Re: [Talk-de] Gültigkeit von Verkehrsschildern nur in eine Fahrtrichtung?

sent from a phone > On 8. Sep 2019, at 00:17, SteMo via Talk-de wrote: > > Ich bin inzwischen auf mehrere Straßen und Wege gestoßen bei denen ich > von einer Seite Durchfahrtsbeschränkungen der Art "Durchfahrt verboten, > Land- & Forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", für Durchfahrt verboten

Re: [Talk-de] Gültigkeit von Verkehrsschildern nur in eine Fahrtrichtung?

Moin Sebastian, ja, das kenne ich, nur ich brauche eine Lösung, die ohne Spuren oder eigenen Linien, wie bei z.B. Autobahnen, funktioniert. Bei den Fällen, die ich meine, geht es hauptsächlich um Tracks, einspurige Landstraßen oder Wege; eine Spur, die sich beide Fahrtrichtungen teilen

Re: [Talk-de] Gültigkeit von Verkehrsschildern nur in eine Fahrtrichtung?

Hallo, im Wiki gibt es auf der Seite DE:Key:access ein Kapitel „Fahrspurabhängige Einschränkungen”. Allerdings braucht man dazu Spuren. Damit könnte also zumindest eine Lösung für breitere Straßen sein. Grüße Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Talk-GB] Boundary_line at the coast

On 2019-09-08 00:09, Colin Smale wrote: > On 2019-09-07 23:06, Edward Bainton wrote: > > 3. Also, there are two walls visible on aerial imagery that all but match the > doglegged county boundary as it crosses the isthmus. Is it safe to assume > that these mark the actual boundary, and can I

[Talk-es] Criterio de clasificación de entidades de población

Gracias Daniel, no conocía las páginas de normalización, cada día aprendo algo nuevo en OSM. ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

[Talk-de] Gültigkeit von Verkehrsschildern nur in eine Fahrtrichtung?

Moin zusammen, ich konnte nach einigem Suchen bisher nichts dazu finden. Gibt es für das folgende eine Mappingmöglichkeit: Ich bin inzwischen auf mehrere Straßen und Wege gestoßen bei denen ich von einer Seite Durchfahrtsbeschränkungen der Art "Durchfahrt verboten, Land- &

Re: [Talk-GB] Boundary_line at the coast

On 2019-09-07 23:06, Edward Bainton wrote: > I'm interested in boundaries marked at Mavis Grind [1] (thanks to SK53 for > the waterway=portage [2] tag - Mavis Grind is an old Norse portage, still in > use by Shetland Canoe Club). > > 1. Does anyone know if county boundary lines at the coast

[Talk-GB] Boundary_line at the coast

I'm interested in boundaries marked at Mavis Grind (thanks to SK53 for the waterway=portage tag - Mavis Grind is an old Norse portage, still in use by Shetland Canoe Club). 1. Does anyone know if county

Re: [Talk-GB] 'Sources' tags

I don't know how iD does it, but Vespucci includes the imagery used when you actually made an edit, potentially multiple different sources. You should still enter a source comment, imagery_used is simply for additional documentation purposes. Am 07.09.2019 um 18:54 schrieb Edward Bainton: > I've

Re: [Talk-GB] 'Sources' tags

Manual addition is still useful as it   confirms that editor guessed correctly (iD will add this data both for user tracing from imagery and one who ignored it). 7 Sep 2019, 19:54 by bainton@gmail.com: > I've noticed the changeset data includes the aerial image used (presumably at > the

Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 132, assunto 5

Projeto muito bom. Parabéns pela iniciativa. Grande sucesso. > > Tópicos de Hoje: > >1. Alunos Turismo Ecológico (Sérgio V.) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:49:23 + > From: Sérgio V. > To:

Re: [Talk-it] Fermata per autobus turistici

Ciao Martin, Grazie per esserti interessato alla questione! Ci ho riflettuto e direi che a questo punto è meglio se tagliamo la testa al toro e facciamo un nuovo tag: highway=tourist_bus_stop Che implicherebbe: bus=no tourist_bus=yes E soprattutto che non è public transport... Se nessuno ha

Re: [Talk-GB] 'Sources' tags

On 07/09/2019 17:54, Edward Bainton wrote: I've noticed the changeset data includes the aerial image used (presumably at the moment you hit 'save', if you've referred to several?) Does this mean I don't need to add a source=aerial_imagery tag before I save a changeset? iD doesn't have it

[Talk-GB] 'Sources' tags

I've noticed the changeset data includes the aerial image used (presumably at the moment you hit 'save', if you've referred to several?) Does this mean I don't need to add a source=aerial_imagery tag before I save a changeset? iD doesn't have it available as default; you have to choose it under

Re: [Talk-es] Directrices para la navegación peatonal

Buenas tardes. Ya está disponible la traducción en español de las directrices para la navegación peatonal. [1] Atentamente, Daniel [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_para_la_navegaci%C3%B3n_peatonal -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Spain-f5409873.html

Re: [Talk-it] problema default access in Italia

In linea di massima sono d'accordo. Sarebbe utile, se facciamo il dettaglio, di aggiungere delle note che fanni'o riferimento alle claissificazioni italiani per legge. Da controllare/aggiornare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad#Italy e guardare anche

