Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-03 Thread Mike
I thought I might actually have an AV free morning. But, it was not to be. After going through my morning e-mail, I received this AV: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 004045B4 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address FFDC.

3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
Yet another AV on deleting a message from the PTV: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 004045B4 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address FFDC. --- OK --- These AVs are

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, These AVs are becoming so routine, that I've come to expect them. I'm getting quite tired of constantly having a program I once swore by becoming a program that I now swear at. I just want a stable program that I don't have to worry about crashing every 5

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 11:37:58 AM, MAU wrote: M I always wonder what does make the difference so that some people, M like you in this case, do get AVs (a lot as it seems) and some M other people, like me in this case, don't get any or hardly any. I M haven't seen a single one in the

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, I've uninstalled it, reinstalled it, deleted my tbuser.def and the results are always the same; I can use it for a while, but the AVs soon follow. And when they show up, can you then reproduce at will? Do they always appear doing the same operation? It looks like most people is

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 1:13:04 PM, MAU wrote: M And when they show up, can you then reproduce at will? Do they M always appear doing the same operation? Unfortunately they're intermittent - the worst kind of bugs. The AVs usually occur when replying to or deleting a

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, I'm running McAfee as my anti-virus and I have TB! set up as simply as possible. Can you fully disable it or even uninstall it for a couple of days? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, Unfortunately they're intermittent - the worst kind of bugs. The AVs usually occur when replying to or deleting a message. I have a hunch it could be related to reading TBBeta in digest mode, because it seems to happen soon after that. But, I can't be sure. Sorry,

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 1:39:08 PM, MAU wrote: I'm running McAfee as my anti-virus and I have TB! set up as simply as possible. M Can you fully disable it or even uninstall it for a couple of days? I suppose I could, but I would hate for that to be the problem. -- Mike

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, I'm running McAfee as my anti-virus and I have TB! set up as simply as possible. M Can you fully disable it or even uninstall it for a couple of days? I suppose I could, but I would hate for that to be the problem. I don't know what version you are using. McAfee

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 1:41:39 PM, MAU wrote: M Sorry, somehow I missed this first paragraph. Does this only or M mainly happen in TBBeta? If so, can you change your subscription to M TBBeta to normal mode for a couple of days? Gee, you really do want to cramp my style,

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, Gee, you really do want to cramp my style, first no anti-virus, then no digest mode. Crack that whip! :) To be more effective in conclusions, if any can be derived, don't do both things at the same time. Both are valid suggestions and I'll probably

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 2:17:50 PM, MAU wrote: M It doesn't hurt (too much :) to try. *sigh* No, but I will let you know the results. :) -- Mike Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Robert van der Hulst
Hi Mike, On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, at 11:27:07 [GMT -0400] (which was 17:27 where I live) you wrote about: '3.5.25 AVs' These AVs are becoming so routine, that I've come to expect them. I'm getting quite tired of constantly having a program I once swore by becoming a program that I

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Allie Martin
Hi MAU, On 02/06/2005 07:52 PM +0200, you wrote: I don't know what version you are using. McAfee used to be a good anti-virus and I used it for many years because it was very configurable. Last year, when my only option was to upgrade to the latest version and saw that I could hardly

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 3:23:21 PM, Robert van der Hulst wrote: RvdH I had AVs myself, until I removed an old copy of tbuser.def. RvdH Could that be your problem as well ? I wish it were. I've deleted my tbuser.def and the AVs continued. -- Mike Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, It's an unfortunately growing trend among applications, i.e., making them unconfigurable. :( Yes, you are right. And I hate being 'nannied'. What's the use of checking TB or any application for viruses every time is is started? Yes, I know why they do that. Virus checking will be

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, resources that people will buy more powerful and fast ones. ^PCs -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Tony Boom
Hello MAU. --On 02 June 2005 22:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: 3.5.25 AVs: resources that people will buy more powerful and fast ones. ^PCs Told ya, too many beers. Your spelling wasn't even close :) -- Tony. M. pgp1LJOod4aMo.pgp

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
After a clean install, I just got a Floating Point Error upon deleting a message. Aren't I the lucky one? -- Mike Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re: 3.5.25 AVs

2005-06-02 Thread Mike
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 8:06:45 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote: M After a clean install, I just got a Floating Point Error upon M deleting a message. Aren't I the lucky one? PO Sure you are ;) PO So, just a dumb question for 'us' reading on here, is your XP a PO Home or Pro version? Not