Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello NetVicious, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 14:31:21, you wrote: N> jueves, 24 feb 2005 at 20:28, it seems you wrote: >> Currently, The Bat! keeps its files in two directories: >> 1. The read-only program files in the "Program Files" folder >> 2. The files that it modifies in the "MAIL Direc

Re[7]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Goncalo, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 7:11:31 PM, you wrote: > In reply to : DH>> or store the short list of possible resolutions in an array and DH>> update the variable (saved screen size) based on startup values. > I like mine better! :) Kidding. > I guess th

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 22:05, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > I think that the path to the working directory should be the only > value kept in the Registry. What do you think about it? As long as you separate system locale settings from general settings (ie windows sizes, server names etc from

Re[3]: Config: Registry -> File

In reply to : MM> Hello Krzysztof, MM> Thursday, February 24, 2005, 00:10:21, you wrote: >>>With TB right now it's very simple, just >>>import a previously-prepared .reg file. MM> If you will notice that The Bat! will loose simplicity to install MM> it, just let

Re[6]: Config: Registry -> File

In reply to : DH> Quoting Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> That's a good idea! At least if the new resolution is less >> than the old, we can ignore the saved coordinates. >> DH> or store the short list of possible resolutions in an array and DH> update the variab

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Martin, On Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:59:01 PM Martin [MS] wrote: >>> Why do you delete the registry tree first before importing the saved >>> data? In my understanding everything is replaced if you import a whole >>> tree. >> If you had deleted a key in the source it would not be d

Re: Double PGP sig

Dear Peter, @25-Feb-2005, 00:13 +0100 (24-Feb 23:13 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> Have you checked my sig My key has about 10 addresses in it. PM> But for signing you only use your primary UID, I suspect. Haven't PM> checked that now... I have one m

Re: Double PGP sig

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:41:46 +GMT, you wrote: MDP> Have you checked my sig My key has about 10 addresses in it. But for signing you only use your primary UID, I suspect. Haven't checked that now... - -- Cheers and good night :-)

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hi Peter! >> Why do you delete the registry tree first before importing the saved >> data? In my understanding everything is replaced if you import a whole >> tree. > If you had deleted a key in the source it would not be deleted in > destination. As one seldom deletes registry keys in TB!-tree i

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello all, I also would prefer having config files located somewhere in the data directories of TB. As I already wrote here in the thread I often move TB from one computer to another computer. Copying just one directory is much easier than always exporting/importing registry trees. By the way: My

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Martin, On Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:42:57 PM Martin [MS] wrote: >> Yes, I also support this! I use The Bat! in 2 computers in my home and >> if I do any change on one computer I must do it in second (export >> registry branch, then delete registry branch in second computer, then >>

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hi Maxim! > If you store screen coordinates in an INI file and move it to a > computer with a display of different resolution, you will see a big mess! Well, I do not have severe problems with different resolutions. I'm using TB both on my client (1152x864) and on my laptop (1024x768) and moving

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hi Prezes! > Yes, I also support this! I use The Bat! in 2 computers in my home and > if I do any change on one computer I must do it in second (export > registry branch, then delete registry branch in second computer, then > import exported branch). Please allow to not use registry at all :-) Wh

Re: html whitelist wish

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Krzysztof Trybowski On 24 février 2005 at 23:29:14GMT +0100 (which was 17:29 where I live) Krzysztof Trybowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KT> I absolutely agree. This will perhaps happen one day. The only pain KT> is, if it will be done i

Re: Double PGP sig

Dear Peter, @24-Feb-2005, 23:36 +0100 (24-Feb 22:36 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: PM>>> default-key 0x03365206E10774CE MDP>> ... MDP>> Looks like you have it already. I have MDP>> GPGShell\GPGkeys.exe defined as MDP>> my key manager in TB and can launch it -

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Maxim, On Thursday, February 24, 2005 you wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > Thursday, February 24, 2005, 00:10:21, you wrote: >>>With TB right now it's very simple, just >>>import a previously-prepared .reg file. > If you will notice that The Bat! will loose simplicity to install it, just