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2019-09-05

These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@

Re: [Talk-it] problema default access in Italia

se non ci sono pareri opposti cambierei le cose evidenziate sopra: 1. aggiungo la proprietà motorroad a fianco a motorway 2. metto "trunk" come primary, secondary ecc., 3. rimuovo la colonna generica di "access" 4. cambio moped a "no" per motorway e motorroad per il default di "path" non sono

Re: [Talk-it] Fermata per autobus turistici

Non c'era più risposte sensate sul forum tedesco, per completezza questo è il link: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67252 La mia proposta sarebbe di fare una proposta ufficiale, perché si tratta di una cosa che si trova ogni tanto in luoghi affollati da turisti, e per me non

Re: [Talk-es] Directrices para la navegación peatonal

Gracias por el aviso y sobretodo por la traducción. Es información muy útil. El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:17, dcapillae () escribió: > Buenos días. > > En el wiki han publicado unas directrices (o buenas prácticas) para la > navegación peatonal [1]. Son relativamente recientes. El original

[talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 475

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 475 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/12353 * Koňské ikony pro osmap.cz * Mapping party Prušánky? * Podzimní MP freemap.sk. * Naučné cedule s OSM. * Místa na kempování. * Solární panely v UK. * Vodíkové plnící stanice. * Lokální zastoupení Nadace OSM.

Re: [Talk-es] Criterio de clasificación de entidades de población

Muchas gracias, Iago. Ya me imagino cómo va a ser recibida la propuesta. Espero que no te desanimen los comentarios, lo que pasa es que has escogido un tema complicado para tu primera propuesta. El uso actual de las etiquetas «place» viene de muy antiguo, son muy empleadas y abarcan todo el

Re: [Talk-es] Criterio de clasificación de entidades de población

Mandado también a la lista de tagging internacional. La tabla que he preparado en la wiki (en una página de propuesta) es bastante flexible y permite que cada región del mundo prepare su propio algoritmo para clasificar las entidades de población. ___

Re: [Talk-es] Criterio de clasificación de entidades de población

Buenos días. Coincido con Jeisenbe en que esta propuesta sería mejor comentarla íntegramente en la lista de etiquetado [1]. Luego la comunidad española que haga lo que quiera, pero dado el alcance de la propuesta, sería bueno que se comentase a nivel global con mapeadores de todo el mundo. Cada

Re: [Talk-us] Oahu, Hawaii CDP boundaries

I agree; this sounds correct. I've lived in the USA for several decades (my entire life), though I do travel. Country, state, county, city (in the USA) rather neatly map onto admin_level= 2, 4, 6 and 8 (respectively). There are wider-area exceptions (like township=7) and in some places

[Talk-in] Fwd: FW: Invitation to Geo4SDGs seminar at GeoSmart India 2019

Invitation to join GeoSmart India 2019 *From: *Megha Datta *Date: *Thursday, 5 September 2019 at 5:48 PM *To: *"talk-in@openstreetmap.org" *Subject: *Invitation to Geo4SDGs seminar at GeoSmart India 2019 Dear OpenStreetMappers, Greetings from Geospatial Media and Communications

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: OSM- Salon géonumérique St Dié

Le 06/09/2019 à 22:10, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : Le 15/07/2019 à 12:22, Benoit Fournier - OpenStreetMap France a écrit : Est-ce que quelqu'un peut/veut présenter OSM, tenir un stand, ... au Festival International de Géographie de St Dié des Vosges (4-6 octobre 2019) ? Bonsoir, Désolé

Re: [Talk-us] Oahu, Hawaii CDP boundaries

ZIP Codes (US Postal Service codes) are not administrative boundaries. They are widely used for addressing, for routing and for deliveries by private companies in addition to the USPS, but they are not used for any official administrative purposes, at least not in the States where I have lived.

Re: [Talk-dk] Fejl 500 på SDFE flyfoto i JOSM?

Linje fra terminalvindue hvorfra jeg kører JOSM: 2019-09-07 07:36:45.189 INFO: GET https://osmtools.septima.dk/mapproxy/tiles/ 1.0.0/kortforsyningen_ortoforaar/EPSG3857/17/68718/41364.jpeg -> HTTP_1 500 (14 B) lørdag den 7. september 2019 08.09.57 CEST skrev Hans Gregers Petersen: > Hej

Re: [Talk-dk] Fejl 500 på SDFE flyfoto i JOSM?

Hej Michael, Er det gennem vores tjeneste (osmtools.septima.dk) eller direkte på SDFEs wms? /Gregers fre. 6. sep. 2019 kl. 14.47 skrev Michael Andersen < openstreet...@stofanet.dk>: > Ca den sidste uges tid har jeg fået et stigende antal "Fejl 500" når jeg > forsøger at zoome ind på områder i

Re: [Talk-es] Criterio de clasificación de entidades de población

Gracias, Iago. Buen trabajo. Creo que deberías publicar un mensaje en la lista de etiquetado general [1] para que mapeadores de otros países puedan proponer cómo creen ellos que se deberían clasificar las poblaciones en sus respectivos territorios. La idea que subyace a este tipo de propuestas