Hello Gary,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 12:30:52 -0500 GMT (25/05/2005, 00:30 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
T News postings get propagated over the world via various news servers.
T That's why the mid needs to be unique.
G Mids are nothing more than previous message-IDs relating to that email.
True.
G
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 19:40:25 +0200 GMT (25/05/2005, 00:40 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
TF To post in the usenet, you need to own an FQDN (fully-qualified domain
TF name).
PP You don't.
I thought I did. Mine is @thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de. Search Google News
and you'll find my
Hello Gary.
--On 23 May 2005 16:28 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
problem or is it still a reference header problem?
Sorry if
Hi Tony,
-- 24.05.2005 08:59 +0100:
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
So if TB! could read that part properly would that solve my threading
problem or is it still a reference header problem?
Reference header is the
Hello Boris.
--On 24 May 2005 10:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Sorry if I didn't understand you correctly, but the threading problem IS
solved. Your message id is fine.
It's not actually fixed. I just bodged it so my list mail is
Hello Manuel.
--On 24 May 2005 10:10 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
You can check it with Mulberry very easily: Mailbox - Sort By - Thread.
Or just click on the Thread heading in the preview pane.
--
Tony.
M.
pgp5V9djPe224.pgp
Hello Gary,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:04:26 -0500 GMT (24/05/2005, 04:04 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
G now the RECOMMENDED part
G The message identifier (msg-id) itself MUST be a globally unique
Gidentifier for a message. The generator of the message identifier
GMUST guarantee that the msg-id
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:24:26 -0500 GMT (24/05/2005, 04:24 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM TB! uses the domain name of the sender address. What if it's
AM 'yahoo.com' or 'gmx.net'? These aren't at all unique either. :)
To post in the usenet, you need to own an FQDN
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 18:12:56 +0100 GMT (24/05/2005, 00:12 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
An explanation is not a solution.
TB No, but knowing the cause leads to a solution... Hopefully!
And it has: Your messages do thread now!
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
A journey of a thousand miles
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 18:19:54 +0100 GMT (24/05/2005, 00:19 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
Accepted. I'll go to sleep now, may it's fixed in the morrow.
TB I don't know if it'll be tomorrow Thomas, I sincerely hope so but I'm not
TB holding my breath.
It's tomorrow, but your message
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:48 +0700 UTC (5/24/2005, 10:12 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Thomas Fernandez wrote:
G now the RECOMMENDED part
G The message identifier (msg-id) itself MUST be a globally unique
Gidentifier for a message. The generator of the message identifier
GMUST
Hello Clive,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 18:35:30 +0100 GMT (24/05/2005, 00:35 +0700 GMT),
Clive Taylor wrote:
You client seems to not do that.
CT Not true, Thomas. The problem's not with the email client but the servers.
I got it.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Personnel executives of 100 major corporations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:12 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
So Tony is safe in my opinion,
Assuming Tony values your opinion that is :)
Lets get one thing straight, I used to be like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:27 +0700 you wrote about Re: OT: Message ID (Was: Re:
3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a preview of issues to be tested):
I'm pretty sure it doesn't and you'd be flamed in the usenet. Luckily, we
are not in the usenet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:31 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
And it has: Your messages do thread now!
I know they do, but it's a bodge not a fix.
- --
Tony.
M.
-BEGIN PGP
Hi Thomas,
On 24/05/2005 10:27 PM +0700, you wrote:
It's not OT. It's about TB handles mids, and when you use TB with
MyGate to post to newsgroups, this is very on-topic.
I was wondering how we came to be speaking about newsgroups and now
it's clear. I don't see why TB! should follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas.
- --On 24 May 2005 22:39 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Please, please: Tell me WHERE!
It's over there somewhere, I saw it on a travel program. I'm pretty sure
it's not far from
Hello Gary,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 10:40:09 -0500 GMT (24/05/2005, 22:40 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
T Hm. Do MUST sentences in the RFCs refer to recommendations?
