Hæ!
I have installed WinXP Pro and wanted to port over TB and its mail
archive and settings from my Win2000 system.
So, I did a backup from v3.5 Pro.
I installed TB 3.5 Pro on WinXP Pro and tried to restore the backup
file.
TB now says me at some point during the restore, it cannot read
Hello Thorvald,
Is this a known bug/behaviour?
I don't know, but there is a similar bug. I get an error message during
a restore from a backup Error reading file *.tbk.
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also this full thread mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU -
Hæ!
Ok, I went back to 3.02.10, did a backup; installed this version on XP
and restored the backup successfully.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows XP Pro (v5.1.2600)
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:50:49 -0500 GMT (26/05/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
I am not sure this is an IMAP issue. [...] Over here, I think it's
an XP problem.
AM If it were an XP problem, it would likely affect the protocol, no
AM matter which client I'm using.
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 13:38, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Next, when browsing a VF, new message was received and added. They
were however not added at the bottom, as they should, but at the top
(sorting on creation date, ascending order). A quick stroke at my
newly assigned refresh shortcut,
with multitasking, too. Over here, I think it's an XP problem.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
SYMPTOM: Floor blurred. FAULT: You are looking through bottom of empty
glass. ACTION: Get someone to buy you another beer.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hi Thomas,
On 26/05/2005 07:46 PM +0700, you wrote:
I am not sure this is an IMAP issue. I have the same problem on POP,
starting with the MS Security Update of 20 April. No traffic for
several seconds in the DUN, then traffic again for a few seconds.
Checking one account at a time speeds
are contradicting me.
mid = message ID.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Why do you need a driver's license to buy liquor when you can't drink
and drive ?
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current
home, so drive as fast
as you can. It's harder for drunk people to hit you.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.5.0.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 10:42:28 AM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
My IMAP problems still remain :) Not being able to read message bodies when
new mail comes in, etc.. Sorry I could not be of more help.
I'm now confirming this issue big time. I'm using MDaemon as well.
I'm browsing my TBBETA
Hi Allie,
On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:16:03 -0500 UTC (5/25/2005, 5:16 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Allie Martin wrote:
My IMAP problems still remain :) Not being able to read message bodies when
new mail comes in, etc.. Sorry I could not be of more help.
A I'm now confirming this issue big time. I'm
Hello Gary.
--On 23 May 2005 16:28 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
problem or is it still a reference header problem?
Sorry if
Hi Tony,
-- 24.05.2005 08:59 +0100:
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
problem or is it still a reference header problem?
Reference header is the
Hello Boris.
--On 24 May 2005 10:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Sorry if I didn't understand you correctly, but the threading problem IS
solved. Your message id is fine.
It's not actually fixed. I just bodged it so my list mail
Hello Manuel.
--On 24 May 2005 10:10 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
You can check it with Mulberry very easily: Mailbox - Sort By - Thread.
Or just click on the Thread heading in the preview pane.
--
Tony.
M.
pgp5V9djPe224.pgp
Hi all,
When I connect to my IMAP accounts with 3.5 TB! does not refresh the
header list in the header pane, automatically. I have to click on another
account or
folder first and then afterwards on the inbox again.
Is this a known issue or perhaps a problem with my settings ?
--
Best
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:03:38 +0200 UTC (5/24/2005, 10:03 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Michael Mlinaric wrote:
M When I connect to my IMAP accounts with 3.5 TB! does not refresh the
M header list in the header pane, automatically. I have to click on another
account or
M folder first
fine !?
--
Best regards,
Michael
TheBat! 3.5 Professional on Windows 2000 SP4
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use
of these terms appears in [RFC2119].
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
I know that the work cycle is not plan/start/finish, but is
wait/plan/plan.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:15:43 +0200 UTC (5/24/2005, 10:15 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Michael Mlinaric wrote:
check account properties / IMAP fine tuning / when on-line refresh folders
every x minutes.
M This item is already checked and set to 1 minute. But when I don't
M follow the
assigned a partner who is their total opposite.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[Reply to: Ian A. White · 2005-05-24 · 02:55 h (CET)]
Hello, Ian!
Normally it starts off with Send the message (F7), the Put message
in outbox. When the message is sent via MAPI, it starts off with Put
message in outbox, then Send the message (F7), and then Put
message in outbox again.