Re: Double PGP sig

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:16:02 +GMT, you wrote: PM>> I know this is getting OT and should be followed up on PGP-Basics, PM>> but while we're at it, how do I set up a default /secret/ key? PM>> default-key 0x03365206E10774CE MDP> ... M

Re: html whitelist wish

Hello The, On Thursday, February 24, 2005 you wrote: > This is a great idea to compete with thunderbird and any email > clients that actually download images from website > If I put thunderbird as exemple, you can choose to download > images from address you have in personnal address book or in >

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Krzysztof, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 00:10:21, you wrote: >>With TB right now it's very simple, just >>import a previously-prepared .reg file. If you will notice that The Bat! will loose simplicity to install it, just let me know! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re: Double PGP sig

Dear Peter, @24-Feb-2005, 23:08 +0100 (24-Feb 22:08 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> Looks like you need to configure a default key in the key MDP>> manager... PM> I know this is getting OT and should be followed up on PGP-Basics, PM> but while we're at it,

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Marek, On Thursday, February 24, 2005 you wrote: > Max, why is needed to use more places for storing configuration data, > why is a problem to use INI files only? Look to Opera, I love it for > this, whole configuration is stored in INI's. This is more or less the source of serious pa

Re: Double PGP sig

Hi Marck, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:56:47 +GMT, you wrote: PM>> gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped PM>> gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped PM>> gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available PM>> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not

Re: Double PGP sig

Dear Peter, @24-Feb-2005, 22:54 +0100 (24-Feb 21:54 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> Working fine for me... PM> I see. I'm up to date now. But still, The Bat! doesn't accept a third PM> or fourth user ID. So if I try to PGP/MIME sign this message, I get PM

Re: Double PGP sig

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:38 +GMT, you wrote: PM>> Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but the newer versions don't work PM>> from within TB!... MDP> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- MDP> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32) MDP> Working fine for

Re: Re[4]: Config: Registry -> File

Quoting Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Goncalo, > > Thursday, February 24, 2005, 23:29:34, you wrote: ---snipped--- >...determine the percentage > >>delta (changes between resolutions) and reduce the screen >> coordinates >>just that much. What do you thin

Re[4]: Config: Registry -> File

jueves, 24 feb 2005 at 22:29, it seems you wrote: > You could store the resolution for the stored screen coordinates, > check, at start, the current resolution and determine the percentage > delta (changes between resolutions) and reduce the screen coordinates > just that much. What do you

Re[4]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Goncalo, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 23:29:34, you wrote: >>You could store the resolution for the stored screen coordinates, >>check, at start, the current resolution and determine the percentage >>delta (changes between resolutions) and reduce the screen coordinates >>just that m

Re: html whitelist wish

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Cees On 24 février 2005 at 22:34:18GMT +0100 (which was 16:34 where I live) Cees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C> AMEN to that! C> If you want THAT kinda crap... use that bitch that's called Outlook Express! C> Let's keep TheBat! the decent

Re: Double PGP sig (was: html whitelist wish)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter Meyns On 24 février 2005 at 22:25:32GMT +0100 (which was 16:25 where I live) Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- PM> Hash: SHA1 PM> Hi all, PM> on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:18:20 +0100GMT, I wrote a m

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

Het was op donderdag 24 februari 2005 om 22:18 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html whitelist wish' : Hallo Peter, PM> PLEASE, not again. We have had this for so many times over and over. TFC>> I really hope this will be implemented in thebat so we can TFC>> see mailing list in html format. PM>

Re: html whitelist wish

Hello Peter Meyns On 24 février 2005 at 22:18:20GMT +0100 (which was 16:18 where I live) Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PM> I don't. Use a browser if you need content that wasn't sent along with PM> the message. The Bat! is an email client, not a browser. And I don't PM> want her to be.

