accounts could be a maproulette
verification for new user edits? Or a delayed captcha e-mail challenge for
the 1st edits to stay in OSM?
Dale Puch
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us>
wrote:
> Sorry for the late posting - I've been working on anothe
/contact-us/field-offices/richmond/community-outreach-1
just lists training...@ic.fbi.gov as a possible contact
Dale Puch
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Denis Carriere <carriere.de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It's not Leaflet's fault the attribution is incorrect, their website is
&g
A better route is to contact http://leafletjs.com/ since they are providing
the actual map data thru their script. Also they probably do so for lots
of other sites.
Leaflet does attribute Openstreetmap at the bottom of their main page page
though.
Dale Puch
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM
Broderick <k...@kevinbroderick.com>
wrote:
> Functio
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
restore/undelete.
Dale
Dale Puch
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 05/19/2015 12:51 AM, Clay Smalley wrote:
Last winter, I drove around a bunch of neighborhoods with my GPS and
manually added them into OSM. I wanted to add a few more
the same
route.
Dale
Dale Puch
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Tom Fistere tbfist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! My name is Tom Fistere and I go by CountryLoon on OSM. After
about a week of editing I thought I should throw out a couple of questions
and comments of what I am doing so far...
I
: northwest 15th drive
spoken data: northwest fifteenth drive
Map data: NW 15th Dr.
I don't think we need to store 2 or 3 copies for 99.9% of the names, but
some will break the rules the rest follow and need some kind of don't
expand flag or alt name(s) stored because of that.
Dale Puch
On Mon, Jul
and tag not to
expand in the future. MapRoulette should also have a checkbox to block
further expanding a name in future checks.
Dale Puch
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After reading about the issues with Scout and problems with name
all the individual sidewalks in the residential
part separate form the roads seems counter productive.
Dale Puch
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Elliott Plack elliott.pl...@gmail.comwrote:
In Baltimore, I've refrained from tracing too many sidewalks, except when
the sidewalk is part of one
. a clean dataset.
Dale Puch
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Martijn van Exel
mart...@openstreetmap.uswrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Secondly, OpenStreetMap data is supposed to be current, rather than
historical. There is a separate mailing
/zipcode_faqs.html commercial zip code boundry
source FAQ explaining the shortcomings of census ZCTA's
Dale Puch
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:11 PM, o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote:
Hi,
I have a shape file from census.gov which contains the boundaries for all
zip
codes in the US. This data
Just a big thank you for all the work you put into these tools. They make
finding and fixing problems hidden in plain sight a lot easier, and more
fun.
Dale
Dale Puch
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
and we're back up. Sorry for the inconvenience
a negative one?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
/
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Ahh nevermind, I just logged into mapmaker and the only user edits there
were POI's
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I see it shows up on google mapmaker, but not google maps except at high
zoom as under construction. Is this possibly entered both places
.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
there)?
(snipped content)
-James
**
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
I haven't gotten the chance to fully review the new code, so I'm partly
going off what the older code did.
In this case the original tiger data was changed from:
name = Wentworth Ave
name_1 = Wentworth Rd
to:
name = Wentworth Road
name_1 = Wentworth Rd
Because tiger:name_type: no longer matches
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
/United_States_roads_tagging
[2]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.48388lon=-73.20368zoom=16layers=M
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
/service/get.py
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
For setting up the runs, is it all SQL queries or are there other items
involved? Perhaps start a wiki page for useful queries to identify
problems
(for this or other projects), or even just collaboration
/talk-us
--
John Novak
585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
From: Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
To: Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com
Cc: Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com;
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] The Remap-A-Tron, Second Wave
What is your browser? Can you
/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
**
** Charlotte Wolter
927 18th Street Suite A
Santa Monica, California
90403
+1-310-597-4040
techl
, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if it is just me, but this seems stuck today. All was fine
yesterday.
I only get one map location and it will not move to another with 'W'
A few of the deleted ways have led me to some large missing
subdivisions and
poor
to these 'invisible' problems.
Martijn
--
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
objects. Potlatch
would tend to snap things to each other so they would be sharing some
nodes. That's my theory.
Toby
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I think Frederik just meant not to rush between bringing it to the list
attention and making the bulk changes.
It's sort of like posting out of the blue: I have this import I was
working on for a year, if no one objects I'll upload it today.
