Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Thank you for the clarification. > On Jul 20, 2020, at 6:08 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > The legend is just for the USFS road layer that is served by Mapbox on JOSM. > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] POI files of Pub/Restaurant chain

Hi Rob, thanks for the nudge, they have a nice amount of brands, it would be great to be able to use their data freely :) @all, where would I document the request (and the eventual permission) in the Wiki? It seems that under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permissions#Europe there's no

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

That's exactly how I see it working too. Eventually we could probably put together a document of best practice, suggestions for the workflow as a guide for anyone else looking to set this up. On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 14:04, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Hi All, > > We expect to encounter the same

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

Hi All, We expect to encounter the same problem at the NHVR if we begin to use OSM. My (possibly unfounded) initial thoughts are based around linking the OSM & Source feature outside OSM in something similar to a "join" table. The join might be on attribution (id), geometry or both. Then, you

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: > > >> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow > > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM > > wrote: >> Clifford, >> >> Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM > wrote: > Clifford, > > Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to make out the > surface reliably from aerial photos. > > Sure - here is a link >

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

The legend is just for the USFS road layer that is served by Mapbox on JOSM. Sent from my Android phone. On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 4:48 PM Tod Fitch wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM wrote: > >> Clifford, >> >> Could you repost

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM wrote: > Clifford, > > Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to make out the > surface reliably from aerial photos. > Sure - here is a link https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/7zQNGbyNQqBMj2S -- @osm_washington www.snowandsnow.us

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

They apply calcium chloride solution as a dust control agent. CaCl2, AKA “cackle 2” From: Mike Thompson Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 6:51 PM To: brad Cc: talk-us Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:10 AM brad

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:10 AM brad wrote: > Hmmm, interesting. I'm not sure they compact very many roads around > here (CO). I have lived, or spent time in, rural parts of four states (MN, IA, OH and CO) and I have never seen an unpaved road compacted. They get graded once a year perhaps

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:46 AM wrote: > Mike, > > Good idea on the route references. What should the network be set to? > > Others on this list are better able to answer that question, but my opinion is network=US:FS: ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Brad, using Alaska as an example, these roads are in fact, compacted by vehicles driving on them. I have occasionally seen a power-roller or sheepsfoot roller used to compact rural roads but such specialized gear is mostly used during the building of larger highways. Typically a road is built up

Re: [Talk-it] Riprendo vecchia discussione, spiazzo deposito tronchi.

sent from a phone > On 20. Jul 2020, at 22:38, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu > wrote: > > storage=pile_log log_pile Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Denominazione di strade interne

sent from a phone > On 20. Jul 2020, at 23:04, Vittorio Bertola wrote: > > Quindi direi proprio che un nome esiste ed è pure ufficiale, sia su carta che > sul posto. E poi, capisci che se l'unica indicazione che sappiamo dare per > arrivare in via Sansovino 243 interno 55 interno L è

[Talk-GB] UPRN tag proposal page

Hi all, As discussed at the State of the Map online workshop, I took away an action to draft a proposal page for ref:GB:uprn. This page is now up online. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ref:GB:uprn This is the first one of these I have done in a long time so hopefully I

Re: [Talk-it] Denominazione di strade interne

Il 2020-07-20 21:38 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: sent from a phone On 20. Jul 2020, at 20:31, Vittorio Bertola via Talk-it wrote: vorrei chiedere se esista una linea guida per il tag name delle strade corrispondenti a interni, perché qui non ne ho trovato traccia:

Re: [Talk-it] Riprendo vecchia discussione, spiazzo deposito tronchi.

Il 20/07/20 16:18, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi ha scritto: > Non mi piace l'uso di amenity=parking perchè in contrasto con il suo > significato di parcheggio per veicoli. È chiaro che non si può usare > come parcheggio: > https://imgur.com/a/7zY9V > > Come tag principale sceglierei un man_made=storage

Re: [Talk-it] Denominazione di strade interne

sent from a phone > On 20. Jul 2020, at 20:31, Vittorio Bertola via Talk-it > wrote: > > vorrei chiedere se esista una linea guida per il tag name delle strade > corrispondenti a interni, perché qui non ne ho trovato traccia: > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Disclaimer regarding data in Virginia (US)?

Jul 20, 2020, 20:35 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > OSM surely incorporates data in Virginia which was not prepared by suitably > licensed entities (per > https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter4/section54.1-402/). > > According to Virginia law, OSM must therefore display the

[OSM-legal-talk] Disclaimer regarding data in Virginia (US)?

