Re: [talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrew Harvey
On 9 July 2016 at 12:55, Simon Slater wrote: >> > 3/ A couple of these too, 'Approximate highway primary discart from >> > 35.5339969622m ' I have a GPS track for at least 1 of these at the moment. >> >> Can you point to where this is? > >

Re: [talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Slater
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 12:06:40 PM Andrew Harvey wrote: > > 2/ Also a couple of 'Intersection of unrelated highway and waterway > > objects'. How to correct these? > > What editor are you using? JOSM > Can you point to where this is? Lost it - I'll find it later. > If a waterway and highway

Re: [talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrew Harvey
On 9 July 2016 at 11:20, Simon Slater wrote: > 1/ There are a few 'Bad value for sport=cricket,_australian_football' in > the > area. The use of the pitch is correct, is the syntax of the tag value wrong? the convention is to use ; to separate multiple tag values. See

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
There are many parts here: road signs in the real world, names which might not match those, data in OSM, and presentation by "stacks" (hardware/software/network) of those data. The first two can be captured with proper tagging in the third. If the fourth does not meet your needs, it MAY be

Re: [talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Slater
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 09:52:26 AM Simon Slater wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 07:37:53 PM Andrew Harvey wrote: > > On 7 Jul 2016 7:21 PM, "Simon Slater" wrote: > > > G'day all, > > Since this is the first time I've done this, I've a couple of questions. A couple more things I'd

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Minh Nguyen
Paul Johnson writes: > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Morgan wrote:It is confusing to use open street maps in my area(Central Ohio) for > driving directions since the "common names" of high ways do not match > road

[OSM-ja] 京都国宝・浪漫マッピングパーティ 第1回 7/16(土)北野天満宮

2016-07-08 Per discussione yasunari
京都の山下です。 みなさんこんにちわ。 京都世界遺産マッピングパーティから看板だけすげかえて(笑 新シリーズ京都国宝・浪漫マッピングパーティ! 第1回は、7/16(土)に全国天満宮の総本宮である北野天満宮。 https://openstreetmap.doorkeeper.jp/events/45753 皆様の参加をお待ちしています!! -- 山下康成@京都府向日市

Re: [talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Slater
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 07:37:53 PM Andrew Harvey wrote: > On 7 Jul 2016 7:21 PM, "Simon Slater" wrote: > > G'day all, > > > > While waiting in the Balranald Bakery yesterday I thought I'd > > install > > > OSMBugs and OSMTracker and see what needed doing in the area.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrew Harvey
On 8 July 2016 at 23:47, Simon Poole wrote: > Both the Horizontal Layer and the Collective Database guidelines address > a specific de-duplication issue (in respect to the above use case): if > you take your proprietary dataset and remove all POIs from the OSM > dataset that

[Talk-es] Tagear correctamente un paso de cebra

2016-07-08 Per discussione A A
Hablando en un foro sobre una de las app que existen de Navegacion GPS uno de los usuarios ha comentado que un paso de cebra debe tagearse así:highway=crossing + crossing=uncontrolled + crossing_ref=zebra En OSM hay un tag predefinido llamado "paso de cebra" con los siguientes tags:highway:

Re: [Talk-dk] Jægersgårdgade i Århus

2016-07-08 Per discussione Niels Elgaard Larsen
Michael Andersen: > Fredag den 8. juli 2016 21:08:28 skrev Niels Elgaard Larsen: >> Asger Frank: >>> Apropos: >>> >>> Hvis der ikke allerede underforstået er sådan en gentleman-m/k-aftale, >>> kunne man sige, at den der sætter en midlertidig spærring/ændring op >>> også forsøger holde øje med,

[Talk-GB] Universal Credits Map

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jonathan
The Dept of Work and Pension is using OSM for its map of Universal Credit areas: http://dwp-stats.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Viewer/index.html?appid=1713828f61dc4c01a98eb9df1dcc5ab9 Nice to see Gov finally seeing the light. Jonathan -- http://bigfatfrog67.me

[Talk-us] Code Sprint at State of the Map US

2016-07-08 Per discussione Mikel Maron
Look forward to seeing many of you at SotM US! Monday will have Code Sprints. I'm planning to focus on analysis, but would also love to delve into some core infrastructure topics.Who's planning on going? Have any more ideas of what you'd like to work on?

[Talk-de] Skandal! Skulptur im Park ohne rollstuhlgerechte Toilette!