G Umm, no, the definitions of these terms, MUST, etc, as below, as to their
G meaning is in RFC 2119. It is difficult for me to just pick
Hello Tony,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:19:47 +0100 GMT (24/05/2005, 23:19 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
And it has: Your messages do thread now!
TB I know they do, but it's a bodge not a fix.
Works for me.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
What to not say to the nice policeman: I was trying to keep up with
Hello Tony,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:18:05 +0100 GMT (24/05/2005, 23:18 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
BTW, your sig delimiter is above your message.
Please, please: Tell me WHERE!
TB It's over there somewhere, I saw it on a travel program. I'm pretty sure
TB it's not far from Phuckit as that was
Hi Tony,
-- 24.05.2005 12:56 +0100:
You can check it with Mulberry very easily: Mailbox - Sort By - Thread.
Or just click on the Thread heading in the preview pane.
Eliminated this, 'cause I want to have a different view. :)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 23:32:28 +0700 UTC (5/24/2005, 11:32 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Thomas Fernandez wrote:
G The spec does not differentiate between email, USENET, or mailing lists,
T This is a mistake, IMHO. For technical reasons:
T News postings get propagated over the world via
Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 5:27:13 PM Thomas [TF] wrote:
AM TB! uses the domain name of the sender address. What if it's
AM 'yahoo.com' or 'gmx.net'? These aren't at all unique either. :)
TF To post in the usenet, you need to own an FQDN (fully-qualified domain
TF name).
You
Hello Martin,
Saturday, May 21, 2005, 11:22:17 PM, you wrote:
M No please again - stop this silly game with official betas, private
M betas, closed betas, daily betas - it's absurd.
It's really not a game. The daily betas are there to test one or two
bugfixes at a time and they're generally
Hello Leif.
--On 23 May 2005 07:48 -0600 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
moderator to everyone
Please don't feel singled out anyone :)
--
Tony.
M.
Current beta is (none) | 'Using
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 16:52 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
It would be very, very nice indeed, more so for me that you.
I'm trying
Hello Boris,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:52:05 +0200 GMT (23/05/2005, 21:52 +0700 GMT),
Boris Anders wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BA^^
BA It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
BA really really annoying for me!
ACK.
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 16:52 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
With your permission I'll forward your message to my provider in order
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:07:03 +0100 GMT (23/05/2005, 22:07 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB I'm trying my hardest. I've notified my provider, they asked for examples
TB and I sent them. Other than traveling to the other end of the Country and
TB supervising the work myself I don't know
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 22:11 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Hm. Have you tried an RFC-compatible client?
Yes, and I'm still using it this very minute.
--
Tony.
M.
Current
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:25:34 +0100 GMT (23/05/2005, 22:25 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
Hm. Have you tried an RFC-compatible client?
TB Yes, and I'm still using it this very minute.
Don't think so. You are using Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32). On TBOT, someone
posted the RFC that says that
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 10:42 PM +0700, you wrote:
Don't think so. You are using Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32). On TBOT, someone
posted the RFC that says that mids must be enclosed in angular
brackets. You client seems to not do that. Threading is still broken,
as your message didn't appear under
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 11:05:27 -0500 GMT (23/05/2005, 23:05 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM I'm using the same client and do you see the problem???
AM This has been discussed at length. The problem is with the IMAP server
AM and Tony is trying to sort this out with his ISP.
The
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 22:42 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't think so.
Thinking is OK for some people, knowing for an absolute fact is far more
reliable when engaging in public debate. A reasonable amount of research
into TB!
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 11:17 PM +0700, you wrote:
The ISP is setting the Reply-to headers? This must be an aspect of
IMAP I wasn't aware of.
I wasn't either until the problem arose and was explained.
You are saying the MUA (or its settings) has nothing to do with
it, but the ISP does.
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 11:05 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
This has been discussed at length. The problem is with the IMAP server
and Tony is trying to sort this out with his ISP.
Thank you for your support Allie, had I read your
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:25:27 +0100 GMT (23/05/2005, 23:25 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB You've either been on holiday, on Mars or asleep for a few Weeks... Or
TB laying on that nudist beach the other side of you island :)
Unfortunately, no nudist beach over here. But I have had
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 18:25 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
my IMAP service provider is
Which would mean, since I'm a 11 customer, too, if I'd be using IMAP, my
threading headers would be broken, too. I have to try that.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 23:17 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
An explanation is not a solution.
