On 09/10/2014 12:56, Dave F. wrote:
Are others getting the same? Anybody able to sort the problem?
It's not your ISP is it? I'm seeing some (unrelated to OSM) routing
oddities on Plusnet (madasafish's parent) in the UK currently to some US
sites.
Other than re-render issues I'm seeing no
On 07/10/2014 16:23, Stefan Oderbolz wrote:
just a quick information that I just releases osmapi 0.4.0 which
finally supports the Notes API (add, comment, close, reopen, search).
For those who have never heard if it, it is a python wrapper for the
OpenStreetMap API (version 0.6).
Thanks
On 06/10/2014 11:30, Tom Chance wrote:
My principal difficulty is in working out what people have done in
each changeset. The best tool we had for this - OWL - is now defunct.
This let you browse around the area looking at all changesets, seeing
features that had been deleted / moved /
With new editors though I sometimes think we forget how hard it is for
someone to start editing now in e.g. the centre of London compared to
when we experienced mappers started. Here, for example (courtesy of
Martijn Van Exel's OSM Then and Now) is what the area I started
mapping in looked
On 04/10/2014 10:14, David Woolley wrote:
... it is probably a mistaken attempt at personal mapping.
That's what it looked like to me, certainly.
The big problem with relations is that they tend to be subject to
frequent edits, so reverts may fail, because they would take out a
On 01/10/2014 02:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
* Slowed down too much after about 200 points of interest (I need
about 30,000 minimum for the current project)
* Limited flexibility in designing the popup
* Ways disappear on the map (they don't get a pin: zoom in on the map
to see two hidden
On 25/09/2014 14:32, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I'm looking for a current answer to:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6208/
/How to view the geometry of an older way?/
Specifically I'm trying to view 2 and 3 of:
http://iandees.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/20953890
How about something
On 15/09/2014 08:53, Stephan Knauss wrote:
So actually a map with no diff is good. At least a good indication
that the map is not missing something important. Assuming for a moment
that Google data is a perfect reference (which is not as we all know).
Unfortunately, we (as in all OSM users
On 09/09/2014 08:11, Stephan Knauss wrote:
I have created a map which visually diffs our data against Google Maps.
I can see how Google could find this useful locally to me - it would
enable them to remove some of the roads on their map that don't exist,
like the one to a coal mine that
On 08/09/2014 15:21, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/09/2014 23:09, Guy Collins wrote:
... inadvertently made the runways disappear ...
and see also this issue raised against the standard style sheet today:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/927
(Airport runways have disappeared)
On 06/09/2014 09:15, Edward Betts wrote:
I adjusted my criteria for islands, villages, towns and cities.
There are now 102,691 matches and 230 mismatches.
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html
One question that immediately springs to mind -
On 06/09/2014 22:15, Archer wrote:
https://wdq.wmflabs.org/ is a powerful Tool for Wikidata
Thanks, but the query builder doesn't appear to actually work, though
(in either Chrome or SeaMonkey on Windows) without cutting and pasting
the resulting magic codeinto a separate search form, and
On 01/09/2014 02:28, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
1. We already link to Wikipedia using the wikipedia=* tag. I really
can't see how wikidata=* is any different.
One way that it is different is that a wikipedia link for e.g. (1) is
human-readable (en:Tate Britain
On 28/08/2014 11:39, Richard Z. wrote:
To make things complicated - a few days ago one contributor did a well
meant effort to convert all
bridge=swing - bridge=movable+bridge:movable=swing
and reverted that edit because there were too many errors in it. Hence
doing a naive search for user
On 27/08/2014 22:15, Andy Mabbett wrote:
What, again? ;-)
You've been beating the drum for wikidata for a while, but that's
mostly been on the GB list or even more locally. I definitely think
that it's worth explaining the benefits on talk@.
For example:
Wikidata has data on each of
On 28/08/2014 13:25, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'm not anticipating many changes; this import gives a leg-up to a
human process.