Re[3]: Config: Registry -> File

In reply to : MM> Hello Marek, MM> Thursday, February 24, 2005, 19:06:16, you wrote: >>>Look to Opera, I love it for >>>this, whole configuration is stored in INI's. MM> If you store screen coordinates in an INI file and move it to MM> a computer with a display of diff

Re: Double PGP sig

Peter Meyns wrote: > Hi all, > > on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:18:20 +0100GMT, I wrote a message that was > signed twice. > > I don't know why this occurred. Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but > the newer versions don't work from within TB!... 1.41rc2 works in TB! -- Dave Calvarese PGP Key Availabl

Re: Double PGP sig

Dear Peter, @24-Feb-2005, 22:25 +0100 (24-Feb 21:25 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: PM> I don't know why this occurred. Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but PM> the newer versions don't work from within TB!... Working fine for me... -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --

Double PGP sig (was: html whitelist wish)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:18:20 +0100GMT, I wrote a message that was signed twice. I don't know why this occurred. Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but the newer versions don't work from within TB!... - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta:

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hallo Maxim, On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:05:13 +0200GMT (24-2-2005, 22:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: >>>When you place the config file in the mail directory they'll have TB >>>asking where to find the message base on every start. MM> I think that the path to the working directory should be the M

Re: html whitelist wish

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi The, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:50:18 -0500GMT, you wrote: TFC> I hope I'm asking to the right list, but I'd like to know TFC> if some of you are agree with this wishlist TFC> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Roelof, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 22:21:28, you wrote: >>When you place the config file in the mail directory they'll have TB >>asking where to find the message base on every start. When The Bat! stores file names in some of the .INI configuration files, like tbplugin.ini, it uses the

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Roelof, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 22:21:28, you wrote: >>When you place the config file in the mail directory they'll have TB >>asking where to find the message base on every start. I think that the path to the working directory should be the only value kept in the Registry. What do you

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Roelof Otten & everyone else, on 24-Feb-2005 at 21:21 you (Roelof Otten) wrote: MM>> Currently, The Bat! keeps its files in two directories: MM>> 1. The read-only program files in the "Program Files" folder > That would be the logical place to store it. TB can always find its > program dir

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello NetVicious & everyone else, on 24-Feb-2005 at 21:31 you (NetVicious) wrote: > Well in this case, TB! should create or mark the ini files with the > Windows username it's using the program. If you don't separate this > the different users of the program will have the same configuration

html whitelist wish

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I hope I'm asking to the right list, but I'd like to know if some of you are agree with this wishlist https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1780 This is a great idea to compete with thunderbird and any email clients that actually downloa

Re[3]: Config: Registry -> File

jueves, 24 feb 2005 at 20:28, it seems you wrote: > Currently, The Bat! keeps its files in two directories: > 1. The read-only program files in the "Program Files" folder > 2. The files that it modifies in the "MAIL Directory" > We don't like to make one additional directory besides the "MAIL > d

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hallo Maxim, On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:28:27 +0200GMT (24-2-2005, 20:28 +0100, where I live), you wrote: >>>I suppose the file will be placed in Documents & Settings/User folder. >>>Because now the registry HKEY_CURRENT_USER makes the possibility to >>>have different configurations for different

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Max, on Thursday, 24. February 2005, at 21:28:27 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding "Config: Registry -> File": > We don't like to make one additional directory besides the "MAIL > directory", we don't like to have three different directories. good choice. > But if there is rationale for thi

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Maxim, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 4:20:52 PM, you wrote: > What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry and what should we > put into a file? As others have already indicated, there is software out there that does not store any data in the registry. Virtual Access (mail a

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 8:28:27 PM, you wrote: MM> We don't like to make one additional directory besides the MM> "MAIL directory", we don't like to have three different MM> directories. Yes, agreed! MM> But if there is rationale for this third directory, please let us know. No, thi

read only config files

Mark, I gave up, un-installed & re-installed. Things seem to be working now. Very strange. Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB!3.0.1.33, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4 ICQ 41116329 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Usi

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Netvicious, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 21:14:10, you wrote: >>I suppose the file will be placed in Documents & Settings/User folder. >>Because now the registry HKEY_CURRENT_USER makes the possibility to >>have different configurations for different users. We will store the files in the

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 8:01:09 PM, you wrote: TB> I'll agree with that. I like the idea of being able to run totally from a TB> USB stick or SD card like PocoPE. So, maybe you will create new preferences tab with two columns: registry and INI file. And user will be able to move ite

