This is fine with me. Brief pause for any objections before making the
charter change request to the ADs…
—aaron
On 18 Jul 2017, at 13:40, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just joined this list.
I can work with this.
Bob
On 07/18/2017 01:36 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Agreed. Thanks for the text pr
Matti did an awesome job with the [Etherpad meeting
notes](http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-99-taps?useMonospaceFont=true)
with an assist from Gorry. Please review them ASAP for any comments you
made or think should be included.
—aaron__
I just joined this list.
I can work with this.
Bob
On 07/18/2017 01:36 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Agreed. Thanks for the text proposal, Kyle!
Tommy
On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote:
+1.
Cheers,
Brian
On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl wrote:
Agree 100% - I
Agreed. Thanks for the text proposal, Kyle!
Tommy
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
>> On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl wrote:
>>
>> Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mic
+1.
Cheers,
Brian
> On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl wrote:
>
> Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Kyle Rose wrote:
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> (1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TA
Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it.
Cheers,
Michael
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Kyle Rose wrote:
>
> Proposal:
>
> (1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TAPS is not chartered to
> perform detailed analysis...").
>
> (2) Change the third bullet
Proposal:
(1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TAPS is not chartered to
perform detailed analysis...").
(2) Change the third bullet right above it to read "Extension,
modification, or creation of transport or security protocols"
The idea being to permit analysis of the properties of se