(as has been mentioned before) wikidata may not change, but OSM data
surely does. If I split a way that has a wikidata tag, how do I know
which of the two resulting
On 27/08/2014 17:47, Edward Betts wrote:
Matching criteria:
https://github.com/EdwardBetts/osm-wikidata/blob/master/entity_types.json
Presumably there's some geographical matching criteria too (so each
Black Hill in the hills list is matched to the correct one)?
If so, is there a licence
On 27/08/2014 17:47, Edward Betts wrote:
I'd like to annotate these 70k objects in OSM with a Wikidata tag
automatically.
Perhaps it's worth explaining the benefits of having a link to a
wikidata item on an OSM item? When this was discussed previously
On 25/08/2014 14:01, Pierre Béland wrote:
Could somebody take care of contacting this contributor.
I'd have thought that in the first instance you were best placed to do
this, since you know what you mapped and why, and you can ask why things
were deleted?
Unless you know what their
On 24/08/2014 00:10, Andy Street wrote:
That's not strictly true, we do multiplex routes but individual
sections of road are only ever referred to by a single route number
(usually the most significant route being carried by the road).
I'm not convinced that we (in the UK) do. I don't
On 23/08/2014 03:49, Andreas Vilén wrote:
I have never edited in Great Britain before so I hope I didn't step on
any toes, but I have edited in southern Sweden since 2008 and before I
started there was barely anything there...
Looking at ITO's OSM Mapper, that village hasn't had a local
On 23/08/2014 10:55, Christian Quest wrote:
For the third one, I don't understand it.
It is a big list (collection if your prefer) of roads, and I don't
understand the opening_hours tags.
What is this supposed to describe ?
Does this mean nobody can drive on these roads except during the
On 23/08/2014 02:03, Dave F. wrote:
... Of course you need local knowledge. ...
I'm not convinced that that's always the case. For example, to-fix
has just taken me here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41203129#map=19/53.23534/-0.61945
Whilst I'm no fan of armchair mapping, you don't
On 21/08/2014 22:36, Janko Mihelić wrote:
This makes sense because you can have more than one route on one
way.
Some countries do this, but the UK (where the B3070 is) does not*, so
there's really no need for it.
Cheers,
Andy
* with the exception of E road routes - which aren't
Hi,
User Gavaasuren has been adding a series of imaginary footpaths over
the last few weeks, each with the changeset comment zwischen
Fußgängerzonen und Straßen Fußweg erstellt. What they seem to be doing
is joining pedestrian islands to random nearby roads in order to
resolve routing
On 17/08/2014 20:34, Ruben Maes wrote:
It's doing it again – the UK is going blue once more!
Does anyone know what the problem is? Last time, was it a broken
coastline in the end?
The Coastline view in OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ suggests a
self-intersection problem roughly here:
On 13/08/2014 10:05, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:37 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads have locally
known names, but these are not displayed on signs :( Need recording but
not necessarily displaying.
I think thats an important
On 11/08/2014 13:00, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote:
You can add this kind of simple detection problem to Osmose QA just by
adding it on this wiki page :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/TagwatchCleaner
In the case of things that aren't simple typos that you think might be
On 10/08/2014 11:50, JB wrote:
Hello,
I think I will reopen the debate here, by asking a simple question:
how many of those saying hey, let this note open, it does no harm to
anybody have actually browsed a country for its opened notes and
tried to close them?
Yes, I do this all the time,
On 06/08/2014 19:17, richard wrote:
Firstly a disclaimer, I am mostly an armchair mapper.
I am working my way around the canals of Britain, tracing the canal banks and
tidying up locks etc. (I have probably seen a dozen different ways that locks
have been tagged.)
(on the more general point)
On 05/08/2014 07:58, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Not, it is not a job for external services. It is much better to use
single service(OSM) rather than multiple(OSM+Wikidata).