No, but knowing the cause leads to a solution... Hopefully!
--
Tony.
M.
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 23:34 +0700 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Accepted. I'll go to sleep now, may it's fixed in the morrow.
I don't know if it'll be tomorrow Thomas, I sincerely hope so but I'm not
holding my breath.
And there is a
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:39 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Which would mean, since I'm a 11 customer, too, if I'd be using IMAP, my
threading headers would be broken, too. I have to try that.
Only if you use Mulberry with IMAP.
Hello Tony,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:25:27 PM, you wrote:
TB would also help in keeping ones foot out of ones mouth :)
I'm only asking because knowing is far more reliable than thinking:
Is the first and the second one supposed to be one and the same? :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
--On 23 May 2005 22:42 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You client seems to not do that.
Not true, Thomas. The problem's not with the email client but the servers.
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is (none) | 'Using
Hello Mark.
--On 23 May 2005 19:27 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
I'm only asking because knowing is far more reliable than thinking:
Is the first and the second one supposed to be one and the same? :-)
I don't know but that's how my Queen
Hello Allie,
Allie Martin wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
True, but what solution do you have to offer? :)
Use another mail-provider for the list or don't post until problem is
fixed. I believe that Tony really don't like his problem at all and
tries hardly to solve it, but that doesn't
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It would be /very/ nice if this wouldn't happen any more. It's really
really really annoying for me!
With your permission I'll forward your message to my provider in order to
outline the problems it's causing?
Don't understand you
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 21:51 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Use another mail-provider for the list or don't post until problem is
fixed.
I won't post anymore then if you don't want me to. I'll just go over here
and sit in the corner
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 21:55 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't understand you here, but do whatever is necessary to fix the
problem! Thanks!
Sorted :)
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
Hello Tony,
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
^^^ strange, but ok.
but that doesn't solve problem right now :-(.
Oh alright then... There, fixed now?
For me, it is. Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12
(see
Hello Boris.
--On 23 May 2005 22:15 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
For me, it is.
Then that makes me happy.
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
^^^ strange, but ok.
Don't know
Hello Tony.
--On 23 May 2005 21:31 +0100 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12 (see above) but
I've no problem with that.
Ooops! Must remember CTRL+X not CTRL+C !!
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Hi Boris,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 22:15:29 +0200 UTC (5/23/2005, 3:15 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Boris Anders wrote:
B Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
B For me, it is. Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12
B (see above) but I've no problem with that.
IIRC, without
Hi Boris,
On 23/5/2005 10:15 PM +0200, you wrote:
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
If only women came with pulldown menus and
Hi Gary,
On 23/5/2005 3:39 PM -0500, you wrote:
IIRC, without looking it up, there is absolutely no spec for a
message ID at all. You can use whatever you wish, as long as it is
unique for each email. If he wanted to put @chicken-soup it is
permissible. :) In fact, many people modify this
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 3:52 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
The Message-ID: field provides a unique message identifier that
refers to a particular version of a particular message.
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 15:55 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
Ok. Anyone saying yes or no on this paragraph. Thanks for the input
Gary.
I'm all for it, I was well impressed.
--
Tony.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: PGP
Hello Gary.
--On 23 May 2005 15:39 -0500 you wrote about Re: 3.5.0.11 / 3.5 Postfix a
preview of issues to be tested:
IIRC, without looking it up, there is absolutely no spec for a message ID
at all. You can use whatever you wish, as long as it is unique for each
email. If he wanted to put
Hello Gary,
Gary wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
Very? Hm, with this IP the right part isn't unique (funny: you use the
same IP than I do :-), but when you use an unique left part (which
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 4:04 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Tony Boom wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
Forgot to mention the source...
RFC 2822 - Internet Message Format
--
Hi Gary,
On 23/5/2005 4:04 PM -0500, you wrote:
Just curious. Can the RFC gurus tell me if that message id format is
legal?
