Hi Peter,
PO - mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Redefined: (Message Finder) Results tab, context menu in the message
PO list: [Attachments | Open] [Attachments | Save] are not working.
PO 3.0.9.20:
PO Can't confirm this as fixed. Am I missing something?
PO Note: Not mentioned before, but Save
Hi Peter,
PO After selecting the Message Finder Results tab, then a message with an
PO attachment, then a tab with an attachment (.jpg, .gif, part.txt) in the
PO preview pane, only [Message List | RMB | Attachments | Save All] shows
PO some activity, the 'Save Attachment as' dialog, multiple
Hello Mary,
Sunday, May 1, 2005, you wrote to me:
MB Additionally--and I do think they are probably working on this, from
MB one of 9Val's remarks--the short-cut editor needs to have more
MB functionality than it presently does in RC2.
I cannot agree more. It is not only about the shortcut
Hello Mary,
Monday, May 2, 2005, 12:53:59 AM, among other things, you wrote:
... It might not be too late to persuade the developers to include
them as separate threading options before the 3.5 release is done.
Hopefully! :-)
And I particularly wanted to support you in that, which was my
Hello MAU!
On Sunday, May 01, 2005, 8:09 PM, you wrote:
Thanks! I'm sure MAU as well because then he could use betas for work
which IMHO would bring make one of the best MUA beta testers available
by the name of MAU to RitLabs disposal. :-)
Amen to that! An immediate reward to the
Hello Roger!
On Monday, May 02, 2005, 3:01 AM, you wrote:
... It might not be too late to persuade the developers to include
them as separate threading options before the 3.5 release is done.
...
MB And it should make their sense of having done the right thing a
MB joy to them, in keeping
Hello Mary,
It's okay with me. :)
And with me. I have proper threading with 3.0.2.10 and my yellowish
icons, why would I want to switch to 3.5?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Miguel!
On Monday, May 02, 2005, 3:48 PM, you wrote:
It's okay with me. :)
And with me. I have proper threading with 3.0.2.10 and my yellowish
icons, why would I want to switch to 3.5?
Why, indeed? When this beta-testing series is over, I might drop back
to 3.0.2.10 myself, which met
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 1 May 2005 19:43:51 +0200 GMT(5/1/2005, 12:43 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Ouwehand wrote:
Below is a list of issues (based on the last posted list and replies) to
be tested with version 3.5RC2.
Sorry haven't been keeping up with the list, but has
Hello Greg!
On Sunday, May 01, 2005, 3:20 PM, you wrote:
Sorry haven't been keeping up with the list, but has threading by
references / subject been fixed or option been provided?
It has not.
As near as I can gather, the development team seems to be planning to
restore this distinction in a
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 1 May 2005 16:19:20 -0500 GMT(5/1/2005, 4:19 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mary Bull wrote:
Sorry haven't been keeping up with the list, but has threading by
references / subject been fixed or option been provided?
It has not.
As near as I can gather, the
Hello Greg!
On Sunday, May 01, 2005, 4:28 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for writing about the lacks in the list posted by Peter
Ouwehand, although, like everyone, I'm very grateful to him for
gathering that list together.
Yes Peter's list are helpful to all of us (i.e. Ritlabs beta
testers). I
Hello Peter!
On Sunday, May 01, 2005, 4:46 PM, you wrote:
MB Thanks for writing about the lacks in the list posted by Peter
MB Ouwehand, although, like everyone, I'm very grateful to him for
MB gathering that list together.
Some days ago Miguel posted
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand. I
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 1 May 2005 16:40:03 -0500 GMT(5/1/2005, 4:40 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mary Bull wrote:
But, just as much, I appreciate your bringing up that missing
subject-reference distinction, as a threading option. Its lack does
make TB!'s behavior feel buggy,
Agree
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 1 May 2005 23:46:47 +0200 GMT(5/1/2005, 4:46 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Ouwehand wrote:
MB Thanks for writing about the lacks in the list posted by Peter
MB Ouwehand, although, like everyone, I'm very grateful to him for
MB gathering that list together.
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 1 May 2005 17:40:29 -0500 GMT(5/1/2005, 5:40 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Strong wrote:
Yes. However hot classifying as a bug is a matter of perspective IMHO.
^
not
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.5 Return
Hello Greg!
On Sunday, May 01, 2005, 5:38 PM, you wrote:
... It might not be too late to persuade the developers to include
them as separate threading options before the 3.5 release is done.
Hopefully! :-)
And I particularly wanted to support you in that, which was my main
reason for
Hello Greg,
Why do I think it is important. Well I use to have good threading
manual correction with my old email client VA. I know you all may be
sick of myself and Miguel bringing this up. To be honest in some ways
VA set the standard for me, so for me in certain regards I DO measure
TB
Hello Greg,
Thanks! I'm sure MAU as well because then he could use betas for work
which IMHO would bring make one of the best MUA beta testers available
by the name of MAU to RitLabs disposal. :-)
What would you like to drink? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Hello Mary,
Thanks! I'm sure MAU as well because then he could use betas for work
which IMHO would bring make one of the best MUA beta testers available
by the name of MAU to RitLabs disposal. :-)
Amen to that! An immediate reward to the developers in MAU's expanded
service to them.
I'm
20 matches
Mail list logo
