Re: (bug?) Macros expanded regardless of %REM ?

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, On Tue, 22 May 2001 18:19:07 -0700 GMT (23/05/2001, 09:19 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: %REM='%INCLUDE=some_file.txt' But Bat! still complains about the missing file! This is wrong as for a %REM behaviour. If you can reproduce

Re: HTML Auto-view

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerry, On Tue, 22 May 2001 08:49:52 -0400 GMT (22/05/2001, 20:49 +0800 GMT), Gerry Doyon wrote: MT The Bat! should always default to display the main message regardless MT how the option is set. For multipart/mixed, this must be part 1. (At

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Screwyluie, On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:22:19 -0700 GMT (22/05/2001, 19:22 +0800 GMT), Screwyluie wrote: S also when I look in that drop down menu it seems to have Every S registered file type as an option... perhaps you have some bad S entries or

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Günther, On Tue, 22 May 2001 16:40:57 +0200 GMT (22/05/2001, 22:40 +0800 GMT), Günther Eisele wrote: GE Here, too. I switch between Win2k and Win98 on the same machine, but TB! GE has the same behavior on both OS (the right one). Must be my

Re[2]: (bug?) Macros expanded regardless of %REM ?

2001-05-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, May 22, 2001, 10:21:17 PM, Thomas wrote: Don't you comment out lines in code when programming sometimes, instead of outright deleting them right away? I think the %REM macro should still ignore the command, and whatever is between the quote marks, as intended by Maxxx. that is

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, On Tue, 22 May 2001 06:49:02 -0500 GMT (22/05/2001, 19:49 +0800 GMT), A Curtis Martin wrote: T The bug description: When I receive a message with an attachment, and I T want to sasve the attachment, TB always choses some weird

Re: Odd bug in personal address book

2001-05-22 Thread Leo Zelevinsky
This bug confirmed exactly here in Beta/8. Hello tbbeta I doubt if this will be repeatable with anyone else - but I'll report it anyway.. a) I have a personal address book group of the department managers (called managers) b) I had 5 entries in it.. but now I'm on beta6 I

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Screwyluie, On Tue, 22 May 2001 12:22:57 -0700 GMT (23/05/2001, 03:22 +0800 GMT), Screwyluie wrote: S so my guess is it's something on his system only, like a bad entry in S the registered file types maybe? that's the only place I can think

Undocumented command-line switches

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello! I found that TB has the following undocumented command-line switches. Do you know their syntax? /STARTEXIT (it's not SMARTEXIT) /MIN - it's documented as /MINIMIZE, though TB accepts anything that starts with /MIN /LDIFIMPORT /LDIFEXPORT - these obviously work with LDIF files, but what

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello, Thomas! T In addition to that, in the combo box for the extensions in the T Windows file dialog when trying to attach a file, there are often T random characters at the end of the choices; sometimes a blank lin T somewhere in between. This is not reliably reproducable but might T give a

Re: Uppercased suffix in filename (was Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments)

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello, Thomas Lieblang! TL Whenever I'm saving a file named xyz.txt it will be saved as TL xyz.TXT The filename is taken by TB from the email message. I suppose that the problem is on the side of the author of these emails, not on your side. To check my assumption, you can: 1. Export the

Re: Undocumented command-line switches

2001-05-22 Thread Nick Andriash
On May 22, 2001, at 1:23:05 PM, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote: Any additions to the list? /NOLOGO -- Nick -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53 Beta 8/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]

Re: (bug?) Macros expanded regardless of %REM ?

2001-05-22 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 22, 2001, at 8:21:17 PM, Thomas wrote: I think the %REM macro should still ignore the command, and whatever is between the quote marks Why? The Macro was designed to add comments to a Template, and that is exactly what it does... and does

Re: Autosave strange behavior

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello, Philippe Gouillou! AKL the official recommendation is now to store attachments in the AKL message bodies; PG How do I do that ? To make _new_ messages store the attachments inside, go to account preferences, the Directories and Files page. There is a switch there. To make old

Re: The Bat! - buglet report: Attachments

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andrew, On Wed, 23 May 2001 00:42:44 +0400 GMT (23/05/2001, 04:42 +0800 GMT), Andrew K. Lovetski wrote: T In addition to that, in the combo box for the extensions in the T Windows file dialog when trying to attach a file, there are often T

vanishing column

2001-05-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
Sorry about the double posting, but I think this should have gone here, not TBUDL. I just had a strange thing happen - or perhaps I just discovered a strange thing which had happened a while ago. Anyhow, I discovered that the Received column was missing from the folders in one of my accounts.

Re[2]: (bug?) Macros expanded regardless of %REM ?

2001-05-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, May 22, 2001, 11:11:37 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: I think the %REM macro should still ignore the command, and whatever is between the quote marks Why? The Macro was designed to add comments to a Template, and that is exactly what it does... and does well. You think it should do