
korektne oreze na 0174.
Mozna byl prilis velka, z logu sem nic nevycetl.
2016-04-06 20:13 GMT+02:00 <0174 :
Achtung:
motorhome=no ist eine Beschilderung, die man in England, und ich denke auch
in den USA, antrifft. Diese schliesst die Langzeitbenutzung von praktisch
fest-installierten Wohnanhaengern als Wohnung aus.
Ich nehme an, dass die Bedeutung beim mappen in OSM die gleiche ist, das
heisst di
Concordo!
A gente consegue fazer isso, inclusive o projeto mencionado na Tanzania
funcionou. Mapear as linhas é apenas o primeiro passo. Conseguir mapear
horários (o que o OSM não suporta) é muito mais complicado. E infelizmente
essa informação é fundamental para roteamento entre diferentes
Stasera controllo e magari chiedo a qualcuno Probabilmente é un ingresso a
chiamata.
--
cascafico.altervista.org
twitter.com/cascafico
Il 12/apr/2016 18:26 "Martin Koppenhoefer" ha
scritto:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> Am 12.04.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Aury88
sent from a phone
Am 12.04.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Aury88 :
>> Sarebbe grave la cosa a parte tutto.
>
> non so se sia un uscita di emergenza...Cascafico dice solo che è apribile
> dall'interno :-/
io non vedo il problema. Un'uscita d'emergenza non deve essere
On 2016-04-12 16:29, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> I am not so concerned with rendering - that's not what we map for.
I think it would sound better if you said that rendering is one of the
many things we map for. OSM is not WOM (write-only memory).
//colin
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Paul Norman wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure here. For small airfields the aeroway=aerodrome
> > feature is a fairly abstract thing essentially indicating only that
> > this is a place where aircrafts start or land. This is not
> > generally something that can be reliably
I have received from the Library Development Section of the LMGA the ITM
co-ordinates of about 350 Irish Public Libraries with permission to use the
data for OSM. When I called to request the data they were unaware of OSM
but are now highly impressed that such a sizable and varied resource had
On 4/12/2016 2:40 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
>first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
>obviously no airport or airfield.
I am not sure
Hi,
* Martijn van Exel [160412 16:29]:
> Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
> can be hard to verify from imagery - [..]
one more thing to check: If the node was imported from GNIS, check the GNIS
website searching for the feature id.
Well, while the use of the data on the 'airport related web sites' may or
may not be valid to use, going around deleting private ones seems somewhat
counter-intuitive - why not simply mark them as private, if that
knowledge/data is open? If they do get rendered, I'm sure there are
precedents for
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
can be hard to verify from imagery - but I am also wondering what the value of
this unverified and stale data is to OSM. If they were mapper surveyed nodes to
begin with I would perhaps feel the need to be
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
can be hard to verify from imagery - but I am also wondering what the value of
this unverified and stale data is to OSM. If they were mapper surveyed nodes to
begin with I would perhaps feel the need to be
> Wikipedia fragen!
Habe ich. Die sind aber ein bisschen bockig wenn sie auf Deutsch antworten
sollen ;)
Es gibt auch ein schönes Wiki, das OSM-Acces-Wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Zu_Lande
Und dort ist caravan ein Wohnwagen und motorhome ein Wohnmobil.
Für
Es müsste nicht noch ein neuer Schlüssel sein.
Die Amerikaner Australier, Neuseeländer taggen das als
tourism=caravan_site .
Einzig die Engländer kennen nur so wenige Wohnmobilstellplätze, dass sie
die Kampingplätze teilweise als caravan_site taggen, da kommt es vor
dass das sogar Plätze sind
Silvano wrote
> Un consiglio da neofita, ma provo a darlo: hai provato l'editor sul
> browser
> iD ? C'è una sezione dedicata alle relazioni nell'interfaccia di modifica,
> magari agendo in quel modo riesci a ottenere o sbloccare qualcosa:
>
girarsi_liste wrote
> Stai dicendo che usano una uscita di sicurezza come entrata per i disabili
> motori?
>
> Sarebbe grave la cosa a parte tutto.
non so se sia un uscita di emergenza...Cascafico dice solo che è apribile
dall'interno :-/
-
Ciao,
Aury
--
View this message in context:
pridal sem zjistovani aktualni polohy, po kliku na mapu se vyplni do
textboxu. prave to du publikovat na play.
