Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

Il 04 mag 2016 22:47, "Federico Cortese" ha scritto: > > > A quelli che hai verificato mettici qualche tag aggiuntivo così non li > cancelliamo :( > > Direi di completare la cancellazione a tappeto, poi faremo casomai delle verifiche sulla qualità dei dati in aree che

Re: [Talk-es] 10as Jornadas de SIG Libre y 2a Conferencia QGIS: Yaqueda menos!

Me parece fabuloso que suban algunos videos. Muchas gracias Saludos, jose El 4 de mayo de 2016, 03:27, Lluís Vicens escribió: > On 04/05/16 05:47, Jose Alberto Gonzalez von Schmeling wrote: > > Yo vivo en Paraguay, y me interesa mucho que haya streaming. > > Buenos días José

[Talk-br] limites administrativos

>Somos poucos e ainda há muito por fazer. >Números de Abril de 2016 do Osmand Live: >708 contributors in Brazil >1382 contributors in Argentina >Comparando esses números ao da população de cada país, não estamos bem na foto >-- Helio Cesar Tomio / Mapeador Openstreetmap Legal o Helio trazer estes

Re: [talk-au] place by remoteness

Hi. The remoteness doesn't need to change the definition of the place (e.g. make a hamlet a town) but rather only change how it is rendered. A very remote track might show, as might a remote hamlet. I agree this might be difficult to implement in the renderer. - Ben. -- Ben Kelley

Re: [talk-au] place by remoteness

Remoteness .. nice! It is based on population density .. the same argument I make for lowering the population barriers for city/town/village for Australia. So, yes, I do like it. How far to take the 'remoteness' effect on the population barriers to? If the area has very little population then

Re: [talk-au] place=? An oldie but no past conclusion.

On Wed, 4 May 2016 05:58:27 PM Alex Sims wrote: > The other point I’d make (as I did some time ago) is that the labels are > “British English” labels and form a hierarchy where the names make sense in > the UK but shouldn’t be taken as a slight against any area. They are merely > a series of words

Re: [talk-au] place= rendering

On 5/05/2016 9:50 AM, Timothy Ney wrote: Re: place=? An oldie but no past conclusion. My other concern is the rendering of urban centres at certain zoom extents. If for example, we demote all of the "towns" between Rockhampton and Mackay to Hamlets or Villages, we are going to have 300 km

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 107, Issue 4

f_cities_in_Australia> > >> > >> > > > > Yes there is an 'official designation system' ... subject to political > pressure and separate rules for each state. > > I think the best guide we have is the population, certainly I think it > is much better than the officially given 'status'. > > > &

Re: [OSM-ja] SotM Japan 2016ウェブサイト公開しました！

いいだ@SotM Japan実行委員帽子です。 8月6日開催予定のState of the Map Japan 2016ですが、 発表公募（Call for Proposals, CfP）を開始しました！ https://stateofthemap.jp/2016/#cfp https://jp.surveymonkey.com/r/9QKHPWZ 発表時間は20分、 OSMに関係することで、あなたが思っていること、感じていること、 やってみたこと、やってみたいこと、この機会にお聞かせください！ 締め切りは5月末日の予定です。 遠方から講演参加されるかた向けに、

Re: [Talk-cl] Como etiquetar laboratorios clínicos

On 3 May 2016 21:34:29 GMT-04:00, "Cristián Serpell" wrote: >Sobre lo de western, es ya algo aceptado? No, se quedó en propuesta aunque en muchos lugares se los usa para clasificar mejor estos servicios. Abrazos, Marco Antonio @51114u9

Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

>-Original Message- >From: Federico Cortese [mailto:cortese...@gmail.com] >Sent: mercoledì 4 maggio 2016 21:51 >To: openstreetmap list - italiano >Subject: Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking >water > >Per cancellare i pozzi ho