Personally, I'd argue that OSM isn't a service so much as a large
lump of data. It has services, but these are designed for
On 05/08/2014 08:11, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
I will use my own knowledge obtained on school lessons of history,
geography and English. Large cities are worldwide-known.
OK...
I will be right saying that I can not know all cities, especially
small. I will search ukrainian web articles to see if
On 01/08/2014 11:17, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
OK. Clearly I'm going to have to think on this for a bit longer. I
think looking at somewhere like Swanley is a good idea, and also at
somewhere like Derbyshire if the stops data hasn't been imported there.
If you want to test a merge/import in
On 04/08/2014 18:08, Philip Barnes wrote:
The big problem with transliteration to help pronunciation is where do
you stop, Berlin for example has 194 name tags for different
languages, 84 of which just say Berlin.
Which gets straight to the nub of the problem. Berlin does _not_ need a
On 04/08/2014 16:15, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Hi! I would like to add ukrainian names for cities of UK, but found
that SomeoneElse_Revert removed some of name:uk-tags in changeset
20757217 with a comment reverting undiscussed Ukrainian
translations including ones for which there's nothing on the
On 30/07/2014 15:08, colliar wrote:
Am 30.07.2014 15:58, schrieb Glenn Plas:
...
So he's asking if you know the names of the missing street.
and closing the note.
Therefor you need to have a login to reopen in order to be able to
comment and it will disappear after one week.
Not the best
On 29/07/2014 23:03, Dave F. wrote:
... Is the data valid? Is it an accurate import? Would he have flagged
it up if the user had added them manually one at a time? If the
answers are Yes/Yes/No, then is there a genuine problem?
I suspect the answers are currently FSVO valid (inasmuch it's
On 27/07/2014 22:26, ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that there is a tagging system in place which is
ambiguous from an International point of view.
It is indeed the case that when someone in Germany tags a trunk road the
default access rules are different to when someone in
On 25/07/2014 20:18, Andy Street wrote:
Yes this is a bug. I would have reported it myself but it appears that
you need a GitHub account to do that rather than a standard OSM
account. Please feel free to report it on my behalf.
For info, I've created
On 25/07/2014 13:21, Andy Street wrote:
It's a public footpath i.e. private property over which the public has
been granted a right of access (on foot). Since everything but
pedestrian access is not permitted it therefore tagged as
access=private, foot=yes.
This isn't Andy's example, but is
On 25/07/2014 13:41, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
IMHO it is a tagging error as it should be tagged as [highway=footway;
foot=permissive]
Using yes rather than permissive also seems to be wrong in this case.
Is my highway=track example also a tagging error?
Cheers,
Andy
On 25/07/2014 14:03, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
From this description - I would tag it as highway=footway (as for
public it is a footway and I guess that it is used
primarily as footway, not as a driveway)
It's not used primarily as a footway - it's primarily a track used to
access farmland
On 25/07/2014 15:03, Tom Hughes wrote:
How about assuming good intent ...
No-one's suggesting anything other than people wanting to make the
standard layer better. It's better for what that's the issue. I
think that we ought to be making a map style that better helps people
navigate to
On 25/07/2014 15:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
Traditionally we have always said that out web site is aimed at
supporting mappers
That certainly used to be the case, but the most recent series of
changes have all being about showing less rather than showing more.
How does that support mappers?
On 16/07/2014 19:09, SK53 wrote:
I think all are acceptable. FWIW I've always followed Harry Wood's
dictum and lumped these in as shop=beauty (aka Beauty Salon) possibly
with a sub-tag beauty=tanning. But given the paucity of usage on
taginfo.uk http://taginfo.uk, I suspect I haven't been
On 11/07/2014 14:15, SomeoneElse wrote:
This message from Grant (and the previous items in the thread)
explains what happened, I think?