2016-04-06 22:55 GMT+02:00 Jan Dudík :
> Já androidí aplikaci stále nepřesvědčil k nahrávání - vždy skončím u hlášky,
> že uprostřed oceánu rozcestník být nemůže.
>
> il 21 maggio OpenStreetMap Italia inaugura la sua sede.
Ciao. Mi chiamo Lorenzo (Maxxer) e lurko la lista da parecchio.
Mi dispiace non esserci quel fine settimana per partecipare all'inaugurazione,
mi sarebbe proprio piaciuto.
In particolare essendo volontario in una Protezione Civile ed
> Keine Ahnung?
Wikipedia fragen!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travel_trailer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campervan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorhome
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
tady uz me jen napada smazat data aplikace odinstalovat a zase nainstalovat.
nebo pak uz jen vyzkouset jiny telefon.
2016-04-06 20:27 GMT+02:00 Petr Holub :
>> zkouším zase po nějaké době nahrávat rozcestníky přes webové rozhraní a
>> nejde mi to - ve formuláři se zobrazí "OK",
nesmi byt zaskrtle exif, pak nejde psat do poli lat lon, jinak to jde.
2016-04-07 10:35 GMT+02:00 Zdeněk Pražák :
> Já mám zase problém, že u fotky, u které nemám souřadnice v exifu, nelze v
> nahrávacím okně zadat souřadnice. Fotografie se pravděpodobně nahrála bez
>
ahoj, na osm.fit.vutbr.cz jsou i odkazy na texty BP, tam to je. Nebo github
OsmHiCheck.
Bye
On Apr 11, 2016 8:14 PM, "Martin Landa" wrote:
> Panove,
>
> provozuji na fakulte databaze (PostGIS) s daty OSM. Upgrade dat
> provadim zpravidla z cele davky, napr. [1]. Pocitam,
pokud ma fotka exif polohu, tak se zobrazi v polich lat a lon, 0 tam
byt nemuzou. pokud tam sou tak aplikace nedokaze exif precist:( stahl
sem si tu fotku a vyzkousim to.
aktualni polohu tam vlozit muzu, to neni problem, akorat to nebude hned:)
2016-04-06 22:55 GMT+02:00 Jan Dudík
Un consiglio da neofita, ma provo a darlo: hai provato l'editor sul browser
iD ? C'è una sezione dedicata alle relazioni nell'interfaccia di modifica,
magari agendo in quel modo riesci a ottenere o sbloccare qualcosa:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/45.62132/9.47393
Il giorno 12 aprile
potrebuju poslat tu fotku, ve jmene sice < byt nesmi, ale to se
korektne oreze na 0174.
Mozna byl prilis velka, z logu sem nic nevycetl.
2016-04-06 20:13 GMT+02:00 <0174 :
> Ahoj,
> zkouším zase po nějaké době nahrávat rozcestníky přes webové rozhraní a
> nejde mi to - ve
Keine Ahnung
Wenn es so ist, müsste dann bei tourism=caravan_site nicht noch ein Schlüssel
für Mobil-Home oder Trailer sein ?
Auf Stellplätzen sind eigentlich nur Wohnmobile zugelassen (mit wenigen
Ausnahmen).
Wie gesagt, bin da ein bisschen verwirrt.
Dann kann ich das so verstehen, dass mit
On 12.04.2016 13:06, Simone Schwarz wrote:
Mich hat "caravan" ein bisschen verwirrt.
Caravan = Wohnwagen = Anhänger und Wohnmobil/Camper sind etwas ganz anderes ;)
ist im (US-)Englisch nicht Caravan der Oberberiff mit
Unterkategorien "Mobile home" für Selbstfahrer und
"Trailer" für reine
ok je onda ta od 90 minuta...