[Talk-br] limites administrativos

Ocorreram muitas opiniões e informações interessantes sobre o tema. Particularmente sou contra a qualquer modificação enquanto o assunto não estiver mais amadurecido entre a comunidade brasileira do OSM. Há poucos debatedores e participantes, me parecendo que o assunto não é uma prioridade na

Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

2016-05-04 22:25 GMT+02:00 Francesco Pelullo : > > Il 04 mag 2016 21:51, "Federico Cortese" ha scritto: >> >> Per cancellare i pozzi ho usato questa procedura: >> > > Tra parentesi, ho fatto un controllo a campione e nella mia zona sono > proprio pozzi a

Re: [OSM-talk] Gamification in Volunteered Geographic Information in regard with Contributors' Motivations

As someone who was a developer on a gamification of OSM data, I have questions about this study... What are the terms of the study results? Will they be released as Open Science? Thank you, - Serge Wroclawski On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Chen Chen wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

Il 04 mag 2016 21:51, "Federico Cortese" ha scritto: > > Per cancellare i pozzi ho usato questa procedura: > Tra parentesi, ho fatto un controllo a campione e nella mia zona sono proprio pozzi a cielo aperto, non sono riuscito a trovare nemmeno un caso dubbio. Sembra

Re: [Talk-br] RES: Limite de cidades com distritos

Quanto à afirmação de estar "demonstrado que o Brasil é o único país no mundo que usa boundary=administrative para algo que foi criado com fins geográficos/estatísticos (não apareceu um contra-exemplo até o momento)": O análogo das subdivisões do IBGE na Europa está explicado aqui:

Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

Per cancellare i pozzi ho usato questa procedura: 1) download mediante API Overpass user:corfedeimport and man_made=water_well; 2) seleziono tutto; 3) download parent ways/relations; 4) seleziono con filtro man_made=water_well; 5) elimino tutto e upload. Ora che ho aggiornato all'ultima versione

Re: [Talk-it] Diminuzione Tag totali wikipedia

Il giorno 3 maggio 2016 21:47, Marco_T ha scritto: > Buonasera, > il giorno 28/04 c'e' stata una diminuzione consistente dei tag ... > Si > puo' ripristinare la situazione aggiornata? Grazie. Luca, è

Re: [Talk-es] Propuesta de cambios en la normalización para las vías interurbanas

Hola: Coincido con los que defienden que la etiqueta highway tiene un sentido más funcional o administrativo. Creo que las características físicas reales de las vías se deben especificar a través de etiquetas adicionales. Un saludo Santiago Higuera El mié, 04-05-2016 a las 18:13 +, Diego

Re: [Talk-es] Propuesta de cambios en la normalización para las vías interurbanas

Ahondando en lo mismo, y no queriendo ser repetitivo, hay dos puntos que menciona Alejandro que son claves, por eso me gustaría hacer hincapié: - En primer lugar, no habría que revisar la normalización, sino cómo tenemos la vías en el mapa. Ahí sí hay mucha tela que cortar. - Y en segundo lugar,

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

Kevin Kenny > writes: > Breaking apart the AT into separate relations - ideally with a superrelation > joining them - would be sensible, I think, but be careful about the > assumption about state lines. The AT literally spends a good many miles

Re: [Talk-es] Propuesta de cambios en la normalización para las vías interurbanas

Buenas a todos, En primer lugar, menuda currada Hector, pero coincido con Diego, no creo que sea necesario revisar la normalización. Con tu propuesta (highway en función de características de la vía) lo que se conseguiría es tener duplicada esa información de las características (maxspeed,

[OSM-talk] Gamification in Volunteered Geographic Information in regard with Contributors' Motivations

Hello, My name is Chen Chen and I am a Masters student working under the supervision of Dr. Peter Johnson in the Department of Geography and Environmental Management at the University of Waterloo. We are currently seeking volunteers from the OpenStreetMap (OSM) community to participate in a

Re: [Talk-dk] Sammendrag af Talk-dk, Vol 83, Udgave 1

Jeg må give Asger ret. “Styrelsen tidligere kendt som Geodatastyrelsen” er et formidabelt godt forslag :-) /Martin (SDFE-ansat) On 2016-05-04 13:50, talk-dk-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > Fra: Kurt Forbech Toft [mailto:k...@sdfe.dk] > Sendt: 4. maj 2016 12:31 > Til: OpenStreetMap Denmark >

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [OSM-talk-ie] Registration is Now Open for State of the Map!