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 18:36:16, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > If you store screen coordinates in an INI file and move it to a > computer with a display of different resolution, you will see a big mess! Always do a sanity check on all settings, whether they're stored in an INI file, registry o

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 19:10, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> There is a few annoyances though, one of them being that I every time >> have to change my SMTP server. I do not use the same server when >> travelling as I do at home, but the SMTP server setting seem to be >> stored somewhere in

Re: Config: Registry -> File

jueves, 24 feb 2005 at 17:20, it seems you wrote: > What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry and what > should we put into a file? I suppose the file will be placed in Documents & Settings/User folder. Because now the registry HKEY_CURRENT_USER makes the possibility to have

Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks

On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, Jonathan Angliss wrote... > This email is concerning IMAP and message fetching quirks. It'd appear > randomly TB wants to "hang" on fetching emails. I have sat here for an > hour with 2 emails (yes only 2 emails) sitting in the queue to be > processed with the "Statu

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Prezes, A reminder of what Prezes on TBBETA typed on: 24 February 2005 at 19:14:57 GMT +0100 P> Please allow to not use registry at al I'll agree with that. I like the idea of being able to run totally from a USB stick or SD card like PocoPE. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 6:06:16 PM, you wrote: MM> Max, why is needed to use more places for storing configuration data, MM> why is a problem to use INI files only? Look to Opera, I love it for MM> this, whole configuration is stored in INI's. Or Pocomail, AFAIK it MM> stores everythin

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Marcus Ohlström & everyone else, on 24-Feb-2005 at 18:03 you (Marcus Ohlström) wrote: > There is a few annoyances though, one of them being that I every time > have to change my SMTP server. I do not use the same server when > travelling as I do at home, but the SMTP server setting seem to

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Dear Maxim, @24-Feb-2005, 19:36 +0200 (24-Feb 17:36 UK time) Maxim Masiutin [MM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marek: >>>Look to Opera, I love it for >>>this, whole configuration is stored in INI's. MM> If you store screen coordinates in an INI file and move it to MM> a computer with a displa

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Marek, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 19:06:16, you wrote: >>Look to Opera, I love it for >>this, whole configuration is stored in INI's. If you store screen coordinates in an INI file and move it to a computer with a display of different resolution, you will see a big mess! -- Best regard

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 11:53:07 AM, Cees wrote: C> I feel that ALL userpreferences without exception, including C> folders created by the user, should be put into an ini-file. That C> would really save me a lot of work in the future. I have to agree with this. I'd

Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

Hello Marck, On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:27:26 + GMT (24/02/2005, 23:27 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: TF>> Are you still using the old base in Delphi6, or are you rewriting the TF>> whole source? I'm wondering why it is called an Alpha version. MDP> Try running it - you'll soon see! :-s

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello all, Thursday, February 24, 2005, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Currently, The Bat! keeps the following configuration data in the registry: > - Window sizes, position, column widths > - Directory names last used to save an attachment, import messages, etc. > - Currently select

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 18:03, Marcus Ohlström wrote: > The only files I make sure are *not* copied are: > \MAIL\Account.~flb > \MAIL\Account.flb > \MAIL\\Account.~flb > \MAIL\\Account.flb > \MAIL\except.log > \MAIL\\Account.log > The latter two are excluded by obvious reasons. The form

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Maxim, On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:20:52 +0200 GMT (24/02/2005, 23:20 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry MM> and what should we put into a file? For portability, I always prefer .ini of .cfg files. I even prefer them to be ASCII fil

Re[3]: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Cees, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 18:53:07, you wrote: >>including folders created >> by the user, should be put into an ini-file. The user's folders aren't in the Registry. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Config: Registry -> File

On Thursday, February 24, 2005, 17:26, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MM>> What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry and what MM>> should we put into a file? > Here's how I see it ... > Data pertinent only to the local system - window size / position data > and disk folder usage are

Re: Any plug-in

Dear Jan, @24-Feb-2005, 11:55 -0500 (24-Feb 16:55 UK time) Jan Rifkinson [JR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: JR>>> Every time I install *any* plug-in it drops out whenever TB! is closed & JR>>> re-opened. Anyone know how I can clean up this mess? MDP>> Check for read-only status on conf

