Re[2]: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello, George! On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, at 03:10:57 [GMT -0800] (which was 13:10 where I live) you wrote: ... GM> Ever plan to make the status bar and tabs use system colors? They GM> really stand out now, and not in a good way. Yes, this is something to be public soon. Support of current Windows X

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag Rick Grunwald, am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 um 16:53 schrieben Sie: > I would just like to clean up the subjects. Another that I would > clean up is > "RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:" so I > could more easily see at a glance what the email is about :) I am very aston

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, R> Many of us want to edit the subject on RECEIVED emails R> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6700 Yes, it makes sense. Thanks for the link. -- Best regards, Sergemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Rick, > Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 6:53:58 PM, you wrote: R>> could more easily see at a glance what the email is about :) > Put something like this in your Reply/Forward templates: > %Subject="Re: > %SetPattRegExp=""(?i)\A\:?(\s*(Ответ|re|ha|rcpt|fwd|fw|aw|sv|antwort)(\[\d*\])?:\s*

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 6:53:58 PM, you wrote: R> I would just like to clean up the subjects. Another that I would R> clean up is "RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:" so I R> could more easily see at a glance what the email is about :) Put something like this in

Re: Cleaning up subject (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Sveiki, >> I believe there is a regex template in the library for this. It won't >> clean the subject in incoming messages, but in the replies you send. >> Check out the link at the bottom of each posting on this list, there >> is a lot of valuable stuff there. > I want to clean up received mail

Re: Cleaning up subject (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

> Hello Rick, > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:53:58 -0500 GMT (13/02/2008, 22:53 +0700 GMT), > Rick Grunwald wrote: RG>> I would just like to clean up the subjects. Another that I would RG>> clean up is "RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:" so I RG>> could more easily see at a glance what t

Cleaning up subject (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Rick, On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:53:58 -0500 GMT (13/02/2008, 22:53 +0700 GMT), Rick Grunwald wrote: RG> I would just like to clean up the subjects. Another that I would RG> clean up is "RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:FWD:" so I RG> could more easily see at a glance what the email

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Guten Tag Rick Grunwald, > am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 um 16:26 schrieben Sie: >> I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept >> adding **Possible Spam*** to many of my emails which would of course >> be in their replies. Cleaning that up would be of great value. > The b

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag Rick Grunwald, am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 um 16:26 schrieben Sie: > I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept > adding **Possible Spam*** to many of my emails which would of course > be in their replies. Cleaning that up would be of great value. The best Possi

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Sveiki, >>> anything. You really expect someone to tell a company that runs it's >>> own mail server to change? THAT is complete nonsense >> Well... YES. That's is how things are getting done and fixed >> properly. If they are commercial company it's *their job* to fix the >> services they are pr

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

>> anything. You really expect someone to tell a company that runs it's >> own mail server to change? THAT is complete nonsense > Well... YES. That's is how things are getting done and fixed > properly. If they are commercial company it's *their job* to fix the > services they are providing. You c

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> anything. You really expect someone to tell a company that runs it's > own mail server to change? THAT is complete nonsense Well... YES. That's is how things are getting done and fixed properly. If they are commercial company it's *their job* to fix the services they are providing. You can deny

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

>> Hello Rick, >> >> >>> I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept >> >>> adding *Possible Spam to many of my emails which would of course >> >>> be in their replies. >> > >> >> Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change >> the >> >> subject when wr

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, > Absolutely correct! And while they are at it they should find a time > slot for a draft folder ...:)) You won't get me. I already have a DRAFT folder :)) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.12.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 <>___

RE: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Rick, > > >>> I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept > >>> adding *Possible Spam to many of my emails which would of course > >>> be in their replies. > > > >> Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change > the > >> subject when writing a r

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Rick, I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept adding *Possible Spam to many of my emails which would of course be in their replies. >> >>> Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change the >>> subject when writing a reply. >>

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, >>> I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept >>> adding *Possible Spam to many of my emails which would of course >>> be in their replies. > >> Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change the >> subject when writing a reply. > > ... an