Mark, Price came up on talk-ie and I responded there. I've copied the reply below. The scholarship fund is open to applicants until the 21 May. Feel free to use it as that is what it's their for. Applicants will be judged by a team based on the answers provided (questions focus on topics such as

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Dne 4. května 2016 10:02 Hynek Řehoř napsal(a): > jak často se "párují" fotky nahrané přes http://map.openstreetmap.cz/work2/ > s rozcestníky? O víkendu jsem nafotil 3 rozcestníky v Jindřichovicích pod > Smrkem, v pondělí uploadoval ,a stále se zobrazují jako bez ref a fota. >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Base OSM en lecture seule

Pareil, du coup je me suis retrouvé avec 3 ou 4 instances de Josm en parallèle :-) Stf Le 04/05/2016 à 18:14, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit : Raaah pile au mauvais moment comme toujours ! :-) Bon allez copie du fichier osm et envoi en arrivant à la maison d'ici 30 minutes ça devrait le faire.

[Talk-GB] Geolocation on OSM website in Chrome

I wonder if anyone else has noticed this message when they click the "Show My Location" button in OSM (the arrrow icon) in Chrome: > *www.openstreetmap.org says:Geolocation > error. Only secure origins are allowed (see: https://goo.gl/Y0ZkNV >

Re: [Talk-es] Propuesta de cambios en la normalización para las vías interurbanas

Hola a todos. Mi granito de arena sobre esta cuestión. Creo que el sistema actual de normalización está funcionando bien en general, y que el problema viene dado en aquellas comunidades autónomas en las que la administración ha hecho un uso alegre de sus potestades, y a una misma carretera (con

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [OSM-talk-ie] Registration is Now Open for State of the Map!

i did not know it was common for OSS/linux/opensource/etc style projects to charge there volunteers to attend , wish i was rich computer programmer with lots of free time to kill at these events but i am not , i am the complete opposition being disabled and unable to find any neche in the computer

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Base OSM en lecture seule

Revenue en read-wrtie il y a quelques minutes ;) Le 4 mai 2016 à 18:14, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit : > Raaah pile au mauvais moment comme toujours ! :-) > Bon allez copie du fichier osm et envoi en arrivant à la maison d'ici 30 > minutes ça devrait le faire. > > Nico > > > Le

Re: [OSM-talk] API read-only for next 45mins

Hi All, The mapping API is now back to normal. Happy mapping all. Kind regards, Grant On 4 May 2016 at 16:33, Grant Slater wrote: > Hi All, > > Sorry for the extremely short notice... > > The OpenStreetMap map API will be read-only for the next 45mins. > Any

Re: [Talk-es] Propuesta de cambios en la normalización para las vías interurbanas

Repasando todo un poco (aún no me he metido del todo "a fondo"), hay cosas que no me convencen: - La motorways: creo que tenemos todos claro lo que son en España: autovías. Si alguna vía no tiene referencia A-XX ó AP-XX (azul), pero tiene las características de una autovía, debería mapearse

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Base OSM en lecture seule

Raaah pile au mauvais moment comme toujours ! :-) Bon allez copie du fichier osm et envoi en arrivant à la maison d'ici 30 minutes ça devrait le faire. Nico Le 04/05/2016 17:54, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : La base est actuellement en lecture seule, plus d'édition possible, retour

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Base OSM en lecture seule

Celui-là n'était pas annoncé, notez qu'il y a aussi une maintenance prévue les 9 et 10 mai. 2016-05-04 17:54 GMT+02:00 Vincent de Château-Thierry : > La base est actuellement en lecture seule, plus d'édition possible, retour > escompté à la normale vers 18:15. > > cf.

