At 2012-07-26 18:48, Clay Smalley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Apollinaris Schöll ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
- multiple refs in tag with a semicolon: Many of them had been entered not
too long ago and are clearly not a damage from the redaction. Wasn't the
consensus to use
On Jul 26, 2012 11:30 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
ref=FH nn - USFS Forest Highway
ref=FR nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Route/Road
ref=FT nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Trail
IIRC, all three of these are a single NFD network, for National Forest
Development, and are distinguishable
At 2012-07-27 06:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012 11:30 PM,
Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
wrote:
ref=FH nn - USFS Forest Highway
ref=FR nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Route/Road
ref=FT nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Trail
IIRC, all three of these are a single NFD network, for National
On Jul 27, 2012 8:07 AM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At least in Region 5 (CA), the roads have N or S in the X position, while
trails have E or W. However, I wasn't sure that everyone would necessarily
know that, so I went with a more descriptive prefix, based on the
At 2012-07-27 08:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jul 27, 2012 8:07 AM, Alan
Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At least in Region 5 (CA), the roads have N or S in the X position,
while trails have E or W. However, I wasn't sure that everyone would
necessarily know that, so I went with a more
Alan,
I think you've identified another area
where clarity is needed: What order should be
used when entering multiple refs. I tend to do it
with interstates first, then US routes, then
state routes, within each group by number, low to
high. However, a definite rule would be
At 2012-07-27 09:34, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
I think you've identified another area where clarity is needed:
What order should be used when entering multiple refs. I tend to do it
with interstates first, then US routes, then state routes, within each
group by number, low to high.
At 2012-07-27 09:44, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Alan was anticipating a question I was going to ask, whether to
use FR (forest road) or FS (Forest Service) or Forest Service spelled
out. I have seen all three. Reading his contribution, it seems we should
use FR for the tracklike forest
At 2012-07-27 09:58, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
On a local note, would that mean that S78 in San Diego County,
the one that goes to Anza Borrego, would be tagged ref=CR78 and
network=US:CA:Orange?
I think you mean (state, not county road) SR-78 here:
Here's the page I was thinking of:
http://www.cahighways.org/num-forest.html . It links to another good page:
http://tchester.org/sgm/lists/anf_map_roads.html .
Getting the road/trail names/numbers out of the USFS is difficult,
requiring a fair amount of research to find a map on which it is
OK, to the list this time...damn gmail and lack of reply-to-list...
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netwrote:
Getting the road/trail names/numbers out of the USFS is difficult,
requiring a fair amount of research to find a map on which it is legible,
11 matches
Mail list logo