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Rick, >> I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept >> adding **Possible Spam* to many of my emails which would of course >> be in their replies. > Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change the > subject when writing a reply. ... and I d

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, > I was in constant communication with someone and their server kept > adding **Possible Spam* to many of my emails which would of course > be in their replies. Why "of course"? Anybody, using any e-mail client, can edit/change the subject when writing a reply. -- Best regards,

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Rick, how about being able to edit subject and messages >> >>> That is not one of my "needs", but it looks like many of you would like >>> to edit the subjects of received messages. So, why not. >> >> Here's the link to support it >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6700 >> > T

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Rick, >>> how about being able to edit subject and messages > >> That is not one of my "needs", but it looks like many of you would like >> to edit the subjects of received messages. So, why not. > > Here's the link to support it > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6700 > There are at

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello Dwight, >>> And I forgot to mention... a real DRAFT folder :) >> >> how about being able to edit subject and messages > That is not one of my "needs", but it looks like many of you would like > to edit the subjects of received messages. So, why not. Here's the link to support it https://

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Monday, February 11, 2008, 6:54:14 AM, Maggie Meister wrote: M>> She hasn't been around for quite some time now. But I believe she M>> is still active in TBOT. But I am not sure, I never subscribed to M>> TBOT. > Last I know, she was busy on some photography lists and was > taking pictures eve

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Maggie, >>> BTW I haven't seen anything posted on from Mary Bull. Is she >>> ok? > M>> She hasn't been around for quite some time now. But I believe she is M>> still active in TBOT. But I am not sure, I never subscribed to TBOT. > > Last I know, she was busy on some photography lists and wa

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hi Greg & MAU, On Monday, February 11, 2008 at 5:36:24 AM you wrote: >> BTW I haven't seen anything posted on from Mary Bull. Is she >> ok? M> She hasn't been around for quite some time now. But I believe she is M> still active in TBOT. But I am not sure, I never subscribed to TBOT. Last I kno

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Dwight, >> And I forgot to mention... a real DRAFT folder :) > > how about being able to edit subject and messages That is not one of my "needs", but it looks like many of you would like to edit the subjects of received messages. So, why not. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escoria

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Greg, > BTW I haven't seen anything posted on from Mary Bull. Is she > ok? She hasn't been around for quite some time now. But I believe she is still active in TBOT. But I am not sure, I never subscribed to TBOT. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> On Sunday, February 10, 2008, 2:50:19 PM, MAU wrote: >>> The other features I still miss are: Ignoring threads, Bookmarks >>> and, perhaps the most, Toolbar Macros. >> And I forgot to mention... a real DRAFT folder :) > how about being able to edit subject and messages > oh > and mailto: lin

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Sunday, February 10, 2008, 2:50:19 PM, MAU wrote: >> The other features I still miss are: Ignoring threads, Bookmarks >> and, perhaps the most, Toolbar Macros. > And I forgot to mention... a real DRAFT folder :) how about being able to edit subject and messages oh and mailto: links in vista

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Greg, > I've already accomplished #1. :) No, you haven't this time. If you see: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6057 and my notes to: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542, and notice the dates... they are not from today. BTW, ni

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello MAU, > The other features I still miss are: Ignoring threads, Bookmarks and, > perhaps the most, Toolbar Macros. And I forgot to mention... a real DRAFT folder :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.12 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 ___

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Sunday, February 10, 2008, 11:23:54 AM, MAU wrote: > No thank you, I don't think so. I think since it became open source > it has progressed very little. Looks dead in the water. Sez last release in 2006 but promises a speller before the end of 2007 -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ah

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Greg, > BTW if you ever want to go back and try VA then take a look at > http://www.virtual-access.org/. :) No thank you, I don't think so. I think since it became open source it has progressed very little. > I must admit VA was way ahead of it time. IMHO it was a marketing > mistake wh

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hi Eugene, Friday, February 8, 2008, 7:42:52 AM, you wrote: > (I have to enter the password every time I receive new mail). Not confirmed. -- Best regards, Carsten Current beta is 4.0.12.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.si