[OSM-talk-fr] Base OSM en lecture seule

La base est actuellement en lecture seule, plus d'édition possible, retour escompté à la normale vers 18:15. cf. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/029225.html vincent ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk] API read-only for next 45mins

Hi All, Sorry for the extremely short notice... The OpenStreetMap map API will be read-only for the next 45mins. Any unsaved changes can be saved at the end of the of the 45mins maintenance window. Maintenance will end at: 4:15pm GMT / UTC on 4th May 2016. Please see

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Interview pour le journal L'Avenir

FYI : http://www.lavenir.net/cnt/dmf20160501_00820099/cartographier-le-globe-depuis-son-ecran http://www.lavenir.net/cnt/dmf20160501_00820100/une-sorte-d-economie-collaborative I do not have any access, so if someone could send me a copy of this article (not on this mailing-list because of

[Talk-us] iD news: v1.9.4 released

iD v1.9.4 was released May 3 2016 and is now available for editing on openstreetmap.org The release includes: - Fix bug causing the Save button to remain disabled even when changeset comment entered - Support setting imagery offset via url parameter - New multiple

[OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.4 released

iD v1.9.4 was released May 3 2016 and is now available for editing on openstreetmap.org The release includes: - Fix bug causing the Save button to remain disabled even when changeset comment entered - Support setting imagery offset via url parameter - New multiple selection field type (built by

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

On 5/4/16 9:54 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: > Thanks for all of the feedback. I definitely won't be merging any > relations based on some of what you have all stated. What I will do is > go through and look at each relation state by state to ensure there is > connectivity and what not. I'll update

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Next meeting: Atherstone

I think last time we were there we used the White Horse on Long Street. If I get time for some mapping I’ll focus on the south side of the railway. See you Thursday. Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 May 2016 23:45 To: Brian Prangle Cc:

Re: [Talk-it] OpenMtbMap errore rendering pozzi privati \ drinking water

Ho iniziato la cancellazione dei pozzi. Qui documenterò i changeset caricati: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Puglia/CTR_Import#Cancellazione_dei_pozzi Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

Thanks for all of the feedback. I definitely won't be merging any relations based on some of what you have all stated. What I will do is go through and look at each relation state by state to ensure there is connectivity and what not. I'll update anything of interest here. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at

Re: [Talk-br] Discussão em Changesets

Sim, Nelson, estava caindo no spam, mas o pior é que estava caindo no spam dum email que já não costumava usar mais, mudei isso nas configurações. E agora está ok. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-br] Votação: uso de boundary=administrative para meso/micro-regiões do IBGE

Prezado Leonardo se você pretende conduzir uma discussão, votação etc, como parece ser o caso, então eu sugiro que não responda às mensagens de "cabeça quente" como esta que você me mandou. Isto tem apenas tem o potencial de gerar mais mensagens de "cabeça quente" e rapidamente isto se transforma

[talk-au] osmaustralia.org website and Garmin .img files - current status ?

Does anyone know what's happening with the osmaustralia.org website, and the regular updates of Garmin .img files ? They used to be updated roughly weekly, but haven't been updated since February. (I use these files to update my Garmin GPS with the results of my (and everyone else's) OSM

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Registration is Now Open for State of the Map!

Rob, On 04/05/16 13:56, Rob Nickerson wrote: > 1. We have a scholarship fund in place to help with costs. Feel free to > apply to that. > > 2. At 75 EUR tickets are sold at a loss compared to variable costs > alone. When you add in fixed costs the loss per ticket is much bigger. > We can do

Re: [Talk-dk] Hvad hedder Geodatastyrelsen?