D'oh - more coffee clearly required - thankfully Andy Street beat me to
it and actually included a link
On 23/06/2014 22:12, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Andy,
I think there is a lot of positives in the new rendering as well. I
for one am delighted to see some life back in the standard map
style, this way new tags can be (and have been) added to the rendering
rules. So it's a mix - some things are
On 01/07/2014 09:46, Simon Poole wrote:
Regardless of aesthetics, as pointed out here
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/371 the
current access renderings are misleading and entice wrong tagging.
Playing devil's advocate here, how do we know this? That information
On 30/06/2014 22:23, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
We are currently considering dropping the rendering of
access=permissive (currently rendered as green dashes) from
openstreetmap-carto, the main map on opensteetmap.org
http://opensteetmap.org.
What would be useful would be some comments from the
. The question is, what is?
Cheers,
Andy
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-June/069959.html
[2] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542
[3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmarender
[4]
https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob
Andrew Hain wrote:
Have you talked to them or reverted their edits?
Re the disused railway, I did talk to the person who changed it - and
attached a photo (which showed it to be very much abandoned).
Re the most recent time that I saw I know we shouldn't tag for the
renderer but in
Yves wrote:
Or directed them toward Openrailwaymap ?
I'd have suggested that (in fact it's the first place I looked), had any
of the renderings there been at all useful. There do seem to have been
some odd choices in terms of what gets rendered and what doesn't.
Here's an area not far
John Baker wrote:
crazy golf is what we call it in the UK others call it miniature golf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_golf
In that particular example it's perhaps worth mentioning that that
wikipedia suggests that the two _aren't_ the same - the last sentence of
the first
An OSM user seems to be on a mission to replace a large number of the
low usage tags in OSM - mostly in Europe, but also elsewhere:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Markus59/history
(hit load more a few times and you'll see the extent of it).
Let's leave aside for now the issue that in some
Roman Neumüller wrote:
Recently I noticed that gpsbabel still uses version='0.5' string in
its osm.cc (1).
Latest josm for example complains now when it does not find
version='0.6' string.
It's been discussed on the josm-dev mailing list - see the discussion
either side of this post:
Hans De Kryger wrote:
I don't know if anyone else is aware of this, but Potlatch 2 is
completely falling apart, It's starting to become unusable. It's a
concern for me because it's a huge part of my editing. Anyone else
having problems with it?
No problems here.
You might be better off on
Dennis Raylin Chen wrote:
Hi all
I write a message to him to remind him OpenStreetMap is not place for
random drawing in Chinese.
Waiting for his response
Dennis
Thanks for that. However, they've edited again (changeset 22576684),
it's obviously just doodles, and I've reverted it
Paweł Stankiewicz wrote:
Hi
Recently many railways in Fife have been resurrected like from Kelty
and from Dunfermline to NW and to W:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/56.1121/-3.4351
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104131260/history
The author can be easy found by googling his name and
Arun Ganesh wrote:
Thanks for the lead. Its a bit disappointing that this isn't possible.
Any idea if there is an outdated (6months) mapnik render somewhere
that I could use to go back in osm time?
Perhaps you could create one from old data using an old dataset from:
John Packer wrote:
The tags cuisine=vegetarian and cuisine=vegan are already explicitly
deprecated.
Says who? People who edit the wiki or people who edit the map?
Any change to previously-used keys needs to be talked about in public so
that someone who's got a map that depends on the
Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
I have discovered a mechanical edit of 100 restaurants worldwide by user
BuganiniQ.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22303143
comment=update diet:vegen/diet:vegetarian: set to only according to
cuisine; remove redundant tags
created_by=osmapi/0.2.24
Has this
On 18/05/2014 19:19, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Hi
Sum Wum has replied and was apologetic. They have attempted to
correct their edits but several footpaths were still distorted. I
have therefore reverted this changeset and the original edits.
Thanks Dudley - looks much less higgledypiggledy
Colin Smale wrote:
User mangoyang has been doodling random multipolygons in the middle
of the North Sea...
