On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold <[email protected]> wrote:
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
network=US:I:Future
ref=<number>
modifier=Future
and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
recommend tagging as above.
Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73,
74, and
840. Are there any others?
86 in New York, so signed for various segments of NY 17.
https://www.dot.ny.gov/regional-offices/multi/i-86
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