Re: Any plug-in

On Thursday, February 24, 2005 it appears that Marck D Pearlstone wrote the following in regards to "Any plug-in": JR>> Every time I install *any* plug-in it drops out whenever TB! is closed & JR>> re-opened. Anyone know how I can clean up this mess? MDP> Check for read-only status on configurati

Re[2]: Config: Registry -> File

Het was op donderdag 24 februari 2005 om 17:26 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Config: Registry -> File' : Hallo Marck, MM>> What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry MM>> and what should we put into a file? MDP> Here's how I see it ... MDP> Data pertinent only to the local s

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Hello Maxim, Thursday, February 24, 2005, 9:20:52 AM, you wrote: M> What kind of configuration data should we keep in registry and what M> should we put into a file? Wow.. good question. I know you're selling voyager as a mobile product, but I'd really like to be able to take my TB installation w

Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

Thomas Fernandez said the following on 02/24/2005 10:22: "I saw a woman wearing a sweatshirt with 'Guess' on it. I said, 'Thyroid problem?'" That one really struck me! LOL!! Thanks for the laugh, I really needed it today! -- Dave Current be

Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

Dear Thomas, @24-Feb-2005, 23:22 +0700 (24-Feb 16:22 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stefan: ST>> Basically, it's a "raw" skeleton of the upcoming Beta TF> Are you still using the old base in Delphi6, or are you rewriting the TF> whole source? I'm wondering why

Re: Config: Registry -> File

Dear Maxim, @24-Feb-2005, 18:20 +0200 (24-Feb 16:20 UK time) Maxim Masiutin [MM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MM> Currently, The Bat! keeps the following configuration data in the registry: MM> - Window sizes, position, column widths MM> - Directory names last used to save an at

Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

Hello Stefan, On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:37:33 +0200 GMT (22/02/2005, 01:37 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha :-) is now available ST> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb30901.rar How about a changelog? ST> Basically, it's a "raw" skeleton of the upcoming

Config: Registry -> File

Hello Tbbeta, Currently, The Bat! keeps the following configuration data in the registry: - Window sizes, position, column widths - Directory names last used to save an attachment, import messages, etc. - Currently selected items, i.e. folder, message, etc. - Miscellaneo

Re: The new, improved me!

Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Hemming on TBBETA typed on: 24 February 2005 at 13:02:35 GMT +0100 SH> This mail /should/ be disclaimer free and PGP/MIME signed. Sure looks fine here. This one looks good too. http://www.saddlery.biz/pp/Country_Clothing/Outdoor_Hats_and_Scarves/Togg

Re: The new, improved me!

At 12:00 [GMT+] on Thursday February 24 (actual time - 8:00pm on Thursday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: > OK. Thanks to some help from Tony Broom, This mail /should/ be > disclaimer free and PGP/MIME signed. You'll need to update your copy > of my key (ldap://keyserver.pgp.com) to b

The new, improved me!

OK. Thanks to some help from Tony Broom, This mail /should/ be disclaimer free and PGP/MIME signed. You'll need to update your copy of my key (ldap://keyserver.pgp.com) to be able to validate the signature. -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Ai

Re: Any plug-in

Dear Jan, @24-Feb-2005, 06:23 -0500 (24-Feb 11:23 UK time) Jan Rifkinson [JR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JR> Every time I install *any* plug-in it drops out whenever TB! is closed & JR> re-opened. Anyone know how I can clean up this mess? Check for read-only status on configuration files in

Any plug-in

Battyfolk, Every time I install *any* plug-in it drops out whenever TB! is closed & re-opened. Anyone know how I can clean up this mess? Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB!3.0.2.10, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4 ICQ 41116329

new AV plug-in for TB

Hallo Everybody, Just found this piece of info at the TB forum at the ritlabs site = Topic title: NEW: TBClamWin - AV Plugin for ClamWin Message author: Marco Pontello Message date: 02/24/2005 02:56:11 Message text: I

Alpha - message editor

ALT + "L" to correctly realign quotes only works once. I'm sure this didn't happen when I started using this version. Because none of the menus work at the bottom of the editor it is hard to tell what is happening. Actually I've now inadvertantly found they do work, they just don't