I notice three more changesets from them have contributed doodles near
Bremen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280211805
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280211805
moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
... Why does bitcoin, out of any other likely interests, attract a
combination of enthusiastic but clueless osm contributors in such high
numbers ? What's special about Bitcoin ? We have plenty of niche
enthusiasts in OSM, but they usually map quite well (at least not
Andy Robinson wrote:
I reverted this morning before I saw this thread.
Oops - forgot to mention earlier - I added a Unibus 6 relation that
matched the path of the added and then deleted service road:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3706081
Colin Smale wrote:
The edits don't seem to have done any damage as such. Shall I just go
ahead and remove them?
This service road still seems to be on the Bing imagery:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200271054/history
It was deleted by that user 8 months ago. That suggests a changeset
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/04/14 13:29, SomeoneElse wrote:
1) place=city in OSM might or might not not mean the same as is a
ceremonial city, as defined in the UK
There is no might about it. The wiki at least is explicit:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity
Absolutely
jonathan wrote:
I hate to do this but I don't have time to look in to this for ages.
This new user has made one edit with various changes but a few pages
of deletions. This always worries me, it may need reverting?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21863539#map=18/52.95394/-1.47650
I
This was last discussed back in February:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2014-February/015867.html
when someone (in the UK) changed a number of place=city to place=town.
The discussion at the time covered:
1) place=city in OSM might or might not not mean the same as is a
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
on iPhones you can change this in settings (geographic vs magnetic north) not
sure for other devices but my guess is there will be settings as well...
Unless you're in northern Canada I really wouldn't worry about the
difference between geographic and magnetic
JB wrote:
Dos and don'ts section does not validate this in the wiki : « Don't
use it to put your personal notes here. ». Rather use personal stuff
like gpx files or whatever. Many personal notes just get forgotten
(where is this filtering tool showing /my/ notes? Ha, doesn't exist, I
JB wrote:
Didn't know that. Is it documented somewhere? Not on the wiki about
the api (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Map_Notes_API).
Good to know, anyway, but still unusable for the basic contributor
(even I would not use it easily).
JB.
Sorry - my fault - it's not. I had to
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
sabas88 wrote:
Hi Andy,
I did the manually via JOSM.
OK, but:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
contains this policy covers a wider range of edits, including not only
edits made by bots but also imports and any edits that have a
Brian Prangle wrote:
...
BUT …. now all the extant OpenStreetBugs Notes have migrated over ,
some of which are YEARS old, it’s all getting a bit crowded and hard
to differentiate new notes.
Most of the migrated notes (such as e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/110664 ) presumably
(just something that I noticed while checking for local overlapping
changesets)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20990644
seems to have made a number of tag merges to landuse=port.
Apologies for the noise if it's already been discussed and agreed on an
import list somewhere; just
Philip Barnes wrote:
The number of edits suggests to me that they are not inexperienced.
Is it possible to get some sort of block until they start responding
to emails?
Phil (trigpoint)
Unfortunately, the problem is still occurring:
On 18/03/2014 07:13, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote:
What seems to be the general purpose of his edits? His change sets
have no comments, so could it be that this is just a case of an
inexperienced mapper, at worst a vandal?
I'm not sure what the purpose is, as I've not had a reply to
On 19/03/2014 11:04, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote:
According to this, there's a lot of edits all over the UK, but also in
the US, in some non-descript towns.
http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?dbisping
Since the number of edits is so high, over 4 years, I don't think
reverting everything this
There has been a large series of recent edits to major road junctions
across England such as:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21125717
There have been about half a dozen by the same mapper near me (I'm in
North Derbyshire) which are problematical for a number of reasons:
a) Bus
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The entry level editor could reasonably limit new users to entry
level edits.
Messing with anything with a relation is not a first edit kind of
activity.
What if the entry level editor said hey, this is too complex, map
something else
and gain some experience and come
Colin Smale wrote:
I don't wish to cause offence... Perhaps someone more tactful than me
would consider contacting the user to advise caution?