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

viernes, 8 feb 2008 at 07:26, it seems you wrote: > I suppose everyone is interested in Artem Gorbunov's interface for the > fourth version of The bat!. If it's already in 4.0, how can we turn it > on? I think it will be released with 4.1 -- /\/ Using The Bat! 4.0.11 P

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Jens, On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 22:21:21 +0100 GMT (08/02/2008, 04:21 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: >> I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready >> for a new Beta-cycle :-) JF> Where is the Photo of the Coffee Machine? JF> Or did it explode already? :-) Judging from the pace new versio

3.x key for 4.0 (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Keith, On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:43:45 -0700 GMT (08/02/2008, 08:43 +0700 GMT), Keith Russell wrote: >> 4.1 will be a paid update for the users of v3, nothing extraordinary. >> KR> Just to clarify KR> Does this mean that the 4.0 series is *not* a paid upgrade? Correct, you can use 4.0

Re[2]: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

On 8-2-2008 Roelof wrote msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hallo Fred, > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:55:41 +0100GMT (8-2-2008, 18:55 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: FVV>> Maybe a stupid question but what is the item list? Where can I find FVV>> it? > See attachment Hoi Roelof, Thank you! This was the i

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hallo Fred, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:55:41 +0100GMT (8-2-2008, 18:55 +0100, where I live), you wrote: FVV> Maybe a stupid question but what is the item list? Where can I find FVV> it? See attachment -- Groetjes, Roelof this copy of me has been unregistered for more than 42 years. http://www.voor

Re[3]: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

>> On the item list select "Field name gradient" and "Field value gradient" and >> modify them accordingly > works perfectly, thank you! Maybe a stupid question but what is the item list? Where can I find it? -- Fred mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.7 _

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> Other differences include: MM> # The new status bar with easier controls; Ever plan to make the status bar and tabs use system colors? They really stand out now, and not in a good way. -- George Using The Bat! 4.0.7 on Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2. _

Re[2]: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hi George, > On the item list select "Field name gradient" and "Field value gradient" and > modify them accordingly works perfectly, thank you! -- Best regards, Carsten Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

·---·-Date---· | Q&A [1] | 2008-02-08 | ·---·· [Reply to: »George M. Menegakis« · 2008-02-08 · 10:07 h (CET)] Hello, George! > Now v4 with many great

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Carsten, Friday, February 8, 2008, 11:40:18 AM, you wrote: > How did you do that? Under Messages/Header Layout I can only change the > colour, but it is still gradient, no matter what I choose. On the item list select "Field name gradient" and "Field value gradient" and modify them accordi

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Eugene, Friday, February 08, 2008, 8:26:48, you wrote: >>The only noticeable difference I can see is the >>gradient bars in the header pane. Other differences include: # The tabs has new navigation controls; # Headers and free space in windows have nice gradient background; # Buttons in th

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Carsten, try setting "Field name gradient" and "Field value gradient" to white. -- Viele Grüße Melanie am Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 um 10:40 schrieben Sie: > Hi Eugene, > Friday, February 8, 2008, 7:26:48 AM, you wrote: >> The only noticeable difference I can see is the >> gradient b

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hi Eugene, Friday, February 8, 2008, 7:26:48 AM, you wrote: > The only noticeable difference I can see is the > gradient bars in the header pane. Anyway, I turned them off cause I > dislike gradients. How did you do that? Under Messages/Header Layout I can only change the colour, but it is stil

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Maxim, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 11:16:34 PM, you wrote: > The text editor is the core of an email client. The new MicroEd made v4 a > totally new program, believe or not. I believe you! As I wrote in my earlier posting this (along with some other major thing like html templates) will be

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag [EMAIL PROTECTED], am Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 um 00:48 schrieben Sie: > Bonjour, Bonjour aussi > About your own photo, I saw that you use the following > X-Rogue lines in your header : > > X-Rogue: :Kr_bat: > X-Rogue-URL: http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg > > So if I want to see your p

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

In reply to : VŠ>> Can we have an IMAP fixes now? ST> Fixes? We are going to rewrite it almost from scratch :-) Now our expectations are sky high! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Catastrophes to others are everyday events to you.