2016-07-08 Per discussione Tom Pfeifer
Vermutlich bin ich ja politisch völlig inkorrekt, aber ich finde es eigentlich ganz gut, dass eine Skulptur im Park keine rollstuhlgerechte Toilette aufweist. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/258485628 tourism=artwork artwork_type=sculpture wheelchair=no toilets:wheelchair=no Warum sie mit

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Andy Townsend wrote: > I've tended to use "name:signed=no" and/or "ref:signed=no" if there's a > name or ref that is agreed to be "correct" but not useful for navigation. This is where things get *exceedingly* complicated in my region.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response regarding use of PSMA Administrative Boundaries (Australia)

2016-07-08 Per discussione Diane Peters
Do you mind expanding on what you mean when you say CC hasn't addressed the viral nature of BY 4.0 relative to databases? Trying to understand. Diane M. Peters General Counsel, Creative Commons Portland, Oregon http://creativecommons.org/staff#dianepeters 13:00-21:00 UTC On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at

Re: [Talk-dk] Jægersgårdgade i Århus

2016-07-08 Per discussione Asger Frank
Apropos: Hvis der ikke allerede underforstået er sådan en gentleman-m/k-aftale, kunne man sige, at den der sætter en midlertidig spærring/ændring op også forsøger holde øje med, om den er bliver fjernet igen. Ellers kan spærringen forblive fejlagtigt vist i måndedsvis efter ophør. Sådan var

Wochennotiz Nr. 311 28.06.2016–04.07.2016

2016-07-08 Per discussione Wochennotizteam
Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 311 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2016/07/wochennotiz-nr-311/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Wochennotiz Nr. 311 28.06.2016–04.07.2016

2016-07-08 Per discussione Wochennotizteam
Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 311 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2016/07/wochennotiz-nr-311/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Rafael Avila Coya
Hola: Además, creo que la mayoría de los renderizadores ignorarían los objetos amenity=waste_basket;vending_machine Saludos, Rafael. On 08/07/16 15:12, Santiago Crespo wrote: José Luis, tienes razón en que un nodo puede tener varios tags, pero como una "key" (amenity) no se puede repetir,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response regarding use of PSMA Administrative Boundaries (Australia)

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Poole
> > There are no substantial differences between the CC BY 3.0 and the CC BY > 4.0 licences. A summary of the differences can be found here: > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/version4/. > > CC BY 4.0 (like CC BY 3.0) does not prevent OpenStreetMap from

[Talk-it] OsmAnd e autovelox (speed cameras)

2016-07-08 Per discussione Stefano Droghetti
I cosiddetti "Autovelox" in OpenStreetMap, come sapete, si possono aggiungere in due modi: 1) L'apparecchio è un enforcement sulla way, è un punto della way. 2) L'apparecchio è di fianco alla way, e si prendono tre punti e si mettono in una relazione di enforcement: from (da dove l'autovelox

[Talk-br] Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de Edificações

2016-07-08 Per discussione Sérgio V .
Claro Márcio, fiquem à vontade, é para usar mesmo. Tá na wiki, tá pra uso. Obrigado, abraço - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sérgio / user:smaprs ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

[Talk-lv] maps.me-spotting

2016-07-08 Per discussione Rihards
ar maps.me dažreiz cilvēki sazīmē dīvainas lietas - http://mmwatch.osmz.ru/?country=Latvia var ik pa laikam ieskatīties, vai nav kas labojams. -- Rihards ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andy Townsend
On 08/07/2016 15:45, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: ... According to the Iowa DOT, it's official name is "Interstate Highway 235" but ... As Paul has already said, that sounds like a "ref" to me, not a "name". If something doesn't have a name, you don't need to create one for OSM... Cheers, Andy

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Andy Townsend wrote: > > In the UK we've also had a problem with some (generally armchair) mappers > thinking that "all roads must have a name" and "any name is better than no > name" so they've been adding "names" that might have been in a news

Re: [Talk-br] Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de Edificações

2016-07-08 Per discussione thundercel
Agradeço Arlindo, mas somente por questão ética pedi autorização ao Sergio. []s Marcio From: Arlindo Pereira Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 11:26 AM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br]Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de Edificações Marcio, creio que você possa divulgar

Re: [Talk-it] Recinzioni in ferro

2016-07-08 Per discussione girarsi_liste
Il 08/07/2016 15:00, demon.box ha scritto: > ciao, scusate, secondo voi queste recinzioni in ferro come si taggano oltre > che ovviamente barrier=fence: > > Per me questo railing > >