It looks like someone's already fixing the broken relations; I'd have
thought that it's probably best that they do it as they'll be familiar
Dave F. wrote:
Could you give some visual examples, maybe temporarily creating them
in OSM ( deleting them afterwards)
... or on the dev server:
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
I want to propose a new mailing list. Currently we have serious gaps in
modeling vegetation zones, climatic zones, geology, oceanography and most
other natural phenomena.
Also a mailing list for outdoor enthusiasts and outdoor sports does not
seem to exist.
The tagging
Morten Wang wrote:
Hi,
One of my current research projects[1] looks at OpenStreetMap and
we're interested in knowing the number of views for different regions
in North America (with North America as defined by Geofabrik[2]).
and (apologies for stating what might be obvious but) it's
Brian Prangle wrote:
Try anywhere across Wolverhampton through Willenhall to Walsall - as
you zoom through to level 19 you'll briefly see a nice sharp clear
image which then reverts spontaneously to a less clear image with a
huge shadow which furhter obscures detail.
Have you got a link for
(taking these in a slightly different order)
Eric Grosso wrote:
So from my point of view, the problem described initially by Will is
still a current one.
Indeed - higher up this thread I mentioned a location in Mansfield which
used to have z18 imagery and now no longer does for me (in
Andy Robinson wrote:
Zooming in on Nottingham I'm seeing three different imagery versions at
different zoom levels. I don't anything missing.
Here's a specific example, to the north in Mansfield:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/53.14850/-1.18456
(using P2 because
Interestingly, Bing imagery that was present in December but missing in
January has now reappeared:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=18/52.72279/-2.12197
so perhaps some kind of scheduled renewal process?
Cheers,
Andy
___
Frank wrote:
I'm toying with automating the replacement of abbreviation of street
names e.g. St to Street, Ave to Avenue etc.
I think that people in the USA had similar issues with TIGER data and
created a bunch of tools to do the conversions. It might be worth
asking somewhere that USA
Alasdair McKinnon wrote:
I've spotted that the A9 West of Perth is wrongly designated as the M9
and A93. It has also been re-routed over a short length.
Thanks for mentioning it. From looking at it, it appears that the
current status is as a result of a revert 10 days ago:
Their edits in Australia have led to a block being requested:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2014-February/010286.html
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Donald Noble wrote:
Hi All,
The user robbief14 [1] has changed sections of the M90 around the New
Forth Road Bridge which are still currently under construction to live
motorway. They had also deleted all of the tags for the current road
bridge.
... and they're back:
Just for a info, the people on the talk-gb list have noticed a number of
edits upgrading unfinished motorways to constructed status. The same
user has made similar edits in Australia, the most recent of which is:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20479197
Are these valid (i.e. have
Leon Kernan wrote:
Sorry guys, another one.
This change is just pure vandalism. He's created non-existent
freeways and roads around Ballarat.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20425446
Has anyone got any idea about the NSW ones such as:
Roger Calvert wrote:
It might be worth considering a 'play' version of the data base, where
beginners, schools and others could try things out without damaging
the main map. This would be refreshed every so often, and changes
would disappear.
I've occasionally pointed new mappers at
Brian Prangle wrote:
What's happened to the tiles here? In JOSM I can't see anything at
higher zoom levels except No Tiles at this Zoom Level Is it me or
is there a system failure somehwere?
Is that the same hole that's between Stafford and the A5, west of
Penkridge? If so it's been there
For info, another example - I've reverted
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20083935
which moved the source (for the relation membership) from one way to the
relation as a whole so that
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1438826/history
had tag source=paths at each end, which is
Guillaume Rischard wrote:
It looks like most of these are bad data, and I will attempt to fix
them all manually.
That definitely looks like the best approach...
Others make no sense whatsoever:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238402296 (part of
On 19/12/2013 10:15, Tom Chance wrote:
...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19400206
... Would somebody be able to revert it?
Done in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19528645
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
101 - 200 di 579 matches
Mail list logo
