On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:21:42 +0200, Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I can only think of one other thing that you can try, but it's a
long shot. You can experiment with using the alternative SMTP port of
587 instead of 465.
I had pretty good luck over the summer using an HTTP proxy
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:43:42 -0500, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's therefore a small project to revise the matching process again.
If MDaemon could do a multi-line match, then it would be great.
Just throwing this out there, but I have 50 gmail invites if anyone
(maybe Stuart?)
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:37:39 -0500, Ethan J. Mings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is it fair to say there will be no further releases or betas prior to
Christmas?
Haven't RITLabs already said there wouldn't be a Christmas edition
this year? My mind could be slipping with all the holiday stress,
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:08:19 +0100, Dierk Haasis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the thread you remember an official Christmas Edition release was
said to not happen; Maxim also wrote a beta will be highly likely.
Thanks. I must have missed that last part!
--
Kevin
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:17:04 +0100, Michael Schneider
It's a problem with TB!'s cache. If you move a message to another
folder and don't clear the cache, the next got message will be shown
as the old you just moved. Only solution: clearing cache ...
I've experienced this problem for a while
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:48:55 -0500, AC Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- wrong message bodies being displayed for messages actually selected.
This seems to be triggered by new messages being added to the folder as
you browse it. I'm not sure though. An awful one, that one. :/
I see you've
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA,
but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on a GMailBETA
list?
Probably. Or TBOT at the least. But, TBBETA always turns into
I have 6 invites I'm not doing anything with, and I believe my
girlfriend has 6 shes not doing anything with. So, if anyone wants
one, just reply to me in private.
--
Kevin
Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:47:59 -0600 (CST), Allie Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMAP involves working with the server all the time. You're working with
the messages as they are on the server. As a result, the CC will always
be open.
Yes, this is quite annoying. Oddly enough, I have 3 IMAP
Hi 9val,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 00:24:20 +0200, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[*] IMAP: new mail sound improvements
[*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Use precise counters'
[*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Retrieve only text'
A little description for IMAP users:
First tune option is suitable for IMAP
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:16:27 -0400, Tim Casten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
This is the worst I have seen. I have spent the past 5 hours
restoring going back in builds etc etc.
Have you filed appropriate bug reports?
--
Kevin
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:15:26 -0400, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the entire proof of his case that Google Desktop is definitely *not* security
risk lies on trust; it's possible... but not necessary; and a specious and naive
asseveration of why would they lie?. Seems hardly proof to
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:36:16 -0400, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great argument. I voice my opinion, anybody against me shut up. Those
who agree with me, welcome!
There is no argument. Any semblance of an argument, you've created.
I've gone out of my way to try and prevent an argument,
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:52:24 +0200, Martin Schoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
English is not my native language - but the tone of your messages
sounds strange over here.
It sounds like: I proofed that there is no security problem - and
now shut up.
No worries. Perhaps it's better to not try
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:10:25 +0100, Marck D Pearlstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This topic has gone way off / too long and I am forced to pronounce
it dead.
Sorry Marck. I had replied further to the thread before I saw this
message. Thank you for marking it a dead horse though.
--
Kevin
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:55:36 -0400, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I give up... how do you get 3.0.2.1 ?
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30201.rar
--
Kevin
Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hi,
I think it'd be great if Google Desktop could index my TB! email
files. I realize TB! has its own search facility, but the ability to
search my entire computer at once would be pretty cool. With that
said, if you think this would be nice as well, please let Google know
at:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:26:51 +0300, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new version announcement
within a few hours.
No Halloween edition this year? :-(
Thanks for the hard work though.
--
Kevin
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:20:37 -0500, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. *Is* there a Help file work in progress, though?
This was the subject of another recent thread. I reported the issue a
while back and Max has marked it as resolved. I assume this means
that 3.0.1 will have the
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:22:31 -0400, Ethan J. Mings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A stability period does not mean that development and work stops. It
simply means that there is a definite period of time before a new beta
series starts. My experience here is as soon as a release version is
out
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:04:21 +0100, Foster, Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello tbbeta
I'd like to see some version of TB be able to be run directly off a
USB flash device, then I can carry all my e-mail around in my
Although not the best solution to this, I used to use The Batch!
Corny joke, but I can't resist. Don't bats eat bugs?
--
Kevin
Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 02:27:59 +0200, Daniel Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seconded. Although using ESC is very easy it isn't quite intuitive.
I'd like to have an additional Cancel button to the existing OK
button.
Maybe we could get an Add and Remove button too. Right-clicking
or pressing
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:26:46 -0400, Kevin Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you determine mail was being deleted? I'm trialing this
plug-in and want to make sure the same thing isn't happening here.
