* James Mast <[email protected]> [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
> So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
> tagging these "Future" Interstates?
Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
network=US:I:Future
ref=<number>
modifier=Future
and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
recommend tagging as above.
Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, 74, and
840. Are there any others?
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