It is all about giving others the time to look and
@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
this be matched to some sort of barge
classification?
__**_
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
You might check with the OpenSeaMap guys
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On 5/16/2012 6:48 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
I found this at http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.**
mil/data/dictionary/ddnwn.htmhttp://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil/data/dictionary/ddnwn.htm
=10763371 name v=W 30th St W
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand the script checks for only one instance of the abbreviation.
My point was what is someone manually
that the process is wrong.
Anyway, you realize that the road type doesn't always appear after the
base name, right?
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Serge Wroclawski*
Date: Friday, May 11, 2012
Subject: [Talk-us] Fixing TIGER street name abbreviations
To: Dale Puch dale.p
directionals as well. Serge seems to be doing a good job with
this, and this is just feedback so there aren't any incorrect expansions.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I
should add tags to the uploaded changesets.
- Serge
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
the on-the-ground rule in order to
map for the renderer.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Some of the problem my be a disconnect between county level mapping/import
talk and the country level talk. I personally like imports that are done
well, but also understand how poor imports can make things harder for
everyone. It looks like you guys have done a lot of work and many
/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
correct. The default being automatic fix in 2 weeks if no reply.
Limit the e-mail size, and instead include a partial list and a link to a
larger list if the size was exceeded.
There is a fair potential for spam with this, so it would need a bit of
oversight.
--
Dale Puch
.
__**_
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
... It all just seemed way more labor intensive than
it needed to be.
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan to attack it.
--
Dale Puch
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/**planning/statistics/gis
Oh, I forgot to mention they list the files as being updated weekly. So
apparently what ever changes they make that week get rolled into the data.
So make sure to start with a current set of data.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Response I received in 2008
resolution be an issue? I
really have not had to deal with it before, so do not know how big a deal
that is.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
US:FL
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Ahh right that is why there is US:US
It gives a logical and consistent construction as well as delineated fields
for building the name with the ability to make state specific shield rules
based on it.
--
Dale Puch
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jason Straub strau...@yahoo.com wrote
-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
both the immediate solution, and a long term
one.
--
Dale Puch
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 8/8/2011 11:41 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Dirk added a hidden preference so you can specify your own list of
roles to ignore this warning for. See [0], but if you set
Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
I have only skimmed these messages, so forgive me if it was already brought
up.
There are two criteria I do not think were brought up. Length of a road, ie
is it important for the city, county, state, or country. This needs to be
balanced with the width, and other features of the road like
a user is doing but
number of changes per set and/or what tools they are using.
The instructions and getting people to use them are probably the best place
to put effort.
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
+...@earthlink.netwrote:
At 2011-03-23 04:22, Dale Puch wrote:
A quick note, do not confuse public records as always meaning public
domain.
Some states may not have laws specifically preventing agencies from
claiming copyright, not apply to all levels of government, or have
exceptions to which works.
IE. I
it with any information you come up with.
--
Dale Puch
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 03/22/2011 01:13 AM, Andrew Cleveland wrote:
Thanks. The only indication I can find other than the statement on
ca.gov is that Wikipedia takes anything created
.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I second that sentiment. Great addition.
Now to add more data for this.
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
direction.
--
Dale Puch
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/18/2011 3:43 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
Here in Canada with the NHN import the portion of streams through lakes
and
wider rivers were imported with sub_sea=stream sub_sea:type=inferred
oneway=yes
there, NoName hadn't been rendering. How quickly does
NoName render now? Why was the MapLint layer removed from Potlatch?
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:16 -0500, Dale Puch wrote:
Should it be marked? probably not, but here are two other
suggestions.
Depending on the situation, perhaps use a mini
-
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
As with many OSM tags, there are objective items to begin the
categorization. The final decision though will be at least partly
subjective. Class:bicycle is a good start. Perhaps list specific
features
as a base for the ranking
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
would add to Val's e-mail that county roads might need the same
US:UT:CR-14 as I believe they are handled differently in some state as
well. Also to differentiate them from tags from other parts of the world.
--
Dale Puch
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote
-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Yep just the sort of tool I was looking for!
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Dale Puch wrote:
It would be nice to have a procedure for finding these problems.
Try the OSM inspector's multipolygon view, at
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi
).