Matt and tbbeta,
Long long waits for messages to be visible (No message loaded seems to
be all I see anymore), usually ending with me having to terminate then
restart the IMAP session...which doesn't always fix it. Connection
Centre always shows the various parts of the session are In queue.
begins with a cash advance.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT
another beer.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:48 +0700 UTC (5/24/2005, 10:12 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Thomas Fernandez wrote:
G now the RECOMMENDED part
G The message identifier (msg-id) itself MUST be a globally unique
Gidentifier for a message. The generator of the message identifier
GMUST
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:28:51 +0200 UTC (5/24/2005, 10:28 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Michael Mlinaric wrote:
I can tell you that IMAP functionality will be addressed during the next
beta round, as per Stefan.
M Yes, I've read this statement also. But I've never seen this list update
M
were asked for stories
of unusual behavior by job applicants. 5. Interrupted to phone his
therapist for advice on answering specific interview questions.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:12 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
So Tony is safe in my opinion,
Assuming Tony values your opinion that is :)
Lets get one thing straight, I used to be like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:27 +0700 you wrote about Re: OT: Message ID (Was: Re:
3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a preview of issues to be tested):
I'm pretty sure it doesn't and you'd be flamed in the usenet. Luckily, we
are not in the usenet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:31 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
And it has: Your messages do thread now!
I know they do, but it's a bodge not a fix.
- --
Tony.
M.
-BEGIN PGP
Hi Thomas,
On 24/05/2005 10:27 PM +0700, you wrote:
It's not OT. It's about TB handles mids, and when you use TB with
MyGate to post to newsgroups, this is very on-topic.
I was wondering how we came to be speaking about newsgroups and now
it's clear. I don't see why TB! should follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:39 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Please, please: Tell me WHERE!
It's over there somewhere, I saw it on a travel program. I'm pretty sure
it's not far from
motorcycle gangs.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester
with
traffic. Yes, I know there is no other car around--that's how far
ahead of me they are.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first
Hi Tony,
-- 24.05.2005 12:56 +0100:
You can check it with Mulberry very easily: Mailbox - Sort By - Thread.
Or just click on the Thread heading in the preview pane.
Eliminated this, 'cause I want to have a different view. :)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Hello Gary,
My IMAP problems still remain :) Not being able to read message bodies when
new mail comes in, etc.. Sorry I could not be of more help.
What is your IMAP server software? If it's Courier, do you have the option
for workaround switched on in Fine-Tune?
--
Best regards,
Stefan
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 23:32:28 +0700 UTC (5/24/2005, 11:32 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Thomas Fernandez wrote:
G The spec does not differentiate between email, USENET, or mailing lists,
T This is a mistake, IMHO. For technical reasons:
T News postings get propagated over the world via
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:27:30 +0300 UTC (5/24/2005, 12:27 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
My IMAP problems still remain :) Not being able to read message bodies when
new mail comes in, etc.. Sorry I could not be of more help.
S What is your IMAP server software? If
Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 5:27:13 PM Thomas [TF] wrote:
AM TB! uses the domain name of the sender address. What if it's
AM 'yahoo.com' or 'gmx.net'? These aren't at all unique either. :)
TF To post in the usenet, you need to own an FQDN (fully-qualified domain
TF name).
You
Hello Everyone!
I have just done an install (I thought) of TB! v. 3.5, choosing
complete Install, over v. 3.5.0.14. I used the 3.5 file which I
downloaded on May 13, 2005.
Didn't take.
Still have v. 3.5.0.14, according to Help/About.
I shall now try reverting via the XP Restore point that I
Hallo Mary,
hiermit antworte ich auf die Nachricht vom 24.05.2005 (20:48 Uhr):
MB I have just done an install (I thought) of TB! v. 3.5, choosing
MB complete Install, over v. 3.5.0.14. I used the 3.5 file which I
MB downloaded on May 13, 2005.
MB Still have v. 3.5.0.14, according to Help/About
On 2005-05-24 at 20:48:46 Mary Bull wrote:
I have just done an install (I thought) of TB! v. 3.5, choosing
complete Install, over v. 3.5.0.14. I used the 3.5 file which I
downloaded on May 13, 2005.
Didn't take.
Standard MSI horror stuff. Completely uninstall your old version,
before you
Hello Mary!
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 1:48 PM, you wrote:
... have just done an install (I thought) of TB! v. 3.5, choosing
complete Install, over v. 3.5.0.14. I used the 3.5 file which I
downloaded on May 13, 2005.
Didn't take.
Still have v. 3.5.0.14, according to Help/About.