Re: The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Hello Eugene, >>> Well a new gui is extraordinary enough ;-) MM>> The new GUI is already in 4.0. > I feel confused. The only noticeable difference I can see is the > gradient bars in the header pane. Anyway, I turned them off cause I > dislike gradients. After that my 4.0.0.22 looks very

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Eugene, > And MAPI. I wish The Bat! could handle Exchange's public folders (it > doesn't see them at all by now) and keep the connection to Exchange > server open (I have to enter the password every time I receive new > mail). I dont have to. -- Vili The Bat 4.0.0.20 (BETA) on Windows

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Stefan, VŠ>> Can we have an IMAP fixes now? ST> Fixes? We are going to rewrite it almost from scratch :-) And what about Address Book? Its LDAP support is still unusable. And MAPI. I wish The Bat! could handle Exchange's public folders (it doesn't see them at all by now) and keep the connection

The new GUI (was: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!)

Maxim, >> Well a new gui is extraordinary enough ;-) MM> The new GUI is already in 4.0. I feel confused. The only noticeable difference I can see is the gradient bars in the header pane. Anyway, I turned them off cause I dislike gradients. After that my 4.0.0.22 looks very similar to 3.99. Almost

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Vilius, VŠ> Can we have an IMAP fixes now? Fixes? We are going to rewrite it almost from scratch :-) -- Best regards, Stefan Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Maxim Masiutin wrote: 4.1 will be a paid update for the users of v3, nothing extraordinary. Just to clarify Does this mean that the 4.0 series is *not* a paid upgrade? I'm not ready to pay for an upgrade until TB is fully IMAP compliant and handles IMAP as well as Thunderbird. At the s

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Vilius Šumskas wrote: Hello all, I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job! Yeah, you did *it* again RitLabs. Can we have an IMAP fixes now? AMEN! Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.s

Re[5]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Hi Maxim, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 3:20:57 PM, you wrote: > Hello Bob, > Thursday, February 07, 2008, 23:59:02, you wrote: >>>I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just >>>so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be >>>getting a second seri

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Hi Stefan, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 3:13:51 PM, you wrote: > Hello Bob, BR>> I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just BR>> so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be BR>> getting a second serial number? > No, you will just continue using

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

vendredi 8 février 2008, Bonjour, Le jeudi 7 février 2008 à 22:21:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Where is the Photo of the Coffee Machine? > Or did it explode already? :-) About your own photo, I saw that you use the following X-Rogue lines in your header : X-Rogue: :Kr_bat: X-Rogue-URL: ht

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Guten Tag Stefan Tanurkov, am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 um 23:13 schrieben Sie: BR>> I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just BR>> so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be BR>> getting a second serial number? > No, you will just continue

Re[4]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

In reply to : By adding few gradients you don't make "a totally new program" as stated in the announcement. >> The text editor is the core of an email client. The new MicroEd made >> v4 a totally new program, believe or not. V> Agree. Alone the use of multiple speller engines

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

>> Two TB! users are talking. >> "I have a v3 key" >> "Me, too." >> "But mine is bigger..." > Size doesn't matter :)) I dont know. A v3 user who has to pay for upgrade will see it differently :) -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'Using T

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

> Two TB! users are talking. > "I have a v3 key" > "Me, too." > "But mine is bigger..." Size doesn't matter :)) -- Rick Are we in the Post-Bush era yet? v4.0.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.7 | 'U

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Stefan, >>> ... so get ready for a new Beer-cycle :-) M>>^ M>> Great! I like it! ;-)__| > > The best spell checking I've ever seen - it reads my mind :-) > That's because I'm using CSAPI, you can't stop supporting it :) -- Best regards, Miguel A.