Yes, it is very legal..
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
--
Allie Martin
System specs:
Hi Boris,
On 23/5/2005 11:13 PM +0200, you wrote:
Very? Hm, with this IP the right part isn't unique (funny: you use the
same IP than I do :-),
TB! uses the domain name of the sender address. What if it's
'yahoo.com' or 'gmx.net'? These aren't at all unique either. :)
but when you use an
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, May 23, 2005 4:18 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Yes, it is very legal..
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
--
Gary
Hello Gary,
Gary wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So TB! needs to be able to do lookups on those types of message ids.
yes if it needs to thread on mids or the mid variable is in the reply
template, as Boris has his setup.
Hm threading is fine here, however it doesn't the message if the
Hello Peter,
Peter Ouwehand wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work. Moreover delete produces an AV, when message auto-view
is disabled (since start of TheBat!).
--
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de
Hello Boris,
On Sun, 22 May 2005 10:17:49 +0200 GMT (22/05/2005, 15:17 +0700 GMT),
Boris Anders wrote:
BA Context menu in message list:
BA Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
BA doesn't work.
Not confirmed. works fine here.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
I've noticed that the press tends to
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work.
Can't confirm. Are you sure that an attached file is
marked/highlighted before you use a command?
You are right - I didn't selected the
Hi,
Context menu in message list:
Attachments - Open... |Save...|Delete|Print...
doesn't work.
MS Can't confirm. Are you sure that an attached file is
MS marked/highlighted before you use a command? If there is no one
MS marked - nothing goes - of course.
but the option Save all should work
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 08:21 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
I really don't like if there is a two-class system with testers -
some getting recent versions, others not so recent one...
Whats the problem with that? The official version is 3.5 at the moment,
there *is*
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:26 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
But as far as I see at least two users (are they called
super-beta-testers) have this version.
Yes, they are superior beings, above human.
You have read my previous message. But did you understand it?
If
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:53 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
If you get a message from a dev please test if the bug you had is fixed
with the daily build [URL], would you return to the old version after you
tested it?
So why don't you do it?
Ehhh? Did you
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Delete icons disappears:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confirmed.
Restore problems:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you use internal backup? So I'm not able to test whether it's
reproducible here (I for mine don't trust the internal backup,
Hello Peter,
User Interface:
===
'Watch folders' not displayed in message list context menu
Special/Watch Replies In.
See mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Ian A. White everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 12:53 you (Ian A. White) wrote:
I asked about the version because there was a promised version on the
Monday (that is last Monday) after 3.5 was released.
Yes I know. That announcement was made by Stefan Tanurkov on TBUDL, and he
made
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Why don't you trust it - it's to buggy?
I trust my backup more, than the internal.
So it's something for the bug list then.
Maybe, but I can't confirm any of them.
No On-The-Fly Pwd installation:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not
On Sat 21-May-05 1:42am -0500, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Fixes and changes are compiled into daily builds
and everyone can get them.
I check for the daily builds here:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
The last one is dated 7.05.2005 - that's batspeak for
May 7th -
On Sat 21-May-05 9:13pm -0500, I wrote:
On Sat 21-May-05 1:42am -0500, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Fixes and changes are compiled into daily builds
and everyone can get them.
I check for the daily builds here:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
The last one is
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What I have to do that all me reported bugs and problems get on your
list?
Say the magic word: Beer *SCNR*
Maybe you'll give us the mid's of your reported bugs, and we'll tell you
why it wasn't added or we add it :-).
Please
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 20 May 2005 02:58:35 +0200 GMT (20/05/2005, 07:58 +0700 GMT),
Peter Ouwehand wrote:
PO - mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Empty lines if you scroll total on the bottom with the mouse in the
PO message list.
PO 3.5RC7:
PO - There appears to be improvement in the
Hello Ian,
On Sat, 21 May 2005 11:02:53 +1000 GMT(5/20/2005, 8:02 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian A. White wrote:
I see you are using 3.5.0.11. Where do you get this?
Good question! It is not from the download page because I tried.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat!
81 matches
Mail list logo
