It happenned many times, but I was lazy until now:
1. I got an HTML mail.
2. I open it for forwarding, using the MicroEd editor in text mode. I
add some text to the TEXT part of the mail.
3. Sending the mail.
The other party who uses Outlook does not see my comments, as she only
see the HTML
Hello Vili,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:05:17 -0500 GMT (05/02/2009, 23:05 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V It happenned many times, but I was lazy until now:
V 1. I got an HTML mail.
V 2. I open it for forwarding, using the MicroEd editor in text mode. I
V add some text to the TEXT part of the mail.
V 3.
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:14:12 +0100 GMT (05/02/2009, 04:14 +0700 GMT),
Peter Hampf wrote:
PH Good evening Peter,
PM As I learned from 9Val, the responsible RIT programmer for the sorting
PM office at that time, I had *too* many conditions in a filter, and the
PM result resembled your
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:16:04 +0100 GMT (05/02/2009, 03:16 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM So, a lot of conditions in a filter can be bad, maybe even worse when
PM nested. ;)
The superior filtering system is one of the reason why I use TB!, and
I might not be the only one. If this
Hi Thomas,
V It happenned many times, but I was lazy until now:
V 1. I got an HTML mail.
V 2. I open it for forwarding, using the MicroEd editor in text mode. I
V add some text to the TEXT part of the mail.
V 3. Sending the mail.
V The other party who uses Outlook does not see my comments, as she
PH - TB as a professional system *MUST* be able to handle any number of
conditions
PH and any nesting levels.
PH - even the greatest Luser must not be able to make TB crash or behave in
an
PH unexpected manner.
Fully agree. If a program allow a user to something, it should be able
to
I am not saying that this is an easy problem to solve, but it should
be addressed ASAP as clearly TB has a bug that affects the core of the
program, namely that it can be used for emailing. Result: loss of
confidence in TB.
I just tried to forward an HTML email with embedded links to
Hi Maxim,
on Sunday, February 1, 2009, at 06:12:51[GMT +0200](which was 05:12
where I live) you wrote among others:
The Bat! 4.1.11.2 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb41112.rar
I got today: 404 - HTTP not found
--
Best regards,
Roland
2/5/2009 4:13 PM
Hi Vili,
On 2/5/2009 Vili wrote:
V Yes, that's what I used to do, but it is a workaround :(
The recipient will now see the message with your comments. Don't
worry, even if you use the HTML editor, your full HTML message will
still be intact. You are deleting only the
V The test I did: I forwarded a commented HTML message to another email
V address of mine. In my Sent folder, when I open the mail, I CAN see
V the comment. When I download the mail to my other email account (in TB),
THERE
V IS NO TRACE of the comment in the source of the email.
...
I
Hello,
If You switch to RTV and move mouse over email address link, You can see
mid: added automatically before address, so opening link do not open New
message window but program incorrectly tries to find link to this
address.
added to bugtraq https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7476
--
Hello all,
Friday, February 6, 2009, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
If You switch to RTV and move mouse over email address link, You can see
mid: added automatically before address, so opening link do not open New
message window but program incorrectly tries to find link to this
address.
Hello Vili,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:32:24 -0500 GMT (06/02/2009, 04:32 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V The test I did: I forwarded a commented HTML message to another email
V address of mine. In my Sent folder, when I open the mail, I CAN see
V the comment. When I download the mail to my other
V The test I did: I forwarded a commented HTML message to another email
V address of mine. In my Sent folder, when I open the mail, I CAN see
V the comment. When I download the mail to my other email account (in TB),
THERE
V IS NO TRACE of the comment in the source of the email.
Paul
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, at 21:45:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:45 where I
live) Peter Hampf wrote:
...*snipped*
and yes, the well-known Norton Commander WAS an innovative piece of
software in DOS times!
...*snipped*
The program I am using now (DO) makes me think of Norton Commander now
and then
15 matches
Mail list logo