Naslov: OpenStreetMap - slobodna karta svijeta
Opis:
OpenStreetMap je slobodna karta svijeta, u čijoj izradi i korištenju
može svatko sudjelovati na sličnom principu kao što Wikipedia radi u
svijetu enciklopedija. Karte svijeta koje nisu otvorene kao
diky, podivam se na to
2016-04-11 14:47 GMT+02:00 Zdeněk Pražák :
> Při nahrávání fotek rozcestníků na openstreetmap.cz jsem si všiml, že v
> případě, že rozcestník má starý formát ref, tak se nenahraje lomítko - viz
> rozcestníky s ID 5873 a 5874 kde se místo správného
Hallo Lars,
dann muss das tatsächlich ein Android 6 Problem sein. Wende Dich bitte an die
User im deutschsprachigen bzw. im englischen Locus-Forum, vielleicht kann Dir
dort geholfen werden.
http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php
http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?board=27.0
Gruß
Martin
Hallo und Danke
Mich hat "caravan" ein bisschen verwirrt.
Caravan = Wohnwagen = Anhänger und Wohnmobil/Camper sind etwas ganz anderes ;)
Gruss
Simone
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. April 2016 um 08:35 Uhr
> Von: "Hartmut Holzgraefe"
> An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Il 12 aprile 2016 12:09:30 CEST, Aury88 ha scritto:
>ma quindi quel tag si può usare anche quando non è un vero e proprio
>ingresso ma un uscita in cui qualcuno dall'interno apre se deve entrare
>qualcuno?
Stai dicendo che usano una uscita di sicurezza come entrata per i
Hej Fiona
Først; Jeg har personligt brugt et sted mellem 5000 og 1 timer på
manuel
redigering i OSM og jeg kan slet ikke forestille mig at en opgave som den
du
beskriver kan implementeres uden at det ender galt.
Dernæst vil jeg opfordre jer til grundigt at læse
On 2016-04-07 11:07, Martin Czarkowski wrote:
> Hallo Lars,
>
> loggen mit Bildschirm aus geht natürlich auch, funktioniert bei Locus
> einwandfrei.
Ähm, nee, eben gerade nicht.
Eben getestet, war ne Stunde draussen unterwegs. Er hat genau 3 Punkte
in dem Track drinnen: Start, Mittendrinnen und
dieterdreist wrote
> no, metterei piuttosto un entrance=yes (o altro valore documentato) e in
> più un tag wheelchair=...
ma quindi quel tag si può usare anche quando non è un vero e proprio
ingresso ma un uscita in cui qualcuno dall'interno apre se deve entrare
qualcuno?
-
Ciao,
Aury
--
za mě dobrý,
ještě bychom potřebovali cca 2 hodiny na valnou hromadu - vyblokovat v
programu
ale to asi až to budeme skládat
já se do programového výboru samo hlásím
J
út 12. 4. 2016 v 11:58 odesílatel Rostislav Nétek napsal:
> Ahojte, nabidka z Olomouce stale plati, krasne
2016-04-12 10:47 GMT+02:00 Aury88 :
> i forse si potrebbe usare entrance=wheelchair (ha solo 6 occorrenze
> su taginfo)
>
no, metterei piuttosto un entrance=yes (o altro valore documentato) e in
più un tag wheelchair=...
Ciao,
Martin
2016-04-12 11:25 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
> But now we're getting into something for which there's NOTAMs and
> established official data on, in a highly variable space, and one that is
> generally
> regarded as out of scope of this project
>
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
> first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
> obviously no airport or airfield.
I am not sure here. For small airfields the aeroway=aerodrome
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
> first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
> obviously no airport or airfield.
I am not sure here. For small airfields the aeroway=aerodrome
Ahoj!
> +1
>
> Když to bude značeno jako kct_none, tak by se to mohlo brát jako doporučená
> cesta. Vždy jsem radši, když vidím, kudy asi tak jít, než když musím
> spoléhat na navigaci, která mně může vést například přes uzamčenou soukromou
> branku, která není v databázi.
Ja bych byl pro to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 11:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
>
>> Can we really be sure there is no airfield, just because we don't see
>>> anything in the aerial imagery? Isn't this maybe also a legal
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 11:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
>
>> Can we really be sure there is no airfield, just because we don't see
>>> anything in the aerial imagery? Isn't this maybe also a legal
Ahoj všem,
rád bych to téma dokous, máme tady návrh z Olomouce, uspořádat
FOSS4G.cz 21.10.2016
(pokud termín platí) u příležitosti akce "Podzimní Olomouc" pořádané UPOL.