OSM surely incorporates data in Virginia which was not prepared by suitably licensed entities (per https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter4/section54.1-402/). According to Virginia law, OSM must therefore display the following notice: Any determination of topography or

[Talk-it] Denominazione di strade interne

Salve a tutti, vorrei chiedere se esista una linea guida per il tag name delle strade corrispondenti a interni, perché qui non ne ho trovato traccia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade Attualmente, almeno a Torino, gli interni sono

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:27 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us < talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Jul 20, 2020, 15:32 by o...@dead10ck.com: > > I was going to make a subpage of New York with the title of "NYS GIS > Clearinghouse", and include a link to it in the Potential Data sources > page.

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

On 19/07/2020 18.47, tj-osmw...@lowsnr.net wrote: Editing in Boundary County, Idaho in the Panhandle, I've been extending the forest landuse area around Bonners Ferry and have come across a difficulty in classifying forest roads. It seems that many have been automatically imported and have

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

Jul 20, 2020, 15:32 by o...@dead10ck.com: > Thanks Mateusz, I actually tried to make a page, but I am encountering some > strange behavior from the wiki. When I try to edit or add a page, a text box > appears that says "confirmation code," with no other explanation. I don't get > an email

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ref et ref:FR

Le 20/07/2020 à 00:39, Yves P. a écrit : Je propose de supprimer la colonne Tag2Link, ce greffon n'étant plus utilisé. le greffon n'est plus nécessaire, car il a été intégré dans JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Fr%3AHelp/Action/Tag2Link) n'en connaissant pas l'utilisation je n'ai

Re: [OSM-ja] JOSMの不具合？

坂ノ下です。 不具合報告ありがとうございます。 > ちなみに私はこのようなウェイの共有は割と積極的に分離していってますので、ご理解を。 そうですね。私も海岸線と森林がウェイを共有する必要性は高くないと思います。 ※私も巨大マルチポリゴンな森林は少しずつ削って普通の森に変えていたりします。 それでは。 On 2020/07/20 10:05, OKADA Tsuneo wrote: 岡田です。 JOSMで編集していて不都合な状態が発生しましたので、情報共有のために書いておきます。 coastlineとwoodのエリアをそれぞれマルチポリゴンのouter

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Wildlife Sites

ooo! nice detail. The 'Local Wildlife Sites' seem to be more wide-ranging than the Wildlife Trust's own sites, they appear to be 'important' green areas throughout the area. https://data.gov.uk/search?q=Local+Wildlife+Sites%5Bpublisher%5D=%5Btopic%5D=%5Bformat%5D==best lists a number of areas.

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Wildlife Sites

On 20/07/2020 15:52, Jez Nicholson wrote: Does anyone have any experience with https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/local-wildlife-sites ? I've had an inquiry about including Brighton & Hove LWSes on OSM. I am a member of Yorkshire Wildlife Trust so I had a conversation with them about their

Re: [Talk-it] Riprendo vecchia discussione, spiazzo deposito tronchi.

Penso che il materiale nel deposito dovrebbe essere "log" (tronco) On Mon, 20 Jul 2020, 16:19 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi, wrote: > Il giorno dom, 19/07/2020 alle 20.47 +0200, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo > DOT eu ha scritto: > > Riporto in vita una vecchia discussione da me avviata che alla fine non

[Talk-GB] Local Wildlife Sites

Does anyone have any experience with https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/local-wildlife-sites ? I've had an inquiry about including Brighton & Hove LWSes on OSM. - Jez ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Riprendo vecchia discussione, spiazzo deposito tronchi.

Il giorno dom, 19/07/2020 alle 20.47 +0200, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: > Riporto in vita una vecchia discussione da me avviata che alla fine > nonaveva portato a conclusioni certe [0], escludo a priori > spiazziutilizzati come slarghi o aree non perfezionate per tale > scopo. >

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

Thanks Mateusz, I actually tried to make a page, but I am encountering some strange behavior from the wiki. When I try to edit or add a page, a text box appears that says "confirmation code," with no other explanation. I don't get an email with a confirmation code, so I have no idea what it

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Hmmm, interesting.   I'm not sure they compact very many roads around here (CO).  Maybe a regional difference.  It seems like they put a thick layer of gravel on and let the traffic compact it.   Not fun to ride on with a bike, or a motorcycle. Do rocks tend to come to the surface of a

[Talk-br] Reversão da inserção em massa de bicycle e class:bicycle nas rodovias do país

Envio essa mensagem para documentar a reversão de uma edição em massa, seguindo o código de conduta. [1] Ontem nos grupos do Telegram Classificação e Avançado foi discutida a necessidade de reverter os changesets 88054258, 88055043, 88055062 e 88205409 que adicionaram a 20 mil linhas de rodovias