I shall now
Hello Simon,
On 24 May 2005, 19:53 you wrote:
Mary If that doesn't work, I think I'm in Big Trouble!
Mary, delete the thebat.exe then run the 3.5 installer - select
the repair option - that will work...
Just to confirm... this is the way to go. Note: you may not see the
repair option
Hello Martin, and Simon, and Carsten and Dimitry!
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 2:06 PM, you wrote:
Mary, delete the thebat.exe then run the 3.5 installer - select
the repair option - that will work...
Just to confirm... this is the way to go. Note: you may not see the
repair option
Hello Simon!
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 2:29 PM, you wrote:
... on the subject of Cannot install 3.5 over 3.5.0.14 (or There
and back again):
I love this!
Mary We learn by doing.
You're not wrong Mary - glad you got it all sorted!
Well, I don't know what harm I may have done by using XP
2.12.00 in Downloaded Setups, just in case I started
hating 3.xx too much, and it's still there. LOL. 3.0.1.33 is also
there.) The May 13 3.5 is in Downloads. Today's 3.5.0.14 msi I put
under C:/Mary, which has only two folders in it. But I think I'll go
delete it now!! I put 3.5.0.14 there so
versions there.
--
As ever,
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ALDOUS HUXLEY
___
IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.5
IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2
Hi,
Start off with a number of accounts/folders where one account is
expanded with the the others collapsed.
Confirmed.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Aided
by BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros
1.11a.
Hello Martin,
Saturday, May 21, 2005, 11:22:17 PM, you wrote:
M No please again - stop this silly game with official betas, private
M betas, closed betas, daily betas - it's absurd.
It's really not a game. The daily betas are there to test one or two
bugfixes at a time and they're generally
Hello all,
I have just added a note to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4158
confirming this faulty behaviour on 3.5 final.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Leif.
--On 23 May 2005 07:48 -0600 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
moderator to everyone
Please don't feel singled out anyone :)
--
Tony.
M.
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 16:52 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
It would be very, very nice indeed, more so for me that you.
I'm trying
.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
BROT trocknet nicht so rasch aus, wenn man es stets in einem Eimer mit
Wasser lagert.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 16:52 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
With your permission I'll forward your message to my provider in order
what else to do other than wait
TB for them to contact me.
Hm. Have you tried an RFC-compatible client?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Remember in prayer the many who are sick of our church and community.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 22:11 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Hm. Have you tried an RFC-compatible client?
Yes, and I'm still using it this very minute.
--
Tony.
M.
Current
that mids must be enclosed in angular
brackets. You client seems to not do that. Threading is still broken,
as your message didn't appear under mine, to which you are replying.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Mental backup in progress - Do Not Disturb!
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 10:42 PM +0700, you wrote:
Don't think so. You are using Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32). On TBOT, someone
posted the RFC that says that mids must be enclosed in angular
brackets. You client seems to not do that. Threading is still broken,
as your message didn't appear under
the results.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 22:42 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't think so.
Thinking is OK for some people, knowing for an absolute fact is far more
reliable when engaging in public debate. A reasonable amount of research
into TB
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 11:17 PM +0700, you wrote:
The ISP is setting the Reply-to headers? This must be an aspect of
IMAP I wasn't aware of.
I wasn't either until the problem arose and was explained.
You are saying the MUA (or its settings) has nothing to do with
it, but the ISP does.
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 11:05 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
This has been discussed at length. The problem is with the IMAP server
and Tony is trying to sort this out with his ISP.
Thank you for your support Allie, had I read your
it's fixed in the morrow.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Wenn morgens frueh der Wecker rasselt, ist der schoenste Tag
vermasselt.
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 18:25 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
my IMAP service provider is
Which would mean, since I'm a 11 customer, too, if I'd be using IMAP, my
threading headers would be broken, too. I have to try that.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 23:17 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
An explanation is not a solution.
No, but knowing the cause leads to a solution... Hopefully!
--
Tony.
M
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 23:34 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Accepted. I'll go to sleep now, may it's fixed in the morrow.
I don't know if it'll be tomorrow Thomas, I sincerely hope so but I'm not
holding my breath
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:39 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Which would mean, since I'm a 11 customer, too, if I'd be using IMAP, my
threading headers would be broken, too. I have to try that.
Only if you use Mulberry with IMAP
using
The Bat! Version 3.5
MyMacros 1.11
Useless Macro Collection 2.1.1121 rc8
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 10:33:44) on
Uno AMD Duron
Current beta is (none
--On 23 May 2005 22:42 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You client seems to not do that.