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Dale Puch wrote:
What locals use can be placed in another tag if it differs from the
official
name, but should not be the primary name in the database. Local
governmental standars do affect how we try to break up the names, but not
how
:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
A real problem is that the data itself is not properly tagged, or does not
explicitly state what if any restrictions are placed on it. When it is not
perfectly clear is when non-lawyers like us are putting themselves and OSM
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Atkinson ke...@atkinson.dhs.orgwrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Dale Puch wrote:
The directional prefix/suffix absolutely should not be dropped from any
streets. Even ones that are simple straight lines that change N/S or E/W
at
a point along it. Treat
Well, personally there is what is, what should be, and what is practical.
The directional prefix/suffix absolutely should not be dropped from any
streets. Even ones that are simple straight lines that change N/S or E/W at
a point along it. Treat them as 2 different streets.
What to
it is the common (thought out and planned) tagging scheme
that the render's happen to implement. Render's should be the visual
representation of what the wiki describes.
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
that the data is
public domain, or requires attribution... The best I have come up with was
to post the info to the wiki including the e-mail response in the discussion
page.
--
Dale Puch
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
My thoughts about OSM US:
I don't know
-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Just a FYI if you wanted to read it. It is always good to see some
publicity.
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/06/crowd-sourced-world-map.ars
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
you for not seeing it the first
time around.)
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-April/003087.html
It seems really odd to me, too, but it's not the first time customs have
developed in odd ways...
Nathan Oliver
On 5/17/2010 7:01 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Dale Puch
purposes)?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
to police only access anyhow.
Would you be concerned about highway:raceway not conveying the danger of the
area? You could be killed wandering around the wrong parts of either one.
No need to over think things, and you can't eliminate the need for common
sense with better tagging.
--
Dale Puch
It will probably take some digging to find out the full story, and it will
probably differ from state to state. But it seems that around 1995-2005
time range federal, state and local governments started to share GIS data.
As they did this they also changed their copyright and access policies due
For reference,
http://www.fgdc.gov/library/factsheets/documents/datashare.pdf
There are exceptions, but from what I have seen this policy seems to be the
basis of the government opening up GIS data.
Dale
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It will probably take
Using a bot for specific well know Suffix abbreviations only should be
reasonably safe. IE never change ST to street if it is a prefix sort of
rules.
Dale
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 4/8/10 9:48 AM, Lord-Castillo, Brett wrote:
One issue
Perhaps we should take a look at what a bot would match.
Run a bot that finds and counts the various matches and outputs a report
only. pre, mid and suffix counts the abbreviations. and what the bot would
expand each abbreviation to.
Abbreviations in the middle should be located, but probably
With regards to E Ave Check for a base name if all is matched. If nothing
is left, leave the name alone.
I'm not sure what you asking about with Southbay vs South bay Are you
trying to figure out if the bot should add or remove the space? If so,
leave that for manual edits.
Dale
On Thu, Apr
has no abbreviations, and S Bay would be expanded to South Bay
While the names are confusing, they would remain correct.
Dale
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 23:43 -0400, Dale Puch wrote:
With regards to E Ave Check for a base name
It would probably be best to have both the 'as displayed' name, and 'as
spoken' in the tags. Anything else you have to make assumptions that may or
may not be right.
If both are not stored, the next best alternative seems to be having the
full spoken name in the tags, but have seprate
Drivers basically. I have seen people (end users) try to add SDHC to older
palms by modifying or using a newer driver file. Windows moble based
devices it is even easier to swap out some DLL's and get SDHC compatibility.
Dale
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
or written instructions to go with it.
--
Dale Puch
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:02 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
* Once in some very small sample size (perhaps between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in
10,000 signups) a popup appears
.
--
Dale Puch
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, dion_d...@comcast.net wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase my question: is there any harm in adding a layer=1
tag to something that is already tagged bridge=yes?
In some cases, yes. No layer
It sounds like t...@home needs to trim data at the tile border, and then
close open ways along the border of the tile...
Just my uneducated opinion.
Dale
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com
is the deal when
you have more data. Mapnik seems to deal with it seemlessly.
--
Dale Puch
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Leroy E Leonard
leeoncand...@gmail.comwrote:
They seem to be related to water ways. They're more evident in
Osmarender and Cycle Map.
Here's an example in Virginia:
http
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