Re: [Talk-it] facebook compra mapillary

Il giorno lun, 20/07/2020 alle 14.21 +0200, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > Ciao, > > Il lun 20 lug 2020, 13:51 ha scritto: > > Per chi non l'avesse letto su weeklyosm, c'è questo strumento per > > copiare le proprie immagini da Mapillary a OpenStreetCam. > > https://osm.svimik.com/photosync/C’è

Re: [Talk-it] facebook compra mapillary

Ciao, Il lun 20 lug 2020, 13:51 ha scritto: > Per chi non l'avesse letto su weeklyosm, c'è questo strumento per copiare > le proprie immagini da Mapillary a OpenStreetCam. > > https://osm.svimik.com/photosync/ > > C’è un thread di discussione sul forum di Mapillary. > >

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 12:33, David Wales wrote: > Is there any reason against using a custom tag as a linking key? > > e.g. some_import_object_id=123456 > > Then when you need to update the data, you can match the key in OSM with > the key in the source data. It can be a deterrent to mappers,

Re: [Talk-it] facebook compra mapillary

Il giorno gio, 18/06/2020 alle 22.53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > Appena saputo, Facebook ha comprato Mapillary. Dopo Openstreetcam (venduto da > Telenav a Grab) è il secondo acquisto di streetview che non promette bene. > > Se li avete affidato le vostre foto forse sarebbe una buona

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Mike, Good idea on the route references. What should the network be set to? On 2020/07/20 7:56, Mike Thompson wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 4:49 PM > wrote: > >  For > roads that appear to be public access (e.g. to go to a lake) but are >

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Clifford, Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to make out the surface reliably from aerial photos. On 2020/07/20 14:18, Clifford Snow wrote: > If you are using JOSM there is a USFS road layer. The color of the way > indicates surface and highway classification if I remember

[Talk-GB] Surveying rural buildings

Dear all I have been mapping a few properties using Bing maps with local knowledge supplemented by some physical measuring (tape measure or simply pacing). I now want to ramp up my mapping but the challenge especially in rural areas is that sometimes the outline of a building is not clear -

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Siège des EPCI

Bonjour, Le 19/07/2020 à 13:09, Gaël Simon a écrit : Bonjour, De nombreuses relations EPCI n’indiquent pas leur siège avec le rôle admin_centre. Par contre beaucoup ont un tag wikidata qui indique l’emplacement de ce siège. Ajouter l’admin_center a-t-il alors un intérêt ou ces informations

Re: [Talk-GB] TPT / NCN62 (was: Re: National Cycle Network removal/reclassification)

> It'd be a lot of work for relatively little reward though - presumably that's why no-one's stepped up to tidy things up yet. Andy, I'm quite happy to pick this up as I've been mapping parts of the route local to me anyway so assessing what is and isn't the TPT shouldn't be that arduous. It's

Re: [Talk-it] Sondaggio OpenStreetMap Italia

Ciao Marco, grazie mille a te per il lavoro che ci hai messo per fare questa classifica! Anisa On 7/17/20 1:32 PM, mbranco2 wrote: Grazie Anisa del tuo lavoro, interessante. Oltre a notare che non hanno risposto mappatori di San Marino e Vaticano (forse hanno una loro mailing list? :-) ),

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

I imagine this approach would work better on nodes than on ways. But I imagine that the number of keys with changed nodes would be much fewer than the total number of keys, allowing the unchanged nodes to be easily updated, and reducing the conflation burden. On 20/7/20 5:24 pm, Mateusz Konieczny

Re: [Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

Kevin wrote:: A nit: most 'improved' gravel roads are surface=compacted. 'gravel' is like rail ballast; a compacted surface ordinarily has a mix of fine gravel and even finer material such as sand, and is rolled. Americans will often refer to a compacted road as a 'dirt' or 'gravel' road but the

Re: [OSM-talk] "helpful" remote correctional edits (or "please don't correct bank ATMs in the Sahara desert" - was: Re: Planned revert of added surface and tracktype tags without local knowledge in va

sent from a phone > On 19. Jul 2020, at 23:27, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote: > > no doubt many of our gravel tracks were correct at the time and have now been > paved or bound. I have thought about this, the tags were added in 2017 and while the asphalt didn’t look as if it was paved

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

(1) pollution of tags by such keys is irritating (2) people may split, move, delete, edit or copy such tag wikidata key is slightly better - but requires wikidata entries Jul 20, 2020, 04:33 by daviewa...@disroot.org: > Is there any reason against using a custom tag as a linking key? > > e.g.

Re: [Talk-us] Interested in importing address points in New York State

Jul 20, 2020, 05:12 by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:46 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <> > talk-us@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> Once you write this diary entry (or OSM Wiki page) please post >> it to the mailing list! >> > > Here you go:  >