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

BR>> I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just BR>> so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be BR>> getting a second serial number? > No, you will just continue using your key with 4.1+ versions. This is an issue when I am harsh: _who_ figured o

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

V>> Just to be sure: if we are harsh sometimes, you can handle that, V>> right? :) > Absolutely :-) Olga told me you keep our pictures there and darts used to fly these times :)) V>> It's all for the better goal. > I always keep it in my mind, and so do other team members (I hope > :-).

Re[4]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Hello Bob, Thursday, February 07, 2008, 23:59:02, you wrote: >>I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just >>so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be >>getting a second serial number? I still have my original serial >>number from an earlier

Re[4]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

>>> Thank you and all testers for your support, patience and >>> understanding. Without your help, we would never get even a fraction >>> of this job done. I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready >>> for a new Beta-cycle :-) >> Just to be sure: if we are harsh sometimes

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Hello Bob, BR> I purchased an update copy of version 3 in November or December, just BR> so I would qualify for the 4.1 and following versions. Will we be BR> getting a second serial number? No, you will just continue using your key with 4.1+ versions. -- Best regards, Stefan _

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Vili, V> Just to be sure: if we are harsh sometimes, you can handle that, V> right? :) Absolutely :-) V> It's all for the better goal. I always keep it in my mind, and so do other team members (I hope :-). -- Best regards, Stefan __

Re[3]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hi Vili, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 2:51:28 PM, you wrote: >> Thank you and all testers for your support, patience and >> understanding. Without your help, we would never get even a fraction >> of this job done. I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready >> for a new Beta-cyc

Re[3]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

>>>By adding few gradients you don't make "a totally new program" as stated in >>>the announcement. > The text editor is the core of an email client. The new MicroEd made > v4 a totally new program, believe or not. Agree. Alone the use of multiple speller engines/languages is unique...

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello MAU, >> ... so get ready for a new Beer-cycle :-) M>^ M> Great! I like it! ;-)__| The best spell checking I've ever seen - it reads my mind :-) -- Best regards, Stefan Current beta is 4.

Re[3]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again! (Serial Number Question)

Hi Maxim, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 12:18:55 PM, you wrote: > Hello Henk, > Thursday, February 7, 2008, 8:47:17 PM, you wrote: >> When can we expect the new look? > Whad do you mean bu the new look? >> Yeah, I know in 4.1 but when is that >> planned, because you just showed that you work wi

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Thank you and all testers for your support, patience and > understanding. Without your help, we would never get even a fraction > of this job done. I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready > for a new Beta-cycle :-) Just to be sure: if we are harsh sometimes, you can

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Stefan, > ... so get ready for a new Beer-cycle :-) ^ Great! I like it! ;-)__| -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hi MAU, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 11:00:50 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job! > They worked hard, even on weekends and late at night, and they met > their schedule for a new release on Feb. 7th. Yes, 4.0.0.22 is > certainly not bug free, b

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag Stefan Tanurkov, am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 um 22:10 schrieben Sie: > I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready > for a new Beta-cycle :-) Where is the Photo of the Coffee Machine? Or did it explode already? :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag George M. Menegakis, am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 um 22:07 schrieben Sie: > I mean the new editor, the url manager the new search and some other fancy > functionality (like html templates) would be a very good reason to upgrade. > Don't get me wrong, I will upgrade to 4.1 just to sup

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello George, Thursday, February 07, 2008, 23:07:38, you wrote: >>By adding few gradients you don't make "a totally new program" as stated in >>the announcement. The text editor is the core of an email client. The new MicroEd made v4 a totally new program, believe or not. -- Best regards,

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thursday, February 7, 2008, 3:10:05 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > so get ready for a new Beta-cycle :-) I think we are eagerly awaiting it. -- Dwight A. Corrin 1201 W River Blvd Apt B108 Wichita KS 67203 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.7 o

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello MAU, M> Good job guys! Congratulations! Thank you and all testers for your support, patience and understanding. Without your help, we would never get even a fraction of this job done. I know, there is a lot of work ahead, so get ready for a new Beta-cycle :-) -- Best regards, Stefan _