Må her lige gøre opmærksom på, at den rigtige kreditering af FOT nu GeoDanmark Data er som beskrevet i dette dokument: http://gst.dk/media/gst/64649/Vilkar%20for%20brug%20af%20FOT-data.pdf Så den rigtige betegnelse må derfor være: SDFE og Danske Kommuner Venlig hilsen Allan Gyldendal

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [OSM-talk-ie] Registration is Now Open for State of the Map!

On 02/05/16 21:56, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Hi all, > > Tickets for State of the Map 2016 are now on sale. Get yours before the > price goes up (to EUR 100)! Sadly, this cost is too high to justify attending. I care about OSM, and I have been a silent contributor for years, but spending on plane

Re: [Talk-us] Improving coverage of exit numbers and destinations on motorways

So, I am confused here. What Paul is talking about, isn't that what is being proposed (besides the junction:ref bit)? This is a proposal to use the node and way approach, like the one Duane points too, right? On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:31 AM Duane Gearhart wrote: > Hey all, >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Bonjour Le 04/05/2016 10:21, Benoit FOURNIER a écrit : > foot <-> network = lwn > bicycle <-> network = lcn > et autres tags name/distance C'est pour cela que j'étais parti sur le principe d'une relation par type de transport Cordialement -- David Crochet

Re: [Talk-us] Improving coverage of exit numbers and destinations on motorways

On 5/4/2016 4:18 AM, Greg Morgan wrote: At one time there was a discussion on the list about moving exit_to tags as destination tags on the ramp. I moved most of the exit_to tags that I mapped to the ramps. Here you are proposing something different by leaving some exit_to tags and adding

Re: [Talk-br] Votação: uso de boundary=administrative para meso/micro-regiões do IBGE

On 04/05/2016 03:20, Flavio Bello Fialho wrote: > Discordo: Primeiro, o tema é polêmico e acho a votação precipitada. Que é polêmico acho que nem tem como discutir. Ou o fato de ser polêmico também é polêmico? :-) Sobre a precipitação da votação, poderia explicar em mais detalhes o que há de

Re: [Talk-br] Votação: uso de boundary=administrative para meso/micro-regiões do IBGE

Caro Gerald, On 03/05/2016 00:50, Gerald Weber wrote: > Tenho objeção a conduzir a votação desta maneira, isto é uma votação > induzida. Me proponho a criar um terceiro tipo de voto, de "Objeção", que funciona exatamente como os outros. Caso responda a este e-mail votando desta forma vou

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Cus, Dne 4.5.2016 v 11:56 Hynek Řehoř napsal(a): Ahoj, ještě dotaz - při updatu ref rozcestníků dostávám warning: Inline image 3 Mám hlášku ignorovat nebo opravit? Pokud opravit, jak? Díky, H. To varovani vychazi nejspis z predpokladu, ze rozcestnik neni soucasti cesty jako takovy, ale

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Dne 4.5.2016 v 11:56 Hynek Řehoř napsal(a): > ještě dotaz - při updatu ref > rozcestníků dostávám warning: > > Inline image 3 > > Mám hlášku ignorovat nebo opravit? Pokud opravit, jak? Rozcestníky nedáváme na silnici, ale na to místo kde opravdu jsou - obvykle sloup vedle silnice. (proč? viz

Re: [Talk-dk] Hvad hedder Geodatastyrelsen?

Hej Asger Den officielle forkortelse er SDFE Venlig Hilsen Kurt Toft Fra: Asger Frank [mailto:asg...@gmail.com] Sendt: 4. maj 2016 12:23 Til: OpenStreetMap Denmark Emne: [Talk-dk] Hvad hedder Geodatastyrelsen? Jeg angiver troligt source som Geodatastyrelsen, selvom jeg godt ved, at det hedder

Re: [Talk-it] palestra di roccia

dieterdreist wrote > In che senso sono "palestre"? C'è una recinzione? Si paga per l'utlizzo? > Ci > sono servizi offerti? per spiegare: non c'è nessuna recinzione, ne ovviamente si paga e nemmeno è offerto nessun servizio, trovi soltanto i chiodi già piantati... però la parete ha un nome bene

[Talk-dk] Hvad hedder Geodatastyrelsen?