Re: [Talk-br] Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de Edificações

2016-07-08 Per discussione Arlindo Pereira
Marcio, creio que você possa divulgar sem problemas independentemente de autorização, uma vez que a licença do wiki do OSM é Creative Commons (CC-BY-SA). Mais detalhes em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki_content_license. []s Arlindo Pereira 2016-07-08 9:17 GMT-03:00

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andy Townsend
I've tended to use "name:signed=no" and/or "ref:signed=no" if there's a name or ref that is agreed to be "correct" but not useful for navigation. It's not used much: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Asigned but it does mean that you can exclude "non-useful names" from maps made

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Ilya Zverev
Thanks for raising the issue. We at maps.me tried to follow the license: basically we are combining the OSM data without certain nodes (see the list of ids at http://direct.mapswithme.com/direct/latest/skipped_nodes.lst ) and a proprietary data set for hotels. Since we do not use any OSM

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jeffrey Ollie
It's been a long time since I've messed much with turning OSM data into Garmin maps, but even back then the main problem was mapping the OSM data model to the Garmin data model, what kind of data to retain, what data to leave out, what data needed to be massaged before being included etc. It's

Re: [Talk-cz] edity z maps.me

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jan Martinec
To je to nejmenší - name:zh by db schroupala a ještě by se oblízla. Problém je v povaze dat: "tady v hostelu bydlím" se zdá být častý zdroj duplicit. Navíc to vypadá, že @Zverik si bere veškerou kritiku velmi osobně, a tím vylévá dítě i s vaničkou - viz followup tady:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Poole
Am 08.07.2016 um 14:52 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > According to [1] if someone combines non-horizontal layers together, > the results must be shared under the ODBL. No. First a general remark: A data consumer that is not complying with the ODbL always has two options to comply with the licence:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Peter
But what if this is just a layer above the OSM data technically? Regards Peter On 08.07.2016 15:15, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Maps.me made an announcement in the last update that they are using > Booking.com data to show hotels and allow reserving hotel rooms from > within the app. I doubt

Re: [Talk-cz] edity z maps.me

2016-07-08 Per discussione Miroslav Suchy
Dne 8.7.2016 v 14:35 Jan Martinec napsal(a): > Číňanům v Praze je to fuk a mydlej to tam hlava nehlava. Jj. Hlavně píšou poznámky v čínštině, což je velká legrace :) Mirek ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Janko Mihelić
Maps.me made an announcement in the last update that they are using Booking.com data to show hotels and allow reserving hotel rooms from within the app. I doubt Booking.com released their data with a permissive license. Janko Mihelić pet, 8. srp 2016. u 14:54 Andrew Harvey

Re: [OSM-co] Fwd: [HOT] Fwd: FW: Fwd: [acknowl-ej] Call for collaborative political ecology cartography (EJATLAS) (English/Espanol)

2016-07-08 Per discussione carlos felipe castillo
Para trabajar en ese campo, hay mucho. Ahí esta el trabajo de la mina Colosa, adelantado por Fredy, la desaparición por minería del primer río en Colombia, el río Sambingo en Bolívar Cauca, ademas muchas entidades del orden ambiental y corporaciones necesitan datos para adelantar acciones por el

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
José Luis, tienes razón en que un nodo puede tener varios tags, pero como una "key" (amenity) no se puede repetir, creo que quedaría algo así: amenity=waste_basket;vending_machine vending=excrement_bags operator=Ayuntamiento de Madrid payment:none=yes Y si son papeleras únicamente para

Re: [Talk-dk] Jægersgårdgade i Århus

2016-07-08 Per discussione Michael Larsen
Vejen er lukket resten af året - se også note 612368. Dette er også kun begyndelsen på vejarbejdet, det kan forventes at hele vejen lukkes. /MichaelVL On fredag den 8. juli 2016 00.34.07 CEST Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40433210 > > "Road closed due to

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Rafael Avila Coya
Hola: Un nodo puede tener todas las etiquetas que desees, incluso 0. Pero no puedes tener 2 o más "keys" repetidas. Por lo tanto, no es posible dos amenity con valores diferentes. En JOSM, por ejemplo, si abres un fichero que contiene un objeto con keys repetidos, como éste [1], se queda

[Talk-it] Recinzioni in ferro

2016-07-08 Per discussione demon.box
ciao, scusate, secondo voi queste recinzioni in ferro come si taggano oltre che ovviamente barrier=fence: fence_type=bars oppure fence_type=metal ?

[OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrew Harvey
According to [1] if someone combines non-horizontal layers together, the results must be shared under the ODBL. From my investigation it appears that the MAPS.ME app [2] is combining OSM hotels with non-OSM hotels. https://tianjara.net/hosted/maps.me-1.png is a screenshot from the app. Hotel A

Re: [Talk-cz] edity z maps.me (was: Poznámky uživatelů)

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jan Martinec
Ahoj, situace s maps.me se IMHO trochu lepší - z changesetů vytvořených přes maps.me je problematická jen menší část - ale zdá se, že konkrétně Číňanům v Praze je to fuk a mydlej to tam hlava nehlava. Nejčastější je právě duplicitní POI: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40340725 Nicméně -

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response regarding use of PSMA Administrative Boundaries (Australia)

2016-07-08 Per discussione Simon Poole
Unluckily this simply confirms that the data cannot be included in OSM. As I pointed out before, this is simply an indirect subsidy of the producers of proprietary data and closed systems. Simon Am 08.07.2016 um 03:15 schrieb cleary: > The issue of using the Australian PSMA Administrative

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Jose Luis Perez Diez
El Divendres 08 Juliol 2016, a les 12:38:25, Rafael Avila Coya va escriure: > Lo de separarlos es porque son dos cosas diferentes. Cuál de los dos > amenity=* pondrías? Es lo mismo que cuando tienes un restaurante que es > pensión a la vez, por ejemplo. Yo creo que es más correcto. segun

Re: [Talk-br] Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de Edificações

2016-07-08 Per discussione thundercel
Bom dia Sergio. Parabéns pelo Tutorial. Você nos autoriza a reproduzir esse tutorial em nosso site Cocar, com os devidos créditos? []s Marcio From: Sérgio V. Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:57 AM To: talk-br@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-br] Rio Olympics – Tutorial para Importação de

[OSM-co] Fwd: [HOT] Fwd: FW: Fwd: [acknowl-ej] Call for collaborative political ecology cartography (EJATLAS) (English/Espanol)

2016-07-08 Per discussione hyan...@gmail.com
Hola maperos! Les comparto esta convocatoria a la cual quizás podamos participar debido a la pertinencia con problemas ambientales en el país o la región, se que hay antecedentes de mapeo de industria extractiva donde converge con choques de las comunidades. Saludos, Humberto Yances --

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
Creo que la opción de 2 nodos es más correcta, porque son 2 instalaciones. Por otro lado, tampoco me parece mal lo que propone Alejandro, pues creo que un usuario que quiera encontrar bolsas posiblemente buscará vending=excrement_bags (sin amenity=vending_machine) y otro que quiera las papeleras

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Maurizio Napolitano
Forse questo torna utile https://github.com/knowname/morituri --- morituri -- the COMMercial2OSM converter comm2osm creates an OSM (OpenStreetMap) PBF/XML/etc. file from commercial shapefiles to be able to use OSM tools on the data. The architecture is plugin based. Currently there is a plugin

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
> - aggiungere il C.A.P. riferendosi a questa mappa: > http://www.rudybandiera.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cap-ferrara.jpg (N.B. > qualcuno ha idea di come si possa fare velocemente una cosa del genere? > Altrimenti c'è da impazzire.) Tempo fa veniva suggerito in ML di usare la tabella degli

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
> - La normalizzazione mi sembra agisca su preposizioni e abbreviazioni del > nome via, purtroppo non conosco lo standard ISTAT, è sufficiente? Chissà > perché ero convinto che andassero normalizzate anche le definizioni es. Via > G. Garibaldi => Via Giuseppe Garibaldi, Via Garibaldi => Via

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Alejandro Moreno Calvo
Yo lo de separar en 2 nodos no lo veo porque físicamente son el mismo aparato. ¿Qué ventajas veis a tenerlo en 2 nodos?¿No va a implicar más mantenimiento? El 8 de julio de 2016, 12:25, Rafael Avila Coya escribió: > Hola: > > Creo que mejor, coincidiendo en muchos puntos

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Rafael Avila Coya
Hola: Creo que mejor, coincidiendo en muchos puntos con Santiago: * amenity=vending_machine * vending=excrement_bags * payment:none=yes ó fee=no (yo me inclinaría por payment:none=yes) * operator=Ayuntamiento de Madrid Yo separaría en dos nodos. En un segundo nodo (a centímetros del anterior):

Re: [Talk-es] Mapear papeleras con dispensador de bolsas para perros

2016-07-08 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
Hola, Yo cambiaba fee=no por payment:none=yes, como pone en la wiki [1], aunque entiendo que da un poco igual. También mira la discusión sobre si conviene separar en 2 nodos la papelera y el dispensador, creo que tiene sentido hacerlo [2] Y en Madrid podríamos añadir operator=Ayuntamiento de

