* James Mast <rickmastfa...@hotmail.com> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]: > So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with > tagging these "Future" Interstates?
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form: network=US:I:Future ref=<number> modifier=Future and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd recommend tagging as above. Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and 840. Are there any others? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us