Pokud nemá nikdo nic proti, rád bych založil registrační formulář a začal
se bavit o organizaci. Rosťo: bude potřeba nějaké
Luca Delucchi wrote
> non seguo la discussione indoor-mapping, però perchè rimuovere il
> vecchio metodo?
> non possono convivere i due metodi?
teoricamente no, ma quello vecchio è un metodo definito obsoleto/inattivo
ormai da tempo a favore del nuovo e di fatto tutti i servizi che lo
sfruttavano
2016-04-12 11:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
> Can we really be sure there is no airfield, just because we don't see
>> anything in the aerial imagery? Isn't this maybe also a legal question
>> besides physical characteristics?
>>
>
> Well, if it's not on the ground, what are we
>Dne 12.4.2016 v 07:43 Petr Holub napsal(a):
>> Cestu mezi nimi už si pak
>> musí najít sám, nebo pomocí routingu přes existující cesty.
>
>Tak přesně tohle - jako uživatel - nechci dělat. Na mnoha místech jsem
>narazil na to, že na výběr by bylo více možností. Přičemž ta cesta
>vyznačená (byť jen
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 4:50 GMT+02:00 Martijn van Exel :
>
>> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the first
>> time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 4:50 GMT+02:00 Martijn van Exel :
>
>> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the first
>> time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
quella usata comunemente mi sembra in realtà quella ufficiale quindi
entrance:main
l'altra penso serva solo per permettere ai disabili di entrare visto che la
principale non lo consente. se ho capito bene la descrizione non è un vero e
proprio ingresso visto che è apribile solo dall'interno quindi
2016-04-12 10:03 GMT+02:00 Aury88 :
> richiesta aiuto:
> Allora ho cominciato a lavorare sul centro commerciale Il Globo[1], ma sto
> avendo dei problemi a rimuovere le relazioni che erano utilizzate nel
> vecchio stile per la mappatura indoor.
>
cut
>
> alla fine ho
2016-04-12 4:50 GMT+02:00 Martijn van Exel :
> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the first
> time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is obviously
> no airport or airfield.
Can we really be sure there is no airfield, just
richiesta aiuto:
Allora ho cominciato a lavorare sul centro commerciale Il Globo[1], ma sto
avendo dei problemi a rimuovere le relazioni che erano utilizzate nel
vecchio stile per la mappatura indoor.
A quanto pare, a causa di relazioni con reciproche interdipendenze, non
riesco a rimuovere
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Miroslav Suchý
Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 12. 4. 2016 8:32:19
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Pomocny rozcestnik - neznačená trasa
"Dne 12.4.2016 v 07:43 Petr Holub napsal(a):
> Cestu mezi nimi už si pak
> musí najít sám, nebo
shop=caravan 92x in der Datenbank vorhanden.
Am 12.04.2016 um 07:54 schrieb Simone Schwarz:
> Hallo Liste
>
> Da Deutschland als Land der Wohnmobile gilt, frage ich gleich hier nach ;)
>
> Frage 1: Wie tagge ich am besten eine Camper-Werkstat ?
> - Werkstat für Reparaturen
> - Vermietung
On 12.04.2016 07:54, Simone Schwarz wrote:
Hallo Liste
Da Deutschland als Land der Wohnmobile gilt, frage ich gleich hier nach ;)
Frage 1: Wie tagge ich am besten eine Camper-Werkstat ?
- Werkstat für Reparaturen
- Vermietung von Wohnmobile und Wohnwagen
- Verkauf von Wohnmobile,
Dne 12.4.2016 v 07:43 Petr Holub napsal(a):
> Cestu mezi nimi už si pak
> musí najít sám, nebo pomocí routingu přes existující cesty.
Tak přesně tohle - jako uživatel - nechci dělat. Na mnoha místech jsem
narazil na to, že na výběr by bylo více možností. Přičemž ta cesta
vyznačená (byť jen na
Bonjour,
Juste un petit message pour faire remonter le sujet… Quelles nouvelles ?
Le 07/02/2016 00:53, Muselaar a écrit :
Qu'est-ce qu'on peut faire pour te procurer ce créneau ? Quelqu'un
d'autre pourrait-il le faire ?
J'avais récupéré les photos début octobre 2014, elles dataient de
91 matches
Mail list logo