This is far from scientific, but as I watch my mail download, I can
see it before it gets
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:59:47 -0400, Kevin Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh ... the watchful eye technique. Do you have any spam moving to
your junk folders or do they remain empty?
Well, like I said, unless I specifically mark something as SPAM, I
don't see anything go in the junk folder --
Really, do we need this many threads on the subject? People are
upset, yes. I personally feel like RIT Labs shouldn't have done what
they did. But this is just getting to be juvenile. At this point,
what's done is done. Either use tb! or not. If you feel like RIT
Labs has wronged you, then
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:25:55 -0700, George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're adding insult to insult. Got anything else?
At this point it's pretty clear that V2 is dead and V3 is the future
of tb! Likewise, it's pretty clear that V3 is going to cost money.
Given that, I think 65%
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:56:35 -0700, George Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of people spent a lot of time and effort converting their
filters to the new system. Then with *no* warning they were told
they'd have to pay up to keep them.
It's a beta, and you still have the executable.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:39:35 -0400, Paul Cartwright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that my preferences-anti-spam was the bayesit plug-in by
Achim Winkler, v1.3 . I also noticed that the info on 3.0 shows a new
default bayesit plug-in. So I deleted the plug-in I had, and went to my
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:14:41 -0400, danger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I do not know how to do that.
It's easy. Just go to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php and
create an account and then report your issue. You should search and
make sure there isn't already an existing bug item
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:01:44 -0500, hggdh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually, program Ids are only changed between version/releases. So...
if you installed TB! 2.13 Beta x as an MSI, I would not expect the program
Id to have changed. So... save your data, un-install TB!, re-install with
the new
Guess I'm gonna have to say me too. (I had used the B7 MSI file earlier).
--
Kevin
Current beta is 2.13 Beta/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 22:12:56 +0200, Prezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in antispam
interface should be highest value 99 (100) or it should be Delte if
score is =100 (= not ).
I'd say there's not a whole lot to discuss on this one, so why not
just submit it to bt?
--
Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:44:59 +0200, Carsten Knobloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First: What means Lucky? Must i have luck to get it work? ;)
I'm guessing it's lucky because the minor version is 13.
--
Kevin
Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky'
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:46:26 -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of toolbar buttons, can we *please* get one for marking mail
as junk (the same button could be used for marking a message not as
junk too, based upon the status of the selected message). It's a
major
Only with your help ;)
Not to be rude, but there have been several issues brought up about bt
in the past week (and not just by me). I've emailed Alexander 3 times
now (after he first responded to me), with no further response. I
contend you're losing out on valuable feedback since people
Sorry for sending this to this list, but the only address listed on BT
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) bounces. Who should I contact to get a new
password? I know this has come up before, but why isn't there a
facility for a user to do this on his own?
--
Thanks,
Kevin
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:45:08 +0200, Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're absolutely right IMO. All users should be able to change their
passwords or apply for a new one on their own.
Well, it's actually been a deterrent (at least for me). I.e., I'd
have been more active with BT
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:33:37 -0500, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems unlikely that it can.
I'll have to check what the Received headers look like when I get home
since I didn't even think to check them. Maybe that'll help determine
whether it's tb! or my IMAP server that's
Hey Jonathan,
JA I see a problem... it's a perl based script, which would mean, unless
JA you want to write the code in delphi, or another language, the
JA computer running SpamAssassin would also require perl, that is it was
JA a few months ago anyway.
I know that perl.NET can make natively
Hey guys,
Here are some thoughts I have on the new scheduler. First, I think
this is a great feature, something I've been longing for for quite
some time, and something that would help me sell my Outlook using
friends on the bat! just a little bit more (getting IMAP to work
would be
Hey Nick,
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 10:10:58 PM, you wrote:
NA Because it munges the Subject line due to the fact not all Users will
NA employ it, so the numbering actually has no relevance. Besides, is it
NA really necessary, and all it really accomplishes is lengthening of the
NA Subject
Hey Nick,
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:36:21 PM, you wrote:
NA Hello Gene Gough,
NA On Wednesday, March 27 2002 at 03:49 PM PDT, you wrote:
OK, thanks.
NA Gene, you really should limit use of Reply numbering to these Lists only,
NA or better still remove it altogether. RITLabs should 'not'
Hey Marcus,
Saturday, March 23, 2002, 4:53:10 AM, you wrote:
MO Hello,
MO I installed the final 1.60 yesterday and everything worked great.
MO Launched it and ended it a few times without any problems. However,
MO when trying to launch TB! this morning, I got an error message (see
MO attached
44 matches
Mail list logo