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 12:02, Andrea Musuruane > ha scritto: > > 2016-07-08 11:44 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo >: > > Ciao, > a quanto pare la cosa sembra più semplice di quello che avevo immaginato > usando

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 12:00, Alessandro Palmas > ha scritto: > > Il 08/07/2016 11:44, Lorenzo ha scritto: >> >>> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:34, Lorenzo >> > ha scritto: >> >>

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
2016-07-08 11:44 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo : > > Ciao, > a quanto pare la cosa sembra più semplice di quello che avevo immaginato > usando gli script di Andrea, un paio di domande: > > - nello script (non sono un programmatore quindi metto subito le mani > avanti :) non vedo la

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Alessandro Palmas
Il 08/07/2016 11:44, Lorenzo ha scritto: Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:34, Lorenzo > ha scritto: Ciao, a quanto pare la cosa sembra più semplice di quello che avevo immaginato usando gli script di Andrea, un paio di domande:

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:34, Lorenzo ha > scritto: > >> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:29, Alessandro Palmas >> ha scritto: >> >> Il 08/07/2016 10:31, Stefano Droghetti ha scritto: >>> >>> Potreste linkare questa?

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
2016-07-08 11:30 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo : > > Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:23, Andrea Musuruane < > musur...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > 2016-07-08 10:56 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo : > >> >> Ciao, >> ho iniziato a mettere su una procedura sul repo GitHub

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Stefano Droghetti
Il 08/07/2016 11:29, Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: Siamo sicuri che non siano gli stessi? La regione li ha pubblicati a fine aprile. In caso di dubbio possiamo chiedere direttamente a loro. Leggo dalla pagina wiki che nell'esempio si parla di civico 7a, non si era stabilito che l'esponente

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:29, Alessandro Palmas > ha scritto: > > Il 08/07/2016 10:31, Stefano Droghetti ha scritto: >> >> Potreste linkare questa? >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ferrara,_Italy/Numeri_civici >> Sono, molto più aggiornati di

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Stefano Droghetti
Io nel frattempo ho applicato gli script fatti da Andrea Musuruane alo shapefile di Ferrara, ed ecco il file .osm con i civici di Ferrara, già normalizzati: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_9DH8lxMw2bRmVfQmt5cFV6RVk Ecco cosa bisogna aggiungere prima di fare l'upload su OSM: - aggiungere

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 08 lug 2016, alle ore 11:23, Andrea Musuruane > ha scritto: > > 2016-07-08 10:56 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo >: > > Ciao, > ho iniziato a mettere su una procedura sul repo GitHub >

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Alessandro Palmas
Il 08/07/2016 10:31, Stefano Droghetti ha scritto: Potreste linkare questa? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ferrara,_Italy/Numeri_civici Sono, molto più aggiornati di quelli dell'Emilia Romagna, del Comune di Ferrara. Solo Comune, non Provincia. Siamo sicuri che non siano gli stessi? La

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
2016-07-08 10:56 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo : > > Ciao, > ho iniziato a mettere su una procedura sul repo GitHub > https://github.com/osmItalia/civici/ volevo inserire un riferimento al > repo nella pagina wiki >

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Lorenzo
> Il giorno 07 lug 2016, alle ore 20:57, Lorenzo Perone > ha scritto: > > Ciao Stefano, > vorremmo procedere all'import dei civici rilasciati dalla regione in OSM. > Ho scaricato il pacchetto con gli shape file della provincia di Bologna ed ho > trovato due shape di

Re: [Talk-it] import civici Emilia Romagna

2016-07-08 Per discussione Stefano Droghetti
Il 07/07/2016 20:34, Lorenzo Perone ha scritto: Ciao Lorenzo, per ora stavo cercando di capire dove aprire la pagina wiki per documentare e coordinare l'import. Ho appena creato la pagina http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Emilia_Romagna_import_numeri_civici_2016 ,

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Morgan wrote: > It is confusing to use open street maps in my area(Central Ohio) for > driving directions since the "common names" of high ways do not match > road signs. The common names are used by open map chest for road names. >

[Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

2016-07-08 Per discussione Kevin Morgan
It is confusing to use open street maps in my area(Central Ohio) for driving directions since the "common names" of high ways do not match road signs. The common names are used by open map chest for road names. For example when turning on to State Route 315 with OpenMapChest loaded on my GPS I am