Jeg angiver troligt source som Geodatastyrelsen, selvom jeg godt ved, at det hedder den ikke mere, den afdeling der er relevant for OSM. Men det var sådan et godt navn, og jeg er fristet til at fremover angive source som “Styrelsen tidligere kendt som Geodatastyrelsen”, i analogi til afdøde

Re: [Talk-it] Relation Internazionali d'Italia #2 MTB al Monte Stella

Ecco il sito web: http://www.mtb-mag.com/2-internazionali-ditalia-series-la-montagnetta-di-san-siro-milano/ 2016-05-04 11:52 GMT+02:00 Stefano : > Google suggerisce fosse una tappa del campionato italiano di cross country > http://www.montagnettamilanomtb.it/programma/ >

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Ahoj, ještě dotaz - při updatu ref rozcestníků dostávám warning: [image: Inline image 3] Mám hlášku ignorovat nebo opravit? Pokud opravit, jak? Díky, H. 2016-05-04 11:22 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : > :-D > > Tak updaty POI v OSM jsou v plánu. Ale není to tak jednoduché a ještě

Re: [Talk-it] Relation Internazionali d'Italia #2 MTB al Monte Stella

Google suggerisce fosse una tappa del campionato italiano di cross country http://www.montagnettamilanomtb.it/programma/ http://www.internazionaliditaliaseries.it/ Il giorno 4 maggio 2016 11:34, emmexx ha scritto: > Ho notato che all'interno della montagnetta del Monte

Re: [Talk-us] Improving coverage of exit numbers and destinations on motorways

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Greg Morgan wrote: > > > The work flow that you mention drive me batty.[0] At one time there was a > discussion on the list about moving exit_to tags as destination tags on the > ramp. I moved most of the exit_to tags that I mapped to the

Re: [Talk-it] Relation Internazionali d'Italia #2 MTB al Monte Stella

. > > Va bene cosi'? > > Molto probabilmente no, perché non si tratta di un percorso permanente e con segnaletica. Hai contattato l'utente http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Constable ? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-it] Relation Internazionali d'Italia #2 MTB al Monte Stella

Ho notato che all'interno della montagnetta del Monte Stella a Milano e' apparso un percorso che corrisponde ad una relation di tipo route, mtb http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6171502 Mi pare si tratti non di un percorso definitivo ma di una qualche manifestazione sportiva. Ne sapete

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Covoiturage pour Clermont-Ferrand (State of the Map)

> De: "JB" > > Pour les hésitants entre covoiturage et train, y a-t-il des > possibilités de stationnement facile proches de l'événement ? On n'aura pas de parking attitré mais de l'avis des Clermontois, la pression est faible sur le stationnement aux alentours. vincent

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

:-D Tak updaty POI v OSM jsou v plánu. Ale není to tak jednoduché a ještě to nikdo nenapsal. A v dohledné době to určitě nebude. Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Hynek Řehoř Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 4. 5. 2016

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Malheureusement, ça ne fonctionnnera pas de cette façon-la. La difference entre la solution qui en principe est la bonne et la solution qui fonctionnera effecticement dans la pratique, disons. Jo Op 4-mei-2016 8:43 AM schreef "adrien" : > Bonjour, > > Je n'avais pas pensé à

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Ahoj. Jestli to nebude tím, že to ref je potřeba doplnit do OSM. Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Hynek Řehoř Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 4. 5. 2016 10:28:20 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Covoiturage pour Clermont-Ferrand (State of the Map)

Pour les hésitants entre covoiturage et train, y a-t-il des possibilités de stationnement facile proches de l'événement ? JB. Le 04/05/2016 à 10:03, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : Bonjour, en prévision du State of the Map à Clermont-Ferrand dans 2 grandes semaines, pour ceux qui

