I'm just curious, but how are you going to add shields for all of the Turnpikes
out there that have their shield posted alongside another route shield (like
the PA Turnpike, New York Thruway, Ohio Turnpike as examples)? Will there need
to be some tweaks to the relations for those said routes
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
tagging these Future Interstates?
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
network=US:I:Future
ref=number
modifier=Future
There is one other. I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday (07-09-13).
That is I-295 in Fayetteville.
http://gribblenation.net/ncfutints/fut295.html
And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the :Future part dropped out
and just put in the modifier area.
-James
Date: Wed, 10
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 08:59 -0400]:
There is one other. I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday
(07-09-13). That is I-295 in Fayetteville.
Okay, I've got that one in my rendering now, too.
And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the :Future part
I could fix the PA Turnpike relation with the US:PA:Turnpike network tag in
a moment. Would that work instead of just fixing the name tags for both
directions? I only split it up because it was getting close to 1,000 ways and
thought it would be easier to edit in the future having two smaller
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 09:22 -0400]:
I could fix the PA Turnpike relation with the US:PA:Turnpike network
tag in a moment. Would that work instead of just fixing the name tags
for both directions?
That wouldn't affect my rendering as it currently stands. The
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:40:22 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 09:22 -0400]:
I could fix the PA Turnpike relation with the US:PA:Turnpike network
On 7/10/13 9:14 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
Also, I note that someone has added ref=NJTP to the New Jersey Turnpike,
which breaks my rendering there. I do support ref=initials tags for
some New York parkways, because that's basically how the signs look, but
I'm not sure how reasonable it is for the
Well, I've found a bug in the rendering engine.
What's up with these US 1-9 shields?
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=16lat=35.52081lon=-79.18442layers=B
Is it because there are two different US 1 relations tagged on those ways?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11177
No
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:44 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.comwrote:
Well, I've found a bug in the rendering engine.
What's up with these US 1-9 shields?
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=16lat=35.52081lon=-79.18442layers=B
This is a real thing. Welcome to the insane variety
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
network=US:I:Future
ref=number
modifier=Future
and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
recommend tagging as
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.comwrote:
Also, do you guys think for the PA Turnpike XXX routes, that the
network tag for them should be US:PA:Turnpike (also for the mainline PA
Turnpike relation and NE Extension)?
That's how I've been handling the Oklahoma
Let me take this opportunity to sollicit another round of feedback on
http://maproulette.org/relationpages/
This is still updated every 4 hours. It needs a pretty index page, better
filter options. I prefer it if you just file an issue at
https://github.com/mvexel/relationpages/issues
Martijn
On
* Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net [2013-07-10 09:58 -0400]:
an NJTP shield is probably appropriate. the turnpike is _not_ precisely
I-95.
I think I was unclear in my question. I have a New Jersey Turnpike shield
that I want to use. My question is: should the route relation for the New
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2013-07-10 10:16 -0500]:
I don't think we hit a consensus, did we? Seems like we were talking
about whether having a modifier tag or not, and if not, including the
banner in the network.
As I documented at
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 10:44 -0400]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172380289
There are some interesting things going on here.
Is this road really part of both US 21 and US 21 Bypass? That seems weird
to me, but if someone says that's how the road's signed
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2013-07-10 10:28 -0500]:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.comwrote:
Also, do you guys think for the PA Turnpike XXX routes, that the
network tag for them should be US:PA:Turnpike
That's how I've been handling the Oklahoma
FYI:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/08/local/la-me-adv-map-ruling-20130709
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
We have already 7 participant locations for the upcoming Summer #editathon
on July 20/21.
Join us and add your city, too! Ideally until Friday, this way we have you
in the upcoming announcement blog post.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Summer_Editathon_2013
--
Alex Barth
Secretary
No ref unless it has a ref. If a renderer wants initials in absence of a
ref, it can extrapolate that from the relation's name.
On Jul 10, 2013 2:50 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net [2013-07-10 09:58 -0400]:
an NJTP shield is probably appropriate.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
network=US:I:Future
ref=number
modifier=Future
and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
Good to see common sense won out. Now we need volunteers (with lawyer
friends) to take this up in other states. At least in Virginia there are
some municipalities that charge exhorbitant rates for GIS data and require
NDA's.
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Alex Barth wrote:
FYI:
Great idea, Martijn!
Another site that might be useful for contacting people at the neighborhood
scale is Nextdoor.com. It's not quite the same concept as Neighborland, but the
people who have signed up for the site are similarly concerned with what's
going on in their local area.
Alan
On
23 matches
Mail list logo