Not true, Thomas. The problem's not with the email client but the servers.
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is (none) | 'Using
Hello Mark.
--On 23 May 2005 19:27 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
I'm only asking because knowing is far more reliable than thinking:
Is the first and the second one supposed to be one and the same? :-)
I don't know but that's how my Queen
Hello Allie,
Allie Martin wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
True, but what solution do you have to offer? :)
Use another mail-provider for the list or don't post until problem is
fixed. I believe that Tony really don't like his problem at all and
tries hardly to solve it, but that doesn't
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
With your permission I'll forward your message to my provider in order to
outline the problems it's causing?
Don't understand you
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 21:51 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Use another mail-provider for the list or don't post until problem is
fixed.
I won't post anymore then if you don't want me to. I'll just go over here
and sit in the corner
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 21:55 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't understand you here, but do whatever is necessary to fix the
problem! Thanks!
Sorted :)
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
^^^ strange, but ok.
but that doesn't solve problem right now :-(.
Oh alright then... There, fixed now?
For me, it is. Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12
(see
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 22:15 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
For me, it is.
Then that makes me happy.
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
^^^ strange, but ok.
Don't know
Hello Tony.
--On 23 May 2005 21:31 +0100 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12 (see above) but
I've no problem with that.
Ooops! Must remember CTRL+X not CTRL+C !!
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Hi Boris,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 22:15:29 +0200 UTC (5/23/2005, 3:15 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Boris Anders wrote:
B Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
B For me, it is. Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12
B (see above) but I've no problem with that.
IIRC, without
Hi Boris,
On 23/5/2005 10:15 PM +0200, you wrote:
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
If only women came with pulldown menus and
Hi Gary,
On 23/5/2005 3:39 PM -0500, you wrote:
IIRC, without looking it up, there is absolutely no spec for a
message ID at all. You can use whatever you wish, as long as it is
unique for each email. If he wanted to put @chicken-soup it is
permissible. :) In fact, many people modify this
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 3:52 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
The Message-ID: field provides a unique message identifier that
refers to a particular version of a particular message.
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 15:55 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Ok. Anyone saying yes or no on this paragraph. Thanks for the input
Gary.
I'm all for it, I was well impressed.
--
Tony.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: PGP
Hello Gary.
--On 23 May 2005 15:39 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
IIRC, without looking it up, there is absolutely no spec for a message ID
at all. You can use whatever you wish, as long as it is unique for each
email. If he wanted to put
Hello Gary,
Gary wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
Very? Hm, with this IP the right part isn't unique (funny: you use the
same IP than I do :-), but when you use an unique left part (which
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 4:04 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
Forgot to mention the source...
RFC 2822 - Internet Message Format
--
Hi Gary,
On 23/5/2005 4:04 PM -0500, you wrote:
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
--
Allie Martin
System specs:
Hi Boris,
On 23/5/2005 11:13 PM +0200, you wrote:
Very? Hm, with this IP the right part isn't unique (funny: you use the
same IP than I do :-),
TB! uses the domain name of the sender address. What if it's
'yahoo.com' or 'gmx.net'? These aren't at all unique either. :)
but when you use an
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 4:18 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Yes, it is very legal..
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
--
Gary
Hello Gary,
Gary wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
Hm threading is fine here, however it doesn't the message if the
Not sure what happened but over the last couple of days, IMAP with 3.5
has taken a horrible turn for the worse. Same old problems are
occurring...
Long long waits for messages to be visible (No message loaded seems to
be all I see anymore), usually ending with me having to terminate then
restart
Hello Peter,
Peter Ouwehand wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work. Moreover delete produces an AV, when message auto-view
is disabled (since start of TheBat!).
--
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de
to be quite accurate, except when
they're writing on a subject I know something about. - (Keith F.
Lynch)
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work.
Can't confirm. Are you sure that an attached file is
marked/highlighted before you use a command?
You are right - I didn't selected the
Hi,
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work.
MS Can't confirm. Are you sure that an attached file is
MS marked/highlighted before you use a command? If there is no one
MS marked - nothing goes - of course.
but the option Save all should work
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 08:21 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
I really don't like if there is a two-class system with testers -
some getting recent versions, others not so recent one...
Whats the problem with that? The official version is 3.5 at the moment
1 - 100 of 843 matches
Mail list logo