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Maxim, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 9:18:55 PM, you wrote: > Whad do you mean bu the new look? By adding few gradients you don't make "a totally new program" as stated in the announcement. Not that I have a problem with the current interface but the changes were not radical, as expected by

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Guten Tag MAU, am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 um 19:00 schrieben Sie: > I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job! > Good job guys! Congratulations! > Any confirmations? ;-) Confirmed, i never thought they would get it possible this way ... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Frani

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Jernej, > - the headers in Edit Mail Message window still use hardcoded > colours, making them stand out too much Why don't you ask before making 'hardcoded' statements? ;) Options/Preferences/Messages/Header Layout/Set colour for the header pane in: Editor. -- Best regards, Miguel A

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thursday, February 7, 2008, 20:27:44, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > That's already done in 4.0. There are a few things left to fix: - stop adjusting toolbar icon colours according to Windows colour scheme - the results are awful, since the icons are high-colour - the headers in Edit Mail Message w

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, at 21:28:06 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:28 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote: Hello Maxim, > Thursday, February 7, 2008, 9:25:49 PM, you wrote: >> Well a new gui is extraordinary enough ;-) > The new GUI is already in 4.0. This one? The larges

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thursday, February 7, 2008, 1:27:44 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >> The new design affects every single item of the program from the >> main window to the smallest dialog boxes. > That's already done in 4.0. the discordant colors -- Dwight A. Corrin 1201 W River Blvd Apt B108 Wichita KS 67203 3

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Henk, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 9:25:49 PM, you wrote: > Well a new gui is extraordinary enough ;-) The new GUI is already in 4.0. -- Best regards, Maximmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 4.0

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thursday, February 7, 2008, 1:23:13 PM, Marek Mikus wrote: > The largest-scale changes were made in The Bat!’s interface. Users > will see a totally new program. Together with Artem Gorbunov design > bureau we created a modern interface that facilitates > e-communication via The Bat! 4.0 and f

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Marek, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 9:23:13 PM, you wrote: > a modern interface that facilitates e-communication via The Bat! > 4.0 and further releases. The new design affects every single item of the > program from the main window to the smallest dialog boxes. That's already done in 4.0.

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, at 21:18:55 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:18 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote: Hello Maxim, > Thursday, February 7, 2008, 8:47:17 PM, you wrote: >> When can we expect the new look? > Whad do you mean bu the new look? The new gui (graphical user interface). >> Yeah, I know in

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello all, Thursday, February 7, 2008, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >> When can we expect the new look? > Whad do you mean bu the new look? from october's press release: The largest-scale changes were made in The Bat!’s interface. Users will see a totally new program. Together with Artem Gorbunov des

Re[2]: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello Henk, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 8:47:17 PM, you wrote: > When can we expect the new look? Whad do you mean bu the new look? > Yeah, I know in 4.1 but when is that > planned, because you just showed that you work with deadlines :-) 4.1 will be a paid update for the users of v3, nothing

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hello all, Thursday, February 7, 2008, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: > When can we expect the new look? Yeah, I know in 4.1 but when is that > planned, because you just showed that you work with deadlines :-) 4.1 was planned in March, but 4.0 in december. So I expect, it will not be released before Ma

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, at 19:00:50 [GMT +0100] (which was 19:00 where I live) Mau wrote: > Hello all, > I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job! > They worked hard, even on weekends and late at night, and they met > their schedule for a new release on Feb. 7th. Yes, 4.0.0.22 is >

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

> Hello all, > > I think that RIT guys did it again. I mean, a great job! Yeah, you did *it* again RitLabs. Can we have an IMAP fixes now? -- Best Regards, Vilius Šumskas LNK TV IT manager http://www.lnk.lt Current beta is 4.0

Re: 4.0.0.22: A great job again!

Hi MAU and fellow beta testers, Thursday, February 7, 2008, 1:00:50 PM, you wrote: M> Good job guys! Congratulations! M> Any confirmations? ;-) Confirmed here. Thank you, folks. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v4.0.0.22 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

  1   2   >