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Est-ce qu'on ne perd pas de l'information, avec les liens : foot <-> network = lwn bicycle <-> network = lcn et autres tags name/distance qui sont noyés dans la description avec une seule relation et liste à point-virgule ? 2016-05-04 8:42 GMT+02:00 adrien : > Bonjour, > >

Re: [Talk-us] Improving coverage of exit numbers and destinations on motorways

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Jinal Foflia wrote: > There has been a recent push to improve the coverage of exit numbers and > destination signs on the motorways in the US by the data team at Mapbox. > Some context here [1][2][3][4]. The primary sources of data were DoT

[OSM-talk-fr] Covoiturage pour Clermont-Ferrand (State of the Map)

Bonjour, en prévision du State of the Map à Clermont-Ferrand dans 2 grandes semaines, pour ceux qui cherchent une place ou ont des places à proposer dans un véhicule, nous avons mis en place ce tableau : https://framacalc.org/Covoiturage%20SOTM-FR-2016 Bonne journée, vincent ps. en

Re: [Talk-cz] OsmHiCheck chybejici rozcestniky do osmap.cz

Ahoj, jak často se "párují" fotky nahrané přes http://map.openstreetmap.cz/work2/ s rozcestníky? O víkendu jsem nafotil 3 rozcestníky v Jindřichovicích pod Smrkem, v pondělí uploadoval ,a stále se zobrazují jako bez ref a fota. Fotky jsou v pořádku nahraná, kontroloval jsem. Dík, Hynek

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Le 4 mai 2016 à 08:42, adrien a écrit : > Il faudrait donc que je taggue plutôt comme ceci selon vous : > > type = root > root = foot; bicycle; horse > network = lwn; lcn > name = blabla > distance = XX km > Bonjour, c'est en effet ce qui me parait le plus logique --

Re: [Talk-es] 10as Jornadas de SIG Libre y 2a Conferencia QGIS: Yaqueda menos!

On 04/05/16 05:47, Jose Alberto Gonzalez von Schmeling wrote: Yo vivo en Paraguay, y me interesa mucho que haya streaming. Buenos días José Alberto, Por el momento, y lamentándolo mucho, no está previsto programar un /streaming/ por cuestiones de coste y logísticas. Lo que sí hacemos es

Re: [OSM-talk-be] State of the Map Brussels taking shape

> Will there be recordings of sessions and thus need to monitor those > recordings? > > Jo > There will definitely be live streaming, and we have our eyes on high quality recording material also used at FOSDEM and SOTM-EU. But we haven't found anyone available who has the necessary experience

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Oui "route". Le 4 mai 2016 à 09:02, Stéphane Péneau a écrit : > Je suppose que tu voulais dire > "route" au lieu de "root" :-) > > Je viens de vérifier sur le site waymarkedtrails.org, et c'est supporté : > "Une balise route avec des valeurs multiples est supportée

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Bonjour, Juste un commentaire sur les points virgules, il ne faut pas d'espace donc cela ferait root=foot;bicycle;horse Romain Le 4 mai 2016 à 08:42, adrien a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Je n'avais pas pensé à mettre les valeurs avec des points-virgules. > J'avais essayé de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Je suppose que tu voulais dire "route" au lieu de "root" :-) Je viens de vérifier sur le site waymarkedtrails.org, et c'est supporté : "Une balise |route| avec des valeurs multiples est supportée quand celles-ci sont séparées par des points-virgules sans espace autour. La classification (et

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation avec plusieurs types (foot, bicycle) ?

Bonjour, Je n'avais pas pensé à mettre les valeurs avec des points-virgules. J'avais essayé de mettre plusieurs balise « root ». Il faudrait donc que je taggue plutôt comme ceci selon vous : type = root root = foot; bicycle; horse network = lwn; lcn name = blabla distance = XX km au lieu de